@iknownuts, thanks for the note on warrant.

I do not have much daibochi wb left in my portfolio but more mother shares for long term holding.

What possible news that pushed it to new high today?

aiyo this has to drag on for another 3 weeks to 25th Oct.

No need to waste time on this and better focus on other counters.

Ok got it, thanks.

I was misled by the timeline in the CIMB report.


Posted by iknownuts > Oct 4, 2021 1:07 PM | Report Abuse

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/market_information/announcements/company...

If you accept the offer from scientex via this method, if there are any subsequent increased scientex offer, you will also get the increased price

@iknownuts, are you sure today is the day Scientex first accepts offer from the public?

I reproduce the wordings from CIMB analyst's report dated 14 Sept for reference:

[ Other salient details of Scientex’s takeover offer
Takeover offer lapses in three weeks if no extension granted
 Scientex will get to compulsorily acquire the remaining Daibochi shares it does not have when its ownership in Daibochi reaches 97.2%. Section 222(1) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA) permits the offeror to compulsorily buy the target company’s shares it still does not hold once it already has 90% of the shares it did not own prior to the takeover offer.
 The first expiration date to accept Scientex’s offer is 4 Oct 2021, being the 21st day after the notice of the unconditional voluntary takeover offer was first tabled.
 If Scientex wants to extend the offer’s expiration date, it will have to inform Bursa Malaysia by 2 Oct 2021 – or two days before the first expiration date.
However, the takeover offer cannot go past 60 days of the offer date (Friday,
12 Nov 2021).]

However, when I cross check on the Notification from UOB dated 20 Sept, clause 4.5 (a) says that "..the Offer will remain open for acceptance from the Posting Date for a period of not less than 21 days ...".
Clause 4.3 says ".. the Offer will be made in conjunction with the posting of the Offer Document ("Posting Date"), which will not be later than 21 days from the date of this Notice.

Now, I do not know exactly when the Posting Date is set to be. If UOB posted out the Offer Document on 20 Sept, then the Offer shall expire on 11th Oct the earliest. If the Posting Date was set at the 21st day from the Notice, then the Posting Date shall be 11th Oct and the Offer shall expire latest by 25th Oct. Right?


Posted by iknownuts > Oct 4, 2021 1:02 PM | Report Abuse

Adoi pls, dont simply spew misleading info again. Today is the day the offer document goes out la. Means today is also the day scientex first accepts offer from the public

Again, pls post responsibily…

As @observatory pointed out, Daibochi share price is likely to settle higher than the RM2.3-RM2.4 pre-announcement level given Daibochi’s hidden value gets wider recognition now.

As liquidity will be thin after a few more percentage of Daibochi shares have been mopped up by Scientex and funds from the open market, share price volatility will only increase. A bad news would move the share price by 5%-10% easily and a good news would make it surge over 10%-30% in a single day of tradings.

As long as fundamentals have not changed, lower share trading liquidity is not an issue to me as I do not buy in millions. I had success in picking up DKSH below RM3.00 though its free floats are lower than 20% with DKSH parent holding over 75% of this listed entity in Bursa. Patience pays off handsomely by riding on its expansion plan from two years ago by M&A and investments in internal cost optimisation projects.

DKSH announced a good set of results for quarter ended June 2021 and investors chased it high by over 80% in few weeks. Why are funds and investors so upbeat on DKSH? Again, I will resort to cash flows analysis to explain why this is a real gem. DKSH operational cash flows are so strong that it managed to pare down RM100 million of debts with just 6 months of operational cash flows and declare a 10 sen dividend. Its paid-up capital is low at 168 million shares, so its annual operational cash flows could top RM200 million. With minimal ongoing capex, it would be able to declare high dividends once its debts are pared down to manageable levels. With projected EPS of 60 sen and free cash flows above RM1.00 per share, DKSH may declare dividends up to 60 sen a year. For a dividend yield of 7.0%, DKSH may be worth RM8.57. For a dividend yield of 5.0%, DKSH may be worth RM12.00.

Now look back at Daibochi. It has quite similar situation as DKSH:
1) a strong parent with over 60% stakes
2) involved in consumer food & beverage product chain
3) long term business partner to consumer F&B giants like Nestle
4) embarking on expansion plan though organically and potential benefits to be realised in next 2 years
5) has potential to embark on internal cost optimisation projects to improve EBITDA margin with synergy support from Scientex in areas like raw material procurement, factory operational efficiency, inventory optimisation, stronger negotiation power with customers & suppliers
6) strong operating cash flows of 32 sen per share potentially when the 60% capacity expansion plan is successful, and hence potential high dividend payouts for many years to come
7) low liquidity
8) wider recognition of its potential among investment community

In the next few days, Scientex will need to make announcements on how much acceptance it has received for the privatisation offer, including any from the institutional funds.

It is anybody's guess now as to whether Scientex would raise the offer price. Scientex could well walk away with 66%+ stakes and get on with life, and hence there is a real risk for Daibochi share price to fall to RM2.30-2.50 level in short term.

Investors need to consider the potential risk of losing +/-10% capital if not accepting the offer, and balance the risk with potential rewards of holding it for long term.

Today 4th Oct 2021 is the last day to accept the take over offer from Scientex. Given that Scientex did not announce any extension of the offer by 2nd Oct, the current privatisation offer will not be extended so today is the last day to submit your acceptance form to Scientex. I do not know the exact procedure of submission as I do not have any intention to accept the offer, hence do not bother reading the procedure.

@observatory,

Hmmm... this PE matrix is even trickier. This Forward PE ratio in page 7 was calculated using the most recent weekly share price of Daibochi divided by the four upcoming quarterly consensus EPS.

My view:
1) This PE was distorted by a few bad quarterly results, eg. 4QFY2018 that recorded a small loss.
2) This PE figure was brought down substantially by consensus forecase earnings that were higher from 4Q2019 after the completion of MPP acquisition
3) Not sure if the consensus forward earnings estimates have taken into account the planned expansion

Anyway the chart also shows that the Forward PE for past 5 years for other Container & Packaging Group Average was also around 20.0x. Therefore, it shows the generally bullish view of consensus on comparable packaging companies.

As you mentioned, Daibochi is a long term indispensable business partner to big consumer giants like Nestle and Heineken who are trading up to 27x PE. Ones would argue that Daibochi should be trading at PE range higher than that of packaging companies but below that of big consumer giants. In short, it is reasonable to peg a PE range of 20x to 27x to Daibochi.

Applying it to Daibochi actual FY2021 earnings of 14.4 sen per share:

1a) 20 x RM0.144 = RM2.88
1b) 27 x RM0.144 = RM3.89

Applying it to Daibochi forward FY2022 earning estimate of 20.1 sen:

2a) 20 x RM0.201 = RM4.02
2b) 27 x RM0.201 = RM5.43

My view is that since this is a Forward PE, so it should be applied on forward FY2022 earnings estimate rather than past actual FY2021 earnings. So we are looking at a valuation of RM4.02 to RM5.43 for Daibochi.

Analysts may apply certain discount to factor in the low liquidity of Daibochi. How much this discount factor should be again is arguable.


Posted by observatory > Oct 2, 2021 4:40 PM | Report Abuse

@dragon328,

You've brought up a valid point that Daibochi mean PE may be lower than the past 10 year mean at 18.6X given it was a higher growth company in the past.

I checked out the forward PE of last 5 years using Bursa Alpha Indicator Report. It was based on Refinitiv data. You can find in page 7 of the report in the link below. The past 5 year average forward PE is even higher at 20.5X (it shows average instead of mean). The average forward PE was only dragged down in the last two pandemic years, a temporary situation.

https://www.bursamarketplace.com/mkt/tools/research/ch=research&pg...

Applying the 5 year average PE approach
(1) pre-announcement consensus FY22E EPS = RM0.201
(2) Fair value per share = RM0.201 x 20.5 or about RM4.1

Even apply a 20% margin of safety it still yields RM3.3

Why did the forward PE stay above 20X, even up to 27X for most of the 2017 to 19 period? I believe one of the reasons is during that period the market has rerated branded consumer companies like Calrsberg, Heineken and Nestle. The forward PE of Nestle was raised from 30+ times to an eye watering 50X times. As an indispensable business partner to Nestle and the like, Daibochi should benefit.

@anti_colonialists, oh you come back again with even hotter temper!!

Your heated tempo has blurred your own logic, sadly to say.

I have stated many times that I am just a small investor in Daibochi and my view is naturally biased for my investment interests in Daibochi.

Do I have a bigger agenda? To smear Scientex as bad guy? What for?

I already said I do not dispute the remarkable achievement by Scientex in the past 10-20 years and Mr. Lim has good business acumen.

The topic of this forum is on Daibochi and the recent hot topic is obviously on the proposed privatisation offer from Scientex.

As a long term investor in Daibochi, I believe the take-over offer price from Scientex of RM2.70 is inadequate and I think its privatisation offer will fail this round. I hope for a higher offer price from Scientex or for continued listing of Daibochi to allow us to ride on its long term expansion plans. Full stop. No other agenda.

It appears that it is you who try to attack forumers here who do not support the offer from Scientex. What is your agenda?

Are you speaking for any analyst or journalist or Scientex or other "giant competitors of Apollo"?

I do have difficulty understanding your posts to which sometimes I have difficulties writing any response. But I try my best to put some response to your "genuinely explanation" below in BLOCKs.


Posted by anti_colonialists7 > Oct 2, 2021 3:43 PM | Report Abuse

@dragon328 was gloomy morning here you bring good laugh.

You refuse accept own flaw, after I destroyed your logic and invalidate your argument.

Also proven by reason you are evil due to continued new false claims, to support your view, that reasonable to smear name and integrity of innocent parties like hard working analyst and journalist, using made up flawed logic to support your bigger agenda to smear Scientex as bad guy.

After I invalidate logic of your argument, now you try to hide your track again, change tune softer to "just personal view" that it is "common trick" in "M&A" and "stop waste time with nonsense".




Anyway give you last benefit of doubt, if you really believe you innocent, then you might have difficulty understanding my post, and I will genuinely explain again why your logic is flawed and your action evil. Suggest you repent.

1. Analyst job is to answer licensed big investors like Apollo/Samarang (investor of Daibochi), Vanguard/Norges/EPF/Affin (investor of Scientex) that have billions dollars. [WOW THIS IS A EVEN BIGGER PUBLIC SMEAR ON ALL THE ANALYSTS WHO HAVE FAMILIES TO FEED LEH]

2. In other words customers of analysts are giant licensed companies with billions dollars parked everywhere in world, not some little company that make plastic and low cost house. [THIS IS YOUR OWN SMEAR AND UNDERSTATEMENT ON SCIENTEX ACHIEVEMENT]

3. If you want to stick to your claim that analysts can be paid and influenced by third party, it is naturally more likely that other giant customers of the analysts (not Apollo/Samarang) are doing so. [DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE LOGIC BEHIND YOUR ACCUSATION ON OTHER "GIANT CUSTOMERS" OF THE ANALYSTS, WHAT FOR THEY WOULD DO IT?]

4. If you really think just because tp is lower after Scientex announce take over, is "proof" analysts are swayed by third party, naturally it must be giant competitors of Apollo that are current investor in Scientex, like Vanguard/Norges/EPF, that are "exercising muscle onto analysts" to get lower tp and block Apollo so they can get Daibochi at good price. [YOU SEEM TO BE SLAPPING ON YOUR OWN FACE HERE. WHETHER IT WAS SCIENTEX OR "GIANT COMPETITORS OF APOLLO THAT ARE CURRENT INVESTOR IN SCIENTEX" WHO EXERCISED MUSCLE ONTO ANALYSTS TO GET LOWER TP, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? YOU SEEM TO BE HAVING INSIDER KNOWLEDGE ON THIS. PLEASE REPORT IT TO SC FOR THE GOOD OF THE PUBLIC.]

5. If that sound crazy, imagine how insane your own claims sound, and your public accusation and evil smearing of innocent hard working people like analysts and journalist with families to feed, it should be you that is brought to justice in a real court [THAT REALLY SOUNDS CRAZY TO ME, HAHA. IF THESE ANALYSTS AND JOURNALIST DO NOT WANT THE PUBLIC TO CRITICISE THEM, THEN THEY'D BETTER BE MORE PROFESSIONAL AND RESPONSIBLE TO THE TARGET READERS AND HENCE TO THEIR OWN FAIMILIES. HAD SOMEONE REPORTED THEM TO THE SC OR MACC, THEN THEIR CAREER WOULD BE DOOMED AND FAMILIES NOT FED. IT ALREADY HAPPENED BEFORE. THEY ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO ANSWER TO ANY OF THESE SO-CALLED "GIANT CUSTOMER" NOR "GIANT COMPETITORS OF APOLLO AND CURRENT INVESTOR IN SCIENTEX".]

I think the assumed nett profit of RM65.7m for FY2022 may be reasonable as it has factored in a 39.5% increase of profits from actual FY2021 net profit of RM47.1m. It takes time for the company to realise higher revenue and earnings from its planned expansion.

The PER ratio of 18.6x may be questionable as it was the mean PER for past 10 years of Daibochi which was considered a high growth company who expanded its market cap by 20x in 20 years. Even if I pitch it 20% lower at 15x PER, Daibochi would still be worth RM3.00 per share.

But the key point is that Daibochi is one-of-its-kind in Bursa, that enjoys consumer monopoly with big F&B MNCs through its long standing good track records and relationship with the customers. It is really hard to find another company listed in Bursa that has such an enviable position in consumer business. If Scientex wants to privatise it, it will take away the rights of investors to ride on the long term success of Daibochi. This is a great company that may continue to expand organically or via M&A for the next 10-20 years.

The other plastic flexible packaging companies like BP Plastic, Thong Guan or even Scientex make commodity-like products like stretchable films which compete mainly on pricing. When other low cost producers come along from China or Vietnam, their profit margin will suffer just like what we are seeing now in glove makers here.

Even if Scientex walks away from the offer, Daibochi share price may drop momentarily to RM2.30-2.50 level but it will eventually rise beyond RM2.70 when more investors see its potential. That's why I have not sold a single lot of Daibochi mother share which I think may fetch a valuation of over RM4.00 in medium term.

Why so bullish? Again I will resort to cash flow valuation. In my earlier post above, I estimate that Daibochi may see annual free cash flows of 32 sen per share by FY2023. If there is not further major expansion, the capex requirement will be minimum and Daibochi would be able to declare up to 80% to 90% of net profits as dividends just like what Bermaz Auto and Uchitec have been doing for years. So Daibochi dividends may go as high as 25 sen a share from FY2023. For a 7.0% yield, Daibochi may trade up to RM3.57 and for 5.0% yields, it may go close to RM5.00. For comparison, other consumer stocks like Nestle, DIGI or Dutch Lady trade at 3%-5% yields.




Posted by observatory > Oct 2, 2021 11:40 AM | Report Abuse

Meanwhile I want to return to the valuation. This is what have brought me to Daibochi forum in the first place.

I've earlier put forward my own valuation case based on a simple 10 year historical forward PE. Some analysts have used this approach to value Daibochi. Forward earning helps to look past the recent pandemic impacts.

(1) Just before the offer announcement, before analysts' forecast have been affected by the offer, the Bloomberg consensus FY22E net profit is RM65.7m (source: Kenanga)
(2) The share base is 327.372m. FY22E EPS = RM65.7m/ 327.372m = RM0.201 per share.
(3) 10 year mean PE is 18.6X (source: CIMB)
(4) Fair market per share = RM0.201 x 18.6 = RM3.73

The estimated fair value at RM3.73 is much higher than RM2.70.

Granted valuation is an inexact exercise. But even with margin of safety applied, it's still much higher than RM2.70.

Besides acquirer should pay for premium rather than mean valuation.

@iknownuts, I understand your points. In fact, I shared some of your views and offloaded some daibochi-WB at 0.345 yesterday.

I have declared my interests in Daibochi and would share my rationale of betting more on its warrants Daibochi-wb. I was fortunate to have grabbed plenty of daibochi-wb at 0.13-0.15 weeks before the privatisation offer from Scientex appeared. Investment is an art rather than pure logic. It is a game of probability of winning vs losing. Often you need to take on high risks to get higher returns in order to beat the market.

Daibochi-wb exercise price is RM2.50 and expires in June 2022. Daiabochi was trading at RM2.20-2.30 and wb was at 0.13-0.15 then, meaning the warrant was out of money. Why bet on it? What was the downside? I told myself that I would cut loss on wb at RM0.10 for a max 30% loss by year end if daibochi still languished below RM2.50. The upside could be handsome if Daibochi goes towards RM3.00 for a 300% upside gain. I was betting to see earnings growth of Daibochi in its July quarterly result or latest in its Oct quarterly result, from its expansion plan. So it was a no brainer.

Now Scientex's offer is on the table and Daibochi share price is kind of stuck at RM2.70s and wb at RM0.30s at least for next 2 weeks. Where is the upside and the risk?

Lets look at the potential upside first. What is the chance of Scientex raising its offer price? We need to examine the reason behind Scientex offer in the first place. Why would Scientex still want to increase its stakes in Daibochi though already holding a controlling stakes of 62%? I would evaluate this in terms of cash flows which is the most important factor to businesses.

In Daibochi's Q4 quarterly result, it achieved operating cash flows of about RM70 million after tax payments before working capital changes for FY2021. It spent close to RM64m for its expansion capex, funded entirely from its operating cash flows, not requiring to raise any new debts nor equity injection from Scientex. If Daibochi pulls off its expansion plan well to increase capacity by 60% and its management is able to secure additional revenue for 80% of the additional capacity over the course of next 10 months or so, then it is reasonable to project that Daibochi revenue and earnings will expand by 50% by FY2023. Its annual operating cash flows may expand to RM105 million then. Given its nett debt of RM50m only and normal capex of RM5.0m, its free cash flows may top RM100m or 32 sen a share by FY2023. If Scientex is able to acquire the remaining 38% stakes in Daibochi at RM2.70 per share, it will have to fork out cash of RM336m. Scientex would be able to get back this money in just 3 years by owning 100% stakes in Daibochi and extracting out the annual free cash flows as dividends. So it makes good business sense for Scientex to privatise Daibochi. For Scientex to raise the offer price to RM3.00, it will set it back with RM37m of additional privatisation costs which it would get back with 3 months of cash flows from Daibochi. For offer price to be raised to RM3.30, it will need additional costs of RM75m which would face strong resistance from Scientex shareholders. In short, I would put the probability at 50% for the offer price to be raised to RM3.00 and at 30% for offer price to be raised to RM3.30.

Where is the downside? If Scientex walks away with the offer, I expect Daibochi share price to drop back to RM2.30-2.50 level and wb to RM0.15-0.20 level at initial responses. I would put this probability at 20%. Even for a low probability, the potential downside to daibochi-wb is huge at 30%-50%. That is why I chose to offload some holdings of daibochi-wb at 0.345 yesterday. The risk is real. Investors beware.


Posted by iknownuts > Oct 2, 2021 11:49 AM | Report Abuse

@observatory

Nope my view point has not changed. Also, i did not advise anyone to do anything. I am not a licensed person anyway to advise anybody. What i said in my earlier postings is for investors to think about all possibilities instead of just seeing the mainly rosy points painted here. Whilst we post here anonymously, we still need to post responsibily (Well, for me anyway)

I have a position in daibochi, and i do intend to accept the offer from scientex, but if the price keeps going up, i will continue to sell in the open market. I have already started offloading some on friday.

Now why do i offload now instead of waiting? If scientex ups their offer, i can also enjoy the upside, right?

@anticolonialists, I think your logic is fraud and you are the one making false claims here. If funds like Apollo or Samarang had exercised their mucles on analysts, then we would have seen analysts' reports calling for a fair value of RM3.85 or higher for Daibochi. But what we saw was just a report from CIMB lowering his valuation immediately from RM3.85 to RM2.75 after the offer.

It was my personal view that it is common trick for an acquiror to work on analysts or journalists to put out a report favourable to them in a M&A exercise. And my view may be biased because I have declared my interests in Daibochi and I strongly felt that the offer price by Scientex is inadequate.

You appear to be strongly against any view that the offer price is unfair and you think Scientex is all good. That is your view and it is ok for me.

If you are just an observor who "enjoy good arguments", then put up hard facts and figures to support your view, and not launch personal attacks on those with a different view.

Stop this nonsense. We just want to invest and make some returns from the stock market. You too stop wasting time here and grab a good coffee and have a good weekend!!

Daibochi to RM3.00 and Daibochi-WB to RM0.60 next week, cheers!!



@dragon328 good job contradicting your own arguments, once again reveal your consistent false claims, raising worrying question about your intention.

I have already responded you that analyst job is to answer big investor like Apollo, in other words licensed investment companies with billions dollars to play. You ignore that to create new false claims.

If you want to stick your claim that someone can "exercise its muscles onto analyst", then it is more likely other customers of the analyst, big investors like Apollo, are "exercising their muscles".

Companies like Scientex are not licensed investment company that have billions dollars and analysts begging to service them.

There can be many reason for analyst to think that Scientex offer is fair. If I use your argument style, one possible reason is other big investors with share in Scientex and are Apollo competitor, are "exercising their muscles on analysts" that need their business.

If true then possible competition between foreigner Apollo/Samarang (Daibochi) and Vanguard/Norges (Scientex) or local big investors like EPF/Affin (Scientex). It is normal for them to play hundreds of millions to billions in market and have many analysts begging for their business.

Level headed investors may think that sound unlikely. If sound unlikely, other possible view is the analyst is independent, and think the offer price is fair for Daibochi shareholders due to own professional opinion.

If you really believe they are pressured and their integrity compromise, what stop you from reporting to regulators and let them investigate? Clearly they will know better than us if any malpractice.

But you seem happy to destroy other people lives and rice bowl by your perverted sense of justice and slander and trial in court of public (collusion) opinion.

This is clearly because you want to sway public that Scientex is unfair, and you even make slanderous claims that they "exercise their muscle onto analysts and journalists and using them to do tricks".

I said earlier, are you joking or think everyone has 0 integrity and can be paid or pushed by Scientex? That is big insult to all hard working analysts and journalists implying they are bought. No different from anti vaxxers insane claims on big pharma.

You are clearly doing this to support your evil agenda to smear Scientex name and integrity with fake story and slanderous claims and you are happy to harm other innocent parties to support your agenda.

Do you think it is fun if their professional career and integrity discredited and smeared on a public website by unknown people? Only conclusion why you are acting this way is because you are evil.

Unsurprising from same people masquerading as victims and champions of greater good, while ironically camouflaging attack to smear name and integrity of genuine professionals and companies.

Shareholders that are reading here beware and do not be swayed by master puppeteers acting behind the scene.

Don't just keep saying that Scientex has improved Daibochi performance. Be more specific. In which areas and by how much?

We are just small investors in Daibochi. Naturally we like to see the company we invest in to perform well and hope for a higher offer price mah.

Don't get too emotional. Grab a coffee and some Daibochi-WB shares, then you will have a different perspective. Cheers!



Posted by anti_colonialists4 > Oct 1, 2021 2:46 PM | Report Abuse

@observatory you claimed "a big part of Daibochi's growth come from Mega acquisition". What is your intention are you trying to discredit Scientex role that improved Daibochi performance?

While ignoring fact that @dragon328 make false claim that Scientex did not improve Daibochi performance? Are you condoning false claim to suit your agenda to sway shareholders?

(Note you already said you are biased, Scientex unfair, and hope other shareholders follow you)

Your reply raises question if you work together with @dragon328. Since you claim "(partly due to the pandemic situation)" what is your intention to say "partly" when the pandemic is main reason?

Daibochi performance improved under Scientex until the pandemic hit most companies in the world. Whether Mega or not the fact is Daibochi performance magically shoot up to RM47 million for 2 years under Scientex and win-win for all. Is it your intention to discredit Scientex role and say partly due to bad management?

After that you go further say Mega "mostly plateaued profit in 8 to 9 quarters" to support your bias view or condone false claims by @dragon328 that Scientex did not improve Daibochi.

Makan to RM2.78!! What a rush to mop up shares.

@anti_colonialists

You have not been able to come out with any specific point to support your view that the offer price of RM2.70 is good.

And you are particularly sensitive to remarks that you deem discredit Scientex. We do not know your interests here but your desperate action itself seems to suggest that you are trying to encourage retailer investors here to accept the offer by Scientex. But you need to understand that whatever remarkable achievements made bby Scientex in the past 20 years has nothing to do with this privatisation offer and bears no interests to shareholders of Daibochi whatsoever.

If you think Scientex deserves some respect by making such an offer, then it has to earn it. Likewise, if you want us to think the offer is good, convince us with facts and figures.

Why the offer price of RM2.70 is good enough? What are the improvements to Daibochi financials if Scientex owns 100% of it? What good would it be for minority shareholders of Daibochi to forego our long term holdings of Daibochi at RM2.70 instead of riding out its expansion plans?

If you cannot even convince ikan bilis us here, then Scientex is doomed to fail in this privatisation attempt. FYI, Samarang just added 346k shares of Daibochi yesterday at RM2.71 and Scientex got zero. People are buying up Daibochi at RM2.73 now and Scientex will likely end up nil today.

It is a common trick in corporate deals. Can you prove it right or wrong?

If an equity analyst came along to recommend that the fair value of Daibochi should be RM3.85 (CIMB original tp) or higher, then it would make sense to suspect other investors or funds to have exercised muscles onto the analyst, but we have not seen any of such.

Get your facts right and not just make baseless claims here.

If you are just an observor, you are wasting your time posting abusive comments on those who think the privatisation offer is unfair.

If you are an investor in Daibochi, just sell off your shares if you think the offer is good and move to other counters.

If you are a shareholder or party in concert with Scientex management, then go tell Mr. Lim to just raise the offer price or withdraw it. DO not waste everbody's time here.


Posted by anti_colonialists3 > Oct 1, 2021 11:41 AM | Report Abuse

@dragon328 you claimed "big boy exercising muscles onto equity analysts and investment journalists to help sway retail investors to sell off Daibochi to them. totally unnecessary small tricks getting analysts to produce reports to their advantage."

Another unfair beautifully disguised shot to discredit Scientex by smearing their name and integrity with false claim?

It is analyst job to answer big investor like Apo***, so your claim is half false or full false. If your claim is claim half true, you must agree it is also possible some other big investor or competitor of Apo*** are "exercising muscles onto" analysts?

Are you claiming Scientex paid or exercised its muscles on analysts and paid The Edge and other journalists to use them as "small tricks"?

Are you joking, or think everyone have 0 integrity and pressured or paid by Scientex? That is big insult! No different from anti vaxxer insane claims on Big Bad Pharma!

As I posted earlier, I did not and do not know if Scientex was involved in the payment of the RM4.9m. I just put out the facts and you are free to interpret in whatever way you like.

Who is attacking who now? It seems like both yourself and anti_colonialist are launching personal attacks on me.

This is a forum free for all to express own views. If you do not agree with my view, you are welcome to debate and lay out your counter arguments.


Posted by iknownuts > Oct 1, 2021 11:46 AM | Report Abuse

@dragon328

erm…. So u knew scientex was NEVER involved in the payment of the 4.9m to snr management, and yet you posted this earlier, implying scientex in 2018 paid off the management and will pay off the management again in 2021. Wow

You also attacked new forumers just bcos they do not agree with your viewpoint?

The directors tried to explain that the reward was already agreed one year earlier when a European company was negotiating to acquire a majority stake in Daibochi to allay senior management's job security concerns. That would have been sensible if the European company did acquire a majority stake in Daibochi and lay off these senior management staffs. But the negotiation failed and there was no deal with the European company.

Then Scientex came along and acquire a majority stake in Daibochi. Did Scientex fire off these senior management of Daibochi after taking over? I do not know. If the senior management was retained, it became absurd to me that such a generous reward was given to them. What has this senior management done to deserve such a reward? By making the accounts and financials of Daibochi look really bad for quarters ended Dec 2018 and March 2019 in order to justify a low take over price by Scientex? It raised many questions and funds were concerned with such a "reward" mentality.

I was in a big MNC overseeing the commercial aspects of few subsidiaries in a number of countries. When we acquired a new company, we did not reward any of the senior management of the target company by doing a job favourable to us as the acquiror, but we retained those who were honest and capable.

Then what really happened behind the reward, only those directly involved in the Scientex-Daibochi takeover deal in 2019 would know. Investor funds and minority shareholders then could only question the directors who, as expected, failed to give a satisfying answer.

@iknownuts, I was not among the 40 analysts and fund managers who attended the briefing by Daibochi on 25 Feb 2019. I am also not an employee or former staff of Daibochi, and I do not have any insider info. I got to know this info from an update report written by Nigel Foo, the CIMB analyst then who covered this stock. An extract of the report is reproduced below:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
4Q18 briefing highlights
● Daibochi’s 4Q18 results briefing was led by Managing Director Thomas Lim, Executive Director Low Jin Wei and CFO Tan Gaik Hong. Around 40 analysts and fund managers attended the briefing, similar to its 3Q18 results briefing. We believe investors are interested in the potential synergies with its new major shareholder Scientex (SCI MK). Scientex owns 42.4% stake in Daibochi and is undertaking a mandatory takeover for the remaining Daibochi shares not owned by Scientex.

Daibochi’s directors proposed to reward senior management
● One year ago, a European company was negotiating to acquire a majority stake in Daibochi. To allay senior management’s job security concerns with the emergence of a potential new major shareholder, Daibochi’s board of directors agreed to reward its senior management RM4.9m if there was a takeover of the company. Negotiations with the European company failed last year.
● However, in Nov 2018, Scientex Bhd proposed to buy a 42.4% stake in Daibochi, which led to a mandatory takeover of the remaining Daibochi shares not owned by Scientex. This led to Daibochi giving its senior management the RM4.9m reward, recognised as M&A costs in the 4Q18 results, it said.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


Posted by iknownuts > Sep 30, 2021 10:26 PM | Report Abuse

@dragon328 i agree with what you said. This is just me thinking out aloud:

- if what you said re this 4.86m being paid by daibochi to snr management is true, it was done on or before 31/12/18. Scientex completed the share sale agreement on 19/3/19. So this was paid by daibochi to their management before scientx came into the picture. Meaning, the ex shareholders of daibochi (which was also the main decision makers in daibochi then) sanctioned this payout, and effectively screwed the shareholders of diabochi?

- as we all know when we sell a business, or even a normal property transaction, the seller always pay commission to a middleman/agent. Scientex bought daibochi shares from the ex shareholders in 2019 at RM222,500,425.60. Assuming a standard 2% commission, this equates to rm4.45m. Assuming other costs of legal, IA fees etc etc of 400k, could this be the “m&a” fee of rm4.86m you mentioned earlier? If this is true,why are the ex shareholders not paying out from their pocket, but instead from the books of daibochi?

A good bonus could be rewarded to the senior management for a job well done in integrating MPP and delivering the revenue & profits growth, and possibly so for expanding the capacity by 60% within budget and delivering another wave of revenue & profit growth in next few quarters.

But it should have not been rewarded for selling the company controlling stakes to Scientex at RM1.60 in 2019 then, and now for helping Scientex to privatise it at again another sub-par offer price.

@iknownuts, yes the reward payment of RM4.86m was mentioned in this bursa announcement.

That reward payment (which was labelled as M&A transaction cost) was questioned by fund managers during the result briefing on 25 Feb 2019 attended by 40 analysts and fund managers. Such reward was rather unusual to the senior management of a company for selling the company controlling stakes at way below market price. That payment effectively dragged Daibochi into a loss for that quarter. What an outrage to Daibochi shareholders then.



Posted by iknownuts > Sep 30, 2021 4:35 PM | Report Abuse

@dragon328 are u referring to this announcement when u say Rm4.9m was paid to snr mng?

https://www.bursamalaysia.com/market_information/announcements/company...

Posted by dragon328 > Sep 30, 2021 3:24 PM | Report Abuse

The current privatisation offer from Scientex is not doing any good to Daibochi nor its shareholders.

Recap that the senior management of Daibochi was rewarded with RM4.9 million for making through the acquisition of controlling stakes by Scientex in 2019.

The current privatisation offer from Scientex is not doing any good to Daibochi nor its shareholders.

Recap that the senior management of Daibochi was rewarded with RM4.9 million for making through the acquisition of controlling stakes by Scientex in 2019.

As anti_colonialists and Investor420 seem to be speaking for Scientex, can you both please reveal to us how much reward will be paid to the senior management of Daibochi or parties in concert for making this privatisation deal through?

Please make sure any of such reward money should come from Scientex, and not charged to the accounts of Daibochi. It is a complete waste of money and time to Daibochi for such a non-sense privatisation offer to appear and drag on.

As shareholoders of Daibochi, we would be grateful for Scientex to withdraw its offer soonest and maintain the listing status of Daibochi.

No shareholder here needs Mr. Lim to bail out. Daibochi was doing just fine without Scientex offering to privatise it.

I am not sure what your intention here is. I am just a minority shareholder of Daibochi and have been tracking this great company for years. Apollo does not need to place any mole here to sway investors' opinion, the fund is in good hands of Claire who had invested in Daibochi way before Scientex started big on its stretchable film business.

I just want to stay invested in Daibochi and ride on its expansion plan. Scientex is trying to get everyoeg off the plane with such a below-par offer. I cannot possibly influence other big investors by posting some comments here. The fact is that many others feel the same way as me, and not selling at this unfair offer price. As I write, some other big investors are queuing big buy volumes at RM2.71. I wish I had the capital to buy so much.



Posted by anti_colonialists > Sep 29, 2021 9:55 PM | Report Abuse

@dragon328, since you said "nobody is saying Mr. Lim cheating his shareholders", then is it possible that Mr. Lim is bailing out shareholders and trying to bring a win-win deal? As @Investor420 said "I believe under PJ Lim, it’s for the greater good, or Scientex wouldn’t have this run for the past 20 years".

The difference between both of your opinions, one seeing the world with broken lens and being taken for a ride, the other a level headed investor that trusts in a 20 year performance.

Back to Daibochi profit, how did RM20 million extra profit appear magically? @dragon328, your post trying to discredit @Investor420, saying there was no improvement under Scientex, does not make sense, and raises a question similar to @Investmon's concern of moles.

Are you one of Apollo's hired moles trying to create negative stories to sway the opinion of shareholders?

As observatory correctly pointed out, the increase in revenue and profits of Daibochi from 1QFY2020 onwards was clearly from the contribution of MPP acquired in August 2019.

A summary of Daibochi financials is listed below:

Quarter Revenue EBITDA Net Profit (RM million)
1Q2018 104.7 12.6 6.4
2Q2018 106.4 12.8 6.8
3Q2018 109.2 10.8 7.9
4Q2018 110.5 8.1 4.3
5Q2019 110.8 9.5 4.3
7Q2019(Jul) 123.3 12.1 7.6 (4 months as FY changed to July)
1Q2020 152.6 22.3 11.8 (first quarter after MPP)
2Q2020 159.0 26.4 14.6
3Q2020 152.0 22.5 11.9
4Q2020 155.8 23.6 15.2
1Q2021 156.7 23.3 12.8
2Q2021
3Q2021 150.1 18.9 10.3
4Q2021 133.7 10.9 8.9

In a note after the acquisition of MPP, the management indicated that Daibochi revenue was expected to increase to RM600 million and EBITDA to RM70 million within 1 year of integrating MPP. Credits to the management to have achieved what was indicated in Aug 2019. Possibly some credits to Scientex too as a big brother backer to Daibochi for this acquisition.

MPP financials were not bad with revenue of RM131.7m and net profit of RM7.0m in 2018, and revenue of RM128.8m and net profit of RM7.8m in 2017. The revenue increase for Daibochi from RM430.8m in FY2018 to RM619.4m in FY2020 was RM188.6m, way higher than the normal annual revenue of MPP before integration. EBITDA jumped by a larger quantum of 114% from RM44.3m in FY2018 to RM94.8m in FY2020 simply shows the cost synergies from integration (in areas such as bulk purchase of raw materials and sharing of marketing and distribution costs as per CIMB analyst report on 26 Sep 2019).

CIMN analyst then Ivy Ng in her report on Daibochi 7Q2019 quarterly results reported that since Scientex took over in Mar 2019, Daibochi management has managed to reduce inventory from RM93.9m in end Mar 2019 to RM62.4m as at end July 2019. That was probably one area where Scientex has helped Daibochi to improve on its working capitals.

In the same report, Ivy NG reported that Daibochi had been working with a domestic MNC F&B company on environmentally firendly packaging materials that do not use polyester. Then she reported on 6 Dec 2019 that Daibochi had commercialised its first sustainable mono-material laminate packaging material (MNL) for a major domestic beverage customer in Q1FY2020. Daibochi started using this new 3-layer MNL (polypropylene-based) compared to the earlier complex 5-layer structure and expected to secure more customers using this new MNL material by 4QFY2020. To me this is good reporting by Ivy Ng and good efforts by the management to develop new environmental friendly products.

Now, anti_colonialists, please highlight to me where else Scientex has possibly helped Daibochi to improve on its performance.

CIMB analyst Nigel Foo in his report dated 15 May 2019 reported management as saying that the potential synergies to be derived from integration into Scientex are:
1) lower material costs due to economy of scales and central buying at Scientex
2) improved efficieny at Daibochi's two factories in Ayer Keroh and Jasin Melaka, and
3) reduction in wastages at Daibochi's factories

Looking at the declining EBITDA margin of Daibochi in its quarterly results from Q1FY2020 to Q4FY2021, I do not see much cost saving in raw material procurement with Scientex, nor improved efficiency at its factories. Please prove us wrong here.




Posted by anti_colonialists > Sep 29, 2021 9:55 PM | Report Abuse

Agree with @Investor420 that Daibochi performance improved a lot under Scientex.

I am just an observer here to enjoy good argument. @dragon328 claimed "I do not really see any improvement in Daibochi operations since Scientex took over control in 2019." Your claim doesn't make sense.

Beg to differ. For 5 years, 2013 to 2017, Daibochi profit gone no where up and down RM23 million to RM27 million. No growth for 5 years! After Scientex came in, look, net profit now consistently RM47 million for 2 years!.

In other words, Scientex took a 0 growth company, gave shareholders 70% net profit growth in 1 year. Now offer to buy over at much higher than original 2019 offer. Offer price is also around highest price for last 1 year.

Haha his image is already tarnished anyway.

I thought he was pretty sure of no revised offer from Scientex when reading the headlines of his report, until I saw this sentence.

I am afraid he might need to shoot a bullet on his own foot again in 2 weeks time.

I am pretty sure now Scientex will revise up the offer price as it will not be contented with just additional 5%-7% stakes from this privatisation exercise. I remember Scientex did offer the offer price of RM1.60 for months after it acquired the controlling block from Daibochi's original major shareholder but did not receive much acceptance. Would it want to go through the same long but unfruitful process again for another few months?

It will be disruptive to the daily operations and expansion efforts of Daibochi while such a privatisation attempt is prolonged.

@observatory, well said about the liquidity issue below.

I agree with you that it will not make any difference in terms of liquidity for retail investors of Daibochi even Scientex raises its stakes to 70% by end of the offer period, compared to a stake of 61.88% before the offer.

I do not mind for Scientex to raise its stakes in Daibochi as much as it likes but I just hope that it will maintain the listing status of Daibochi even with 25% - 30% free floats. After the offer period ends, Scientex please withdraw the privatisation offer and let the market decides the fair value of Daibochi.

If it drops back to RM2.20-2.30 level, then everybody including Scientex would be free to add more positions. If it goes past RM3.00 then it simply indicates the worth of Daibochi and makes many shareholders (including Scientex that will have higher stakes then) happy.



Supporting Scientex's offer, the report has added warning that "Even if Scientex does not manage to attain 90% of Daibochi’s shares, the former will not look to comply with Bursa Malaysia’s public shareholding spread, and investors could be stuck with illiquid shares"
(Note: Low liquidity concerns are more for the institution clients. Typical retail investors don't hold millions of shares and therefore can get in/ out without moving the share price)

But the analyst failed to notice that after two weeks of offer, until yesterday Scientex only managed to get a miserable 4.47% shares, increasing its holding from 61.88% to a mere 66.35%.

Besides, if the analyst is concerned about the low liquidity, why would he has recommend a buy call just three months ago while the public float only differ by a few percent?

As I expected, CIMB analyst lowered its target price for Daibochi to RM2.70 very conveniently in his update report on Q4 results.

However, what bewilders me is his change of stand from a supposingly neutral position to a strong advice for investors to take the offer from Scientex. What has changed in Daibochi's fundamentals in past few weeks that renders a drastic change in his recommendation from a high conviction Buy call to an Accept Offer call? It is a big slap on his own face. If Scientex raises the offer price next week, would he change his projections and target price again?

He did not bother analsying the drop in EBITDA margin nor updating the cash flow projections with latest capex spent, but just the easy route of asking clients to accept the offer. Lazy fellow.

Nobody is saying Mr. Lim cheating his shareholders. It is in fact a remarkable achievement of him building up Scientex in the past 20 years.

The key point here is that the privatisation offer price is too low and not fair to Daibochi shareholders. Time will tell if Scientex will succeed in this privatisation exercise, but looking at the declining volumes of shares it managed to gather from the open market in past few days, I expect it to fail.

The fact that other funds like Apollo and Samarang are increasing their stakes in Daibochi at and beyond RM2.70 simply shows the increasing difficulty of Scientex getting even close to 90% stakes at this price.

To me, if Mr. Lim sees good value and potential of Daibochi, he should revise up the offer price to a better valuation of RM3.00-3.30 level to get to a win-win situation with the stakeholders. If funds like Apollo and Samarang are willing to part with their long term holdings of Daibochi shares, then he will know he has got a fair valuation.

In running the business over long term, he cannot win it all. He will not be able to grow the company if there are many dissenting shareholders and management personnel at the subsidiaries. He should be using the might of Scientex to help Daibochi in negotiating good deals with its MNC customers, and not taking advantage over minority shareholders.

I do not really see any improvement in Daibochi operations since Scientex took over control in 2019. @Investor420, please highlight the areas of improvement to us.

Quarterly revenue has been around RM150 million in past few quarters and EBITDA margin around 12%-13% since 2019, dropping to just 10% in the latest Q4. Scientex has been supplying the raw materials to Daibochi before and after it acquired a controlling stake in the latter, but we do not see much synergy nor cost savings achieved by Daibochi since 2019, some more incurring forex loss over RM2.3 million in this Q4.

If you are a shareholder of Scientex, you will naturally argue that the privatisation offer is good and strategic for Scientex. But how would it be more strategic for Scientex in wanting to own 100% rather than 62%?

If Scientex is not able to improve Daibochi financial performance while owning 62% of its stakes, what difference would it make by owning 100%?

It would be good for Scientex only if Mr. Lim sees huge potential in Daibochi itself and the privatisation offer at RM2.70 per share would be earnings accretive to Scientex.

We do not dispute the great stewardship of Mr. Lim in making Scientex a successful company. But we just hope that in driving the success of Scientex, he does not undermine the value of its subsidiary and the effort of the management team, as well as creating many dissenting shareholders. It is not good for Scientex and Daibochi in the long run.



Posted by Investor420 > Sep 28, 2021 5:13 PM | Report Abuse

Lol, so much fuss within the ikan bilis here, just sell daibochi and switch to Scientex, then you own full daibochi and Scientex. The funds will have liquidity issue to swap but not you for you all. Pretty sure the idea behind the privatization is more strategic rather playing the cronies privatize low, relist high trick. All of you here arguing to have a higher valuation seems the be the petty one imo.

Expect CIMB to lower its target price for Daibochi further to RM2.70 or below tomorrow after this "managedly" poor quarterly result.

The idea is to encourage more retailers to sell their shares to Scientex at RM2.70 but I do not see any big panicked selling yet.

It came as no surprise that Daibochi did not declare a final dividend. Naturally it will keep all the cash until Scientex accumulates enough of its shares and its capex plan is complete.


Posted by Syndicates > Sep 28, 2021 1:19 PM | Report Abuse

where is your promised at least 30% of income as dividend?

As expected Daibochi reported a poor Q4 result but it is not as bad as feared. Revenue dropped about 10% q-on-q and gross profit fell by a larger percentage.

Adding back depreciation & amortisation of RM6.2m and forex loss of RM2.3m, EBITDA was not too bad at RM13.6 million though EBITDA margin still dropped from typical 12%-13% to 10%.

Post-tax operating cash flows for the whole year was still commendable for a wash-out year at about RM70 million before working capital changes and capex. Capex spent plus deposits made totalled RM64 million, about 2/3 of its planned RM100m expansion.

The ongoing privatisation attempt by Scientex may have disrupted Daibochi's operations and expansion plan, in the way that the target company might not be allowed to show any big improvement in cost optimisation (raw material supply by Scientex, forex management, etc.) and be forced to push back any expansion effort in acquiring new customers. If this privatisation offer drags on for another few months, then we can reasonably expect the Q1 FY2022 result of Daibochi to be muted as well.

It is a solid company with earnings growth and margin expansion over next few quarters as more economic sectors reopen and cost optimisation efforts continue to bear fruits.

Maintain my first target price at RM7.00 which may be achieved by year end as more analysts upgrade and more fund managers see value in this counter as its market cap exceeds RM800 million.

Perhaps I will go and grab a copy of The Edge tomorrow just to see this article if you say it is a more balanced reporting.

Anyway looking at the drying volumes in past 2 days, I do not think Scientex will even get its stakes in Daibochi up to 75% by the end of the 21 day offer period.

Will continue sitting pretty to wait for Daibochi next quarterly results (not much to expect from the July one but Oct one will look interesting) and the next move of Scientex after it fails in its illy-planned privatisation attempt.

Good observation.

Scientex is stuck for now with <70% stakes in Daibochi. What is it going to do next?

I think we will have to wait till Daibochi quarterly result is out next week to gauge what will happen next.

I maintain my projections that DKSH should reach RM7.00 in 6 months and even RM10.00 in blue sky scenarios within 2 years.

With major shareholders holding over 75% stakes, DKSH is itself a prime target for privatisation. Pegging a FY2021 PER of 10x, I expect a take-over price not less than RM6.00. DCF based valuation would take it to beyond RM7.00 for any meaningful acceptance.

No stock can keep rising forever. I did warn before that DKSH had risen too fast after the result announcement and profit taking would take place soon.

DKSH had risen for 10 days or so from RM3.00 to a peak of RM4.85 with total traded volume in excess of 15 million shares in the 2-week period. It then goes on a profit taking phase that runs into its 11th day now with about 5 million shares traded so far.

It is normal for a stock to give up 50% to 68% of the gain especially the gain was achieved within a short period of time. I see support levels at RM3.90 then stronger one at RM3.60.

Nothing has changed in its fundamentals, it is just that profit taking is flushing out weak holders who are impatient enough to hold for 2-6 months and enticed to take quick profit after the recent strong gains.

wow such a good bargain to load up more. A happy day indeed.

@observatory, thanks for the article by Claire Barnes of Apollo. It clearly reinforces our view that Scientex's offer price is too low.

"It has chosen to attempt privatisation, not by offering a compelling price to encourage willing sellers, but by emphasizing that companies can be delisted and it would do nothing to prevent this - although with this offer it seems unlikely to reach the level of voluntary acceptance required for compulsory acquisition. Fear can feed on itself, so investors should not relay uncritically the storyline that delisting is inevitable.¹ "

@Multibagger, many thanks for the extracts from the Notice of Offer.

Typically takeover offfers have provisions for revising the offer price. It does not make sense to keep the offer for too long if it has become clear that the offer price is too low with most retail investors not selling but other substantial shareholders adding their positions, i.e. the offeror will fail anyway.

Scientex should either raise the offer price and wrap up the privatisation soonest or just withdraw the takeover offer and let the market to determine the fair value of Daibochi share price. If it drops back then everyone is free to add position to participate in its long term growth prospects. If it rises then it is again free market movement to determine how high it is worth then.

I do not bother buying or reading The Edge Weekly journals anymore as I find most of the articles inside are just recycled materials from here and there, same as equity analysts from Kenanga and CIMB.

Why use a EV/EBITDA multiple of 12x?? bcoz it fits well into Scientex's offer price mah.

The big boy is exercising its muscles onto equity analysts and now even investment journalists to help swaying retail investors to sell off Daibochi to them at the offer price.

Actually all these are totally unnecessary small tricks, getting analysts to produce reports to their advantage. Nowadays even small retail investors are knowledgable enough to be able to tell which analyst's report is unbiased and which one is just made up to suit the big boy.

What Scientex ought to do is just raise the offer price to a more reasonable level eg. RM3.30 then it would get the provatisation done in 2 weeks and get back to real work in improving the company operations, rather than spending endless time trying to take advantage of retail investors with all these trivial little tricks with analysts and media. It will earn no respect from all parties and end up in vain.

Just look up to KLK move - just offer a good fair price once and got control of IJM Plantation within a month, now reaping the full benefits of high palm oil prices from all the plantation output of IJM Plantation by integrating it early with KLK's own operations. As an industry leader, KLK boss truly shows the color of a statesmanship and has earned respects of many from this take-over exercise.

Scientex as an industry leader too in the plastic packaging industry should not be distracted by any unnecessary corporate hiccups that may drag out for months, which would tarnish its reputation and make it lose confidence from even Daibochi's own management / founder and long term investors by undermining the valuation of the latter. Any such prolonged privatisation exercise will surely affect the smooth operation of Daibochi management in completing its expansion plan and efforts in getting more international customers.

I strongly advocate for Scientex to raise the offer price immediately, not after this 21 day offer period, to above RM3.00 for Daibochi mother shares and RM0.60 for daibochi-wb and get this exercise out of the way asap so that Daibochi could focus on its expansion plans and deliver more values to its shareholders.

As to what small investors like us can do now, I suggest just holding on to what we have. We have time to monitor the situation in coming days to see how many more shares of Daibochi will be mopped by Scientex and other substantial shareholders. We can decide on the last day of offer if we want to sell our holdings in the open market at RM2.70 and RM0.32.

As we can see now, other big players have crowded off Scientex in the buy orders at RM2.70 for mother and RM0.32 for wb, with more desperate ones nimbling at RM2.71 and RM0.325 forcing Scientex nothing much to do about.

I do not expect this upcoming July quarterly result of Daibochi to be exceptionally good, as Scientex privatisation effort is going on.

But I also do not think that they could alter the results too much just to suit into the ongoing privatisation effort.

Key things to look out for in the upcoming results will be any revenue growth and additional capex spent to gauge the management effort to get more customers for its new capacity and the ongoing capex plan of RM100m to raise capacity by 60%.

NO need to read too much into this qtrly earnings which might be easily skewed to fit major shareholders' purposes.

Daibochi is about to jump on a new growth phase having spent half of the planned RM100m capex expansion to increase capacity by 60%. Its share price and earnings have yet to reflect on this potential.

What Scientex is doing effectively force all minority shareholders to get off the plane before it takes off. Minority shareholders of Daibochi have been waiting for over 2 years since its acquisition of Mega Printing & Packaging in May 2019 to see the synergies and earnings growth that have yet to materialise.

This year is supposed to be the year of reckoning after spending RM125m for acquiring MPP and another RM100m on expansion. Scientex knows it very well so it is taking the advantage of weak share prices in August after a weak April qtrly result to launch the take over.

If the offer price is reasonably high above RM3.00 then it would have been a little reward for minority shareholders of Daibochi for approving the MPP acquisition and the huge capex expansion before seeing the growth in earnings and share price. But the low offer price basically deprives off the benefits of explosive earnings growth and share price appreciation of Daibochi from its minority shareholders.

Just look at DKSH. Had DKSH Gmhb the parent company who owns over 70% of the listed entity in Bursa made a privatisation offer at say RM3.60 per share of DKSH (which was trading at about RM3.00) before the announcement of June qtrly result, the minority shareholders of DKSH would have been deprived of the huge share price gain of DKSH after the June qtrly result announcement, which shot up to as high as RM4.85 . Minority shareholders of DKSH had been waiting for over 2 years since its acquisition of Auric Pacific Singapore in 2019 for close to RM500m to release the benefits of the expansion, and now we can see and reap the benefits of holding onto DKSH shares. DKSH is rewarding shareholders with much higher dividends. I would like to see similar case in holding onto Daibochi shares.

The warrant is always a cheaper option to owning mother shares, especially so when Daibochi just crossed the exercise price of RM2.50. Before the privatisation offer by Scientex, my thought was that the risk-and-award of holding Daibochi-wb at 13-15 sen a piece was so much skewed to the upside thinking that Daibochi would be reporting growing earnings in the coming quarters after the capex expansion plan and its Mymnmar plant had returned to operations after workers' strike.

Daibochi would easily test RM2.80-3.00 if this July quarterly result or latest the Oct qtrly shows improvement in additional revenue and earnings growth, just like the case of TGuan and BPplas. Daibochi-wb would be worth at least 30-50 sen without any premium then.

Now this provatisation offer at RM2.70 makes the situation a little trickier. I agree with observatory that there is more of an element of gamble in betting on the warrant rather than mother share. The risk for wb would be for it to drop back to 20 sen or below if Scientex succeeds in privatising Dabochi at RM2.70 or withdraw the offer.

However, when I saw the huge buying orders of over 60 million (far exceeds the total issued shares of 27 million wb) at O.305-0.315, it strikes me that more funds or big players see the opportunity of loading up daibochi-wb as a much cheaper entry to blocking the privatisation effort of Scientex at unreasonable price. As Scientex owns very little (<5% stakes) of daibochi-wb, it opens up opportunities to other funds like Appollo or Samarang to raise stakes in Daibochi by up to 25m or 8% stakes at just 1/9th of the cost of buying the mother shares. They can decide to convert the warrants into ordinary shares as and when required. This is a very capital effective way of blocking Scientex from gathering 90% of the shares it did not own prior to the offer to force a mandatory take-over. These long term funds would not bother much if Daibochi is delisted or not, as they have representative at the company level and would continue getting dividends from Daibochi even unlisted. What they do not want to see is for them to forcefully part with their Daibochi stakes at RM2.70 when Scientex gathers 97.2% ownership of Daibochi.

Those funds holding less than 3% stakes in Daibochi would want to protect their own interests by loading up more wb at a fraction of the cost, so that they do not need to depend on other funds holding more to fight off the low-priced privatisation. If Scientex succeeds, they will not lose by selling all their warrants to Scientex at 32 sen. If Scientex raises offer price to RM3.00 or higher, they make a lot of money from buying wb itself besides getting higher price for their mother stakes. This is the war art of defending by attacking first.

The fact that the buy orders far exceed the total issued shares of wb only shows that there were more than one fund trying to load up the warrants. If volume traded dries up in coming days, it will make them and Scientex more desperate to buy up.

Conclusion is that holding daibochi-wb may have a low risk of dropping back to 20 sen but a higher chance of getting the upside to 62 sen or even 90 sen! It is 30% downside vs 100% - 200% upside. The choice is yours.

Well said, observatory.

Everyday in the past few days, there were over 10m shares of buy orders for Daibochi at 2.68-2.69 and over 60m shares of buy orders for Daibochi-WB at 0.310-0.315. This clearly shows that more funds and big players are trying to grab shares of Daibochi and wb other than Scientex. Scientex will need to eat up shares beyond RM2.70 and wb beyond RM0.32 in order to gather more shares or raise the offer price later to succeed in this privatisation effort.


Posted by observatory > Sep 16, 2021 11:45 AM | Report Abuse

It's up to individual investor's choice. But if you believe it's undervalued, you can have the choice of staying for Scientex to come up with a fair offer later, or staying invested as if nothing has happened.

Of course, as @iknownuts pointed out, there is also the choice of further investing alongside Scientex by topping up at RM2.69 now. I just did that albeit in a small way. The privatization by Scientex has now cleared my remaining uncertainty of Daibochi's value. It will be nice if Scientex offer to buy my stake back at a higher price later. Else I just grow with the company.

The key is, as explained in the previous discussion, it's will be difficult for Scientex to secure 90% with a mere RM2.70 offer. Even assuming they reach 90%, Scientex is still obliged to acquire the remaining shares at RM2.70. The downside is limited for me.

It's misleading to compare Daibochi with CCB on what could happen if privatization fails. Prior to Jardine first announcement in 2020, CCB share price has been declining for years to about RM1.2. CCB is also loss making. Its prospect is bleak after losing the wholesale distributorship of Mercedes Benz vehicles. Yet even CCB could see its share price bid up to 150% higher. Despite the failed privatization, the latest price is still at RM2.2 which is more than 80% higher than 2020 price.

Now compare with Daibochi -- 15 years of non interrupted quarterly profit; CAGR of net profit at about 10% in the last 10 years; growth picking up in the last 5 years (check out annual report); and RM100 million for 60% capacity expansion in FY20-21 is about to bear fruits. With or without the privatization offer the earning prospect is as good as before. Over time share price will follow earnings.

Besides the mere RM2.70 offer has reduced whatever little downside of a failed privatization. Assuming the exercise fails, the share price probably retreats to pre-offer time of about RM2.4. This was the level Samarang topped up in Apr.

One key difference is now investors know that Scientex wants to get the whole pie for itself at RM2.70. When price drops back to RM2.4 what should a rational investor do?

Glad to see TA Securities appointed as independent advisor by Daibochi for this privatisation offer, and not CIMB Securities who happens to have this analyst with weak conviction and no confidence in what himself was writing before the offer.


Posted by dragon328 > Sep 15, 2021 12:24 AM | Report Abuse X

An analyst may have many considerations, self interests is one, priviledged cliets' demand is another. He was the only equity analyst covering this stock (maybe another one from MIDF but I have not seen any update from MIDF yet) and should have been well aware of the sensitivitiy of his revised target price.

He raised the tp for Daibochi by 52% from RM2.66 to RM4.04 on 18 Sept 2020 "due to its rousing growth potential after its capacity expansion". After Daibochi reported a weak Q3 result on 23 June 2021, he then lowered the tp by only 5% to RM3.83, admitting that he should have been aware that workers' strike in Mymnmar would be a drag on its sales. What has since changed on Daibochi fundamentals that makes him cutting tp by 28% to RM2.75? Just because Scientex made a low priced offer, he has to throw away all his own assumptions and projections to get inline with the offer or what markets perceive it to be? What kind of professionalism is that?

What you can do is to hold on to your Daibochi shares and not to sell it to Scientex at RM2.69 at open market. Scientex has managed to collect over 7 million shares of Daibochi mother shares on Day 1 of privatisation offer and less than 1 million on Day 2. It will be a long long way before Scientex can collect 60 million to cross 90% stakes for delisting.

I am confident Scientex will not succeed in this privatisation effort at RM2.70 offer price. It will have to raise it to over RM3.00 later on if it is not able to collect enough from the open market and acceptance from retail investors. I do not expect the funds holding Daibochi will accept the offer at 2.70.

It is understandable for Scientex to make the first offer at a low price so that it can collect as much as possible at 2.69-2.70 in the open market during this 21 day offer period, knowing very well that the offer price is too low and will not gather much acceptance. It is in fact very smart of Scientex to make this offer with every 1% extra shares gathered at 2.69-2.70 saving at least RM1.0 million of privatisation costs.

I reckon that Scientex will need to raise the offer price to RM3.30 for Daibochi mother share and RM0.90 for Daibochi-WB for funds and more retail investors to bite.

It has about 62% stakes of Daibochi before the offer and has gathered close to 8 million shares in first 2 days of privatisation offer. I estimate that Scientex may be able to get some 15-20 million shares from the open market during the 21 day offer period, which will bring its stakes to 68-70%.

To get another 20% stakes or 66 million shares, Scientex would just need to spend extra RM39 million to raise the offer price to RM3.30 and complete this exercise in 2 weeks. Scientex would get this money back from this extra 28% stakes of Daibochi in few months just from the strong operating cash flows of the latter. What for to drag it months or years with low liquidity and non-compliance of listing requirements?

Just be a bit more generous in the offer price and it will save a lot of time and distress, also gaining trust and applaud from Daibochi's management and shareholders as well as Scientex's own public shareholders (for fast and determined corporate exercise by Scientex and not dragging things for months/years on petty valuation issues).