Margin call some more.....

All other furniture stocks up, Evergreen, FFHB, Honeriz, Pohuat, Liihen, except this MF sui stock

MF Yong, margin calls everywhere now

MF

When the market operators already openly declared war, how can the shares price stand the attacks???

Tomorrow all margin call

Bu ki the Yoong MD, hevea shares drop like shit

Then take over at lower price, one limit down $1.05?

good positive thinking. If still got bullet, why not taking over hevea? At $1.50 will cost you $150m only for all the hevea shares you not already owned

Angel where got so black hearted one? At this level the man on the moon already losing 20 sen yet you still want it at 1.50? No good

News out?

smart alex not so smart after all

Wait for result? You have until tomorrow to sell, because after that when the result is really loss $1m I think can see $1.30-1.40 level

Posted by Alex Chan > Nov 23, 2014 04:33 PM | Report Abuse
Only 5 mil profit cannot go down, now turn to losses of 1 million, see price can go down. Some more suddenly kangkung come out..
Small boy stuff.

I wonder who is the small boy now!

Ss661, that's a fairer perspective in business. sometimes we are taken by the facts that what we are see or hearing is not what we want, henceforth the biased and stubborn stance

Somebody wants to buy cheap? I don't think so, looking at the overall volume of only 80,500 shares on Friday. I am inclined to think that the big guys cabut already at >$1.90 level since the last 2-3 months

Alex Chan
2308 posts
Posted by Alex Chan > Nov 23, 2014 04:33 PM | Report Abuse

Only 5 mil profit cannot go down, now turn to losses of 1 million, see price can go down. Some more suddenly kangkung come out..
Small boy stuff.

I believe 1Mtalkingkangkung more. Let's see who is the small boy come after 6pm 25/11

Now he said there is a $1m loss, he meant what he said. All we need is to wait animal 2 days 25/11 to see if what he said is correct!

Stock: [HEVEA]: HEVEABOARD BHD
Nov 10, 2014 02:48 PM | Report Abuse
Q3 announcing 25/11.
R U N

1mtalkingkangkung already said Q3 announcing on 25/11, those lazy buggers who don't like doing homework or living on spoon-feed pls get lost

Why travel to UK to discuss about black-box? When you buy an aircraft, you should know the answer by means of sale or by international convention. Rakyat has to sponsor him with first class air travel, subsistence allowance and lodging. If he has to be there for 7 days including travelling days may cost the rakyat money RM25K (economic class with limited hotel room type) and for sure the costs are more if travel 1st class with luxurious hotel rooms.

Dignity, self-respect and ethics are not cherished here because they don't buy you fancy bungalows, luxury cars, SYT (sweet young things), exotic holidays, branded clothes, shoes and flashy accessories - all the "good" things in life.

AJY is not resigning until he gets MAS soaring again. Yes, you heard it right. This is nothing exceptional but the rule in Bolehland where Umno-BN politicians and their cronies all stay to make things right after messing up the everything.

No house cleaning but just business as usual. Responsibility and accountability are two rare gems in Bolehland.

That is a very tall turnaround order indeed even if chief executive officer Ahmad Jauhari Yahya (AJY) is a magician or a real business wizard.

If anything, things are likely to get far worse for MAS in the immediate short term before they can start to get better, that is assuming management and employees can sit down together, put differences aside, make hard decisions, remove NEP (New Economic Policy) blockers and start working together in the common interest of saving the airline and its prospects for making profits.

The cause of that tragedy is also unknown as the plane and its black box have not yet been found. So saying that MAS will be able to sort all these serious problems out in six months is far too optimistic and a totally unrealistic expectation.

Malaysia Airlines (MAS) obviously suffers from serious structural management, union and employee relationship issues as it has been running at a big loss over the past few years.

It now also has the unexpected MH370 disaster on its books to add to its business miseries.

As well as flying its P-8 surveillance planes out of Perth, the US Navy is playing an instrumental role via its high-tech underwater black-box detector equipment.

It has sent both its towed pinger locator, which this week picked up signals which may be from the missing plane's cockpit data recorders, and a Bluefin-21 autonomous underwater vehicle.

An earlier search in the South China Sea by Vietnam was estimated by local media to cost US$8 million (RM26 million), a figure that has not been verified by officials.

Chinese warships would cost at least US$100,000 (RM325250) a day to operate, and most likely a lot more, the newspaper added.

"There's a lot of pressure in China to find the plane," said a Beijing-based Western diplomat. "China will spare no effort."

The Pentagon said last week that it had already spent more than US$3.3 million (RM10.7 million) on the search and has put in place plans to nearly double its original US$4 million budget (RM13million).

China has been sending two Ilyushin Il-76 aircraft, on alternate days, on sorties from RAAF Pearce Base near Perth for almost three weeks.

The Global Times, an influential tabloid published by the ruling Communist Party's official People's Daily, estimated that an Ilyushin Il-76 costs US$10,000 (RM32,525) an hour to keep in the air on fuel alone, not including money spent on maintenance or accommodation for the crews.

The other big spenders so far are China and the United States.

China, which was home to the majority of the 227 passengers on board the missing plane, has sent a total of 18 ships, eight helicopters and three fixed-wing aircraft to various search areas during the month-long hunt.

Beijing has declined to comment on how much it is spending on looking for the aircraft, saying only it is dedicated to keep searching "as long as there is a shred of hope".

"While that might not sound like much compared with the ADF's annual sustainment budget of A$5 billion, if this continues for much longer other activities such as 'Operation Sovereign Borders' will be under pressure to find savings," he added, referring to the federal government's policy of turning back asylum seeker boats that approach from Indonesia.

"The search effort for MH370 is costing the ADF at least A$800,000 (RM2.4 million) per day and possibly considerably more than that," said Kym Bergmann, editor of Asia-Pacific Defence Reporter and a former government defence adviser.

Australia has so far contributed around half of the cost, with ships and aircraft on duty for some three weeks. Its HMAS Success alone costs around A$550,000 (RM1.7 million) a day to operate, according to Australian Defence Force, or ADF, figures.

A Malaysian government source, who declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media, said the entire search and recovery for MH370 could be at least double the money spent to recover the black box from Air France's AF447.

"It's only reasonable that we should bear this cost - it's an act of international citizenship," Abbott said last week.

"At some point, there might need to be a reckoning, there might need to be some kind of tallying, but nevertheless we are happy to be as helpful as we can to all the countries that have a stake in this."

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, whose country is leading the search, and his Malaysian counterpart, Najib Abdul Razak, have repeatedly said the cost of the search is not an issue.

Still, Abbott has hinted that Australia, which has so far borne the brunt of the expense as the search homes in on the southern Indian Ocean off its western coast, may at some point be sending out invoices

Britain dispatched a nuclear-powered submarine, HMS Tireless, to assist in the search, without disclosing the vessel's previous location.

Angus Houston, the retired Air Chief Marshal in charge of the Australian-led international search, said on Friday he would give an overall estimate of the cost at a later date.

"It's a lot of money," he said.

The US$44 million estimate for MH370 does not cover all the defence assets being used by countries including Britain, France, New Zealand and South Korea, nor numerous other costs such as civilian aircraft, accommodation for hundreds of personnel and expenses for intelligence analysts worldwide.

Just as salvage experts said the actual costs for the Air France operation could have been three or four times higher than the official figure, the bill for the current search is expected to run into hundreds of millions of dollars.

The figure for the first month of the search is already about equal to the official 32 million euros (RM143 million) spent in searches lasting several months spread over a two-year time frame for Air France's Flight AF447, which crashed into the Mid-Atlantic in 2009.

The figure is based on defence force statistics on available hourly costs of various assets, estimates by defence analysts and costs reported by the Pentagon.

The hunt for missing Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 is on track to cost hundreds of millions of dollars, becoming the most expensive search in aviation history with 26 countries contributing planes, ships, submarines and satellites to the international effort.

A month into the search for the jet, estimates compiled by Reuters show that at least US$44 million (RM143 million) has already been spent on the deployment of military ships and aircraft in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea by Australia, China, the United States and Vietnam.

1.50, wau !

高处不胜寒

999, I know all mothers are female 講了等于沒有講

Insurance policies may also indemnify only up to certain agreed maximums or perhaps even deny liability altogether if gross negligence in maintenance standards (drat, those SOPs again) can be proven to have existed at MAS.

Doubtless, lawyers will use those past safety breaches as rich pickings to infer a breach of safety standards in this instance of the MH370 incident.

I recall MAS cutting corners before on important safety-related SOPS, like being a stinge on the levels of safety buffer fuel it was required to carry on its planes, and for which it was once caught out and slapped a heavy fine at Heathrow Airport.

In other words, screwing up on internationally agreed aviation SOPs by cutting corners on them and/or making assumptions that should not be made.

MAS is in serious trouble if it cannot prove those black box radio beacons on its planes were serviced and maintained correctly with the minimum standard battery life stipulation of 30 days.

The automatic inference from that negative inference, particularly if the black boxes or plane cannot be located and found, is that the loss of MH370 was a preventable disaster that only happened because of a safety failure resulting from the possibly illegal approach MAS appears to have had to vital standards of maintenance.