Posted by kcchongnz > 2014-06-12 15:43 | Report Abuse
Pak Lah,
The computation part is easy and most of them will give you the same results if you use the same data and assumptions. That is mathematics.
So the important thing are the data and assumptions you use. Assumptions are yeah assumptions. Are they realistic? That is the question and that is an art.
Notice I use quite high growth assumption for the next three years of 15% which I seldom do. But knowing the near term future prospects of Pintaras now, I think that assumption is not too liberal.
Posted by Pak Lah > 2014-06-12 16:17 | Report Abuse
Thanks kcchongnz for the explanation.
Sop, ptaras has got RM330mil book order which must be realised in the next 12~18 months. As per the recent report in the star paper, the machineries they invested years ago are now fully amortised/depreciated, and their bottom line is set to surge as a result. I'm as upbeat as kcchongnz for ptaras.
Posted by cy1988 > 2014-06-14 19:30 | Report Abuse
hii...kc chong...u said that pintaras have 5m net capital expenses is a assumption or the figure from AR?if from AR,where u get the figure?
Posted by kcchongnz > 2014-06-14 19:52 | Report Abuse
I was just basing on the past capital expenses and depreciation and made an assumption that the net capex, or capex less depreciation is 5m a year in the future. Capex is purchasing of property, plant and equipment in the cash flow from investing activities.
No result.
1
Rakuten Trade Research Reports
2
Stock Market Enthusiast
Top 3 AI/Data Center Newsflow for the 3rd Week of December - #TENAGA, #YTL, #YTLPOWER
3
save malaysia!
4
Good Articles to Share
5
Good Articles to Share
6
Good Articles to Share
Gaza ceasefire deal 'closer than ever', says Hamas and two allies
7
Good Articles to Share
Ryan Serhant makes bold pitch to fix the housing ‘affordability crisis’
8
Good Articles to Share
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Pak Lah
197 posts
Posted by Pak Lah > 2014-06-12 15:00 | Report Abuse
Kcchongnz, thanks for your above efforts. Wow, intrinsic value of RM6.50 though it was worked out with the conservative parameters. Can we use the "intrinsic value calculator" in this website? http://www.moneychimp.com/articles/valuation/buffett_calc.htm I adopt the variables you suggested, i.e. EPS = RM0.31, Growth for the next 3 years at 15%, Subsequently 5%, Confidence Margin = 77.5%?, Discount Rate = 10%, press the "calculate button", I get RM6.50. Is this calculator applicable? Please advise. Thanks