Like it or not.....vivocom is a questionable company.....why am i so sure? Just look at how weak the management team and board of directors of the company behaving.....insider info also can get leaked out so simple.....and got published. It's like ur bank manager telling others abt ur financial banking info and put it for online viewing.

at the meantime.....enjoy these:

TALKS ON THAI-CHINESE RAILWAY HIT SNAGS
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/business/TALKS-ON-THAI-CHINESE-RAILWAY-HIT-SNAGS-30291712.html

Just Say No to High-Speed Rail
http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-07-07/just-say-no-to-high-speed-rail

Japan, China face round 2 in high-speed rail battle
http://asia.nikkei.com/Politics-Economy/International-Relations/Japan-China-face-round-2-in-high-speed-rail-battle

CCCC denies involvement in alleged 1MDB conspiracy
http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/08/01/cccc-denies-involvement-in-alleged-1mdb-conspiracy/

MIDF Research noted that while there is a risk of a slowdown in the construction sector due to policy reversal through the reduction of development expenditures by the governments of Malaysia and/or China, it anticipated a moderate degree of structural risk exposure.

Other risks in the stock include severe depletion in net working capital and structural risks pertain to contract provisions and definition especially on the role as a project management and a sub-contractor as well as the strength of the contractual covenants, such as projects that require specific technical capabilities such as railway engineering (signaling and telecommunication.)

MIDF Research noted that without the strong covenant and contract provision with clients and vendors, Vivocom would face a heightened risk of the vendors and suppliers exiting pre-maturely or unpredictability in supply or services for project execution.

chart showing that it reached fibonacci retracement 50.0% at 0.295 and since it cannot go over it then it is thus falling back down with so many heavy selling queues placed at .29 .295 .300 .............u should see it very clearly without me telling u. Chart doesn't lie..........also insiders selling as well and this is putting more pressure on the selling side to push down

holding onto vivocom shares does not mean it will give u better returns in the long term because the issue of sustainability has to be outlined and explained by the CEO because he alone is the captain to decide the direction of the company and by now Dr Yeoh should be able to tell whether the future earnings is sustainable or not. Why does this targeted RM2 billions orderbooks has to come from Managing Director Mr Choo and not CEO himself? What is the role of a silent CEO in this company? Worth to consider.........

u simply praise and talk good abt vivocom won't do u any good....believe this point. The true imminent risks are the following:

- Lack of diversification of earnings (all based in Malaysia only)
- Insufficient working capitals or cashflow (*Need for funding thru private placements every few months moving forward)
- No track records for railway projects & lower chance at bidding success (*Unlike Gamuda/IJM done Underground tunnels/rails/MRT/LRT and Sunway/Suncon done Bus Rapid Transit)
- Overly relied on one man show CEO Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and CRCC
- Too many scandals and leaked insider info and rumours (*Weak management and corporate governance)

The birth of the vivocom story is rooted in the emergence of CRCC linkages and involvements since only vivocom itself claimed that they are the in-house contractor for CRCC in Malaysia and particularly for those CRCC's projects in M'sia. This is an immediately obvious notion that vivocom is growing on the CRCC backing and the ONE MAN who made it all happened is DS Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and this is called over-reliance. This man has been rumoured to step down as CEO just many weeks ago and how could such crucial news piece can get leaked out and published into a reputable publisher's newspaper TheEdge and not getting any clarification or explanation from TheEdge? This is blasphemy and obviously the insider of this vivocom company is misleading and having weak management or corporate governance. Do u see any of these happened in good or large construction companies like Gamuda, IJM, Sunway/Suncon, WCT, etc.?????

Diversification of earnings is what many construction companies are scrambling to do it nowadays because they know simply relying on projects in m'sia is very risky to their fundamental earnings base.

You must be able to weigh in between the traits and shortcoming of any such company if u are to be serious in it. Otherwise u are simply gambling.

why u campaigning here everyday? got stucked still at very high entry prices? vivocom will only go down in history.......

ktsk88 is full of BS lol...........

ktsk88 is using DoraCuties......busted!

chart showing that it reached fibonacci retracement 50.0% at 0.295 and since it cannot go over it then it is thus falling back down with so many heavy selling queues placed at .29 .295 .300 .............u should see it very clearly without me telling u. Chart doesn't lie..........also insiders selling as well and this is putting more pressure on the selling side to push down

holding onto vivocom shares does not mean it will give u better returns in the long term because the issue of sustainability has to be outlined and explained by the CEO because he alone is the captain to decide the direction of the company and by now Dr Yeoh should be able to tell whether the future earnings is sustainable or not. Why does this targeted RM2 billions orderbooks has to come from Managing Director Mr Choo and not CEO himself? What is the role of a silent CEO in this company? Worth to consider.........

u simply praise and talk good abt vivocom won't do u any good....believe this point. The true imminent risks are the following:

- Lack of diversification of earnings (all based in Malaysia only)
- Insufficient working capitals or cashflow (*Need for funding thru private placements every few months moving forward)
- No track records for railway projects & lower chance at bidding success (*Unlike Gamuda/IJM done Underground tunnels/rails/MRT/LRT and Sunway/Suncon done Bus Rapid Transit)
- Overly relied on one man show CEO Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and CRCC
- Too many scandals and leaked insider info and rumours (*Weak management and corporate governance)

The birth of the vivocom story is rooted in the emergence of CRCC linkages and involvements since only vivocom itself claimed that they are the in-house contractor for CRCC in Malaysia and particularly for those CRCC's projects in M'sia. This is an immediately obvious notion that vivocom is growing on the CRCC backing and the ONE MAN who made it all happened is DS Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and this is called over-reliance. This man has been rumoured to step down as CEO just many weeks ago and how could such crucial news piece can get leaked out and published into a reputable publisher's newspaper TheEdge and not getting any clarification or explanation from TheEdge? This is blasphemy and obviously the insider of this vivocom company is misleading and having weak management or corporate governance. Do u see any of these happened in good or large construction companies like Gamuda, IJM, Sunway/Suncon, WCT, etc.?????

Diversification of earnings is what many construction companies are scrambling to do it nowadays because they know simply relying on projects in m'sia is very risky to their fundamental earnings base.

You must be able to weigh in between the traits and shortcoming of any such company if u are to be serious in it. Otherwise u are simply gambling.

most likely the coming quarter result will be dead disappointing....don put high hope!

lackluster performance by vivocom.....can simply pronounce it dead....dead fish....not worth to look at anymore.....mediocre counter...............

most likely the coming quarter result will be dead disappointing....don put high hope!

lackluster performance by vivocom.....can simply pronounce it dead....dead fish....not worth to look at anymore.....mediocre counter...............

The birth of the vivocom story is rooted in the emergence of CRCC linkages and involvements since only vivocom itself claimed that they are the in-house contractor for CRCC in Malaysia and particularly for those CRCC's projects in M'sia. This is an immediately obvious notion that vivocom is growing on the CRCC backing and the ONE MAN who made it all happened is DS Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and this is called over-reliance. This man has been rumoured to step down as CEO just many weeks ago and how could such crucial news piece can get leaked out and published into a reputable publisher's newspaper TheEdge and not getting any clarification or explanation from TheEdge? This is blasphemy and obviously the insider of this vivocom company is misleading and having weak management or corporate governance. Do u see any of these happened in good or large construction companies like Gamuda, IJM, Sunway/Suncon, WCT, etc.?????

Diversification of earnings is what many construction companies are scrambling to do it nowadays because they know simply relying on projects in m'sia is very risky to their fundamental earnings base.

You must be able to weigh in between the traits and shortcoming of any such company if u are to be serious in it. Otherwise u are simply gambling.

u simply praise and talk good abt vivocom won't do u any good....believe this point. The true imminent risks are the following:

- Lack of diversification of earnings (all based in Malaysia only)
- Insufficient working capitals or cashflow (*Need for funding thru private placements every few months moving forward)
- No track records for railway projects & lower chance at bidding success (*Unlike Gamuda/IJM done Underground tunnels/rails/MRT/LRT and Sunway/Suncon done Bus Rapid Transit)
- Overly relied on one man show CEO Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and CRCC
- Too many scandals and leaked insider info and rumours (*Weak management and corporate governance)

its slowly becoming dried meat under the sun...........finished with its mountains of hopeful growth stories......too good to be true.......sure will hit a snag when the BAD news churned out soon......must be delayed deliveries and escalated costs eating up its own profits, etc.

vivocom has become a dead meat......let it rot under the sun........its growth stories are created to lure ppl into investing in it.....

The birth of the vivocom story is rooted in the emergence of CRCC linkages and involvements since only vivocom itself claimed that they are the in-house contractor for CRCC in Malaysia and particularly for those CRCC's projects in M'sia. This is an immediately obvious notion that vivocom is growing on the CRCC backing and the ONE MAN who made it all happened is DS Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and this is called over-reliance. This man has been rumoured to step down as CEO just many weeks ago and how could such crucial news piece can get leaked out and published into a reputable publisher's newspaper TheEdge and not getting any clarification or explanation from TheEdge? This is blasphemy and obviously the insider of this vivocom company is misleading and having weak management or corporate governance. Do u see any of these happened in good or large construction companies like Gamuda, IJM, Sunway/Suncon, WCT, etc.?????

Diversification of earnings is what many construction companies are scrambling to do it nowadays because they know simply relying on projects in m'sia is very risky to their fundamental earnings base.

You must be able to weigh in between the traits and shortcoming of any such company if u are to be serious in it. Otherwise u are simply gambling.

vivocom is a scandalous company.....from leaking out info regarding its CEO Dr Yeoh's departure to lack of legal actions against those responsible for it......this is totally questionable......

with its share price being stagnant for long period of time....perhaps this is a dead stock already......or worse is that investors are pulling out money from this company........

long timer idiots here still think those other IDs are me.....really naive to think that only me feel bad abt vivocom.......this company is done......ppl jump to others

better not hold onto this counter......won't bring u much luck.........

lackluster performance by vivocom.....can simply pronounce it dead....dead fish....not worth to look at anymore.....mediocre counter...............

buy more lose more.....lelong......

u will see that their both ID have disappeared from the scene but every once in a while they will reappear to mess up ppl's minds here.......still wanna believe in these ktsk88 and Myview losers? Can u trust these 2 losers? Answer is NO.....they everyday been cheerleading in the past because they hope that ppl would buy into vivocom and bail them out......

both cheerleaders ktsk88 and Myview have abandoned vivocom already.....they both jumped to other counters without telling ppl.......u know why? because they both lose faith in vivocom and this is just too painful for them to recoup their current losses which they got stucked at very high prices.

The birth of the vivocom story is rooted in the emergence of CRCC linkages and involvements since only vivocom itself claimed that they are the in-house contractor for CRCC in Malaysia and particularly for those CRCC's projects in M'sia. This is an immediately obvious notion that vivocom is growing on the CRCC backing and the ONE MAN who made it all happened is DS Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and this is called over-reliance. This man has been rumoured to step down as CEO just many weeks ago and how could such crucial news piece can get leaked out and published into a reputable publisher's newspaper TheEdge and not getting any clarification or explanation from TheEdge? This is blasphemy and obviously the insider of this vivocom company is misleading and having weak management or corporate governance. Do u see any of these happened in good or large construction companies like Gamuda, IJM, Sunway/Suncon, WCT, etc.?????

Diversification of earnings is what many construction companies are scrambling to do it nowadays because they know simply relying on projects in m'sia is very risky to their fundamental earnings base.

You must be able to weigh in between the traits and shortcoming of any such company if u are to be serious in it. Otherwise u are simply gambling.

u simply praise and talk good abt vivocom won't do u any good....believe this point. The true imminent risks are the following:

- Lack of diversification of earnings (all based in Malaysia only)
- Insufficient working capitals or cashflow (*Need for funding thru private placements every few months moving forward)
- No track records for railway projects & lower chance at bidding success (*Unlike Gamuda/IJM done Underground tunnels/rails/MRT/LRT and Sunway/Suncon done Bus Rapid Transit)
- Overly relied on one man show CEO Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and CRCC
- Too many scandals and leaked insider info and rumours (*Weak management and corporate governance)

is that all? .295 and .300 still standing ...............

pls use up ur bullets first......i'm waiting too

giv me ur bullet first......last man standing

can cross .295 ? kekekekeke...........

habis beras pulut? quick la lol............

The birth of the vivocom story is rooted in the emergence of CRCC linkages and involvements since only vivocom itself claimed that they are the in-house contractor for CRCC in Malaysia and particularly for those CRCC's projects in M'sia. This is an immediately obvious notion that vivocom is growing on the CRCC backing and the ONE MAN who made it all happened is DS Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and this is called over-reliance. This man has been rumoured to step down as CEO just many weeks ago and how could such crucial news piece can get leaked out and published into a reputable publisher's newspaper TheEdge and not getting any clarification or explanation from TheEdge? This is blasphemy and obviously the insider of this vivocom company is misleading and having weak management or corporate governance. Do u see any of these happened in good or large construction companies like Gamuda, IJM, Sunway/Suncon, WCT, etc.?????

Diversification of earnings is what many construction companies are scrambling to do it nowadays because they know simply relying on projects in m'sia is very risky to their fundamental earnings base.

You must be able to weigh in between the traits and shortcoming of any such company if u are to be serious in it. Otherwise u are simply gambling.

u simply praise and talk good abt vivocom won't do u any good....believe this point. The true imminent risks are the following:

- Lack of diversification of earnings (all based in Malaysia only)
- Insufficient working capitals or cashflow (*Need for funding thru private placements every few months moving forward)
- No track records for railway projects & lower chance at bidding success (*Unlike Gamuda/IJM done Underground tunnels/rails/MRT/LRT and Sunway/Suncon done Bus Rapid Transit)
- Overly relied on one man show CEO Dr Yeoh Seong Mok and CRCC
- Too many scandals and leaked insider info and rumours (*Weak management and corporate governance)

Gandalf says thou shall not cross...........

told everybody that today is FRIDAY.....TGIF......everything everyone must sell out.....no holding no contra no settlement......alll must sell!! because it's a SELL DAY.........SELLING DAY

friendofi3 called himself the "creation" but is a every early morning creation in the toilet bowl.....lol

u are the sinkable one and supposed to be flushed down but u pop-up which is odd and making sounds one.....ever heard of a pooop talks? lol.........

lol yes u are a creation right there in the toilet bowl.....u are re-created everyday morning but u are the not floatable one......lol

people don't want to hold vivocom shares.....employees selling........

China's economic slowdown deepens
http://www.bbc.com/news/37055873

Short position
http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/07/09/short-position/

Defects on SMRT trains 'not safety-critical', to be repaired by manufacturer: LTA
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/defects-on-smrt-trains/2931802.html

holding onto vivocom shares does not mean it will give u better returns in the long term because the issue of sustainability has to be outlined and explained by the CEO because he alone is the captain to decide the direction of the company and by now Dr Yeoh should be able to tell whether the future earnings is sustainable or not. Why does this targeted RM2 billions orderbooks has to come from Managing Director Mr Choo and not CEO himself? What is the role of a silent CEO in this company? Worth to consider.........

vivocom is not a normal counter.........u gonna breaking down gonna start from scratch....shaking off like it's meant to be......moving on

worn out and exhausted......cheerleaders are starting to give up......i can understand....since vivocom is FALLING........