rMoi, you need to go through the book to know if anything hanky-panky. At least the plantation deal has something similar that we can compare and raise concern to SC. anyhow, add your name to the list if you are interested to meet SC for petition.
I shall write to SC as you suggested. I agree that we should do something more positive than just complaining in the forum.
1) Please help to draft a reasoned letter to SC so that others can use it too for sending their complaint/request to SC.
2) Please help to draft a letter to Rosali stating the sentiment of the minority shareholders, and requesting him to look into possibility of fraud for such huge losses, and caution him that he and other directors should take responsibility and should not deserve any substantial director fee.
Should search for activist investor get certain percentage of shares and make hostiles takeover at discount cash. Easier n All win right? Maybe roger is
Wah. Maybe get a banker n a activist lawyer to issue a hostile takeover would be better and faster. No need lots of money. Use company money will do. Just a black n white and a letter of support. Wahla price reflect the value of company. the risk of management siphon out money gone. Activist n all minority happy. Activist get some discount on company cash and free land bank beside eco puncak alam.
Be prepared to be a long term investor in Puncak. No doubt there's plenty of cash in its piggy bank. what happen to the cash 3 years later? Puncak may use up most of the cash for paying plantation land and (plantation expenditure about 400 millions) to plant palm oil. what about palm oil Mills. They need to build at least one... It seems cash outflow no ending until harvesting the palm oil.
Extracted:
2. What’s more worrisome? Puncak Niaga is only buying a 60% stake. Question is if Puncak Niaga intends to acquire the rest of 40%. If yes, what would be the price? If the rest of 40% is acquired only after the planting is completed, does that mean Puncak Niaga’s minority shareholders have to shoulder another overpriced planting cost of RM 11,492/hectare? There are 33,372.6 hectares unplanted in Puncak Niaga’s deal, that would mean Puncak Niaga is on hook to at least overpay another RM 154,407,167.68 (RM 11,492/hectare*33,372,6hectare*60%.)
Hng: u like to bs alot. Everyone know ur style. Singkalan. Told people to buy puncak at 2.80++. Now wat happened to ur followers. Hahaha. U have plenty money, can average the share anytime. Bec ur money is the money i burned to my grandparents.
Pity lor clown roger123, keep one curse stock, non stop, and yet dun nothing about how to profit on stock.
just today skpt surge alone, portfolio sold all and lock at 1.55 , alrdy reap 10% fast handsome contra profit, free up all capital together handsome gain swap back to buy more laggard stock Puncak, Iwcity and Drd etc, keep on rolling profit
Hng33: if i trust u, i am stupid. If u dare, show us ur profit in the blog. Or else keep quiet. Wondering tat u know to differentiate profit n loss or not
In order for V-shape recovery, Puncak need to acquire construction specialist, Triplc to no only revive its construction, but also able to enjoy steady earning from triplc concession and project contract.
remark: With latest accumulation on Puncak after its result release, portfolio average holding cost on Puncak now at RM 1.01+
hng33: Triplc is only a small business construction company. Look at the over supply of properties in the market right now. Are you sure, acquiring Triplc will post a better next Qr for Puncak?
Triplc concession business is Build operate transfer under private and public finance initiative. For Puncak to acquire concession business from triplc, it need fed gov approval and bond holder approval as it involve senior medium term note worth (MTN) RM 240m, and junior term note RM 60m that fund triplc first concession construction and these funding is to be repay back by gov funding throughout 20 year concession period.
The approval is also needed from triplc another just newly secure MTN worth RM 630m to fund its another new concession which is still pending construction and involve even longer tenure 25 year concession.
As based on triplc first concession, that worth RM 266m, triplc derive handsome profit during the construction period from q1 2012 to q3 2014, triplc EPS have record attractive and consistent profit range EPS 10 sen to 16 sen every quarter, cumulatively give rise to massive increament in its NTA from RM 1.10 to current level RM 2.56. Its more than double increment in NTA throughout its 3 year construction period, and triplc share price also react in tandem, increase from 70 sen to double up RM 1.40.
It is after completion of its construction period, that triplc profit reduce significantly, as its now only derive fixed payment from fed gov throughout 20 year concession under maintenance period and these fixed fund is going to gradually repay back MTN bond.
However, with triplc secure also new concession RM 599m, worth double than its first concession, and have also secure new MTN RM 630m to fund its construction, a quantum leap in Triplc profit is expected to kick start again, a growth in profit and EPS is expected throughout next 3 year construction period.
With such attractive prospect ahead, triplc can standalone comfortable. But, if Puncak wanna to acquire triplc, it need to offer attractive price.
During construction period to kick start RM 266m worth of concession begin in 2012, Triplc record attractive every quarter EPS for consecutive 10 quarter attractive earning begin Q4 2011, ending Q1 2014, cumulative record total EPS = 100sen
5.12sen (Q4 2011) 15.36sen + (Q1 2012) 12.19 sen + (Q2 2012) 13.12 sen + (Q3 2012) 12.69 sen + (Q4 2012) 7.6 sen + (Q1 2013) 9.63sen + (Q2 2013) 10.03 sen + (Q3 2013) 8.90 sen + (Q4 2013) 5.52 sen (ending Q1 2014)
Remark: There is additional construction work on top of concession contract recorded july 2015, resulted additional EPS= 25.5sen.
What will be construction profit for 2x higher concession contract worth RM 599m, to be kick start now and for next 3 year construction period le !!
Triplc investment is a lousy investment loh....!! Thats why tabung haji disagree & Rozali is disposing his stake in Triplc....in order to avoid related party transaction loh....!!
Raider believe the xtra cash better to use for plantation than go for triplc.....mah....!!
The cash of Puncak....must be properly use loh...!!
LTH is seen happy for the HOA between Puncak and Triplc. That's why LTH has accumulated more than 3.5 million shares of Puncak for the past few months.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
rogers123
4,018 posts
Posted by rogers123 > 2016-11-29 17:09 | Report Abuse
Stock: [SKPETRO]: SAPURAKENCANA PETROLEUM BHD
Nov 29, 2016 05:00 PM | Report Abuse
bought skpt at 1.41
Stock: [JTIASA]: JAYA TIASA HOLDINGS BHD
Nov 29, 2016 04:42 PM | Report Abuse
bought back all jtiasa at 1.35
Stock: [GENTING]: GENTING BHD
Nov 29, 2016 04:40 PM | Report Abuse
bought more genting wa at 1.40-1.42
Stock: [INSAS]: INSAS BHD
Nov 29, 2016 04:20 PM | Report Abuse
Accumulate more insas at 69.5sen
Stock: [INSAS]: INSAS BHD
Nov 29, 2016 04:03 PM | Report Abuse
bought insas at 69.5sen
Stock: [GENTING]: GENTING BHD
Nov 29, 2016 03:54 PM | Report Abuse
bought back all genting wa at 1.43
Stock: [GAMUDA]: GAMUDA BHD
Nov 29, 2016 11:58 AM | Report Abuse
bought back all Gamuda-WE at 1.16-1.17
Stock: [ARMADA]: BUMI ARMADA BERHAD
Nov 28, 2016 04:40 PM | Report Abuse
sold back all at 51.5sen, cut loss all
Stock: [ARMADA]: BUMI ARMADA BERHAD
Nov 28, 2016 11:50 AM | Report Abuse
These is the reverse way to average down holding cost