Good luck to Landmarks on this deal if it goes through. Blumont gets the revenue generating assets like Natra along with some plots of land that they now own and can sell. In return they give shares to Landmarks. To me, it’s like exchange revenue generating business and plots of land for toilet paper.

Landmark’s NTA is most probably inflated and not updated. If you believe that their asset is worth that much, you would be in for a surprise when it’s time to sell.

Landmarks is left with only Anmon to generate cash. It will not cover the cost of KL and Singapore office. It will not even cover the cost of maintaining the operations of Bintan. I wonder how are they also going to repay their loan regularly.

This deal to sell land in Bintan to Blumont looks like a shady deal. Mark Wee and Fong Chee Khuen are shareholders in Blumont. One is the CEO, one is the COO of Landmarks. Which hat are they wearing? On what basis did the board members approve this?

Landmarks is not selling land to Blumont. No cash is coming in. They are exchanging land in Bintan for shares in Blumont. What is the use of having shares in Blumont? It’s being run by the same group of people. It will be the same result. The land would be sold, they pay themselves salary, no dividends is announced. What does Landmarks benefit to exchange this land for shares in Blumont? When all asset is sold and money spent, what is the 29% stake in Blumont going to be? By then, Mark Wee and his cronies should be good enough to retire.

Why is Genting turning a blind eye to what they are doing to the company all these years? Their % in the company has been diluted by the current management. Soon, they will not be the majority shareholder.

This deal must be stopped. There should be a change in BOD and management before Landmarks is stripped of everything.