Why bother to spend million to promote tourism when sabotage is ongoing

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse

In a dramatic turn of events, Bruce Gilley, a US academic whose controversial remarks at a Universiti Malaya (UM) talk ignited a firestorm, has now spoken out against the Malaysian government and labeled the country as unsafe for travel. Gilley, a renowned professor of political science at Portland State University, cited safety concerns as the primary reason for his departure from Malaysia, attributing these concerns to what he described as an "Islamo-fascist mob whipped up by the government there." His departure comes amidst a backlash stemming from his purported claim that Malaysia was pushing for a "second Holocaust against the Jewish people," a statement that sparked widespread condemnation and raised tensions. Gilley's criticism of the government's handling of the situation adds a new dimension to the already heated debate surrounding freedom of speech and academic discourse in Malaysia. The incident underscores the complex interplay between academic freedom, political sensitivities, and international relations, highlighting the challenges faced by scholars navigating contentious topics in diverse cultural contexts. It also raises questions about the broader implications for intellectual exchange and the perception of Malaysia as a destination for scholarly engagement.

Be the first to like this.

3 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 1 week ago

EngineeringProfit

17,703 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse


We must question the rationale behind investing millions of dollars in promoting tourism when there are ongoing issues such as sabotage, as exemplified by Bruce Gilley's situation in Malaysia. Gilley's experience, where he faced backlash and safety concerns due to his controversial remarks, paints a picture of a country where academic freedom and freedom of speech might be constrained. This raises doubts about Malaysia's image as a safe and welcoming destination for travelers and scholars alike.

Investing in tourism promotion is typically aimed at showcasing a country's attractions, cultural richness, and hospitality. However, when incidents like Gilley's backlash occur, they can tarnish this image and deter potential tourists and academics from visiting or engaging with the country. This is particularly significant in today's interconnected world, where news and information spread rapidly, influencing public perceptions.

Moreover, the incident with Gilley brings to light broader issues regarding political sensitivities, academic discourse, and international relations. It highlights the challenges faced by scholars who engage in controversial topics, especially in countries where certain topics are considered highly sensitive or contentious. It also underscores the importance of ensuring a balance between freedom of expression and maintaining social harmony, which is crucial for fostering a conducive environment for intellectual exchange and promoting a positive image internationally.

Therefore, the question raised about the effectiveness of spending millions on tourism promotion amid ongoing issues reflects concerns about the country's overall reputation, safety, and the conducive nature of its intellectual and academic environment.

EngineeringProfit

17,703 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse

From public fund-exhausting fanaticism to rampant vigilantism ......From molotov attack on KK marts, vandalism on McD advertisment board and slanderous axing of vern shoes.................

EngineeringProfit

17,703 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 week ago | Report Abuse

prk KKB issue: T0001

Post a Comment
Market Buzz