People are just blind to follow the blinds.

U dump when the blinds dump and u buy when the blinds buy. Basically, you are the blinds following the blinds and monkey see monkey do.

Why can't u be objective and judgemental ?

yer, provided that they can maintain EPS of 28 cents or more every quarter consistently , there is no reason why they can not reach RM 3.36 or more on the basis of PE of 3.

Why lousy?

Patience is virtue

As far as I am concerned,spike never plummets.my Bruce is not delusional but appreciative unlike others....

Tied up now and I 'll deal with you for a short while.

It sounds promising but the possibility of extension could not be ruled out ,which could end up as a false alarm....

No more drama
No more kung fung fighting.
No more D Day
The only way is spike.

Anyone, When is the deadline for submission of regularisation plan ?

Seated tight in AXX flight and set to fly to the Moon..... here we go .....

No averaging , no avalanches and no emotional distress . Hence no cause of concern

Dont jump to conclusion in a hasty manner.

Don’t ever mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance or my kindness for weakness.

Bruce and I have been in coherence. No cause of concern.

The said companies just channel the funds from one company to another company through PP and RI with fake project and MOU " internally".


Basically the funds are passed from the left pocket to the right pocket internally.

Even my Bruce knows also

You keep talking about PP and RI , do you believe that they can get these funds easily without valid justification, through fake projects and MOU ? Do you believe that the investors are cuckoo or what ?

To obtain more fund through the issuance of PP and right issues ( RI) ? who are going to subscribe for the PP and RI? If no one is interested to subscribe for the PP and RI , do you believe that they will get the funds at their disposal in the end ?

Ton of money in the kitty. Hence, there is no need to issue right issues.

It is believed that the next rally could be RGB with 100% increase after Classita has cooled down

"100%" increase is better than no "0 %" . Any % increase is a good start but whether it can be sustained for long or not remains to be seen.

Yes. The M group has finally realised the fact that it doesnt do any good to anybody if they keep on with the loggerhead with anyone. That's why i say , the future depends on what you do TODAY. They have resolved the issues today so they can move on towards the future....

My " Bruce " has calmed down lately. He is feelingless now when I mention both the duo and M Group. If " Bruce " can sense that there is no cause of concern, why cant we ? ( Bruce is my pet dog in case some still dont know )

Future is determined by what you do TODAY so TODAY is the most important day. No TODAY , NO FUTURE ...

One ought to be flexible in his investment in response to the dynamic changing trends and circumstances surrounding the company concerned and the market . The "buy call " of today can be reversed as "sell call " tomorrow and vice verse .No big deal .

Dont bark like a mad dog and dont run from reality like an ostrich by putting your head inside the ground hole or hole of any kind as if nothing was happening outside.

In my view, Glove bizs are already saturated in the Glove markets now so no point to cherish for it . Its not my cup of tea now. One ought to be flexible in his investment in response to the dynamic changing trends and circumstances surrounding the company concerned and the market . The "buy call " of today can be reversed as "sell call " tomorrow and vice verse .No big deal . Serbad D ( SD ) has been embroiled in false accounting as a matter of fact ,which should be condemned and rebuked . There is no clear signs of RGB to be triggered as PN 17 so it is out of the question.

When people buy high ,u mock.when people buy low,u also mock.

Are you a fxcking mocker or what?

All you know is only P&D.what else do you know? What you say always turns out to be opposite.

It is recalled a year ago that you said phama would spike to Rm 10 but turned out to be 30c++ now....so fxuking pathetic...



You

Seeing is believing...... Your miss is larger than your loss

Flying to the moon in anticipation of surprised announcement soon. I know and Bruce ( my dog) Knows... u need to know ....

No substantial disposals are expected .
No panicky sales are foreseen ( all the chickened ones have been flushed out).
Loggerhead fights seem to be ended.
Markets across the globe are flamboyant now.
Hence , there is no reason to believe why it should not be spiked

As long as it is up, who cares whether its one cent or what. Time.com and RGB are of different ball games .Hence , comparison of Apple to Apple should be made. Trap or not remains to be seen.

All they need to do is to improve their corporate governance and the prospects are still bright to them . No cause of concern.

Cheap sale now .. too good to be true but thats what it is now ....

There will be special announcement soon....

TP is believed to be 1.00

Flying to the moon........

I doubt it

No sight of false accounting. No hanky panky in accounting.

The resignation of auditors was due to the fact that the company didn't seek to continue the reappointment of the incumbent auditors.

The new BOD has the auditors of their choice.

Flying up or plummeting for landing?

Who is the "P"?.

the "Peace" or the "Pissed off"?

No news means good news.
No tussle no tearing apart
No hard feelings no plunge
No "P" messing around no fun.

Then look for penny stocks

In some cases, the Board resolution ( BR) is required but in some cases, the decision could be delegated to the lower level of authority where no BR is required , for instance, purchase of motor bike costing 10k can be approved by CEO without the need for BR.

In the case of RGB, the Company Motor vehicle involved was of " vellfire" which is worth a lot of money . Hence, I find it hard to believe such purchase could be proceeded without BR.

Unlike RGB , KPMG was up to the job in SD but was removed by SD for the obvious reason.

In the case of Serba ( SD) , the Auditors ( KPMG) highlighted the irregularities found during the conduct of their normal audit, KPMG expected the Top Management of SD to address the said issues but the Mgt turned to deaf ears. Instead of addressing the issues raised within the timeframe ,SD condemned the auditors being difficult as a result of which SD removed and sued KPMG and engaged EY to conduct special audit. Having conducted the special audit, EY established the same facts as KPMG. SD was not pleased and removed and sued EY.

Both Auditors resigned in the above cases. Such audacious and unjustifiable action of the company is believed to have great impact on the market confidence and image of the company. Indeed, the Company has paid a heavy price of no return . The company is doomed to be wound up sooner than you and me could imagine.

Auditors need not be permanently engaged. They only serve one term subject to re-appointment at the next AGM. The change of auditors will not have impact on the market confidence and the image of the company. It is a commonplace like the change of lawyers and other professionals. If the Auditors are not up to the job, then change for another one. No big deal.

It is up to the company whether they want to remove the auditors or sue the auditors depending on the seriousness of the case , quantum of economic loss and benefit and cost consideration The Company has opted for the former. Auditors are at liberty to resign and by the same token, the company is at liberty to remove and /or not to re-engage for another term at the AGM. Before the auditors are removed , it is better for them to resign to save their reputation. No big deal

Usually, New BOD prefer to use their own " preferred Auditors " which is normal in the normal course of business .No big deal.

Previous auditors were said to be negligent in that they failed to verify with due professional care that the close related transactions ( not done at arm length) were reasonable , justifiable and in compliance with the internal procurement procedural policy and relevant corporate governance. The auditors also failed to ensure that the assets of the company were properly accounted for in the financial report otherwise the purchase /sale of the company car without board resolutions would not have happened. It is believed that a lot of issues were highlighted to justify to remove the auditors. To save their own face, they chose to resign.

The 3 Ngs have been laughing at those who have believed them by still holding their shares since RM 2.00....

Don't be silly.

The auditors were fired because they failed to perform their duty of care in the conduct of their audit in the past.

They failed to detect the irregularities,one of which was the purchase/sale of company car without board resolutions etc etc.

New auditors will be appointed in due course. No cause of concern