TM's revenue is most likely going to be hurt by the mandatory price reduction imposed by the government. The price reduction is also going to introduce competition, while good for the consumers like you and I, aren't good for this company if the management is unable to overcome this hurdle. The challenge? They have been a comfortable monopoly for far too long.

Inari is doing a lot of active trading with Inari lately. Makes you wonder if they are trying to play catch-up toward their annual target return.

IMO, OCK is pursuing expansion at too fast a pace. Too fast that expenses are gradually increasing at a rate more than revenue. Will the company find a balance to eventually see cash flow coming in and staying in their books? Or will the company's vision of regional expansion eventually cause its expenses to be unsustainable?

So does kwang2209 want riches or does he want to keep his pride and joy?

Calm down guys, let’s provide more constructive and less emotional inputs.

Perhaps because maintenance cost > potential revenue?

Lol, do you know the concept of supply and demand?

QR by 30 May 2018

Seems like a lot of ppl here aren’t aware of what’s going on globally.

Mmm, sure you have your points. Would like to know if your statements are based on empirical observations or merely speculation?

I know that they are not relying solely on bus operations for revenue generation. However, since bus operations is their core business activity, it does warrant a concern. I guess what we should then try to identify is the source of revenue decline. Is it due to ticketing sales? Breaking down of busses? Decrease in demand in the general market?

General and administrative expenses decrement. Gotta look into that in conjunction with other factors. Is it due to improvement in processes? Or is it caused by layoff of workers due to lack in business?

Decreasing financing cost. Perhaps it’s a contract type of thing? One of the reasons a borrower can get a lower rate is good payback record. Can’t criticise solely on a single parameter. Perhaps it’s part of their debt financing strategy.

Just brainstorming here.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but based on reporter's arguments:
1. Gross profit went down due to investment in new terminals right?
2. General and administrative expense down - This is a good thing as cost went down.
3. Finance cost down while loan is increasing - This is also a good thing as debt became cheaper.

So what is he trying to say really? In favor or against the company?

Patience!

When will QR be out?

Lol this stock forever tumbling. Qtr report releasing next week? Hopefully some good figures.

@saubergoh Ex date was on 9 Nov 2017, which means 8 Nov was the last day you can buy the stock to be entitled to the bonus issue.

That line on Anzo has been the same since months ago, still no 100% profit :/

I think what diehardunited meant is 0.20 la. 2.00 a bit too far-fetched right?

@NoPainNoGainJo WB expiring at 8 Jun 2019.

Strong buy support at 1.70 despite relatively heavy selling volume at 1.70.

@lizi

Correlation will work both ways, there's no positive correlation for up moves then zero/negative correlation for down moves. For example, first you said they are related, then you say they are different entities. Pretty contradicting to me.

When KLCI goes up, all must follow suit is it? Lol.

When warrant price > mother share price, the difference is the premium investors would pay for the time before maturity of the warrant. We call that a time premium. As the maturity date of the warrant is only in 25 June 2019, there are still possibilities for the mother share price to rise above, in this case, 0.48 + 1.15 = 1.63, to render the warrant worth buying. And as we can see, many investors have a target price above $2 per share for Ekovest within this year. Hence, taking a forward-looking perspective, the share price and warrant are still relatively cheap.