Followers
2
Following
0
Blog Posts
0
Threads
4,879
Blogs
Threads
Portfolio
Follower
Following
2021-06-27 18:49 |
Post removed.Why?
2021-06-27 18:47 | Report Abuse
I m asking lya rasman to resign for saying it is mind blogging
OrlandoOilSemiconIoT * LYN RAHNAN U should resign!! Definitely must resign
Why mind blogging ? * LYN RAHMAN
U all accused her of being *NOT independent tat is why she resigned
It is also mind boggling to see the newly appointed INED Masleena Zaid who has been the talk of the town in view of her connection with the other two newly-appointed INEDs, namely chairman Datuk Mohamed Ilyas Pakeer Mohamed and Johan Mohamed Ishak, had tendered her resignation citing “personal commitment”
2021-06-27 18:17 | Report Abuse
Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence
https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/patheticfallacy/2021-06-26-story-h1567055447-SERBA_DINAMIK_WHY_SERBADK_S_LEGAL_SUIT_IS_NOT_FRIVOLOUS.jsp
2021-06-27 18:16 | Report Abuse
If KPMG hv Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence it should have qualified its audit report on day 1
The Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence wil ensure its safety no need to be dragged into fiasco
2021-06-27 18:13 | Report Abuse
Suffice to say u 3 average man on d street jokers hv not a clue what is an audit
Fyi... an audit is an evidence based undertaking
Auditors must find Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence
Aùditors must hv Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence to support their opinion
Go read the audit report already
2021-06-27 15:51 | Report Abuse
30 sen.. m very sure u r gonna u pest
2021-06-27 15:33 | Report Abuse
Are u thinking straight?
2021-06-27 15:32 | Report Abuse
If KPMG has them then KPMG should hv qualified its audit report on day 1
shortinvestor77 KPMG and Those INEDs that have resigned already have first hand IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE. They are just waiting for independent review to verify it. Of course, SD doesn't want it to be exposed lah.
27/06/2021 3:24 PM
2021-06-27 15:28 | Report Abuse
Come on u all 3000+ average man on the street let's help Serbadk legal suit
https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/patheticfallacy/2021-06-26-story-h1567055447-SERBA_DINAMIK_WHY_SERBADK_S_LEGAL_SUIT_IS_NOT_FRIVOLOUS.jsp
2021-06-27 15:27 | Report Abuse
Come on u all average man on the street let's help Serbadk legal suit
The more the 3000+ average man on d street posted "even without IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE l believe KPMG" the stronger Serbadk claim tat KPMGs premature report to SC caused d blow up
2021-06-27 12:30 | Report Abuse
INED cannot agree wit his method that is all in no way saying Serbadk has done wrong
2021-06-27 12:24 | Report Abuse
Well
KL is a small town
Smaller stil is d circles of people at the tops
https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/patheticfallacy/2021-06-26-story-h1567055447-SERBA_DINAMIK_WHY_SERBADK_S_LEGAL_SUIT_IS_NOT_FRIVOLOUS.jsp
2021-06-27 12:21 | Report Abuse
Well
KL is a small town
Smaller stil is d circles of people at the tops
The way he talks do u think he is one to lower himself to officer level??
He of coz called d people at the very top but of coz too ths people at the top cannot admit
He was introduced as one wit connections ( how can Karim said tis... Karim is honest to a fault but is good in d current context)
He is of d old amno era who was used to kao tim things behind d screen
Warlord
Jz tat he is not in touch wit time n youngsters INED cannot agree wit his METHOD
lie about meeting SC,
2021-06-27 12:15 | Report Abuse
U should resign!! Definitely must resign
Why mind blogging ?
U all accused her of being independent tat is why she resigned
It is also mind boggling to see the newly appointed INED Masleena Zaid who has been the talk of the town in view of her connection with the other two newly-appointed INEDs, namely chairman Datuk Mohamed Ilyas Pakeer Mohamed and Johan Mohamed Ishak, had tendered her resignation citing “personal commitment”.
She was only appointed less than two weeks ago. – June 26, 2021
2021-06-27 11:58 | Report Abuse
Do u hv evidence to say wat u hv said?
So wat is new?
Average man on d street jumped d gun at MAYBE without evidence like KPMG
2021-06-27 10:43 | Report Abuse
3000+ average man on d street in here
2021-06-27 10:37 | Report Abuse
Told u d
Don't know anything don't simply post
U can find tis fella in Jurong Singapore
Can wait for him in Pengerang Johor
2021-06-27 10:35 | Report Abuse
3000+ average man on d street in i3
2021-06-27 10:34 | Report Abuse
I intend to all in
2021-06-27 10:34 | Report Abuse
If u r relying on d price to decide right n wrong u r doing a KPMG on Serbadk
2021-06-27 10:15 | Report Abuse
If u r replying on d price to decide right n wrong u r doing a KPMG on Serbadk
2021-06-27 10:11 | Report Abuse
Price is not a good indicator of right n wrong
If yes tat Focus something wld b the righteous co in Bursa
2021-06-27 10:07 | Report Abuse
For the record
4 INED said they disagreed wit METHOD the APPROACH not admitting Serbadk is guilty
The new one resigned immediately coz ppl accused her not independent
2021-06-27 10:04 | Report Abuse
Dont get what you r trying to say
2021-06-27 10:02 | Report Abuse
Dont see the difference
2021-06-27 10:00 | Report Abuse
Huang
Hv u got it or not?
Simply put figures can land Karim is trouble big penalty
U think without consequences on d BOD part??
Huangbk72 OrlandoOilSemiconIoT Average man on d street thinks simply put figures in QR is without consequences jz coz QR r not audited??
This is why its not signed off by auditors.
27/06/2021 9:58 AM
2021-06-27 09:57 | Report Abuse
Average man on d street thinks simply put figures in QR is without consequences jz coz QR r not audited!!!!
2021-06-27 09:56 | Report Abuse
Average man on d street thinks simply put figures in QR is without consequences jz coz QR r not audited??
2021-06-27 09:54 | Report Abuse
I m referring to a statement not the figures
Oso not audited yes but Serbadk BOD wil b taken to task will b reprimand n penaltied for publishing fake figures
U seriously think simply put figures in QR is without consequences jz coz QR r not audited??
2021-06-27 09:49 | Report Abuse
Huang
For ur own good u shd up n keep an open mind
See latest QR for d statements
2021-06-27 09:47 | Report Abuse
OrlandoOilSemiconIoT We r taking legal actions shd b read as WE R CONFIDENCE WE R RIGHT
27/06/2021 9:44 AM
2021-06-27 09:45 | Report Abuse
OrlandoOilSemiconIoT Serbadk has clearly stated an independent reviewer wil b appointed asap
In the meantime
Wat Serbadk is trying to do in the meantime is to do damage control firstly by sending a message to investors.. by saying we r confidence we r right to the extent tat we dare to legal actions
27/06/2021 9:42 AM
2021-06-27 09:44 | Report Abuse
We r taking legal actions shd b read as WE R CONFIDENCE WE R RIGHT
2021-06-27 09:42 | Report Abuse
Serbadk has clearly stated an independent reviewer wil b appointed asap
In the meantime
Wat Serbadk is trying to do in the meantime is to do damage control firstly by sending a message to investors.. by saying we r confidence we r right to the extent tat we dare to legal actions
2021-06-27 09:35 | Report Abuse
I m jz wit a strong sense of right n wrong
https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/patheticfallacy/2021-06-26-story-h1567055447-SERBA_DINAMIK_WHY_SERBADK_S_LEGAL_SUIT_IS_NOT_FRIVOLOUS.jsp
Posted by OrlandoOilSemiconIoT > Jun 23, 2021 9:49 PM | Report Abuse X
Loosing money is one thing
KPMG shd has been more conclusive
KPMG shd not have spoken before obtaining the IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE
2021-06-27 09:22 | Report Abuse
Well tis is free country
Go ahead those who want to believe stock kingdom
2021-06-27 09:15 | Report Abuse
OrlandoOilSemiconIoT My england my ang mo not good
Kindly read again carefully tis time n advise
unnecessary here is referring to the impasse or the appointment?
Stock Kingdom When I tried to put myself in the shoes of KPMG in communicating & meeting with the BOD.
I was not satisfied with the replies from the management and were opinions that the explanations & evidences/proofs provided by the management need to be verified independently & required forensic investigation, which may not be within the expertise of an audit firm or/and within the terms of engagement.
To resolve the matters, I proposed the management to appoint an independent reviewer where the reviewer can be empowered to engage/employ/appoint private investigators, lawyers, or/and other agencies to investigate & verify the subject matters.
By doing so, I trust that we can easily confirm the creditability & validity on the evidences & replies by the management.
HOWEVER, THE MANAGEMENT BELIEVED IT WAS UNNECESSARY!!!
So how?
###############
58. The Plaintiff further states, as noted in Paragraph 23 of this Statement of Claim, that the impasse created by the Defendant in demanding for a 3rd Party independent review was unnecessary in the circumstances and would cause adverse speculation in the market against the Plaintiff as known or ought to have been within the knowledge of the Defendant.
27/06/2021 2:47 AM
sukesuke OrlandoOilSemiconIoT My england my ang mo not good
Kindly read again carefully tis time n advise
unnecessary here is referring to the impasse or the appointment
*****
I was about to ask the same question, my understanding of that particular extract of the article differ totally from the learned Stock Kingdom. Probably due to my bad England too
27/06/2021 8:44 AM
X
OrlandoOilSemiconIoT Stock Kingdom d powerful england we r waiting for ur learned explanation
27/06/2021 8:50 AM
2021-06-27 08:50 | Report Abuse
Stock Kingdom d powerful england we r waiting for ur learned explanation
2021-06-27 08:38 | Report Abuse
My england my ang mo not good
Kindly read again carefully tis time n advise
unnecessary here is referring to the impasse or the appointment?
Stock Kingdom When I tried to put myself in the shoes of KPMG in communicating & meeting with the BOD.
I was not satisfied with the replies from the management and were opinions that the explanations & evidences/proofs provided by the management need to be verified independently & required forensic investigation, which may not be within the expertise of an audit firm or/and within the terms of engagement.
To resolve the matters, I proposed the management to appoint an independent reviewer where the reviewer can be empowered to engage/employ/appoint private investigators, lawyers, or/and other agencies to investigate & verify the subject matters.
By doing so, I trust that we can easily confirm the creditability & validity on the evidences & replies by the management.
HOWEVER, THE MANAGEMENT BELIEVED IT WAS UNNECESSARY!!!
So how?
###############
58. The Plaintiff further states, as noted in Paragraph 23 of this Statement of Claim, that the impasse created by the Defendant in demanding for a 3rd Party independent review was unnecessary in the circumstances and would cause adverse speculation in the market against the Plaintiff as known or ought to have been within the knowledge of the Defendant.
27/06/2021 2:47 AM
2021-06-27 08:37 | Report Abuse
My england my ang mo not good
Kindly read again carefully tis time n advise
unnecessary here is referring to the impasse or the appointment?
Stock Kingdom When I tried to put myself in the shoes of KPMG in communicating & meeting with the BOD.
I was not satisfied with the replies from the management and were opinions that the explanations & evidences/proofs provided by the management need to be verified independently & required forensic investigation, which may not be within the expertise of an audit firm or/and within the terms of engagement.
To resolve the matters, I proposed the management to appoint an independent reviewer where the reviewer can be empowered to engage/employ/appoint private investigators, lawyers, or/and other agencies to investigate & verify the subject matters.
By doing so, I trust that we can easily confirm the creditability & validity on the evidences & replies by the management.
HOWEVER, THE MANAGEMENT BELIEVED IT WAS UNNECESSARY!!!
So how?
###############
58. The Plaintiff further states, as noted in Paragraph 23 of this Statement of Claim, that the impasse created by the Defendant in demanding for a 3rd Party independent review was unnecessary in the circumstances and would cause adverse speculation in the market against the Plaintiff as known or ought to have been within the knowledge of the Defendant.
27/06/2021 2:47 AM
2021-06-27 08:35 | Report Abuse
If one has d IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE one would dare to qualify ones opinion
Why dare not qualify?
Mind u there is such a as giving a wrong opinion
Stock Kingdom As auditors of the company, if I think the replies & answers given by the company do not satisfactorily enable me to give a true & fair view towards the accounts of a company & the management refused or unable to furnish further conclusive proofs, i may only have below choices:
1) give adverse/disclaimer opinion on the accounts
2) report to SC
3) accept the answers & give clean view
What will you do if you are the auditor?
———————-
Hints for thought:
1 & 2, Serba will die & auditors will be safe
3, Serba celebrate & KPMG will not sleep well, remember fine 2,2mil & settlement 324mil paid by Delotte over 1MDB case
27/06/2021 2:47 AM
2021-06-27 08:30 | Report Abuse
My england my ang mo not good
Kindly read again carefully tis time n advise
unnecessary here is referring to the impasse or the appointment?
Stock Kingdom When I tried to put myself in the shoes of KPMG in communicating & meeting with the BOD.
I was not satisfied with the replies from the management and were opinions that the explanations & evidences/proofs provided by the management need to be verified independently & required forensic investigation, which may not be within the expertise of an audit firm or/and within the terms of engagement.
To resolve the matters, I proposed the management to appoint an independent reviewer where the reviewer can be empowered to engage/employ/appoint private investigators, lawyers, or/and other agencies to investigate & verify the subject matters.
By doing so, I trust that we can easily confirm the creditability & validity on the evidences & replies by the management.
HOWEVER, THE MANAGEMENT BELIEVED IT WAS UNNECESSARY!!!
So how?
###############
58. The Plaintiff further states, as noted in Paragraph 23 of this Statement of Claim, that the impasse created by the Defendant in demanding for a 3rd Party independent review was unnecessary in the circumstances and would cause adverse speculation in the market against the Plaintiff as known or ought to have been within the knowledge of the Defendant.
27/06/2021 2:47 AM
2021-06-26 19:29 | Report Abuse
See u in court o
I see u in court !!
I see u in court is not d natural path of the guilty la
No one expects KPMG to b cowed
In any case independent review is unavoidable even wit court case
qqq3333 sorry Orlando... u will not agree with my next statement. but Serba actions is the natural path of the guilty.... things do flow in a natural way
26/06/2021 7:15 PM
2021-06-26 18:45 | Report Abuse
U r lower much lower thn average man on d street
2021-06-26 18:44 | Report Abuse
Certainly not by a MF like u
AlsvinChangan Samada IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE atau Tahi EVIDENCE
siapa yang decide ? Bapok kau?
26/06/2021 6:31 PM
Blog: SERBA DINAMIK - WHY SERBADK'S LEGAL SUIT IS NOT FRIVOLOUS
2021-06-27 18:51 |
Post removed.Why?