Just to clarify. When u say 1 CW to accompany 1 mother share, do u mean in terms of number of shareholdings or in value terms?

CLIQ directors are wasting their time and money to go to the courts. Even if SC had approved their QA, it could still be rejected by shareholders in the EGM (just like Sona). Why don't the directors just move on with their life and return back the money to shareholders. Make everyone happy in the process...

AirAsia was doing well financially (benefits from lower oil price, stronger RM) until this placement comes in to dilute minorities. The key question is whether the earnings can more than offset the dilution?

good point mentioned by hpcp and Desa20201956. Nobody highlighted about the diluted project IRR figure. Definitely less than 15%

Company adjourned the meeting so that can it can give more time for people to think about the potential capital repayment. Mind u this is just a potential capital repayment. It is not guaranteed and not certain if a lot of shareholders voted against the acquisition. So, the quantum of the repayment can range from 0 to 7 sen. Even at 7 sen, it is not really attractive enough. What if most people vote against the acquisition, the capital repayment could just be 1 or 2 sen. Nothing to shout about

Title is misleading. Has Mr Koon added positions on Xingquan since his 1st purchase? Title of "Why am I buying Xingquan" means that Mr Koon is buying it now at the current price. Buying as much as i can since PE is low and the company has so much cash! Title should be renamed as "Why am I a shareholder of Xingquan?" if Mr Koon has no intention of buying more of the stock.

Don't panic. If u sell at this price, OLH will be the one buying from u. This is akin to accepting his low RM1.60 offer. He is just trying his luck here. He can't merge/consolidate the property companies without getting majority control of PJD