Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2019-09-07 14:20 | Report Abuse

Why had NEP failed to reduce poverty rate to below 15%? How much had been spent? Who had benefited the most? Where were points for corruption?

Posted by chinaman > 2019-09-07 14:24 | Report Abuse

always RCI with no end result. all bullshirt rhetoric. Too much wastage, leakage, inefficiency in all civil servants, public serv. even with Pakatun. each time mention reform on pension, sure got high resistance.

Posted by chinaman > 2019-09-07 14:30 | Report Abuse

Pension reform into EPF like private should apply across all level from ministry level, govt. agencies to 1.6 million civil servants. all rhetoric with no end result. there is no strong political will to make it happen. all just Wayang kulit. wakaka

Posted by stockraider > 2019-09-07 16:49 | Report Abuse

MSIA NOT THAT COMPETITIVE, THUS NOT THAT RICH MAH....A 15% PROVERTY RATE IS CONSIDER REASONABLE & ACCEPTABLE LOH....!!

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2019-09-07 16:56 | Report Abuse

Fail to compete because of refusal to

1. support diversity by embracing pluralism, and

2. ensure getting only the people who are not lazy but worthy to deserving positions which are the key to performance

Posted by chinaman > 2019-09-07 18:24 | Report Abuse

Why not MYR be stronger than SGD when it start with SGD-MYR 1 parity last 60 years ago? Why should MY still has high poverty level with abundant resources?

Posted by chinaman > 2019-09-07 18:30 | Report Abuse

pakatun should has the courage, boldness to do real drastic reform. Lest, forever MYR won't reach SGD level. i guess i'm dreaming. wakaka