Good Articles to Share

Kuan Yew on Najib, 1Malaysia and Pakatan

Tan KW
Publish date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013, 12:06 PM
Tan KW
0 502,485
Good.

August 7, 2013

Lee Kuan Yew also opined that when it comes to the crunch, Pakatan Rakyat would not be able to do away with Malay supremacy.

 

 

 

SINGAPORE: Former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew says Malaysia’s race-based policies place the country at a disadvantage.

In excerpts from his newly-launched book titled “One Man’s View of the World” here yesterday, Lee said:”It is voluntarily shrinking the talent pool needed to build the kind of society that makes use of talent from all races.

“They are prepared to lose that talent in order to maintain the dominance of one-race.”

“In recent times, the Malaysian government has been somewhat willing to acknowledge this loss of talent to vibrant cities elsewhere and is making an attempt to lure some overseas Malaysians back.

“But the reality is that these efforts may be too little, too late,” said Lee, who was formerly Minister Mentor, in the book’s  chapter on Malaysia – A Different Path.

Also in the book, Lee said in a globalised world, competitive advantage of a people will increasingly hinge on skills, the brain power and the drive they possess.

“Malaysia is losing ground. It is giving other countries a head start in the external competition.

“In the aftermath of the 2008 general election, there was strong sense among some quarters in Malaysia that the country was on the verge of real change,” he said.

He noted that an opposition that campaigned officially on, among other things, promises to do away with some of the country’s race-based policies surprised even its own supporters with the result it got.

“In terms of votes, it was the opposition’s best result since 1969. In terms of seats, it was the best result ever.

“The government was denied a two-thirds majority,” he said.

Najib’s political realities

A year after the election, Lee noted in his book that when Najib Tun Razak took over as prime minister, he launched a campaign called 1Malaysia to strengthen racial harmony and national unity.

He said Najib brought the 1Malaysia campaign to win back some of the Chinese and Indian votes that his party lost in the 2008 election.

“But has the ground moved with him? Has there been thunderous applause from the Malays at 1Malaysia. It may have been that he (Najib) started with ambitious plans.

“But it appears that political realities may have conscribed his subsequent actions,” Lee said in the book.

Lee said it was impossible for Najib to win the votes from the Chinese and Indians without losing votes from his party’s core supporters – the Malays.

He noted that the 1Malaysia slogan had not lived up to the initial excitement it created.

In his book, Lee said: “When I met with the Chinese press shortly after its launch, they said they had initially reported it as one multiracial Malaysia but were later corrected to report as simply 1Malaysia.”

“In other words, the people share one Malaysia, but the communities remain distinct, as Malays, Chinese and Indians. It still remains to be seen if the campaign can level the playing field for non-bumiputeras in any significant way,” he wrote.

Pakatan an ‘opportunistic adhoc’ group

In the book, Lee also said that if those counting on 1Malaysia to usher in a new era for race relations were being unrealistic than those counting on the opposition to do the same someday very much less so.

To begin with, Lee said the opposition coalition coming to power in the near future was a very long shot indeed.

But even if it were to happen, he said the chances of it getting rid of Malay special treatment were next to nothing.

To understand this, Lee said one had to examine closely the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition.

This, he said, was  an opportunistic and adhoc group not held together by even a vaguely coherent set of ideas but by a common desire to unseat the government.

“As long as it does not actually hold the reins of the federal government and therefore does not have to implement the said multiracial policies, some semblance of unity can be maintained.

When it comes to the crunch, Lee said, Pakatan would not be able to do away with Malay supremcy.

“The moment the bluff is called and it is handed the full power to push ahead, it will either be torn apart within or be paralysed by indecision.”

Published by Straits Times Press, the book publishing unit of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) Ltd, the 400-page volume conveys Lee’s views on the future of the major powers and regions of the world.

Bernama

 

 

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 9 of 11 comments

KC Loh

LKY will be waiting for backlash from UMNO and the youth especially. Then will be softened by increased bilateral ties, and soon with more MOUs and agreement signed, all to Singapore's advantage! brilliant man, this LKY!

2013-08-07 13:41

KC Loh

Iskandar is sort of a compromise. Singapore needs space for its population soon. Under the guise of business and investment, it could work. Multiple entry visa or PR

2013-08-08 12:59

Grandma

Grandma will b weary as LKY warning is not without base. If you have a look at Iskandar, it's still at a very initial stage for those who have been there. So far Medini area, you can see E&O, PIV, WCT, Mahsing, UMland very obviously as you drive in to Kota Iskandar. Mah Sing's Meridin is the most obvious both ways driving in and out especially into Legoland. While almost all the rest apart from Mah Sing are still red solid and doing their due diligence and demarcation, construction wise Grandma see Sunway being very prominent there especially in Legoland. There will be a Mall a coming up soon there.
For those who have caught a glimpse of LKYs opinion on Iskandar and have experience the controversy in the sand and water agreement between Singapore and Malaysia would understand the concern.

2013-08-08 13:12

Grandma

LKY as oppose to his son's pack with Najib, doesn't believe Malaysia will honor the agreement just like the sand and water. Singapore was smart under LKY, they already saw this coming and in the 90s were looking for alternative fr membrane technology to various other technology to solve the water issue even though there was an agreement. They offered a prize amt for anyone who could solve their problem on water. However then, it took time to get the solution moving. Similarly, for the sand, they had to pay a higher price (taking fr Vietnam) which he claim was what Mahathirs intention to punish Singapore even after having the agreement because Singapore did not Kow tow to Malaysia with some unintended differences.

2013-08-08 13:24

Grandma

While Grandma agree that it looks very tempting in Iskandar, and the question often asked is "who is not there in Iskandar" rather than the opposite, and also more investment pouring in. It's also a catchment area for Malaysian, Singaporean, and Indonesian visitors. Currently there are 2 theme parks there (Lego and hello Kitty) and they are building another one soon. Opposite Traders hotel. The contractor is Encorp which Grandma see is partnering with some Singapore development.

They need the money from Singapore to pour in to kick start and vice versa as Singapore position as hub is already affected. So what best than to join the new bandwagon. A large part of the tourist are from Indonesian. So this is good as all the holidays Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia apart from the other nationality will ensure the in flow is smooth. That of course if all abide by agreement and concession and etc. any failure into that may slow the whole process and create non commital and fear amongst investors.

2013-08-08 13:38

Grandma

In short, Grandma feels, Singapore in caught in a catch 22 situation and the immediate action is to come in and join the bandwagon! But that does not mean they are solely dependent here. ( Just like the case of water solution in the 90s) So malaysia especially Najib should not think we have conquered Singapore into investment. Today there was another gangland style murder in Penang Anson street and this will also deter investors alike.

Grandma foresee Indonesia may come up with its own Iskandar type theme parks or some sort of catchment and then Singapore will be all in too. Placing bets in a company is easirer than running the company isn't it? So the same putting investment in diff end places is easier than running the whole place like Iskandar.

2013-08-08 13:46

tc2012

you must bear in mind they are many "defect" mahadel clones around.They are good at "srew" up thing ........

2013-08-08 13:48

Grandma

For those who have not read this, Grandma advice all to know where we are headed.

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/mobile/article.php?id=249308

Imagine this. outflow of money and loses in forex, this means money that will not come back in. Few ways to get liquidity back in
1. Print more money
2. Get more foreign investors in
3. Increase borrowing and flood the market
Etc

What do you think will happen if assuming 1. was prevalent. Someone personal pocket will be enrich? But the money will still be flowing out! We have done this and result is obvious

No 2 is more realistic because if you cannot succeed, use someone else who has a more business ability and drive to help you push through your objective. We are doing that now but what will happen once we have move to 3 rd gear and so on? It's always inherent that we change policies here and dump ppl who help build it? Tis is what LKY meant

No 3 is also already done deal and we know we don't have the ability and discipline to bring debts down. We have seen what happen to states that use revenues and money allocated or money save fr kickbacks or debt notes to bring down the debts. This was done in Penang by DAP but the dungus who do not understand gearing and reduction in gearing because they are so use to kickbacks will continue to say this money is from federal Goverment. All money are fr taxpayers (whether income tax, service tax, excise etc) country's commodity ( Petrolium or Palm or etc) so on.

If you understand 1,2 and 3 you would also see what will happen as more and more foreign investors starts buying in. We control 51/49 by rule of policies so we think. But what happens if more outflow and debts get surmounted? Do we think we have a choice to say 51/49? What happens when there is no liquidity, we continue with 1 again and our debt will increase and outflow follow suite. There will be a saturation point when these keeps repeating itself. Wen that happens, the policy of 51/49 will no longer apply especially when they depend on a few top 10 in Malaysias rich to support but eventually continue to give projects to Syed Mokthar instead of those who support Malaysia?

2013-08-08 16:28

Post a Comment