We believe the best case for MAS is to maintain its listed status and undergo a restructuring exercise to boost yields and improve productivity, while trimming its sizeable workforce. With news reports hinting of an imminent restructuring and an emphasis on productivity, this bodes well for the airline in the long term. We upgrade the stock to NEUTRAL, with an unchanged FV of MYR0.19.
Key Highlights
Negative news flow dampens outlook. Negative media news flow on MAS has intensified of late, sparked by comments made by Government officials that it may be too late to save the national carrier, although this was subsequently denied. This follows huge losses of MYR1.2bn made in FY13, and more recently another sizeable loss of MYR448m in 1QFY14. Compounding the financial problem is the tragic disappearance of MAS’ Flight MH370 on 8 March 2014, which has significantly tarnished the carrier’s reputation.
What went wrong? MAS underwent a route rationalisation exercise back in 2012, cutting capacity by as much as 8.3% y-o-y, as measured by available service kilometer (ASK). The move helped the airline reduce its losses to MYR433m in 2012 from MYR2.5bn in the previous year. MAS’ route rationalisation has allowed it to optimise its fleet and boost its underlying yield up by 4.5% y-o-y. While overall revenue inched down 2.7% y-o-y due to reduced capacity, this was offset by cost reductions stemming from the route cuts, which to some degree, also cut fuel, leasing, maintenance and handling costs. During the same year, MAS saw its cash burn from operating cash flow reduced to MYR305m from MYR597m. But what did MAS do differently in 2013?
In 2013, MAS adopted a more aggressive approach by expanding its capacity 17% yo-y to 59.9m ASK. It had committed to a number of aircraft deliveries and at the same time entered into the oneworld alliance. This gave the carrier some optimism that it was timely to increase its capacity. Besides MAS, its competitors were also expanding, such as AirAsia X (AAX MK, NEUTRAL, FV: MYR0.70), AirAsia (AIRA MK, BUY, FV: MYR2.78) and the newcomer Malindo Air, which commenced operations in late March 2013. Despite the capacity increase, MAS succeeded in optimising its route network and reducing airport turnaround time, thanks to the feeder traffic from its oneworld alliance. This pushed the utilisation rates of its widebody aircraft to 14 hours (from 13 hours) and narrow-body aircraft to 11 hours (from 9 hours).
However, the carrier’s aggressive capacity expansion forced it to cut its airfares aggressively in an attempt to boost loads to achieve the desired economies of scale.Although overall unit costs (based on available tonnes capacity measurement, or ATK) improved by 1.4% y-o-y on a larger capacity base, this was outweighed by adrop in overall yields of 1.8% y-o-y , thus ballooning the losses to MYR1.2bn in FY13 from MYR433m in the previous year.
Had MAS maintained its fleet size with unchanged yields, would it have suffered a worse fate? What went wrong? We work out the numbers below on how it would have been for MAS had it maintained its yields, at the expense of a much lower load factor given higher airfares.
Our analysis above suggests that the decline in yields was one of the culprits behindthe company’s losses in FY13, other than its bloated cost structure. Had the yields been maintained, the downside to earnings would have been lesser. In this scenario, we estimate that losses would have been lower at MYR1.1bn, compared with the reported net loss of MYR1.2bn the carrier incurred last year. Furthermore, had there been more efforts in cutting costs, MAS’ bottomline would not have been as bad.
Challenging times. Further compounding its already dire situation was the recenttragedy of missing Flight MH370. Management acknowledged that it will be an uphill battle for MAS to turn a profit after the incident, especially during the weaker travel period in 2Q and 3Q.
Since the incident, the number of passengers from China has dropped significantly partly due to a boycott, which forced MAS to cancel some of its flights and deploy its aircraft elsewhere. While we see this as a temporary setback, with the profit drag reducing cash for its working capital, the incident has further raised investors’concerns. Investors had earlier been banking on a recovery in FY14. In addition, the market conditions remain challenging, given the aggressive expansion by its competitors.
After skipping its regular promotional offerings as well as the annual Malaysian Association of Tour & Travel Agents (MATTA) Fair following the flight tragedy, MAS recently rolled out its Malaysia Airlines Travel Fair (MATF), offering passengers up to 50% discounts on its airfares, in an attempt to recoup lost revenue and replenish its depleted forward bookings.
Source: RHB
Chart | Stock Name | Last | Change | Volume |
---|
Created by kiasutrader | Jun 14, 2016
Created by kiasutrader | May 05, 2016
what is vital now is,,give a good VSS PACKAGE to staff...actually the top management should be held responsible,,not the working staffs..for every 10 workers you have one executive or manager.. why so many managers??? very high salary for executives,, but field staffs are not been bothered at all. executives that are just sitting in office are getting technical allowances of rm 3,000.. actually this allowances should go to field technical staffs
2014-06-16 01:33
in the past tony fernandez was interested to come in...but higher management does not like this,,because if tony comes in,,their honeymoon period will be over.. so they went arround brainwashing the field staff n unions, to stop tony from coming in...real stupidity
2014-06-16 01:38
johnny cash
it s too late already, restructuring won t help, better file bankruptcy, n close shop...make sure give a good VSS package to staffs
2014-06-16 01:26