Bosskufanboy u got no profit. U have been here since it was dropping. Stop cheating yourself.

Ryoyagod im not judging anything. Im just asking the Public to view the price historical data, the activity of this forum, and the volume during selloff.

Ryoyagod there Is nothing wrong If I ask the public to check the price historical data. At least they can see, that arbb started dropping even before the RI announcement. Some might even study the volume when the Stock started dropping n How neonstrife, bosskufanboy and maybe yourself were actively promoting the RI n Stock.

Im trying to help the Public to make the right judgement

Please try to understand

Kkl123 it was a good counter for u. But now based on pass records, high chances for it to be a bad counter.

MoUs have limited legal value. Raising money for mou doesnt make Business sense to me.

Neonstrife, arbb is doing Iot Business. They have to be good enough to understand the difference between getting consultants from a university and signing an mou.

I think the probability might rise to 95%

Kkl123, wrong. Based on your logic, with 90% probability arbb is a bad counter now. Why? Because 90% counters fall after RI. With the type of counter like arbb, where the moves are a bit suspicious, eg mou with local universities while claiming IoT experts, 230k per Green house which is exorbitant,

PatienceCounts you have not given any real reasons. Everything said was speculative in nature.

Hoot9eonly lets contribute something more useful for the betterment of others. We should encourage the Public to check the historical data. The Public can view the volume of sell off before RI announcement. They can also view the data after stellar profit announcement. And the immediate volume of sell off

Kkl123, must check the past records. See the movement pattern. Yes the counter spiked Many Times before. But they were traps.

Public invest called buy for perisai and Many more. Moral of the story, dont listen to them.

Hehehe

They may correlate with neonstrife’s, Bosskufanboy’s posts during that time.

Peace99, please check the historical data. Your question came at the right time. Lets get the Public to do their homework. They can view the volume of sell off before RI announcement. They can also view the data after stellar profit announcement. And the immediate volume of sell off

Kkl123, this has got nothing to do with countries. Arbb is just a small counter which hasnt got much attention. Even the substantial shareholders sold it even before RI, erasing 30% of the value.

Anyway Thanks for describing. You may invest in some real Iot companies, that make chips for an example.

So, due to 90% probability of falling. I would buy at much lower price (If I ever to).

Im happy for the thought neonstrife

But sadly, arbb doesnt qualify as a IoT Company. They might be systems integrator the most.

Therefore, Regardless of the subscription rate, the points brought up is still the same, that is,

1) the cost proposed by the company to develop an Iot system for a Green house, is exorbitant. Im not sure who would subscribe for their service then. High cost n MoUs demonstrates that this company doesnt have in house expertise.

2) The value of the Company, with 90% probability, based on the Stock prices of other companies, that used RI as a method to raise more funds, migh drop after RI.

3) therefore, Very unlikely for anyone with a rational mind to subscribe to the RI.

PatienceCounts,

Its undeniable, thaf the counter is approaching something similar to fintec, as per RJ87.

Messers kkl123,

Im happy for the positive thought.

Regardless of the subscription rate, the points brought up is still the same, that is,

1) the cost proposed by the company to develop an Iot system for a Green house, is exorbitant. Im not sure who would subscribe for their service then.

2) The value of the Company, with 90% probability, based on the Stock prices of other companies, that used RI as a method to raise more funds, migh drop after RI.

3) therefore, Very unlikely for anyone with a rational mind to subscribe to the RI.

4) Besides, please compare DNEX clients n arbb’s.

This is based on past records of other counters.

PatienceCounts you should have waited for it to go to 8 cents. U might loose around 30-40% now.

So anyhow you look at this counter, the outcome is still negative.

PatienfeCounts - you may portray that the bosses are going to make great sum by doing manipulation. You might b right. At least u agree that the Public should stay away from such a crooked syndicate.

My objective is clear:
1) to inform the right situation, So that the Public wouldnt be fooled in thinking that this counter has dropped because of the RI and bad sentiment of Bursa. This counter fell before RI and was falling even during the mini bull Market. The drop was significant, which was about 40%.
2) to pass the message to the substantial shareholders, which are also the managers, that they should subscribe the RIs. This would make Them commit in what they are doing. Its only by having sincerity and hardwork, this counter could prospee.

PatienceCounts- the counter has been a slaughter house throughout. The only way is to give the actual picture of How the counter has been falling, which is even before the RI. We should inform others, So that they could make an informed decision. Let the bosses invest in the RI, and make them work harder. This is the only way forward for this counter. With sincerity and hardwork, im sure this counter could flourish too. But If the Public keeps on pouring money, Then it would be a bad News all the time.

Hope my views will make a difference, in helping others in making the right investment choice.

Kkl123, please do not compare DNEX with arbb. DNEX owns silterra. Please go through silterra’s client list and arbb’s client list, before investing into arbb.

Messers PatienceCounts,

Regardless of the subscription rate, the points brought up is still the same, that is,

1) the cost proposed by the company to develop an Iot system for a Green house, is exorbitant. Im not sure who would subscribe for their service then.

2) The value of the Company, with 90% probability, based on the Stock prices of other companies, that used RI as a method to raise more funds, migh drop after RI.

3) therefore, Very unlikely for anyone with a rational mind to subscribe to the RI.

4) Besides, rumours about chinese funds are just temporary spikes. An old trick that hasnt really worked well. The Public is already aware about this.

In my opinion let the bosses invest, ie subscribe to the RI. As most shares drop after RI, it would give the bosses a chance to work harder and prove their sincerity. Plus, the Public would have a chance to invest at much cheaper price.

Messers Ryoyagod,

Lets focus on arbb. Being a Company that has lost a great deal of confidence among Its substantial shareholders even before RI, i think, they should get serious and start working properly. By simply signing MoUs with local universities, arbb is just creating unnecessary suspicion. Arbb should have technical capability and they could hire professors from all over the world, rather than signing unnecessary mous.

RJ87 I just dont want the Public to get conned....

Neonstrife, stop repeating your mistake. Lets contribute something for the betterment of others. Arbb has failed Many. Let the bosses work harder and improve the situation.

I just asked to contribute something more sensible. I dont want the Public to view neonstrife, bosskufanboy, ryoyagod irrelvant spammrrs.

@neonstrife, It would be great If u could contribute something more relevan n useful, If u want ppl to treat more seriously!

Thank you neonstrife for the spam. Would appreciate If u could stop cutting n pasting irrelevant stuff. At the moment the Public needs something more useful for better decision process.

Messers MarcusBioTech,

You answered my questions but I am worried that:

WHY INVESTORS AREN’T THE SAME AS MANAGERS?
Yes Investors are different and arent the sAme as managers. But in this case, dont u think as Potential investors, we are supposed to evaluate the credibility of the figures given by the proponents of the prospective investment opportunity. The figure of 270k is way off for a hydroponic Green House system. Although u may argue that ARBB undergoes strict auditting process as per SC guideline, the question would come to our mind is; Why would a Company pay an exorbitant price, given the availability of cost effective approaches.

Besides, Potential questions that may arise among the investors: Why do u need MoUs with local universities to develop technologies? Isnt ARBB, a well Established IOT company would already have a good team. Yes, you may hire consultants, But Why do u need an MoU?

Yes, One may justify using corporate governance as a safety mechanism, which is more appropriate, but Why would one invest, when he can just Avoid such an organisation. My objective is clear, which is to ask, reasonable questions to add value to investment decision process. I m not trying to influence the day to

As for arbb, let the bosses put in the money. Once dropped, one can buy, If they want.

Thanks neonstrife. U cant deny the truth.

But mr molah, I understand, sometimes Its difficult to accept. A counter that claims to have assets, fell to just 30% of value. A drop of 40% was even before RI.

So If u love your money, dont do it. Plus, even now, sometimes it is around 12/12.5 cents. So u might not even get 12.5 cents.

Molah, by the time u get it, usually the counters will drop much lower. Probabilitistically, based on past records, it will fall below. So Its not a wise move to do.

Hi Messers MarcusBioTech,

You answered my questions but I am worried that:

WHY INVESTORS AREN’T THE SAME AS MANAGERS?
Yes Investors are different and arent the sAme as managers. But in this case, dont u think as Potential investors, we are supposed to evaluate the credibility of the figures given by the proponents of the prospective investment opportunity. The figure of 270k is way off for a hydroponic Green House system. Although u may argue that ARBB undergoes strict auditting process as per SC guideline, the question would come to our mind is; Why would a Company pay an exorbitant price, given the availability of cost effective approaches.

Besides, Potential questions that may arise among the investors: Why do u need MoUs with local universities to develop technologies? Isnt ARBB, a well Established IOT company would already have a good team. Yes, you may hire consultants, But Why do u need an MoU?

Yes, One may justify using corporate governance as a safety mechanism, which is more appropriate, but Why would one invest, when he can just Avoid such an organisation. My objective is clear, which is to ask, reasonable questions to add value to investment decision process. I m not trying to influence the day to day operations.

Marcus- I like your analysis. But, who are their customers? Any ready customer? What are the termination clause? Please advice others the truth.

EastWestTalker: im telling the truth. U cant say the bosses Always win. Sometimes they also loose. This could be a good example.

Moral of the story: big fish dont win all the time.

RJ87, the Boss did a mistake this time. He wanted to con But he got conned.... hehe... subscription barely 10% I think.... never mind he got money. He can Buy at expensive price n sell at cheaper price