we understand what you are talking , we know what we are doing . no point non stop to force us to accept your points of view . no one can read the future , Jaks problem is not truly a problem , Jaks power plant is real..... no assumption needed ..... the power plant has started operation is real....... do not need an assumption ...... the power plant is generating net cash more than a billion a year for 25 years is real ..... no assumption is need ......... LSS4 has started operation and will generate another 10M yearly stable income is real...... no assumption needed..... Renewalable energy is the new focus of the company is rael .... no assumption ....the company is heading toward the right direction is real.......local business loss is reducing is real .... no assumption is needed ,.........The company is currently in the process of divesting its local business is real ....... no assumption is needed .........share is not determined by TA or FA but good news and sentiment is real ..... no assumption is needed , Jaks has all the prerequsite to generate good news anytime is real...... no assumption is need . you are not a businessman , what you see is crisis not opportunity

your intentions might be noble, but there's always a possibility that you actions could result in unintended harm rather than benefit. Honestly, Jaks is our best informed investment . well before you emerge here , we are already talking about the facts you are talking about now.

have you heard of a saying : it takes 1 or 2 years to learn to talk , but it take a life time to learn to listen

my advice : when you are emotional , take a rest . more you talk your fact , the further the fact run away from you.

never talk to a super man because he can see 30 years ahead but you can't

what is the moral of the story ?

are you a superman or ultra man ?

oh..... i see .... you can see 30 years ahead ......

This your theory or assumption ? If it is your theory , then share trading is not a place to make money because your theory said noone can beat the market . If it is your assumption , then it can be ignore because no one can guarantee your assumption is right or wrong . Learnt ?

What is the moral of a story?

You are what I was 10 years ago . 10 years ago I talked exactly the way you talk now.

Less you talk ,less mistake you make . What more using the present price of 0.19 to tell the future.

What is moral of the story.?

2. Did Aseng talks anything about Jaks . You must be a seeing blind, you did not see uncle seng is conducting a moral education here ?

h Satanic Accuser Johnny and Nasty Uncle DiuNiaSeng are panicking.
Instead of quietly laughing to bank
both daily write tons of stuff praising Jaks but its still 19 sen.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[>>>>>>> you must be a seeing blind . Do you find any DiuNiaSeng here. ?

Your grandfather will slap you

I believe I can not find a another person other than you who dare to talk about the price movement today as a reflection of the future of a company.

You do not even know these basic fact , how dare you to comment which fact is true which is false

3. Not everybody deserve to win big . If you are not deserved, do not try to spread fear to stop the deserve . Doing so will make you more undeserved. This is not only fact but a universal law of karma .

2. Shares trading is sometimes it takes a shorter time to win and sometimes it takes longer. If you can't wait, then let others wait .do not spread fear , your intention might be good but it can also bring more damage than good .

1. If you can not win , let other people win generosity brings wealth

What is the good advice?

EGO IS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN CONSCIENCE

What is the moral of the story?

Why not you say it was 0.17 some days ago ?

John discusses facts straight from the source regarding the focus and future direction. As for your discussions, those facts might be considered historical now, unalterable but valuable for learning to prevent repetition in the future. Please do not spread fear and mislead the readers here with your half baked logic and arguments about facts . We can learn from the past but will never repeat the past's mistake . Understand ?

Felix888

Wow this nenek theory banyak banyak panjang. Copy from ChatGPT ke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. because this nenek is something wrong . in his mind , nobody know about the fact he is talking about . but he doesn't know these fact are too old to worth the time to talk . Nothing will remain unchange forever, this not a fact nenek can accept because if he were to accept , his ego will punish him . but I can assure you no one can escape from this universal fact , after some years when he had grown up , he will talk a fact different from this one . this is fact . not at the level he can not understand , not at the right time , he can not appreciate its reality .

Again you prove Aseng right

You ego indeed more expensive than your conscience.

This is fact
But after some years you are more mature, you change a better you

You conscience is more expensive than your ego

THIS IS FACT .

understand ?

Asengkianjoo

what is the moral of the story ?

Answer : EGO IS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN CONSCIENCE

what is the moral of the story ?

or you mayhave realised your are too insignifant in weight
then , the formula is

DK + GOTYOU = HOLLAND makan aagin

Now do you want to repeat the history ?

DK + JUST88 = HOLLAND makan angin ????

many readers are not new here , they know what I am talking about . TRUTH ! NONE OTHER THAN THE TRUTH !!!!!!

Posted by Just88 > 14 minutes ago | Report Abuse

You did not listen to DK more than 2 years ago and that is where you are now. Now, you don't listen again. Don't blame me later. .........>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. ...............have you forgotten the formula then, 2 years ago

DK + Aseng = HOLLAND makan agin

Posted by Just88 > 7 minutes ago | Report Abuse

By then Jaks is still alive but you are already dead........ rational ?

372 posts

Posted by Just88 > 2 minutes ago | Report Abuse

ALP continued to get his free shares and nothing for you......... if the free share is zero value in the market , he is equally nothing for me and him . so, he must do something , so that he get more , I get less but enough lah for cari makan

look at cypark !!!!! this company has no negative cash flow ? what happed now ? closed shop ? please face the truth . do not mislead people with you half true theory after you had sold all your share . do nothing bad is equally good as doing something good . learnt ?

look AAX , isn't it still in PN 17 ? what had happened now ? based on your theory , it would have closed shop long ago

you are not a business man . you only know how to play with figures . how many time i need to tell you , if a problem that can be solved by money , it is really not a problem . that is why , a business man make million but you make only enough to spend

we are not the same , we are still believing what we are doing is right , becausethe power plant is real , the problem of the squeeze can be solved is real, the company right direction into RE is real . our faith in what we believe is real . not today right , tomorrow wrong and day after right balik? can you claimed you are governed by rational self or emotional self . your answer is as good as mine

do not you were once a strong supporter of Jaks . should I believe what you said after you had made yoursel a confirmed with apper loss turn into real lost . in my eyes, you are more a one want to prove yourself right than to share the truth .

that is basic of his assumption of tomorrow with yesterday fact and data . he had forgotten basic fact that nothing is unchnged in an improving world . his argument sound reasonable but at all true . if not , DK calculation and assumptions would have created thousand of winners NOT thousand of losers still struggling there in the group or outside

Ular, the moral of the story is : today is certainly not a reflection of tomorrow . Tomorrow i want to be more excellent than today . follow Aseng, you are better one tomorrow. follow joyvest , you are what you were 10 years or 20 years or 100 years ago.

what is the moral of the story ?

please do not tell me the answer is" of course again" , please ....

Posted by joyvest > 17 seconds ago | Report Abuse

Anyway, continue your barking and woolfing but dont teach your grandmother how to suxk eggs....>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of course i won't . how can I? by the way , I am curious made you think I will ? you always do it ?

I believe you must be a new hand or newbie in shares market . if not ,your talk would have not reflected you more a copy cat of what other people said than a rational palyer of your ownself

joyvest

In the absence of facts..........,then take a rest lah..... why force yourself to do something that you do not know what you are doing ....assumptions can be used........ NOT always because assumption is something you do not know true or false ... but they must be reasonable and not far fetching......... you can't avoid it can be biased .... because you own emotion is more power than your logic

joyvest

The morale of the story is not to teach your grandmother how to suxk eggs ....>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>. you donot need to see joyvest personally , see the way he talks , you know

you better jangan main ponteng . attend my moral lesson here , if not,........... ( i dare not say , but the consequence is everybody can see clearly)