Acceptable la

start at 56 , end with 56...

No more story, Is time to run

below 8, seems good to enter now

When line said others people is Keyboard warrior. Try to see line profile.
All time Arbb. Maybe is a promoter ? hahaha....
Anyhow line, you don't every time bulat bulat. Arb before this involve in Iot and SME
Keep call people show evidence ? You never work in Firm before. This is common TNC.
Ohhhh..... I forgot you selling sim card only. Sorry......

Capital A logo look like airbnb , lmao

UWC can go for long term. Quality stock

Wow, interesting. Line still here ?

Instead of saying people keyboard warrior, track back all your comment, I think who on monitor this counter will know who is the keyboard warrior.

haahaaha... Anyhow international fund is very depends on sector one. If use this balance I think unfair di, Even like Kwan family , hup send last time also without international fund la. but Fintech gang got international fund. LCW help XOX do advertisement also. wahhh, then must show XOX so geng lo ? My godness, you cannot take this as a point la.

......

Wow. LINE so hardcore.

All time here just to comment random sheet ?

FULL TIME JOB as keyboard warrior ?

Really LOW life.

Jazmaster where did I say I’m against using api.

Line, you memang pandai twist, check back your comment.

Now jazmaster will ask me what do I mean by technological direction.

Please, don't shiok yourself.

High tech with patents, I agree.
But onside, does all the tech needed to cover patent or just part of it ？
If you are answer were yes, I will super curious you work for which company.

For ARB.
I am not going comment since I am not holding any tickets but If you said hit and run. I will really laugh. You tot dueling business with irresponsible freelance or web agency ?

API .
Nothing wrong but such companies won’t last long. No technological direction.
Grab, Uber, Spotify, Zoom is all using API. Do you know that ?

Temporary still solid. Let's see what next

Bias ? Yes, Line is Bias.

First ? How you define low tech and high tech ?

From tech company ? Which department are you from ?

SVM ? Then you must know the different of engineering and programmer.

Your job is intergrade system ? layman terms = Repetitive tasks, Am I right ?

You, let say about API ? I guess you know the pro or cons.
Then anything wrong if using external API ?

Not only that, too many combination showing that he is totally out of knowledge in IT sector.
No idea what is metaverse, No idea what is Iot, API and etc. He just know what is SIM Card. That's It.

Anyhow disclaimer again : I am not holding any ticket of ARB, just that I see this LINE keep blowing, I pass by and comment only.

hoot9eonly ------
This line is a joker. track back his comment. You guys will know why.

Such a funny counter.

Need wait a little longer more

No power is better , keep collect

LINE

If you want to be a keyboard warrior, can professional a bit ?

Don't blow, give fact, static, analyst.

Blow who also know,

Line - Guess you really work hard being a keyboard warrior.

Haiz, I don't know what make you so hard to being a typical keyboard warrior , blow only, Give static please.... Blow number one. No study come blow IoT.

https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/malaysia-information-communications-technology

this guys (LINE) is a really Big joker

last time used to share a API video and say everyone can build IoT, lol....

limited knowledge is ok, but don't keep giving wrong info about IoT.
Misleading people by your own thinking.

Disclaimer: I am not holding any ticket of ARB , don't listen anything bxxxxxt from user LINE.

0 value and empty knowledge of IoT, but keep blowing like macam yes.

line - Empty knowledge on IoT

Conclusion - LINE is keyboard warrior, random comment.


1) no patents yet it’s called tech company - FYI patent is not a nessasary for tech company.
Software tech and EMS is two type of thing.

7 REASONS NOT TO PURSUE SOFTWARE PATENTS
1. THE PATENT PROCESS IS SLOW
2. THE COSTS DON’T ALWAYS JUSTIFY THE INVESTMENT
3. YOU CAN PURSUE LOWER-COST IP PROTECTIONS
4. IP MIGHT NOT BE YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET
5. SOFTWARE DOESN’T REQUIRE A HIGH R&D INVESTMENT
6. SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ISN’T GUARANTEED
7. OPEN-SOURCE MODELS COULD UNDERMINE THE VALUE OF YOUR PATENTS


2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised
Development fee is knowledge based thing. Why does it no guarantee ? Is based on development time.


3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers
How does it failed ? Don't you know they are 1 thing in IT industry called [FIX BUG]


4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing
In the Game of IoT, not only google, tencent, grab and meituan, microsoft, arb, censoft is having different type of playrole.

5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity
I am not commenting on this, but IoT is future, Which is true, Else you won't see zoom, blockchain, metaverse, NFT in market.


6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast
I guess you make some study on this, but small tech company dissapear is on US market, Not south east asia.


Conclusion - LINE is keyboard warrior, random comment.

Read back your comment - LINE -> Mr Uturn

Regarding share I am not sure but don't keep misleading with your limited IT knowlwdge.
Don't act smart, Most of them think they are smart actually F......

https://henry.law/blog/software-patent-protection/

7 REASONS NOT TO PURSUE SOFTWARE PATENTS
There are many valid arguments against software patents as part of a business strategy. Depending on the particular type of software you’re developing and your business model, some of these reasons might apply to you.

1. THE PATENT PROCESS IS SLOW
On average, it takes about two to three years for an application to mature into a patent. But in the fast-paced world of software development, that can be a lifetime: By the time your patent issues, your software may be outdated, or its code might have evolved significantly.

2. THE COSTS DON’T ALWAYS JUSTIFY THE INVESTMENT
Patent prosecution isn’t cheap, and you should evaluate whether the benefits will justify the cost.

Notably, you might not see much return on investment if you seek patent protection for an invention with a short shelf life — and the rate of technological change for many types of software is extremely high.

3. YOU CAN PURSUE LOWER-COST IP PROTECTIONS
You can use copyrights or trade secrecy (or both!) to protect your software for a much lower cost.

Besides, in order to file for a patent, you must publicly disclose the technique used in your software — which may not benefit your business. By contrast, neither copyrights nor trade secrecy require public disclosure.

4. IP MIGHT NOT BE YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET
Typically, you want to invest the most in your core business assets. “IP-centric” companies consider their technological innovations to be among their most important business assets and will set aside a significant portion of their R&D budget for patent prosecution.

But many software companies’ strongest assets are their brand, user base and industry adoption — meaning a particular innovation or patentable feature won’t be as valuable towards their business strategy. In this case, you might prefer to protect your IP using less costly options.

5. SOFTWARE DOESN’T REQUIRE A HIGH R&D INVESTMENT
In addition, “IP-centric” companies typically have long R&D cycles. And because patents exclude competing products from the market for up to 20 years, they’re essential for recouping high R&D investment.

But many types of software don’t require the same level of R&D commitment as many other fields of technology. For this reason, patents may not be a necessary tool to maximize your profit margins.

6. SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ISN’T GUARANTEED
In the wake of the Alice decision, the patent process is far less predictable for software inventions than it used to be. Even though software can be patent-eligible, the U.S. patent office has created a moving target for meeting the patent-eligibility standards. You might prefer to invest in a more certain maneuver.

7. OPEN-SOURCE MODELS COULD UNDERMINE THE VALUE OF YOUR PATENTS
If your business utilizes open-source software licensing, patents could complicate your strategy.

Generally speaking, you can pursue patent protection for software that includes open-source code.

If you patent an open-source software tool that you developed, you could potentially exclude competitors from distributing competing products. However, open-source models aren’t compatible with typical royalty-based patent licensing terms, and your open source distribution would end up weakening your ability to enforce your patent.

Invest in your knowledge first.

.......

I though Creativity only for designer, now for IT industry also. I am really amazed with your comment

Iot is not based on creativity ? Are you serious ?

Yes, i can say maybe he got business minded but everything he say is just empty and surface.

I read the comment, I really can't stop laugh. My gosh.

JOKER - line

walao, this topic still continue ?

Bro, being offensive to a counter is ok, but don't buta buta tembak.
Don't act smart, karma is smarter than you...

Con or con I don't know. but you really make me laugh man. hahahaha...

Please..... I don't think you even have any IT knowledge.

If anything is like what you speak, then I can tell you 1 thing.
The whole industry don't need IoT, just like your sharing, copy india video, india tech, india nokia., india IoT, india cloud, lol ...

India is famous with tech, Guess everyone know it.

In fact, if you want to comment like an expert, go study how tencent and microsoft work.

If youtube can work, IT, programmer, software engineering will not categories as a high pay job. They can join your partnership to sell Phone Numbers.....

I am just pass by here. I am not sure how good or how bad ARB is but the comment from this user [line] sound just too funny. Guess he is not from this industry. but [acting smart]. This user make my day. Hahahah....

The bom bi bi will come

Keep calm and Steady !!!

Not bad le, After Sung master, here come with RTO.

LIMIT UP ?!!!!!!!

New solar family ?

https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/blogging2win/2021-09-23-story-h1571678877-Another_solar_related_gem_that_is_YET_to_be_discovered_by_investors.jsp

Market so bad, still standing firm. Nice UWC, super solid

Seems good

Wow, @BilisMasin FULL TIME SPAMMER at Kanger ? So working hard to fight back all comment

https://www.nst.com.my/business/2021/09/725001/kangers-new-acquisition-sung-master-deliver-strong-profit-fy21

KUALA LUMPUR: Bamboo flooring manufacturer Kanger International Bhd is upbeat about its prospects, mainly driven by its acquisition of a 51 per cent stake in building materials supplier Sung Master Holdings Sdn Bhd for RM94.8 million.

"The acquisition of Sung Master will positively enhance our financial performance as Sung Master is a profitable company. For the full-year (ended June 30 2021), we expect Sung Master to deliver an estimated net profit and revenue of about RM20.0 million and RM115.0 million respectively," said Kanger executive director Steven Kuah Choon Ching said.

Kanger said Sung Master had consistently delivered a profitable performance over the past three financial years (FY), from FY ended January 2018 up to the audited 17-month of FY ended June 2021 and the latest unaudited 10-month ended April 2021.

Moreover, Sung Master even paid out dividends totaling RM25.0 million during the periods.

It has also consistently recoded double-digit gross profit margin for the past two financial years with low gearing of 0.63 times and also strong current ratio of 2.4 times , suggesting strong operating cashflow.

For the latest 10-month ended April 30 2021, Sung Master reported an unaudited net profit of RM11.8 million against revenue of RM76.0 million.

Sung Master is mainly involved in the sales and trading of building materials, which include timber flooring, tiles, bulk cement, concrete, locksets and sanitary ware.

Its clients consist of property and construction players as well as engineering consultants.

Kanger recently diversified into the construction business and the acquisition of Sung Master is part of the group's growth strategy to enhance its competitive advantage when bidding for new projects in the construction industry.

"By leveraging on Sung Master's existing network of suppliers, we can source for building materials at relatively competitive prices. This will lead to greater cost efficiencies when tendering for new projects," Kuah said.

Kanger is currently working on construction projects with a combined orderbook of about RM1.0 billion.

It is applying for the Grade 7 contractor licence from the Construction Industry Development Board which will enable it to undertake construction projects of any value.

Kanger has also expanded its portfolio of investment properties with a RM142.9 million acquisition of 126 service apartments units in Antara @ Genting Highlands.

The development of the properties are expected to be completed by 2024.

"Once the service apartment units are completed, the properties will bring in a steady flow of recurring income by way of receiving rental income. "Furthermore, we will also benefit from capital gains when the properties are sold, as we managed to buy these units en-bloc at an attractive price."

"Genting Highlands is an attractive tourist destination for local and international travelers. We are confident that these apartment units will be in high demand once travel restrictions are lifted and tourism activities return to normal," Kuah said.

Kanger's existing bamboo business has been disrupted by the lockdowns in China and Malaysia due to the Covid-19 pandemic which affected sales in the last year.

"We took this time to explore and identify various opportunities to expand our revenue portfolio into new areas that are complementary to our core competencies. In addition to property investment, we also decided to diversify into the construction business," he said.

Kanger is currently undergoing a renounceable rights issue with warrants on the basis of one rights share for every existing share, together with one free detachable warrant for every one rights share subscribed.

At an issue price of RM0.06 per rights share, the exercise could raise gross proceeds of up to RM20.0 million under the minimum case scenario and RM171.7 million under the maximum case scenario.

"We are putting the group on a stronger and resilient foundation and hope our shareholders share in our vision. With the rights issue exercise, our shareholders will have the opportunity to participate in the prospects and future growth of our group," Kuah said.

Since share price started rebound, see what is going on next ba...
Since many people being supportive, add on a bit during closing time

Seriously I don't wish that the CEO got change. Since the current CEO is working pretty good and making turn around to the company.

I like people who use "My understanding" to comment. XD

Whenever Prinsiptek Corp Bhd is on board, the accounting also not that nice la.

Did empty project and lie to the investor.

If you let me choose. I will prefer Ages more. Smoke screen or what, I don't care.
The share price is what everyone concern, at least let u earn few wave at nice timing lo.

Volume come liao ？ Coming two quarter should be outstanding qr.