One of reality distortion field that clouded tey and ooi's judgment.

They think that they have deep connection that will protect them when their crime is exposed. For example: ooi kock aun filed complaint to macc and not entertained. Well, macc's chairman is the board chairman at protasco and protasco is a company under the protection of Tun Daim.

Another example, tey and ooi think they could used their indonesian nominee as a scape goat for their crime. Little that they know, the said indonesian nominee have deep connection to indonesian politician and conglomerate. For example, his brother is a senior director in one of the largest conglomerate in indonesia (top 5). So in attempt to deter this nominee from telling the truth, tey and ooi instructed their other nominee to filed police report against this rogue nominee. Not only the case is stalled eventhough tey and ooi hired a dirty lawyer to pay corrupt cop in the amount of idr 2billion to carry out the attack, but upon the counter attack of this nominee, pt inovisi's office was raided by the indonesian police to the shock and horror of tey and ooi.

Tey and ooi's enemy in singapore also has cooperate with the immigration office to supervise tey and ooi activity in singapore. Because of this it is found out that recently tey met with dedi francis, his most loyal nominee in singapore to discuss the strategy. Dedi used to work at frank & co, pt suka permai santosa and pt go dynamic who made many communication with tey and his malaysian cohort. For example he communicate with adolf chien fay lie, a director of hytex integrated bhd in number 628196789. Hytex shareholders are owned by tey por yee, nutox ltd (which director is adolf) and pt nusantara rising rich.

If you read this, yes tey por yee and ooi kock aun, we monitor all your activities and you will not escape from your crimes. It time to pay the piper LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR: A proposed joint-venture (JV) mixed development project in Sepang involving Nexgram Holdings Bhd and Asdion Bhd has failed to receive the land development order (DO) from the Sepang Municipal Council.

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia, the software developer said following the council’s rejection, the land vendor Hijrah Murni (M) Sdn Bhd had sent to Top Valley Properties Sdn Bhd - which was to be the project’s joint developer with Nexgram Land - a notice terminating the sale and purchase agreement.

“Nevertheless, the company was informed that Top Valley is in the on-going process of re-negotiating terms and timelines for new DO submission,” added Asdion, which plans to diversify into property development via a JV arrangement with Top Valley.

In December 2014 Top Valley signed an off take agreement cum sale and purchase agreement (SPA) with software developer Nexgram Holdings Bhd’ unit Nexgram Land Sdn Bhd whereby they would develop and sell to MyAngkasa Bina Sdn Bhd the entire mixed property development project on 2.154ha. Meanwhile, Top Valley entered into the land SPA with Hijrah Murni.

The project, to be undertaken on a piece of agricultural leasehold Malay reserved land, was to comprise three tower blocks comprising a total of 659 units of serviced apartments and 10 units of commercial/retail shops with a gross development value of RM297.39mil.

Top Valley’s entitlement from the project was estimated to be RM13.4mil, and Asdion was to have a participation right in Top Valley’s entitlement and to share the project benefits (80% share or RM11.9mil).

Bursa Malaysia Securities considered it a related party transaction as Datuk Tey Por Yee was a common major shareholder of both Nexgram and Asdion, and See Poh Yee was a common director of both.

In the latest statement On Monday, Asdion said it was informed that for the purpose of the offtake agreement cum SPA with Nexgram Land and MyAngkasa which was still subsisting, Top Valley was currently exploring all possible viable options, including sourcing for an alternative suitable land and continue negotiating with the land owner for resubmission of the DO.

“The board had discussed the letter in a board meeting held on March 14 and requested the management to provide further information for deliberation before making any decision,” it

Here is the lesson from warren buffet to help you choose the company to invest in.

Never trust the financial report. It can be cooked. Like nexgram's financial report, it was cooked til burnt and can't even be eaten.

Never trust the number in the counter. It can be over valued because it was cooked. Like nexgram's counter.

So what to do?

You have to scrutinize the company that you invest your money or planned to invest to. And if you look into nexgram, then you will see the signal to cut loss:

- nexgram got it big break from inovisi and depended on inovisi and other overseas subsidiaries for source of revenue. Now, inovisi and the companies are bankrupt.

- nexgram was used by tey and ooi in their scheme to cheat others.

- nexgram attempted to hide it subsidiaries' owners (pt star, gold dynamic etc) by claiming they don't have information (what????).

- the owners of the said subsidiaries are tey and ooi as indicated by the fact that dedi francis was and is the director in both companies.

- three out of nexgram's directors quit nexgram citing protasco's suit against tey and ooi as the reason.

- tey was ousted from nexgram.

Etc.

Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer

ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.

On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.

Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.

“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.

Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.

Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.

The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.

According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.

Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.

StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.

However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.

Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.

It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.

However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.

At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.

On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.

Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.

Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.

This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.

This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.

The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.

Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.

This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.

On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.

Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.

In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.

Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.

Tey Por Yee is running away from nexgram, asdion and ire-tex LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR: Some 24.81 million shares in Asdion Bhd traded off-market yesterday. This is the second company, linked to businessman Datuk Tey Por Yee, which of late has had a substantial block of shares changed hands off-market at a steep discount.

It appears that Tey is making an exit from the companies that he had invested in for less than three years.

According to Bloomberg data, Asdion saw 24.81 million shares representing a 21.34% stake in the company traded off-market at 27 sen yesterday, a sharp discount of 38.64% over the closing price of 44 sen.

The shares were moved in one block through a direct business transaction, but there is no filing to Bursa Malaysia on the parties involved as at press time.

Coincidentally, Tey is the single-largest shareholder of Asdion, with a 21.34% stake — the same size of the block changing hands off-market.

Tey’s another related company, Ire-tex Corp Bhd, also saw a 22.97% stake in the company traded off-market on Wednesday. He also held the same amount of stake that was traded off-market.
29/03/2016 09:58

KUALA LUMPUR: A proposed joint-venture (JV) mixed development project in Sepang involving Nexgram Holdings Bhd and Asdion Bhd has failed to receive the land development order (DO) from the Sepang Municipal Council.

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia, the software developer said following the council’s rejection, the land vendor Hijrah Murni (M) Sdn Bhd had sent to Top Valley Properties Sdn Bhd - which was to be the project’s joint developer with Nexgram Land - a notice terminating the sale and purchase agreement.

“Nevertheless, the company was informed that Top Valley is in the on-going process of re-negotiating terms and timelines for new DO submission,” added Asdion, which plans to diversify into property development via a JV arrangement with Top Valley.

In December 2014 Top Valley signed an off take agreement cum sale and purchase agreement (SPA) with software developer Nexgram Holdings Bhd’ unit Nexgram Land Sdn Bhd whereby they would develop and sell to MyAngkasa Bina Sdn Bhd the entire mixed property development project on 2.154ha. Meanwhile, Top Valley entered into the land SPA with Hijrah Murni.

The project, to be undertaken on a piece of agricultural leasehold Malay reserved land, was to comprise three tower blocks comprising a total of 659 units of serviced apartments and 10 units of commercial/retail shops with a gross development value of RM297.39mil.

Top Valley’s entitlement from the project was estimated to be RM13.4mil, and Asdion was to have a participation right in Top Valley’s entitlement and to share the project benefits (80% share or RM11.9mil).

Bursa Malaysia Securities considered it a related party transaction as Datuk Tey Por Yee was a common major shareholder of both Nexgram and Asdion, and See Poh Yee was a common director of both.

In the latest statement On Monday, Asdion said it was informed that for the purpose of the offtake agreement cum SPA with Nexgram Land and MyAngkasa which was still subsisting, Top Valley was currently exploring all possible viable options, including sourcing for an alternative suitable land and continue negotiating with the land owner for resubmission of the DO.

“The board had discussed the letter in a board meeting held on March 14 and requested the management to provide further information for deliberation before making any decision,” it

Larry Tey Por Yee is running away from nexgram, asdion and ire-tex LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR: Some 24.81 million shares in Asdion Bhd traded off-market yesterday. This is the second company, linked to businessman Datuk Tey Por Yee, which of late has had a substantial block of shares changed hands off-market at a steep discount.

It appears that Tey is making an exit from the companies that he had invested in for less than three years.

According to Bloomberg data, Asdion saw 24.81 million shares representing a 21.34% stake in the company traded off-market at 27 sen yesterday, a sharp discount of 38.64% over the closing price of 44 sen.

The shares were moved in one block through a direct business transaction, but there is no filing to Bursa Malaysia on the parties involved as at press time.

Coincidentally, Tey is the single-largest shareholder of Asdion, with a 21.34% stake — the same size of the block changing hands off-market.

Tey’s another related company, Ire-tex Corp Bhd, also saw a 22.97% stake in the company traded off-market on Wednesday. He also held the same amount of stake that was traded off-market.

Lookie, lookie....ooi kock aun was handcuffed. I have to compliment him. At least he did not hide his face like tey por yee LOL LOL LPL

http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/112179

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks

Now, let wait if anyone here could get me picture or video of the chongs and handcuff LOL LOL LOL LOL

Anyone with a half of brain also know tey and ooi's companies are their alter ego mah...are you brain dead or what? LOL LOL LOL

LOL LOL LOL

Poor tey and ooi...cannot debunk this fact so you went nuts LOL LOL

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ex-company-director-charged-with-rm68m-fraud

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/02/04/former-director-claims-trial-to-rm80mil-cbt-charge/

Nexgram's founders charged for fraud and perjury.

Nexgram itself probed by the sc over irregular business activities.

http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/01/19/probe-deepens-on-nexgram/

LOL LOL LOL

Nexgram's founders charged for fraud and perjury.

Nexgram itself probed by the sc over irregular business activities.

http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/01/19/probe-deepens-on-nexgram/

LOL LOL LOL
25/03/2016 09:17

TeyPuki LOL LOL LOL

Poor tey and ooi...cannot debunk this fact so you went nuts LOL LOL

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ex-company-director-charged-with-rm68m-fraud

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2016/02/04/former-director-claims-trial-to-rm80mil-cbt-charge/

Wednesday, 3 February 2016 | MYT 8:14 PM
Former company director claims trial in cheating case involving RM80mil

BY MAIZATUL NAZLINA

KUALA LUMPUR: A former company director has been charged in the Sessions Court here with cheating the board of directors, making a false declaration and criminal breach of trust involving more than RM80mil.

Datuk Ooi Kock Aun, 49, was accused of cheating Protasco Bhd’s board of directors and its officers by withholding information that he had had direct involvement with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, a company incorporated in Indonesia.

His action resulted in Protasco entering in an investment agreement on oil and gas in Indonesia via the purchase of 63% of PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia valued at US$22mil (RM68,393,170) with PT Anglo Slavic Utama.

The payment for the purchase was made in stages into two bank accounts.

The offence, under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating, was allegedly committed at Protasco’s office at Level 2, Corporate Building Unipark Suria, Jalan Ikram-Uniten, Kajang, between November 2012 and Jan 30, 2014.

Ooi, who is now a businessman, faces a second charge of making a false declaration to the Commissioner for Oaths that he did not have any ties with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, its directors or shareholders when he knew that he indeed had an interest in the company.

The offence allegedly took place at Wern Li Morsingh commissioner for oaths office at Fraser Business Park in Jalan Metro Pudu, off Jalan Yew, on July 25, 2014.

The third charge reads that Ooi committed CBT involving PT Anglo Slavic property worth RM16,250,000 at CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd in Menara Southern Bank in Plaza Damansara, Bukit Damansara, on Feb 4, 2014.

Ooi claimed trial to the charges before Sessions judge Suraiya Mustafa Kamal.

DPP Nurshuhaida Zainal Azahar offered bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges.

She also urged the court to impound Ooi’s passport and prevent him from approaching all prosecution witnesses.

Ooi’s counsel Edmund Bon, in asking for a lower bail, said his client had cooperated with police throughout the investigation.

He said Ooi had a wife and four children and he was a respected individual in the accounting field.

Suraiya fixed bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges and ordered Ooi to surrender his passport and prohibited him from approaching prosecution witnesses.

The court fixed Feb 26 for mention.

Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun were also notorious for not paying their rentals, to the point that their landlords had to threaten legal action and resort to cutting off the utilities to get what was owed to them.

Worse off were their suppliers, of whom many had to suffer the bitterness of bankruptcy because tey and ooi refused to pay them their dues. Tragically, one of them even committed suicide because of bad debts, courtesy of Dato’ Tey Por Yee and Dato' Ooi Kock Aun.

This was not the only blood on his hands. He used a friend, Dedi Francis from Indonesia, to stand as a nominee for Tey and Ooi. When the loyal Dedi pressed for payment on company debts to incurred by Tey and Ooi's manipulative schemes, he was given the runaround. Time finally ran out for Dedi. Desperate, with his back to the wall and creditors all around him, Dedi almost took his own life but was able to be brought to hospital by his family on time.

FYI:

Lookie,Lookie....gooogle search on Tatto Media....just like Nexnation before!

Tatto Media has repeatedly featured as a scam advertiser.[7][8] Quote from Techcrunch:

A typical scam: users are offered in game currency in exchange for filling out an IQ survey. Four simple questions are asked. The answers are irrelevant. When the user gets to the last question they are told their results will be text messaged to them. They are asked to enter in their mobile phone number, and are texted a pin code to enter on the quiz. Once they’ve done that, they’ve just subscribed to a $9.99/month subscription. Tatto Media is the company at the very end of the line on most mobile scams, and they flow it up through Offerpal, SuperRewards and others to the game developers.[9]

The company was criticized on a similar scam using free poster offers - including The Twilight Saga stars that tied a undisclosed monthly credit card subscription fee to the poster request.[10]

The company has been noted for running deceptive offers involving text charges and mobile subscriptions which often trick consumers into signing up for services.[9]

At age seven, tey por hee was already showing signs of what he was destined to be: a thief and a liar. Ten sen, twenty sen, fifty sen…all would disappear “mysteriously” from his families drawers, savings and piggy banks. Later, bigger sums would go missing, from his father’s wallet to his mother’s purse. Tey would be placed at the scene of the crime but he always had an excuse or story to wriggle his way out of the situation.

For a while his parents believed him. Until he got caught red-handed one day. Then, his father had no choice but to punish him. If we hoped that would beat some sense and decency into him, we were sadly mistaken.

He took his bad habits with him to school. Already skilled at telling lies and manipulating people, he began cheating his classmates. The sums ranged from a few ringgit to hundreds of ringgit. The figures may seem small to some, but for a young schoolboy, the sum is enormous. As usual, his long-suffering father had to clear his debts and try to redress the damage done to his victims.

At age sixteen, Tey por yee had to audacity to go to his uncle’s house to borrow money. He said he needed RM2,000.00 because his father was sick and desperately needed the money for an operation. Believing his lies totally, the uncle gave it to him. His family never lived down the humiliation when the truth came out.

Since young, he has always been obsessed with money. Even when he had a lot of it, it was never enough. He wanted more and more. Never mind if it was obtained in a deceitful manner, just as long as he got what he wanted. It only goes to show that he is not only a pathological liar, but a pathological thief as well. With hundreds of millions already stashed away in private bank accounts, more than he can ever spend in ten lifetimes, he still remains greedy for more. So greedy that he is willing to lie, cheat and steal to achieve his end.

So much anger....how to achieve transcendental awareness and happiness?

Let me assist you in understanding Godynamic Investment Ltd- GIL a BVI (British Virgin Islands) an offshore company.

As rightly pointed out GIL is and has always been an integral part of Nexgram (51% owned) since inception and perhaps packaged in for Nexnation's listing on Mesdaq back in 2004.To all effects and purposes TPY is the CEO and/or COO.GIL is also the vehicle for most of TPY's forays in Indon.

So the question that goes a begging is any transaction between GIL and/or Nexgram are Related party Transactions that TPY should NOT forget to mention.

The accounts for GIL be it at company or group should be very clear to TPY;he cannot be excused from making such elementary mistakes OR now he is laying blame on the auditor,CFO or accountant.So the statements to Bursa for one to be true the other has to be false.
That is a facepalm and contemptuous to Bursa.

When GIL makes such purchases or sales,are the monies equitably apportioned(51% cost and profits)

Those are questions shareholders should pose to TPY

hmmm ...why rant when I am assisting you???

DRwarrant: you are right FD would actually yield a better rate of return,whether taken from 2004 or 2014.

bye!!, gotta play wei chi with Kong Ming ......

Lookie, lookie....ooi kock aun was handcuffed. I have to compliment him. At least he did not hide his face like tey por yee LOL LOL LPL

http://www.hmetro.com.my/node/112179

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks

Now, let wait if anyone here could get me picture or video of the chongs and handcuff LOL LOL LOL LOL

Anyone with a half of brain also know tey and ooi's companies are their alter ego mah...are you brain dead or what? LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 15 — A former director of Protasco Bhd was charged in the Ampang Sessions Court today with fraud involving RM68 million, and making a false declaration, four years ago.

Datuk Tey Por Yee, 40, claimed trial to both charges. On the first charge, he is accused of concealing information from the company’s board of directors and officers that he had a vested interest in a company, PT Anglo Slavic Utama in Indonesia.

In so doing, he allegedly misled the victims into entering into an oil and gas investment agreement with PT Anglo Slavic Utama through the purchase of 63 per cent of PT Anglo Slavic’s shares in Indonesia worth US$22 million (RM68,393,170).

The payment for the shares was allegedly channelled in stages to two CIMB PT ASU accounts.

Tey is accused of committing the offence at Protasco Bhd’s office at Corporate Building Unipark Suria, Jalan Ikram-Uniten, Kajang here, between November 2012 and January30, 2014.

On the second charge, he allegedly made a sworn false statement before Wern Li Morsingh, a Commissioner of Oaths that he did not have any vested interests in PT Anglo Slavic Utama, whether as a director or shareholder. He is accused of committing the offence in the company’s conference room at the same place on July 25, 2014.

Judge Rushan Lutfi Mohamed set bail at RM1 million with one surety and February24 for re-mention.

Tey was also ordered to surrender his passport to the court and to refrain from harassing the prosecution’s witnesses.

Deputy public prosecutor Datin Nurshuhaida Zainal Azahar acted for the prosecution while counsel Datuk K.Kumaraendran and Mak Lin Kum represented the accused. — Bernama

- See more at: http://m.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ex-company-director-charged-with-rm68m-fraud#sthash.8ohRAlMG.dpuf
25/03/2016 16:36

By Meena Lakshana / theedgemarkets.com | March 15, 2016 : 4:05 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR (March 15): Nexgram Holdings Bhd confirmed today that its joint venture with Asdion Bhd with regard to a mixed development project has hit a snag, because the Sepang Municipal Council (MPS) has rejected the development order (DO) for the project.

To recap, Asdion had inked a joint venture agreement with Top Valley Properties Sdn Bhd on Feb 12, 2015 to participate in the development of the project known as Selangor Project.

Asdion paid RM6 million to Top Valley to be used solely towards settlement of the purchase consideration of the parcel of leasehold agricultural Malay reserve land, and will entitle the company to share expected economic benefits and profits arising from the development and sale of the Selangor Project with Top Valley.

On Dec 22 2014, Top Valley had entered into an off-take agreement with Nexgram Land Sdn Bhd and MyAngkasa Bina Sdn Bhd, whereby MyAngaksa would buy the project from Top Valley and Nexgram Land (as developer) for RM297.4 million.

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia today, Nexgram said it had received a letter from Top Valley on March 8, disclosing that MPS had rejected the DO.

"Nexgram Land was informed that in view of the failure in obtaining the DO on time, the landowner of the Selangor Project has terminated the sales and purchase agreement with Top Valley," the filig read.

"Top Valley is currently in the midst of exploring all possible viable options, including sourcing of an alternative suitable land, while continuing negotiation with the land owner for resubmission of the DO.

"The company will make the necessary announcement on further development of the matter, in due course," it added.

Yesterday, Asdion also announced via a filing to Bursa Malaysia that based on a letter received from Top Valley on March 8 as well, Top Valley is in the process of re-negotiating terms and timelines for new DO submission.

The Selangor Project, comprising three tower blocks with a total of 659 units of service apartments and 10 units of commercial and retails hops, was to be developed on a 2.154ha piece of agricultural leasehold Malay reserve land in Kg. Limau Manis, Dengkil in the Sepang district, with the lease period expiring on Feb 3, 2104.

Asdion had said it was venturing into the project as a means to diversify its earnings base and reduce its dependence on its existing business of software development, as well as information communication technology and related services.

The deal is a related party transaction, as Tey Por Yee is a common major shareholder of both Nexgram and Asdion (with direct interests of 11.52% and 22.01% respectively), while See Poh Yee is a common director of both companies.

If the members of nexgram's special committee really are independent, then they will report back the following:

- pt star owned by tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
- dedi francis used to work in pt star and report directly to tey por yee.
- gold dynamic owned by tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
- dedi francis is a director at pt gold dynamic, the subsidiary of gold dynamic.
- dedi francis is a commisioner of pt anglo slavic utama.
- dedi francis is a nominee of tey por yee and ooi kock aun.

LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 — Public-listed engineering, property and construction company Protasco Bhd has filed an application to cite two of its directors for acting in contempt of court by allegedly interfering with witnesses in a multi-million ringgit lawsuit brought against it.

In a statement today, Protasco accused two of its directors Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun, as well as their lawyer Gideon Tan, of interfering with a key witness’s evidence in the court case.

Protasco said the star witness and his Indonesian lawyers had already given statutory declarations on the alleged interference, adding that action by the three men amount to “attempts to pervert and/or obstruct the course of justice”.

“On November 18, 2014, Protasco obtained leave of Court to initiate committal proceedings against Tey, Ooi and Gideon Tan, where they must show cause why they should not be fined or committed to imprisonment for contempt of court.

“The High Court has fixed December 8, 2014 as the date for the High Court to hear the committal proceedings,” the company said in a statement.

Protasco had in September mounted a US$27 million (RM90.87 million) lawsuit against an Indonesian company, PT Anglo Slavic Utama (ASU) to recover its money and against Tey and Ooi for alleged conspiracy to defraud, making secret profits, breaching their fiduciary and statutory duties, and hiding their beneficial interests in the latter.

The hearing for the alleged contempt of court case comes ahead of two different extraordinary general meetings (EGM) by Tey and Ooi and the company’s co-founder Datuk Seri Chong Ket Pen next week.

After Protasco’s deal to enter the oil and gas business fell apart in August, the lawsuit was filed and a boardroom battle was sparked between Chong and the two directors — where both sides accused the other of wrongfully making profits.

Chong, who is also Prostasco’s group managing director, has called for an EGM on November 26 to persuade other shareholders to remove Tey and Ooi. Tey has called for an EGM scheduled two days later, where he is expected try to persuade shareholders that his allegations against Chong are true.

Tey had apparently brought a deal to Protasco in 2012 to invest in a working oilfield in Aceh. Protasco agreed to acquire a stake in PT ASU’s PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia (PT ASI), which indirectly owned the oilfield.

The deal was renegotiated in 2014, then terminated by Protasco in August 2014. Protasco then sued Tey and Ooi in September for the return of the US$27 million paid to buy the stake in PT ASI and a shareholders’ advance. It has also made police reports against Tey.

In turn, Tey through his vehicle Kingdom Seekers Ventures Sdn Bhd sued Chong, accusing him of siphoning off RM10 million through a group of “Indonesian/foreign entities” to make an illegal financial gain.

Last week, Chong filed his defence to the suit, denying Tey’s claims. He said he had made a personal loan of RM20 million to Tey, of which RM10 million had been repaid. Chong claimed this RM10 million repayment allegedly still owed by Tey is the illegal financial gain the former was accused of making.

According to Chong, these group of foreign entities have made numerous transactions in shares of listed companies linked to Tey — PN17 company Hytex Integrated Bhd, Wintoni Group Bhd (formerly Winsun Technologies Bhd), Asdion Bhd and Tey’s own flagship Nexgram Holdings Bhd (formerly Nextnation Communication Bhd).

In 1997, when the Asian Financial Crisis struck, Protasco had grown to 600 staff and managed to avoid any retrenchments by making pay cuts across the board. The move left the company in a good position to grab projects when the government began its pump-priming programme to revive the Malaysian economy.

Since it was listed in 2003, Protasco has grown further to 1,800 in staff size, with an unbroken profit record and an average of 8 to 10 sen in dividends paid every year.

The company aims to grow between 15 and 20 per cent in profit every year, and, more ambitiously, to join Bursa Malaysia’s billion ringgit market capitalisation club in five years’ time. Protasco’s market capitalisation is currently RM549 million.

The company’s order book has grown to more than RM700 million since Chong took on a full-time executive role in 2013, from less than RM100 million before.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/claiming-tampering-with-witness-in-lawsuit-protasco-seeks-to-cite-directors#sthash.3ltUuQOb.dpuf

Bad Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun, attempted to tamper with witnesses

Hello,

This year Tatto Media manage to cheat my company out of a very large sum of money, and after being promised my money countless times I was never paid a dime. It wasn't just me who was cheated out of money, however; for a period of months, nearly all their affiliates had their payments withheld for absolutely no apparent reason, under orders by Larry Tey and Adrian Ooi, Tatto's founders.

I've gathered a lot of very incriminating information concerning Tatto, Tey, and Ooi from a variety of sources, outlining illegal and deceptive practices related to things from payment practices all the way to their fake acquisition by Ozura World. If you are owed money from Tatto Media, do not bother trying to contact them for your payment, it's a lost cause. Do not try to threaten them or take legal action alone, as they have created fake "evidence" apparently showing (fake) illegal placements for affiliates who threatened them, and fabricated other excuses for non-payment. The best way to get your money back is in a group.

Instead, PM me here and I'll come into contact with you. I am gathering a group of people who have been cheated by Tatto, so we can take legal action as a group and have more power and leverage. They may be able to create false excuses for non-payment for a single affiliate who sues them, but when they have 100 affiliate knocking on their door requesting their money, and inside information detailing the fact that they instructed their employees not to pay their affiliates and instead to lie to them, they're not going to lie their way out of that one.

-------

LOL LOL LOL LOL

Time for the answer.

Tey and ooi spent usd 90million to acquire scammer company is because ozura and tatto are actually tey and ooi's company, and it founder including andrew bachman is tey and ooi's nominee. And he is horrified to know what tey and ooi been doing with tatto:

"That was December. To say he was freaking out would be an understatement. “I was sitting in my office one day. A guy showed up with a big box of papers and dropped it in my lap,” said Bachman. “I opened it, and first words that hit my eyes were asset freeze and Tatto Media.”

Bachman tried making a couple of phone calls to people he had been associated with back then to no avail. “It was a major shit show,” he told me. “You do something to get on their radar, they will kick your ass, and that’s it. End of story.”

But that’s not the end of this story. It’s really just the beginning… So, what do you do in this situation? Andrew Bachman didn’t know either.

“It was a business that I was years removed from, and it was on the other side of the country. I was reading through the merits of the case, and they weren’t even facts that I could accept,” said Bachman. “The position I was painted in, there’s almost nothing you can really do.” "

Therefore, the acquisition is actually tey and ooi's way to siphon money from inovisi's bank account. It is the same moda operandi when inovisi acquired 10% stakes in nextnation in 2012.

Get it? LOL LOL LOL

Here is another kicker...

Inovisi, and by extension, tey and ooi acquired ozura world for usd 30million then went on to buy tatto media for usd 60million.

Now, tatto media has been charged by US FTC for scam advertisement and often inducing it victims to subscribe it service for usd 9,99/month. Andrew Bachman, tatto's founder was held personally liable for usd 98million and tatto was fined for usd 150million by the FTC.

It thus begs the questions.

Why tey and ooi pay usd 90million to acquire a scammer company?

You tell me LOL LOL LOL LOL

I am sure that you will agree with me that tey and ooi are two stupid people.

- they signed sds which denied their ownership to pt asu etc, but just a year before, tey signed an agreement which acknowledged such ownership.

- they used protasco's money to repay half of a loan to dato chong by concealing it in various money movement between companies owned by tey and ooi. Then they publicly announced that the said these companies were circulating money to pay kick back to dato chong for smoothing the oil and gas deal.

Let's recap shall we:

- the owners of pt haseba are herman koswara and benny tjokro. Both signed agreements with tey por yee and the transaction were secured with inovisi's shares where ooi kock aun sits as finance director and actually is inovisi's ultimate shareholders.

- pt asu and pt asi are the owners of pt haseba. The director and commisioner of pt asu and pt asi, i.e. Tjoe Yudhis, Dedi Francis and Edward Farolan are nominees of tey and ooi.

- the transaction between protasco and pt asu to buy pt asi's stakes in pt fas was secured with inovisi's shares. The shares were deposited to acclaim, a company established by tey and ooi, and on paper is run by Seh Poh Yee's wife.

- the website of pt asu is registered under a company which shares the same address as nexgram. Which company is a subsidiary of inovisi.

- tey and ooi have the power over pt gold child, pt nusantara rising rich, fast global, pt asu as evident from the fact that they are able to move around the money paid from protasco to pt asu and gold child which ended up in rs mahaniaga, dato chong's company as a repayment for the loan provided by dato chong so tey and ooi could finalize the deal to buy stakes in protasco.

Everything linked up to tey and ooi LOL LOL LOL

Edward Farolan, the assistant to director at nusantara rising rich, is also the sole director at pt anglo slavic indonesia (the subsidiary of pt asu and the shareholder of pt fas which is the shareholder of pt haseba) LOL LOL LOL

https://www.linkedin.com/in/edward-farolan-9a107723

http://protasco.listedcompany.com/newsroom/PRTASCO_300114.pdf

LOL LOL LOL

http://www.inovisi.com/index.php/files/download/4c9f81fdc749d47

Nusantara rising rich is related to inovisi, a company where many people from nexgram from ooi kock aun to lim chee guan sits in the management LOL LOL LOL


http://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/anpth/453212.jsp

That is another evidence which proof that in the past nusantara rising rich working closely with nexgram LOL LOL LOL

Could it be that the requisition has to do with recent shareholding changes?

Soo and Saw, along with other family members, used to be longtime majority shareholders of Hytex, mainly via Precious Continent Sdn Bhd. Soo is the founder of the business. The family ceased to be substantial shareholders when Precious Continent disposed of all its Hytex shares in two transactions in January and February this year.

It appears that a large chunk of these shares were picked up by the requisitionists (Nutox and Rising Rich).

> Who’s behind the requisitionists?

Nutox was incorporated in the tax haven of British Virgin Islands. Its registered address is a post-office box in a building there. A Google search shows that dozens of other companies shares that exact address. Rising Rich is based in an office block in Jakarta.

When the two companies separately emerged as substantial shareholders of Hytex, filings with Bursa Malaysia revealed that each was controlled by an Indonesian man – Adolf Chien Fay Lim at Nutox and Dedi Francis at Rising Rich. However, these names didn’t figure in the requisition for the EGM and the subsequent withdrawal.

It’s not known how Nutox and Rising Rich got together, but both have also been substantial shareholders of Nextnation Communication Bhd, an ICT company listed on the ACE Market. According to Nextnation’s annual report 2012, Nutox and Rising Rich were the largest and third largest warrantholders as at Sept 7 last year.

The connection between Hytex and Nextnation extends beyond the requisitionists. Information on the Bursa website indicates that Hytex now has three substantial shareholders – Nutox, Rising Rich and Tey Por Yee, who bought a 13% stake in Hytex in February. Tey is CEO and MD of Nextnation.

One more thing Hytex and Nextnation have in common is that they both had Fast Global Investments Ltd, which is registered in the Caribbean tax haven of Anguilla, as a substantial shareholder.

Yeah....and lookie here...On Feb 2, 2016, the Indonesian SC decided to extend the suspension of PT Inovisi's counter citing their failure to submit audited annual report to the SC LOL LOL

http://redaksi.co.id/47427/otoritas-bursa-lanjutkan-suspensi-4-saham.html

The management of PT Inovisi would not be able to produce such report as currently they went hiding like the slimey mice they are LOL LOL

Inovisi also failed to pay the annual listing fee:

http://economy.okezone.com/read/2016/03/24/278/1344702/bei-perpanjang-suspensi-7-emiten-nakal

Can't pay rent and can't pay annual fee? that is the fate of nexgram. Believe that LOL LOL

Speaking of which....anyone got the update on Nexgram's special committee report on Gold Dynamic and PT STAR? No news? Obviously since both are fictitious company owned by Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun...

http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/01/22/nexgram-sets-up-special-committee-to-address-possible-inconsistencies/

Any news on this so called nexgram venture to property in Fiji? LOL LOL LOL

http://www.bursacommunity.com/t22326-nexgram-ventures-into-property-development-in-fiji

Another fictitious project from yours truly: Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun.

Prior to it demise, the management of PT Inovisi also made numerous announcement on such and such projects or this and that acquisitions, which now we know it fictitious LOL LOL...

Ooo..and blessed are your eyes because they see and your ears because they hear. The heart of the people here has become dull. With their ears they scarcely hear and they have closed their eyes, otherwise with their heart, eyes and ears they will understand that nexgram is a company that soon be foreclosed.
25/03/2016 10:41

Bonus round.

24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).

1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.

28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.

21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.

14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.

23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.

24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.

1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.

25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.

11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.

8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.

15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.

December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.

LOL LOL LOL LOL

Wow, Adrian Ooi got so many porns in his Youtube's channel. No wonder he cheated on his wife with an Indon bohsia cum house maid LOL LOL LOL

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLD7e3IdnQT0dBSASS9YtFg

And look

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFukVxP8Nks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDlQQNA_LEM

Look, a devil is being covered by a bangla bodyguard LOL LOL LOL


Inovisi was probed by the indonesia sc over it transaction and disposal of assets. Sounds familiar? LOL LOL LOL

http://m.kaltim.prokal.co/read/news/229549-saham-dibekukan-inovisi-diinterogasi

Nexgram’s change of auditors raises a lot of questions

WHO says minority shareholders are a helpless lot? How can that be true when a person with a minuscule number of shares in a listed company became the only one to nominate the new external auditors for the company? And he didn’t even have to explain why he did so.

He just threw out the name of the accounting firm and came up with a proposed resolution to be tabled at an extraordinary general meeting.

It was then up to the board of directors to assess the suitability of the firm. The board decided that the appointment of the new auditors was in the best interest of the company and its shareholders, and thus recommended that shareholders at the EGM vote for the proposed change of auditors. The shareholders did as advised.

Take a bow, Ko Boon Leong of Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. If there were such a thing as the Tiny-but-Mighty Corporate Player of the Year Award, you’d likely be a top candidate for 2015.

Then again, an accolade like that shouldn’t be given away cheaply. There should be diligent scrutiny. Let’s go over the story and raise questions when necessary.

But first, the reason this has come up is because the auditors appointed last year now wants to step down, after less than six months in that role. Accounting firm CHI-LLTC explained that its workforce had shrunk recently and it therefore couldn’t handle the increasing work arising from the listed company’s “recent expansion plan”.

The listed company is Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which has been in the news lately after the Securities Commission had issued a public statement on Jan 15 regarding the company’s offer to buy all the securities of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd. It was revealed that three subsidiaries of Nexgram are the focus of ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia. On Thursday, Nexgram applied for consent from the SC to withdraw the offer for the Ire-Tex securities.

Back to the replacement of auditors last year. On July 8, Ko sent a letter to Nexgram to nominate CHI-LLTC as the new auditors, taking over from SJ Grant Thornton. He also offered a draft resolution for the proposed change.

According to the letter, Ko had 1,333 Nexgram shares. That’s almost nothing compared with the company’s 1.88 billion issued shares. Nevertheless, as a shareholder, he’s entitled to nominate the auditors, according to the Companies Act.

But why him? And why make the nomination at that point, when there had been no disclosure regarding a need to change auditors?

Based on announcements made through the stock exchange, the first time the investing public had any idea Nexgram was switching auditors was on July 20, when the company issued a notice of the EGM to consider the proposed change of auditors. The notice mentioned the resignation of SJ Grant Thornton, and yet, Nexgram hadn’t announced that development.

The relevant details only emerged the next day with the release of the circular to shareholders. Some of the fresh information certainly deserves greater attention.

In late June, SJ Grant Thornton told the Nexgram board that the fee for the 2015 audit would be increased from RM200,000 to RM500,000. The accounting firm said the hike was because it classified the 2015 audit as high-risk and would therefore need to use more resources for the job.

The high-risk classification is the result of “significant changes in the level of activities in the Nexgram group” and the Audit Oversight Board’s review of Nexgram’s 2014 audit files, which led to the requirement for additional work to be performed during the 2015 audit.

The board met on July 8 and agreed to reject the fee revision, describing it “not sensible and totally unreasonable”. On the same day, the board received Ko’s letter nominating CHI-LLTC as the new auditors and alluding to SJ Grant Thornton’s resignation.

But Nexgram received SJ Grant Thornton’s letter of resignation only on July 15, after the board had written to the firm on July 10 to say it wouldn’t accept the new audit fee.

In its circular to shareholders, Nexgram says it received Ko’s notice of nomination in “anticipation of the outcome of the negotiation with SJ Grant Thornton”.

That bit of pretzel logic can only trigger questions. How did Ko know about the directors’ stand on the higher audit fee? In fact, how is he — a person with merely 1,333 Nexgram shares — even aware of the fee revision? How and why has he chosen CHI-LLTC as the standby auditors out of the more than 50 other accounting firms in Malaysia that are registered as auditors of listed companies?

And why didn’t the nomination come from somebody else, say, Datuk Tey Por Yee, who was then Nexgram’s CEO and MD, and also a substantial shareholders?

http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2016/01/23/the-tiny-but-mighty-shareholder/

Smell like something fishy is going on LOL LOL LOL

Monday, 18 January 2016 | MYT 11:15 PM
Nexgram in the dark on various aspects of its proposed share sale

KUALA LUMPUR: Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which plans to sell its 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investments Ltd (GIL) to Vast Wealth Management Corp for RM34.8mil, does not have information on details such as who Vast Wealth’s shareholders are.

The company, whose businesses range from IT services provision to property development, told Bursa Malaysia that it also currently did not know how the disposal of its stake in the mobile application service subsidiary would affect the group’s earnings per share, net assets per share and gearing.

Nor does it know the expected gains or losses to the group arising from this proposed sale, which was announced last week.

Replying to Bursa’s query, Nexgram said it would submit details on various questions asked by the regulator “in due course once the information is available.”

On Jan 12, Nexgram announced the disposal of the entire stake in GIL, which owns 84% in Indonesia-based mobile application service/mobile security operations.

In the notice, the company said the GIL group had been making losses for the financial years 2012 to 2014. In the 2015 financial year it made an after-tax profit of RM3.5mil, but Nexgram said this was mainly due to the implementation of a cost-cutting strategy which it is not expected to benefit from anymore due to the tougher business environment.

“The proposed disposal will enable Nexgram to focus on other existing profitable business segments, e.g. property and trading of surveillance equipment,” it said.

Nexgram, via unit Nextnation Network Sdn Bhd, had boosted its stake in GIL from 51% to 69.6% less than a year ago (in April 2015).

It paid RM18.53mil for the additional 18.6% stake. Based on this purchase price, the entire 69.6% stake was valued at RM69.3mil at the time of purchase.

On Friday last week the SC expressed reservations on Nexgram’s takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd - another company linked to Datuk Tey Por Yee - following an ongoing probe into the sale of Nexgram’s subsidiaries, including GIL.

Nexgram shares fell 1 sen to close at 7.5 sen on Monday, with 34.499 million shares changing hands.

---

Well, i can say this much, Tey and Ooi's company in indonesia (inovisi) also answered "this don't know that don't know" when being probed by the indonesian with regard to it corporate action and disposal of assets LOL LOL LOL LOL

Before it demise, the following happens to PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk:

- the police raided the office of Inovisi.
- it shares dropped 70% in a matter of days.
- it sell it assets to an obscure chinese company, fortune phoenix.
- it founders, one Adrian Ooi Kock Aun resigned from the board.
- it was probed by the sc over irregularities in many corporate actions.

Let see if Nexgram share the same conditions:

- police raided it office? Check
- it shares dropped 40% in a matter of month? Check
- it sell it asset to an obscure company (vast wealth management)? Check
- it founders, Larry Tey Por Yee resigned from the board? Check
- it was probed by the sc over irregularities in their corporate action? Check

A quote from Albert Einstein: insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Do you think nexgram would be able to escape the fate of inovisi when adrian ooi kock aun and larry tey por yee does the same things in nexgram and in jnovisi? LOL LOL LOL

I already repeatedly asked Tey on the identity of the consultant, client, etc but he failed to answer. So we can assume that these are just another lies concocted by Tey and Ooi.

Basically, Tey and Ooi's defense (which can be found in numerous blogs set up by them) are as follows:

1. Tey and Ooi are consultants for Indonesian clients who are looking for investors.

Facts: according to the term's sheet signed by Tey and Herman, they are business partners that will develops the oil field in aceh province.

2. Tey and Ooi introduced PT ASU, indonesian vendors, to Protasco.

Facts: PT ASU was established after the fact by Tey and Ooi. It director and commisioner are nominees of Tey and Ooi.

3. Tey and Ooi are brokers whom main business is introduction projects for profits.

Facts: the deal between globalcap/Tey and Ooi's company and Herman Koswara, as well with Dato Chong/Protasco were to co-develop the oil and gas project in kuala simpang and not a brokerage deal.

4. Tey and Ooi obtained the oil and gas project before they were appointed as Protasco's director so there is no fiduciary duty to disclose full information on the deal.

Facts: the statutory duties and fiduciaries duties existed since the first day Tey and Ooi accepted their appointment. So, instead of offering Protasco RM 176million to buy the stake of PT FAS, they should have offered the IDR 31million with Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro.

5. Tey and Ooi found trails of money that proof Dato Chong received bribe to facilitate the oil and gas deal.

Facts: the so called trails actually series of money transfers between companies owned by Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun, i.e. PT ASU and PT Nusantara Rising Rich etc. The money is part of repayment of a loan by Dato Chong so Tey could finalize the acquisition of Tun Daim's protasco stakes.

6. Tey and Ooi are saviours to Dato Chong.

Facts: can you really call yourself savior if from day one you already devised a plan to cheat the person you supposed to save?

7. Dato Chong failed to inform the board on the existence of investment agreement with Tey Por Yee as well as the project.

Facts: Protasco's IC already confirmed that they are aware of the existence of such agreement and the reason Tey and Ooi agreed to buy Tun Daim's stakes. Further the board unanimously adopted the agreement by way of circular resolution.

8. Tey and Ooi are innocence and were framed by Dato Chong.

Facts: tey and ooi crimes includes, inter alia, extortion, forging documents, perjury (lying in statutory documents), fraud, embezzlement, false statements to the sc, obstruction of justice, bribery, cheat, contempt of court, libel, slander, etc.

One of reality distortion field that clouded tey and ooi's judgment.

They think that they have deep connection that will protect them when their crime is exposed. For example: ooi kock aun filed complaint to macc and not entertained. Well, macc's chairman is the board chairman at protasco and protasco is a company under the protection of Tun Daim.

Another example, tey and ooi think they could used their indonesian nominee as a scape goat for their crime. Little that they know, the said indonesian nominee have deep connection to indonesian politician and conglomerate. For example, his brother is a senior director in one of the largest conglomerate in indonesia (top 5). So in attempt to deter this nominee from telling the truth, tey and ooi instructed their other nominee to filed police report against this rogue nominee. Not only the case is stalled eventhough tey and ooi hired a dirty lawyer to pay corrupt cop in the amount of idr 2billion to carry out the attack, but upon the counter attack of this nominee, pt inovisi's office was raided by the indonesian police to the shock and horror of tey and ooi.

Tey and ooi's enemy in singapore also has cooperate with the immigration office to supervise tey and ooi activity in singapore. Because of this it is found out that recently tey met with dedi francis, his most loyal nominee in singapore to discuss the strategy. Dedi used to work at frank & co, pt suka permai santosa and pt go dynamic who made many communication with tey and his malaysian cohort. For example he communicate with adolf chien fay lie, a director of hytex integrated bhd in number 628196789. Hytex shareholders are owned by tey por yee, nutox ltd (which director is adolf) and pt nusantara rising rich.

If you read this, yes tey por yee and ooi kock aun, we monitor all your activities and you will not escape from your crimes. It time to pay the piper LOL LOL LOL

2. Berdasarkan hasil dengan pendapat antara bursa dan perseroan pada 6 Mei 2015, pihak auditor perseroan (KAP Jamaludin, Ardi, Sukimto, dan rekan) menyampaikan bahwa perseroan/auditor adanya kesalahan penyajian pada LK 31 Desember 2013 namun tidak segera menyampaikan keterbukaan informasi atau revisi LK. Mohon disampaikan alasannya. "Perseroan hanya menemukan kesalahan pada bagian rumus perhitungan Aktiva Tetap dan telah melaporkan kepada auditor. Perseroan menyerahkan keputusan revisi kepada auditor."


3. Apakah perseroan sebelumnya menyadari adanya kesalahan penyajian LK 31 Maret 2014 dan 30 Juni 2014? Apabila ya mohon disampaikan latar belakang perseroan tidak segera menyampaikan keterbukaan informasi ataupun menyampaikan revisi LK yang telah dipublikasikan. "Perseroan tidak menyadari adanya kesalahan penyajian LK per 31 Maret 2014 dan 30 Juni 2014."


4. Apakah perseroan yakin tidak terdapat salah saji pada LK 2012, 2011, dan 2010? "Ya, perseroan yakin tidak terdapat salah saji pada LK 2012, 2011, dan 2010."


5. Mohon disampaikan daftar transaksi pada perseroan yang bersifat afiliasi selama 3 tahun terakhir. - PT Graha Tunas Makmur, anak usaha yang menyewakan ruang kantor ke perseroan. - PT Andaman Lestari Multikreasi, anak usaha yang menyediakan tenaga kerja. - PT Greenpine, pemegang saham yang memberi pembiayaan untuk operasional.


6. Nama KAP yang akan melakukan audit LK per 31 Desember 2014? "Perseroan sedang dalam proses penunjukan KAP baru dan akan diputuskan minggu ini."


Terkait Pengendalian Internal Perseroan


1. Mohon penjelasan mengenai pelaksanaan separation of duties atau pemisahan fungsi/tugas keuangan sebagai pengendali internal di perseroan? "Saat ini, pada intinya hanya terdapat pemisahan tugas antara bagian finance dan accounting. Separation of duties yang lebih maju akan dilakukan seiring dengan restrukturisasi perusahaan."


2. Apakah perseroan punya fungsi Internal Audit ? Apabila ya mohon disebutkan: a. Jumlah personel Internal Audit: 1 b. Nama karyawan yang bertugas di bagian Internal Audit: Tyty Chandra. "Sejalan dengan rencana restrukturisasi yang segera akan dilakukan, tim internal audit akan pula dikembangkan dan difungsikan seusia peraturan yang berlaku guna meningkatkan tata kelola perusahaan (corporate governance). Perubahan struktur Internal Audit akan kami laporkan kepada otoritas dan publik."


3. Mohon dapat disampaikan jumlah dan hasil rapat komite audit perseroan selama 3 tahun terakhir. "Komite Audit melakukan rapat reguler, tapi perseroan belum mendapatkan detail lengkap pada hari pengumpulan laporan ini. Hasil rapat yang sudah 22 April 2015, hasilnya adalah perlunya edaran ke anak perusahaan terkait batas waktu pengumpulan laporan keuangan. Hasil rapat 10 September 2014, hasilnya perlunya komunikasi intensif antara dewan komisaris dan dewan direksi terkait rencana setiap aksi korporasi”. (net/lhl/k15)

PERDAGANGAN saham PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk (INVS) masih dihentikan sementara (suspend) alias dibekukan. PT Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) sudah berkali-kali menyurati perusahaan investasi tersebut.

Otoritas pasar modal itu sudah melayangkan berbagai pertanyaan kepada Inovisi, mulai dari soal pelanggan dan pemasok utama, sampai laporan kinerja keuangan perusahaan.

Berbagai pertanyaan interogasi itu tertuang dalam surat Bursa Nomor S-01264/BEI.PG/05-2015 yang dikirimkan pada 15 Mei 2015. Inovisi pun membalas surat ini pada 20 Mei 2015.

Surat tersebut dibuka kepada publik di laporan keterbukaan informasi BEI, seperti dikutip Rabu (27/5). Berikut ini isi tanya-jawab antara BEI dan Inovisi dalam surat balasan perusahaan.

Terkait Pelanggan dan Pemasok Utama Perseroan


1. Identitas mengenai pelanggan dan pemasok utama (pelanggan pemasok dengan nilai melebihi 10 persen dari jumlah pendapatan bersih) Perseroan sebagai berikut:

a. PT Indomax Mediacom (IM)

b. PT Media Artha Raya Semesta (MARS)

c. PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (STAR)

d. PT Fantasi Artis Media Entertainment (FAME)

e. PT Funmobi Nusantara (FN)


"Informasi ini tidak dapat kami sampaikan kepada publik dan jawaban kami kirimkan kepada bursa dalam format cetak," kata Corporate Secretary Inovisi, Dwiwati Riandhini, dalam surat tersebut.


2. Apakah pelanggan dan pemasok utama perseroan di atas merupakan satu grup perusahaan? Apabila ya, mohon disampaikan struktur perusahaan dalam grup perseroan tersebut. "Tidak."


3. Apakah pelanggan dan sama lain utama perseroan di atas memiliki hubungan afiliasi satu sama lain? Apabila ya, disampaikan sifat hubungan afiliasi pada masing-masing perusahaan tersebut. "Tidak."


4. Apakah terdapat karyawan yang bekerja merangkap pada beberapa perusahaan pelanggan atau pemasok utama di atas? Mohon jelaskan alasan perangkapan pekerjaan tersebut (jika ada). "Perseroan tidak mengetahui apakah terdapat karyawan yang bekerja merangkap pada beberapa perusahaan pelanggan atau pemasok utama perusahaan."


5. Berdasarkan kondisi per 30 September 2014, apakah perseroan punya piutang macet? Dari pelanggan utama di atas. Apabila ya, mohon dapat disebutkan. "Jawaban terlampir."


Terkait Inovisi Selaku Induk Perusahaan


1. Mohon disampaikan struktur organisasi lengkap perseroan. "Perseroan saat ini tengah dalam proses penggantian manajemen inti, termasuk dewan komisaris dan direksi dan akan membentuk tim restrukturisasi.



2. Berdasarkan laporan keuangan dan kontrak yang disampaikan, perseroan selaku induk menjual beberapa jasa kepada pelanggan utama antara lain: a. InoConnect Bandwidth Optimizer. b. IP Interconnection. c. SpeedMessanger (Tier I Messaging and VAS Messaging). d. InoConnect VAS Messaging.

Mohon disampaikan


a. Nama bagian/divisi. b. Lokasi atau alamat operasional bagian yang dimaksud. c. Jumlah karyawan. d. Rincian nama karyawan dan kepala bagian. "Informasi ini tidak dapat kami sampaikan kepada publik dan jawaban kami kirimkan kepada bursa dalam format cetak," kata Corporate Secretary Inovisi, Dwiwati Riandhini, dalam surat tersebut.


3. Apakah selama 3 tahun terakhir perseroan (selaku induk saja) menjual produk sejenis di atas selain kepada IM, MARS, dan Star? Apabila ya, mohon disebutkan nama pelanggan perseroan. "Ya, nama pelanggan perseroan PT Nextnation Prisma."


4. Mengingat tingginya jumlah pengaduan dari publik mengenai ketersediaan Corporate Secretary dalam hal menanggapi pertanyaan pemegang saham maupun publik, mohon disampaikan nomor contact person Corporate Secretary yang dapat dihubungi pemegang saham atau investor. "Nomor telepon kantor 021-52901316/52901317."


5. Apakah perseroan memiliki keterkaitan manajemen atau pemegang saham dengan: a. PT Royal Trust Futures. b. Renewable Power Indonesia Tbk (dulu PT Katarina Utama Tbk). "Tidak, perseroan tidak memiliki keterkaitan manajemen atau pemegang saham dengan PT Royal Trust Futures dan Renewable Power Indonesia Tbk."


Terkait Laporan Keuangan


1. Berdasarkan hasil dengan pendapat antara bursa dan perseroan pada 11 Februari 2015, perseroan menyampaikan dan menyadari adanya kesalahan penyajian pada laporan keuangan (LK) per 30 September 2014 namun tidak segera menyampaikan keterbukaan informasi atau revisi LK. Mohon disampaikan alasannya. "Perseroan sedang melakukan revisi dan berencana menyampaikan revisi tersebut kepada bursa begitu laporan selesai."

Here is the lesson from warren buffet to help you choose the company to invest in.

Never trust the financial report. It can be cooked. Like nexgram's financial report, it was cooked til burnt and can't even be eaten.

Never trust the number in the counter. It can be over valued because it was cooked. Like nexgram's counter.

So what to do?

You have to scrutinize the company that you invest your money or planned to invest to. And if you look into nexgram, then you will see the signal to cut loss:

- nexgram got it big break from inovisi and depended on inovisi and other overseas subsidiaries for source of revenue. Now, inovisi and the companies are bankrupt.

- nexgram was used by tey and ooi in their scheme to cheat others.

- nexgram attempted to hide it subsidiaries' owners (pt star, gold dynamic etc) by claiming they don't have information (what????).

- the owners of the said subsidiaries are tey and ooi as indicated by the fact that dedi francis was and is the director in both companies.

- three out of nexgram's directors quit nexgram citing protasco's suit against tey and ooi as the reason.

- tey was ousted from nexgram.

Etc.

Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer

ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.

On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.

Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.

“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.

Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.

Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.

The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.

According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.

Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.

StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.

However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.

Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.

It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.

However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.

At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.

On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.

Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.

Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.

This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.

This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.

The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.

Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.

This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.

On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.

Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.

In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.

Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.

LOL LOL LOL, I can do this all day LOL LOL LOL

Investigations to proceed despite the company withdrawing Ire-Tex offer

ALTHOUGH the takeover offer Nexgram Holdings Bhd made on Ire-Tex Corp Bhd is now off the table, it has not stopped regulators from pursuing their investigations on the former’s past dealings.

On Thursday, Nexgram turned things around by announcing its intention to withdraw its takeover offer on one-stop packaging service provider Ire-Tex. This came a day after it said it would take steps to bring in a special auditor to determine the veracity of some of its assets.

Yesterday, Nexgram also announced that its due diligence committee had taken heed of concerns made by regulators and followed up with a visit to Indonesia, where some of the questionable transactions are said to have transpired.

“The Nexgram board had formed the view that such observations appear to potentially point to inconsistencies with regards to details of certain assets with the Nexgram group,” the statement said.

Following this, Nexgram said it had formed a special committee comprising of four directors of which two are independent, to take necessary steps to address the matter, which include the appointment of a special auditor.

Still, if any evidence suggests Nexgram has not carried out its responsibilities towards shareholders, the company could face sanctions from the regulators, and depending on the severity, it could face criminal prosecutions, insiders say.

The Nexgram saga started after it launched a takeover offer on Ire-Tex last November, which was to be satisfied through issuance of new Nexgram shares.

According to its website, Nexgram says it is a multinational conglomerate involved in the telco, security and surveillance, software development, property development, industries, business advisories and investment activities sectors.

Its rationale to take over Ire-Tex was so it could continue its diversification by tapping into manufacturing and industrial segments.

StarBizWeek earlier reported that regulators had concerns over the takeover due to the veracity of certain assets in Nexgram.

However, it had insufficient grounds to disrupt the offer and continued to follow up on its leads.

Following this, Nexgram posted its offer document on Dec 11, 2015.

It is understood that both the Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia met with the advisors and a representative of Nexgram’s board to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.

However, soon after, through Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of some of its subsidiaries, which according to the SC, were the subject of enquiry.

At the same time, Nexgram made some more changes in the company.

On Jan 14, the company announced that its co-founder Datuk Tey Por Yee (pic) had resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”.

Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.

Interestingly, Tey has not sold off his stake in Nexgram. According to Bursa filings, Tey’s stake stands at 23.4%.

This led to the SC choosing to invoke its powers under the Capital Markets Securities Act (CMSA) under Section 217 to issue a public statement on its concerns relating to those assets, a first for the SC.

This course of action is seen as a rarity even in other countries, says a source.

The SC had issued the public statement on Jan 15, stating that Nexgram’s disposal of certain assets “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia”.

Since Nexgram was seen as being “uncooperative” in bringing in a special auditor to independently verify the value of its assets, Bursa had all this while held back on the greenlight for Nexgram’s circular to its shareholders related to the Ire-Tex deal.

This meant that Nexgram had not been able to call for an EGM to vote on the takeover proposal, which in turn could have led to the offer lapsing.

On Jan 11 and Jan 12, Nexgram announced that it had earlier entered into agreements to dispose of its subsidiaries – Nexgram Resources Sdn Bhd, Godynamic Investments Ltd and PT Semesta Tirta Antara Raya (through Godynamic) – which are believed to be the subject of the regulators’ enquiries.

Although it is not too clear which assets showed some red flags, it is worth taking a look at Nexgram’s balance sheet.

In its financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2014, the company had RM84.5mil in cash balances. However in the following year, a majority of that cash seemed to be reflected in as inventories. Its inventories moved from zero to RM89.8mil in the following financial year while its cash balances fell to RM31.1mil.

Sources say enquiries by the regulators are focused on the paper and cash trail of how those inventories were built up.

PETALING JAYA: Following the unprecedented action by the Securities Commission (SC) to disclose questionable actions by Nexgram Holdings Bhd, the regulator’s next course of action is a thorough investigation into the money trail relating to the RM84.5mil cash balance that had previously existed in the company, sources said.

This investigation will entail, among others, answers from directors, advisors and auditors of Nexgram, which is involved in software and property.

It is learnt that the authorities are looking at the dealings involving three subsidiaries of Nexgram and if the decision to divest them went to the board.

“The three subsidiaries were already the subject of investigations by the authorities in the capital markets. Knowing that, how did the planned divestments get done?” asked a corporate lawyer. The type of action taken will depend on the findings of the investigation by the regulators.

To recap, last Friday, the SC invoked its powers under Section 217(4)(b) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA) by issuing a public statement in relation to a proposed takeover of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd by Nexgram, to be funded by the latter’s shares.

The SC’s concerns had related to the value of the assets of Nexgram, noting that the actions of Nexgram to dispose of some of its subsidiary companies “delays and obstructs the ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia.”

According to sources, both the SC and Bursa had concerns about Nexgram, following the latter’s service of its notice to takeover Ire-Tex last November.

At some point in their investigations, both regulators agreed that there were sufficient grounds for Bursa to require Nexgram to provide verification on the existence of certain assets belonging to these subsidiaries.

It is also understood that as part of the initial investigation into Nexgram, the SC and Bursa had met with the advisors and a representative of the board of Nexgram to request the verification of certain alleged bank balances by an independent accountant.

The trigger point for the SC to take action under Section 217 of the CMSA was the company’s decision to dispose the relevant subsidiaries.

The type of actions of the regulators in this case will depend on when the outcome of their investigations are, which is also a complicated matter as it involves bank accounts and other transactions in Indonesia.

Depending on the timing of the findings, the SC could file for an injunction to stop the offer from proceeding or leave the offer to lapse. This is because Bursa has already notified Nexgram through its advisors that it will not clear the circular to shareholders and thus an EGM cannot be held for Nexgram shareholders to vote on matter, and this in turn would lead to the offer lapsing.

“The combined efforts of the SC and Bursa are ensuring that the shareholders of the target company, namely Ire-Tex, are not in danger of receiving payment in shares that may have a questionable value,” explained the corporate lawyer.

The SC raised eyebrows at the value of Nexgram that was sitting on a cash balance of RM84.5mil as at April 30, 2014. Its accounts showed that in the following financial year, most of that cash looked like it had been converted into inventories.

The company could have used the cash to purchase inventories, indicative by the accounts which showed inventories move from zero to RM89.8mil as at 2015. At the same time, cash balances fell to RM31.1mil. Sources said the SC’s enquiries could have centred around the paper and cashtrail of how those inventories were built up.

The case involving Nexgram has drawn attention to one businessman in particular, Datuk Tey Por Yee, who on Jan 14, resigned as executive director to “pursue his personal interest and goals”. Since his resignation, Nexgram has six directors left sitting on its board.

The rare statement by the SC sent Nexgram’s shares reeling to as low as 7.5 sen yesterday, representing an 11.76% drop.

The stock saw 34.5 million shares exchange hands. The shares closed at 8.5 sen last Friday.

Tey was also involved in the Protasco Bhd boardroom tussle, which saw him together with director Ooi Kock Aun voted out of the board at an EGM.

This came after allegations of a questionable investment in an Indonesian oil and gas company.

Meanwhile, in a related development, Nexgram shed some additional details about its plans to sell its entire 69.6% stake in Godynamic Investmentd Ltd for RM34.8mil on Jan 12.

This was in response to a query by the stock exchange.

Nexgram said while proceeds from the disposal would be used to pay for the 51% stake in Transeaways Shipping Sdn Bhd, which was announced on Jan 14, the company was “unable to quantify the exact amount” to be utilised for the planned acquisition.

Nexgram’s change of auditors raises a lot of questions

WHO says minority shareholders are a helpless lot? How can that be true when a person with a minuscule number of shares in a listed company became the only one to nominate the new external auditors for the company? And he didn’t even have to explain why he did so.

He just threw out the name of the accounting firm and came up with a proposed resolution to be tabled at an extraordinary general meeting.

It was then up to the board of directors to assess the suitability of the firm. The board decided that the appointment of the new auditors was in the best interest of the company and its shareholders, and thus recommended that shareholders at the EGM vote for the proposed change of auditors. The shareholders did as advised.

Take a bow, Ko Boon Leong of Setapak, Kuala Lumpur. If there were such a thing as the Tiny-but-Mighty Corporate Player of the Year Award, you’d likely be a top candidate for 2015.

Then again, an accolade like that shouldn’t be given away cheaply. There should be diligent scrutiny. Let’s go over the story and raise questions when necessary.

But first, the reason this has come up is because the auditors appointed last year now wants to step down, after less than six months in that role. Accounting firm CHI-LLTC explained that its workforce had shrunk recently and it therefore couldn’t handle the increasing work arising from the listed company’s “recent expansion plan”.

The listed company is Nexgram Holdings Bhd, which has been in the news lately after the Securities Commission had issued a public statement on Jan 15 regarding the company’s offer to buy all the securities of Ire-Tex Corp Bhd. It was revealed that three subsidiaries of Nexgram are the focus of ongoing enquiries by the SC and Bursa Malaysia. On Thursday, Nexgram applied for consent from the SC to withdraw the offer for the Ire-Tex securities.

Back to the replacement of auditors last year. On July 8, Ko sent a letter to Nexgram to nominate CHI-LLTC as the new auditors, taking over from SJ Grant Thornton. He also offered a draft resolution for the proposed change.

According to the letter, Ko had 1,333 Nexgram shares. That’s almost nothing compared with the company’s 1.88 billion issued shares. Nevertheless, as a shareholder, he’s entitled to nominate the auditors, according to the Companies Act.

But why him? And why make the nomination at that point, when there had been no disclosure regarding a need to change auditors?

Based on announcements made through the stock exchange, the first time the investing public had any idea Nexgram was switching auditors was on July 20, when the company issued a notice of the EGM to consider the proposed change of auditors. The notice mentioned the resignation of SJ Grant Thornton, and yet, Nexgram hadn’t announced that development.

The relevant details only emerged the next day with the release of the circular to shareholders. Some of the fresh information certainly deserves greater attention.

In late June, SJ Grant Thornton told the Nexgram board that the fee for the 2015 audit would be increased from RM200,000 to RM500,000. The accounting firm said the hike was because it classified the 2015 audit as high-risk and would therefore need to use more resources for the job.

The high-risk classification is the result of “significant changes in the level of activities in the Nexgram group” and the Audit Oversight Board’s review of Nexgram’s 2014 audit files, which led to the requirement for additional work to be performed during the 2015 audit.

The board met on July 8 and agreed to reject the fee revision, describing it “not sensible and totally unreasonable”. On the same day, the board received Ko’s letter nominating CHI-LLTC as the new auditors and alluding to SJ Grant Thornton’s resignation.

But Nexgram received SJ Grant Thornton’s letter of resignation only on July 15, after the board had written to the firm on July 10 to say it wouldn’t accept the new audit fee.

In its circular to shareholders, Nexgram says it received Ko’s notice of nomination in “anticipation of the outcome of the negotiation with SJ Grant Thornton”.

That bit of pretzel logic can only trigger questions. How did Ko know about the directors’ stand on the higher audit fee? In fact, how is he — a person with merely 1,333 Nexgram shares — even aware of the fee revision? How and why has he chosen CHI-LLTC as the standby auditors out of the more than 50 other accounting firms in Malaysia that are registered as auditors of listed companies?

And why didn’t the nomination come from somebody else, say, Datuk Tey Por Yee, who was then Nexgram’s CEO and MD, and also a substantial shareholder?

According to the circular to shareholders, the board reviewed CHI-LLTC’s fee and engagement proposal, and after consulting the audit committee, it decided that the firm’s proposal was reasonable and cost-effective.

Bonus round.

24 Oct 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee via Global Cap Venture signed Term Sheet with Herman Koswara, the controlling shareholders of PT Fas. The purpose of the term sheet is to acquire project kuala simpang timur oil field. It is agreed that Larry will purchase Herman's shares priced at IDR 6billion (Larry has only paid IDR 3billion).

1 November 2012 Larry Tey Por Yee and Benny Tjokro agreed on how to move forward with handling over Benny's shares at PT Fas, i.e. Tey Por Yee paid the operational costs of PT Haseba as of the date of the agreement and Larry Tey Por Yee take over Benny's debt at Mayapada Bank in the amount or IDR 23 Billion (both conditions are not fulfilled). However in the said date Larry already received the shares of PT Fas belonged to Benny Tjokro. Tey put the shares in PT Asi.

28 December 2012: Larry Tey Por Yee sold his shares to Protasco Berhad in the amount of USD 55million without notifying Herman and Benny.

21 May 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee sent a forged invitation for egms of PT Haseba which will be held at the office of Djamkk Asmur, the public notary in Aceh.

14 August 2013: to pay his debt to Benny, Larry wired in IDR 5billion and put Inovisi's shares as a guarantee. Few month later when Larry is in default; Benny attempted to execute the block of Inovisi's shares and finds that the value has dropped to a meager 10% of its initial value.

23 August 2013 Larry Tey Por Yee changed the directors and commisioners of PT Haseba based on the illegal egms.

24 February 2014 Herman Koswara and Benny Tjokro lodged police report against Larry Tey Por Yee alleging that he forged Herman and Benny's signature and defrauded them.

1 April 2014 Benny Tjokro through it vehicle PT Dayasakti Putradharma filed lawsuit against PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia at south jakarta district court.

25 April 2014 Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama filed lawsuit against PT Green Pine, Jerry Djajasaputra, PT Equator Securities and PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk arguing that it had invested IDR 125billion in PT Inovisi which was guaranteed by a block of Inovisi's shares. But it had not seen any profit and when they attempted to cash in on the shares, it shares dropped significantly.

11 December 2014 Benny Tjokro and Larry Tey signed settlement agreement in which Larry agreed to pay IDR 18billion, at the latest 28 January 2015. Up to this day Larry failed to honor this settlement agreement.

8 July 2015 The court ruled in favour of Koperasi Sejahtera Bersama and order Inovisi to pay IDR 200billion.

15 July 2015 Indonesian police raided the office of PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk.

December 2015 PT Inovisi Infracom Tbk closed down it business without prior notice to the investors and employees after failing to pay rent and utilities to Patra Jasa's building management. It management went hiding.

LOL LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR: A former company director claimed trial in a Sessions Court in Ampang here to charges of cheating the board of directors, making false declarations and committing criminal breach of trust (CBT) involving more than RM80mil.

Datuk Ooi Kock Aun, 49, allegedly cheated Protasco Bhd’s board of directors and its officers by voluntarily hiding information that he had direct involvement with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, a company which was incorporated in Indonesia.

His action had caused Protasco’s board of directors and its officers to enter into an investment agreement on oil and gas in Indonesia with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, with Protasco buying 63% of PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia valued at US$22mil (RM68,393,170).

The offence was allegedly committed at Protasco’s office at Level 2 of the Corporate Building Unipark Suria, Jalan Ikram-Uniten in Kajang between Nov 2012 and Jan 30, 2014.

Ooi, who is now a businessman, faces a second charge of making false declaration to the Commissioner for Oath that he did not have any link with PT Anglo Slavic Utama, any of its directors or shareholders when he knew that he actually had interest in the company.

The offence allegedly took place at Wern Li Morsingh commissioner for oath’s office in Fraser Business Park at 50-3A, Jalan Metro Pudu, Off Jalan Yew on July 25, 2014.

He claimed trial to a third charge of committing CBT on the PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia’s property for RM16,250,000 at the CIMB Islamic Bank Berhad in Menara Southern Bank, No 83 Medan Setia 1, Plaza Damansara, Bukit Damansara on Feb 4, 2014.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Datin Nurshuhaida Zainal Azahar offered bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges.

Nurshuhaida also urged the court to order Ooi to surrender his passport.

Ooi’s counsel Edmund Bon, in asking for a lower bail, said his client was least likely to abscond as he has cooperated with the police throughout the investigation.

Bon said Ooi has a wife and four children and he was a well-respected individual in the accounting field.

Judge Suraiya Mustafa Kamal fixed bail at RM1mil in one surety for all charges and also ordered Ooi to surrender his passport. The court also fixed Feb 26 for mention.

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 — Public-listed engineering, property and construction company Protasco Bhd has filed an application to cite two of its directors for acting in contempt of court by allegedly interfering with witnesses in a multi-million ringgit lawsuit brought against it.

In a statement today, Protasco accused two of its directors Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun, as well as their lawyer Gideon Tan, of interfering with a key witness’s evidence in the court case.

Protasco said the star witness and his Indonesian lawyers had already given statutory declarations on the alleged interference, adding that action by the three men amount to “attempts to pervert and/or obstruct the course of justice”.

“On November 18, 2014, Protasco obtained leave of Court to initiate committal proceedings against Tey, Ooi and Gideon Tan, where they must show cause why they should not be fined or committed to imprisonment for contempt of court.

“The High Court has fixed December 8, 2014 as the date for the High Court to hear the committal proceedings,” the company said in a statement.

Protasco had in September mounted a US$27 million (RM90.87 million) lawsuit against an Indonesian company, PT Anglo Slavic Utama (ASU) to recover its money and against Tey and Ooi for alleged conspiracy to defraud, making secret profits, breaching their fiduciary and statutory duties, and hiding their beneficial interests in the latter.

The hearing for the alleged contempt of court case comes ahead of two different extraordinary general meetings (EGM) by Tey and Ooi and the company’s co-founder Datuk Seri Chong Ket Pen next week.

After Protasco’s deal to enter the oil and gas business fell apart in August, the lawsuit was filed and a boardroom battle was sparked between Chong and the two directors — where both sides accused the other of wrongfully making profits.

Chong, who is also Prostasco’s group managing director, has called for an EGM on November 26 to persuade other shareholders to remove Tey and Ooi. Tey has called for an EGM scheduled two days later, where he is expected try to persuade shareholders that his allegations against Chong are true.

Tey had apparently brought a deal to Protasco in 2012 to invest in a working oilfield in Aceh. Protasco agreed to acquire a stake in PT ASU’s PT Anglo Slavic Indonesia (PT ASI), which indirectly owned the oilfield.

The deal was renegotiated in 2014, then terminated by Protasco in August 2014. Protasco then sued Tey and Ooi in September for the return of the US$27 million paid to buy the stake in PT ASI and a shareholders’ advance. It has also made police reports against Tey.

In turn, Tey through his vehicle Kingdom Seekers Ventures Sdn Bhd sued Chong, accusing him of siphoning off RM10 million through a group of “Indonesian/foreign entities” to make an illegal financial gain.

Last week, Chong filed his defence to the suit, denying Tey’s claims. He said he had made a personal loan of RM20 million to Tey, of which RM10 million had been repaid. Chong claimed this RM10 million repayment allegedly still owed by Tey is the illegal financial gain the former was accused of making.

According to Chong, these group of foreign entities have made numerous transactions in shares of listed companies linked to Tey — PN17 company Hytex Integrated Bhd, Wintoni Group Bhd (formerly Winsun Technologies Bhd), Asdion Bhd and Tey’s own flagship Nexgram Holdings Bhd (formerly Nextnation Communication Bhd).

In 1997, when the Asian Financial Crisis struck, Protasco had grown to 600 staff and managed to avoid any retrenchments by making pay cuts across the board. The move left the company in a good position to grab projects when the government began its pump-priming programme to revive the Malaysian economy.

Since it was listed in 2003, Protasco has grown further to 1,800 in staff size, with an unbroken profit record and an average of 8 to 10 sen in dividends paid every year.

The company aims to grow between 15 and 20 per cent in profit every year, and, more ambitiously, to join Bursa Malaysia’s billion ringgit market capitalisation club in five years’ time. Protasco’s market capitalisation is currently RM549 million.

The company’s order book has grown to more than RM700 million since Chong took on a full-time executive role in 2013, from less than RM100 million before.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/claiming-tampering-with-witness-in-lawsuit-protasco-seeks-to-cite-directors#sthash.3ltUuQOb.dpuf

Bad Tey Por Yee and Ooi Kock Aun, attempted to tamper with witnesses LOL LOL LOL

KUALA LUMPUR: A proposed joint-venture (JV) mixed development project in Sepang involving Nexgram Holdings Bhd and Asdion Bhd has failed to receive the land development order (DO) from the Sepang Municipal Council.

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia, the software developer said following the council’s rejection, the land vendor Hijrah Murni (M) Sdn Bhd had sent to Top Valley Properties Sdn Bhd - which was to be the project’s joint developer with Nexgram Land - a notice terminating the sale and purchase agreement.

“Nevertheless, the company was informed that Top Valley is in the on-going process of re-negotiating terms and timelines for new DO submission,” added Asdion, which plans to diversify into property development via a JV arrangement with Top Valley.

In December 2014 Top Valley signed an off take agreement cum sale and purchase agreement (SPA) with software developer Nexgram Holdings Bhd’ unit Nexgram Land Sdn Bhd whereby they would develop and sell to MyAngkasa Bina Sdn Bhd the entire mixed property development project on 2.154ha. Meanwhile, Top Valley entered into the land SPA with Hijrah Murni.

The project, to be undertaken on a piece of agricultural leasehold Malay reserved land, was to comprise three tower blocks comprising a total of 659 units of serviced apartments and 10 units of commercial/retail shops with a gross development value of RM297.39mil.

Top Valley’s entitlement from the project was estimated to be RM13.4mil, and Asdion was to have a participation right in Top Valley’s entitlement and to share the project benefits (80% share or RM11.9mil).

Bursa Malaysia Securities considered it a related party transaction as Datuk Tey Por Yee was a common major shareholder of both Nexgram and Asdion, and See Poh Yee was a common director of both.

In the latest statement On Monday, Asdion said it was informed that for the purpose of the offtake agreement cum SPA with Nexgram Land and MyAngkasa which was still subsisting, Top Valley was currently exploring all possible viable options, including sourcing for an alternative suitable land and continue negotiating with the land owner for resubmission of the DO.

“The board had discussed the letter in a board meeting held on March 14 and requested the management to provide further information for deliberation before making any decision,” it said.

If the members of nexgram's special committee really are independent, then they will report back the following:

- pt star owned by tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
- dedi francis used to work in pt star and report directly to tey por yee.
- gold dynamic owned by tey por yee and ooi kock aun.
- dedi francis is a director at pt gold dynamic, the subsidiary of gold dynamic.
- dedi francis is a commisioner of pt anglo slavic utama.
- dedi francis is a nominee of tey por yee and ooi kock aun.

LOL LOL LOL