Posted by Sslee > 2024-05-31 07:07 | Report Abuse

A clear cut case where people entrusted with authority choose to do the bare minimum and case closed.

Dear SC,

Referring link below:
https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/705743

I am impressed by the action taken by SC in year 2023 especially on ongoing criminal enforcement efforts, which were undertaken with the public prosecutor’s consent, initiated 15 civil actions, including the issuance of letters of demand and restitute back recovered stolen money to aggrieved investors.

Referring below SC announcement
https://www.sc.com.my/resources/media/media-release/sc-reprimands-three-china-based-companies-and-says-retention-of-four-directors-prejudicial-to-public-interest

The SC reprimanded Xingquan, its Executive Chairman and CEO Dato’ Wu Qingquan, Executive Director Wu Lianfa, former Non-Independent Non-Executive Director Ng Sio Peng and former Senior Independent Non-Executive Director Zhou Liyi for:

-falsely recording a loss of RMB415.7 million from the sale of inventory by Xingquan’s wholly-owned subsidiary;
-furnishing to Bursa Malaysia a false agreement between the said subsidiary and a third party;
-furnishing false or misleading financial statements to Bursa Malaysia; and
-recording cash and bank balances in eight bank accounts collectively belonging to Xingquan that were false or misleading.
I am thankful to SC for taking the above reprimanded action but are the reprimand actions considered as justices done and case closed with no further actions?

In view of the seriousness of offends/frauds committed by the fraudsters and their total disregard/contempt shown against authorities of SC and BURSA with no respect for Malaysia Law.

Please pardon me to ask the below repeated questions:

Question 1: Is SC intend to make an extradition request with the Chinese government to extradite CEO Dato’ Wu and his brother executive director Wu Lianfu to stand criminal trial in Malaysia Court?

Question 2: Refer google search: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=gertop

Xingquan brand products (Gertop) are available for sale at many online shopping websites. This means Xingquan still has production lines and assets in China but the China owner and Management team just took us Malaysians as fools and showed utmost contempt to SC and BURSA authorities/Malaysia law.

Will SC now invoke CMSA 2007 section 358 (1) in the public interest, taking legal action against Xingquan to recover loss on behalf of victims who suffers loss or damage by reason of, or by relying on, the conduct of another person who has contravened any provision of Part VI or any regulations made under this Act, the amount of the loss or damage by instituting civil proceedings against the other person whether or not that other person has been charged with an offence in respect of the contravention or whether or not a contravention has been proved in a prosecution?

Question 3: Is SC investigating Xingquan External Auditor: SJ Grant Thornton, IPO: CIMB Investment Bank Berhad and PP & RI: RHB Investment Bank Berhad principal advisor, underwriter and placement agent for:
1. Gross negligence and failure to perform their fiduciary duty; and
2. Are complicit in above fraud/crime in auditing, preparing and approving Xingquan Financial Account, IPO Prospectus and RI Prospectus.

A reasonable exercise of care or due diligence should have detected cash and bank balances in eight bank accounts collectively belonging to Xingquan that were false or misleading.

Note: A precedent case had been set whereby external auditor KPMG and Deloitte pay USD 80 million each and Ambank pay USD 700 million to settle claims linked to the 1MDB scandal.

Thank you

Selamat Hari Raya Aidilfitri
Maaf Zahir Dan Batin

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-05-31 07:35 | Report Abuse

The bare minimum is clearly inadequate, hence the whole circus (including the corruptible ag & team) would fail to justify their compromised punishment when brought

Posted by Sslee > 24 minutes ago | Report Abuse

A clear cut case where people entrusted with authority choose to do the bare minimum and case closed

Posted by Sslee > 2024-05-31 07:42 | Report Abuse

Anyone go to jail for the clear cut case of Omega Securities fraud and cause it to collapse?

The main culprit only go to jail when he try to do the same thing in Singapore.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-05-31 07:59 | Report Abuse

That happened during the old gomen of kotor, lembab dan bohong. With the new gomen of bersih, cekap dan amanah, Hannah's hubby and Lagenda taugeh kena

Posted by Sslee > 2024-05-31 08:19 | Report Abuse

Will see anyone go to jail for clear cut Serbadk fraud?

Posted by Integrity. Intelligent. Industrious. 3iii (iiinvestsmart)$€£¥ > 2024-05-31 09:53 | Report Abuse

First rule of investing: avoid lousy companies. Don't spend time on these. Warren Buffett says,he is able to know them in less than 5 minutes.