surely no possibility for peace if Chinese insist on criticising taliban or islam.

like rafizi says it is the role of malays if they want to criticize taliban or islam or not.

it is not the role of chinese to criticise taliban or islam.

whether taliban or islam....................... they have all their strengths and weaknesses.

I DON'T LIKE NGA WHO talks about taliban.............DAP should sack Nga

China media can built a very good and happy country

I like China media

Western media criticise Taliban....China media never criticise taliban

20% still divided becomes irrelevant

Chinese 20% still don't want to be united?

That is dap can unite the Chinese while MCA has failed

Chinese buta buta vote dap is good enough

We vote parties no need bother about candidates and MP

Ular.. politics like stock market..
Focus on big picture can win already....no need small details

Post removed.Why?

I don't Believe Western media

When u criticise Taliban that is because u believe Western media

I like China foreign policy based on win win mutual respect harmony

I have no desire to criticise Afghanistan or taliban

Bob...like Rafizi says non Muslims must not critical of Afghanistan or Islam....it is up to the Malay to do the criticisms

Ilurker is very bad for mutual respect harmony win win very bad for Malaysia

We must not be like Western media only interested to talk bad about China Afghanistan etc

We must practice harmony win win mutual respect

We must see the good things in other people culture religion character

Even Pas is not all negative....the winning character of Pas is that Islam is compassionate

We just need to be China which has good relationship with Afghanistan

We do not need to criticise Islam or Afghanistan

In politics we do not need ilurker...we need Rafizi

Chinese has dap as a vehicle for unity....we can reform dap to be inclusive, win win harmony mutual respect

Ular, it politics not looking for dates, not dating candidates

Let the 3 fronts fight it out. No one is left behind

Malays are 70 % of population...now divided into 3 viable alternative means every thing is equalised

Since MCA has failed to be the vehicle for unity...Chinese need to united with dap

Chinese is 20% of population...united will remain relevant, divided becomes irrelevant

pH is becoming a viable alternative to bn and pn...
That is good for democracy

PN is becoming a viable alternative to bn.....that is a good thing for democracy

Chinese is only 20%, must be united to remain relevant.

since MCA has fail, all need to unite under DAP.

Malays with 70% population divided into 3 fronts.................... every thing now equalised. Very good. Keep it this way.

Chinese is only 20%, must be united to remain relevant.

since MCA has fail, all need to unite under DAP.

Malays with 70% population divided into 3 fronts.................... every thing now equalised. Very good. Keep it this way.

lets bury MCA

https://klse.i3investor.com/web/forum/forum-thread/600835922

political systems takes time to evolve. Political systems in America in america has been around for long long time and is still evolving.

every party, every coalition also need to be more inclusive. When they talk , let it be win win, harmony, mutual respect, love, patriotism. ....no more politics based on hate, lose lose ...................that is if they want national ambition.

Dap also need to be more inclusive. When they talk , let it be win win, harmony, mutual respect, love, patriotism. ....no more politics based on hate, lose lose .

a 3 party system means everyone can find a party/ a coalition according to is own taste, no one is left behind. Its inclusive. let them fight it out.

that means Malaysia is getting more matured democracies.

Malaysia is developing into a political system more like Europe with ever evolving coalitions.

BN era GE 1- GE 13

practically a one party system. That era is over.

ular....its politics not girl friend...............................

Top glove.... impressive

Let's bury MCA