Buy at own risk. Money to value still here.

Small spike today, Still in value . All tech discount

Retails got EPF already, most probably wont withdraw big amount on market, now the whole market based on sentiment already.

Honest speaking, to financial thing, I got no comment, but to iot erp, line is just keep feeding wrong info and mislead, When people trying to correct, people is bodoh pula, this is what I beh tahan him.

Then should buy greenpacket, then can dapat greenpacket. Hhaha

Line - I must find a way to win even I lose . 死都要拿番扎沙
hhahaha.....

I am not sure how good is arbb or how their operator works, yourself can't understand don't say people bodoh, that show how low you are.

Forum is for sharing, if you cannot take it, then leave it.

I guess you are just same like me, not a ticket holder. Then what for need to bodoh bodoh f00ling around here ? That why I said, if you are not keyboard warrior, what are you and basically we are having similar discussion few months back.

Haaha.... RM6 share price stock drop to RM4 - not a good discount ?

Anyhow I got no idea what is the the condo name they build in klang valley. If anyone know, mind sharing ? hahaa

Heard that they are venture to Klang Valley, which is good moved but klang valley is full of big shark. hahaha.... I think if company manage to make the first condo reputation good, definitely can expand to a bigger scale.

Overrated. Still can fly by sentiment but if review back to company size, order book I think not worth this price - just my 2cent opinion.

macam got a bit power to push up oh

When market is quiet enough, Best to collect....

Because cannot go green and blue then remain red ? hahahah

But also, if capital A get the digital license, all investor still got a big hope to goreng goreng and pull the price up.

Wow, neonstrife. from arb to aa. Anyhow is good to heard that Asean which are finally reopening borders but economic growth is 1 thing- here still we come with another issues - oil price is going to breakout soon and confirm this will make a big impact to Airasia.

Still I stand here to talk is not because I am the shareholder of Arb but some point is just goes wrong. IoT Erp is not like ABC, it factors in a lot of knowledge behind. As also data that you showing is static that willing to expose. There are more and more company would keep their data securely as they understand some info is unable to leak. On side, I guess you know even Google Facebook got hacked too but If you really working in the industry , many things works another way. Including many project by government is not allowed to exposed too. I guess here is more than enough to answer your industry question.

If you got chance to visit listed co, trying to understand what is erp instead of being smart and saying Microsoft Google, The Internet range is wider than you thing. Anyhow I guess you are a hired keyboard warrior and definitely you will fight a way on this but facts is facts.

Wow, are you asking a question? I though you were mention that you from IoT sector ? To advertise or not, is highly based on company. I don't know how Arbb would working out and advertise but if everything is B2B then yes, everything making sense because everything is do it customize. By answer this thing, I think you understanding of internet and industry is only source recourse. Bro, Industry game is different like what you thinking about google microsoft and others.

I think there are a possibility to goreng healthcare stock sooner or later, as market we can see there are few listed co is actually potential. Cengild, scomnet, optimax is actually not bad. Can keep monitor and look for a good price to enter

line, i met you was like 3 -5 month you still here. So hardcore ? Being paid ke? Anyhow to answer you joker question. Another innocent answer for line about statista - online static data is only showing that the customer willing to show their data and exposed. I am not sure are you even working at industry before. If you resign at some company and you jump to another company, you are not allowed to show your previous company portfolio as of the data is private and confidential. Joker Line Joker line, joking all the time.

Still got show 1, just some correction

Acceptable la

start at 56 , end with 56...

No more story, Is time to run

below 8, seems good to enter now

When line said others people is Keyboard warrior. Try to see line profile.
All time Arbb. Maybe is a promoter ? hahaha....
Anyhow line, you don't every time bulat bulat. Arb before this involve in Iot and SME
Keep call people show evidence ? You never work in Firm before. This is common TNC.
Ohhhh..... I forgot you selling sim card only. Sorry......

Capital A logo look like airbnb , lmao

UWC can go for long term. Quality stock

Wow, interesting. Line still here ?

Instead of saying people keyboard warrior, track back all your comment, I think who on monitor this counter will know who is the keyboard warrior.

haahaaha... Anyhow international fund is very depends on sector one. If use this balance I think unfair di, Even like Kwan family , hup send last time also without international fund la. but Fintech gang got international fund. LCW help XOX do advertisement also. wahhh, then must show XOX so geng lo ? My godness, you cannot take this as a point la.

......

Wow. LINE so hardcore.

All time here just to comment random sheet ?

FULL TIME JOB as keyboard warrior ?

Really LOW life.

Jazmaster where did I say I’m against using api.

Line, you memang pandai twist, check back your comment.

Now jazmaster will ask me what do I mean by technological direction.

Please, don't shiok yourself.

High tech with patents, I agree.
But onside, does all the tech needed to cover patent or just part of it ？
If you are answer were yes, I will super curious you work for which company.

For ARB.
I am not going comment since I am not holding any tickets but If you said hit and run. I will really laugh. You tot dueling business with irresponsible freelance or web agency ?

API .
Nothing wrong but such companies won’t last long. No technological direction.
Grab, Uber, Spotify, Zoom is all using API. Do you know that ?

Temporary still solid. Let's see what next

Bias ? Yes, Line is Bias.

First ? How you define low tech and high tech ?

From tech company ? Which department are you from ?

SVM ? Then you must know the different of engineering and programmer.

Your job is intergrade system ? layman terms = Repetitive tasks, Am I right ?

You, let say about API ? I guess you know the pro or cons.
Then anything wrong if using external API ?

Not only that, too many combination showing that he is totally out of knowledge in IT sector.
No idea what is metaverse, No idea what is Iot, API and etc. He just know what is SIM Card. That's It.

Anyhow disclaimer again : I am not holding any ticket of ARB, just that I see this LINE keep blowing, I pass by and comment only.

hoot9eonly ------
This line is a joker. track back his comment. You guys will know why.

Such a funny counter.

Need wait a little longer more

No power is better , keep collect

LINE

If you want to be a keyboard warrior, can professional a bit ?

Don't blow, give fact, static, analyst.

Blow who also know,

Line - Guess you really work hard being a keyboard warrior.

Haiz, I don't know what make you so hard to being a typical keyboard warrior , blow only, Give static please.... Blow number one. No study come blow IoT.

https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/malaysia-information-communications-technology

this guys (LINE) is a really Big joker

last time used to share a API video and say everyone can build IoT, lol....

limited knowledge is ok, but don't keep giving wrong info about IoT.
Misleading people by your own thinking.

Disclaimer: I am not holding any ticket of ARB , don't listen anything bxxxxxt from user LINE.

0 value and empty knowledge of IoT, but keep blowing like macam yes.

line - Empty knowledge on IoT

Conclusion - LINE is keyboard warrior, random comment.


1) no patents yet it’s called tech company - FYI patent is not a nessasary for tech company.
Software tech and EMS is two type of thing.

7 REASONS NOT TO PURSUE SOFTWARE PATENTS
1. THE PATENT PROCESS IS SLOW
2. THE COSTS DON’T ALWAYS JUSTIFY THE INVESTMENT
3. YOU CAN PURSUE LOWER-COST IP PROTECTIONS
4. IP MIGHT NOT BE YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET
5. SOFTWARE DOESN’T REQUIRE A HIGH R&D INVESTMENT
6. SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ISN’T GUARANTEED
7. OPEN-SOURCE MODELS COULD UNDERMINE THE VALUE OF YOUR PATENTS


2) asking money to develop things - and no guarantee that it could be successfully commercialised
Development fee is knowledge based thing. Why does it no guarantee ? Is based on development time.


3) if fail - won’t get any thing - cos Ip are just papers
How does it failed ? Don't you know they are 1 thing in IT industry called [FIX BUG]


4) in the game of IOT - where giants like Google etc are competing
In the Game of IoT, not only google, tencent, grab and meituan, microsoft, arb, censoft is having different type of playrole.

5) dropped nearly 70% from the peak and no one saw it as an opportunity
I am not commenting on this, but IoT is future, Which is true, Else you won't see zoom, blockchain, metaverse, NFT in market.


6) small tech companies usually disappear very fast
I guess you make some study on this, but small tech company dissapear is on US market, Not south east asia.


Conclusion - LINE is keyboard warrior, random comment.

Read back your comment - LINE -> Mr Uturn

Regarding share I am not sure but don't keep misleading with your limited IT knowlwdge.
Don't act smart, Most of them think they are smart actually F......

https://henry.law/blog/software-patent-protection/

7 REASONS NOT TO PURSUE SOFTWARE PATENTS
There are many valid arguments against software patents as part of a business strategy. Depending on the particular type of software you’re developing and your business model, some of these reasons might apply to you.

1. THE PATENT PROCESS IS SLOW
On average, it takes about two to three years for an application to mature into a patent. But in the fast-paced world of software development, that can be a lifetime: By the time your patent issues, your software may be outdated, or its code might have evolved significantly.

2. THE COSTS DON’T ALWAYS JUSTIFY THE INVESTMENT
Patent prosecution isn’t cheap, and you should evaluate whether the benefits will justify the cost.

Notably, you might not see much return on investment if you seek patent protection for an invention with a short shelf life — and the rate of technological change for many types of software is extremely high.

3. YOU CAN PURSUE LOWER-COST IP PROTECTIONS
You can use copyrights or trade secrecy (or both!) to protect your software for a much lower cost.

Besides, in order to file for a patent, you must publicly disclose the technique used in your software — which may not benefit your business. By contrast, neither copyrights nor trade secrecy require public disclosure.

4. IP MIGHT NOT BE YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET
Typically, you want to invest the most in your core business assets. “IP-centric” companies consider their technological innovations to be among their most important business assets and will set aside a significant portion of their R&D budget for patent prosecution.

But many software companies’ strongest assets are their brand, user base and industry adoption — meaning a particular innovation or patentable feature won’t be as valuable towards their business strategy. In this case, you might prefer to protect your IP using less costly options.

5. SOFTWARE DOESN’T REQUIRE A HIGH R&D INVESTMENT
In addition, “IP-centric” companies typically have long R&D cycles. And because patents exclude competing products from the market for up to 20 years, they’re essential for recouping high R&D investment.

But many types of software don’t require the same level of R&D commitment as many other fields of technology. For this reason, patents may not be a necessary tool to maximize your profit margins.

6. SOFTWARE PATENTABILITY ISN’T GUARANTEED
In the wake of the Alice decision, the patent process is far less predictable for software inventions than it used to be. Even though software can be patent-eligible, the U.S. patent office has created a moving target for meeting the patent-eligibility standards. You might prefer to invest in a more certain maneuver.

7. OPEN-SOURCE MODELS COULD UNDERMINE THE VALUE OF YOUR PATENTS
If your business utilizes open-source software licensing, patents could complicate your strategy.

Generally speaking, you can pursue patent protection for software that includes open-source code.

If you patent an open-source software tool that you developed, you could potentially exclude competitors from distributing competing products. However, open-source models aren’t compatible with typical royalty-based patent licensing terms, and your open source distribution would end up weakening your ability to enforce your patent.

Invest in your knowledge first.