Like i said before, this company is not making money thru core insurance biz but from their investment in fixed income. Their insurance biz is worthless. Jual.
This co is hardly making profits. Now with 30.8m to be written-off, it's deeper in the grave. So it appears that this government program was poorly executed. It's called lack of diligence.
From the press release, there seem to be some modern cutting edge with AI technology being employed by TPG. I hope Rohit can realise good profits from these initiatives. Please don't hesitate to kick a..ses if need be. Take the bull by the horns!
Insurance industry is no strange to fierce competition in term of price and service quality. Thus, it is difficult for a small capital company to compete with large cap. company.
I'm still waiting for the right entry price for speculative trading purposes. Rohit won't leave. He's not one to give up with this setback. Chartwise, it's clear that he has turn around the company, halted the massive downtrend caused by previous CEOs.
Revenue of Capital A in aviation reached up to 4.5bil- record high figures. But revenue and earnings of tunepro doesn't benefit at all from airasia and it's disappointing .
10 May 2024 Name MR ROHIT CHANDRASEKHARAN NAMBIAR Age 43 Gender Male Nationality India Type of change Resignation Designation Group Chief Executive Officer Reason Due to personal reasons.
Every quarter, the main task of management is to give reasons why it is making losses and keep hoodwinking shareholders of the great potential ahead. The share price trajectory clearly tells that investors are not buying it.
The only jewel in the crown of this hopeless company is the insurance licence.
Digital channel is just part of the journey and not a point to rest on its laurels. Agency is another important channel and not an excuse to take cost-cutting to the extremes for the sake of pleasing itself by shouting aimlessly at its below 100% combined ratio.
On new group CEO. If it's new from the street - then divestment chances are lower. If the new CEO is promoted from within, then there's higher chances the protect will be divested from capital A.
I was wrong about Rohit not leaving, but the news of him leaving allowed price to fall and let me get in at a lower price. I'm sure others will have a better entry price. This is a speculative trading position (hence small).
Tune as a Group, is a small company, with Gross Written Premium (GWP) of only RM400 million or so average the past 5 years. You can't get that much profits from such a small GWP, the problem is relatively high fixed expenses compared to allowances and profits that can be priced in the GWP. Shareholders need to have a longer term plan, otherwise, new CEOs that brings with them short term "tricks" may show good result in the first year or two but inevitably sets the company back. Both Ms Khoo and Rohit (ex-CEOs) took short term views but after 5 years combined, has not really changed Tune fundamentally at the business level.
As they say, when there's blood on the streets, odds are better than 50/50 that we'll see a surprise on the upside.
Agree with Sheldon, that in the hands of the "big boys" who can afford to take a longer term view to fundamentally grow the business, that insurance license will come in handy. Problem with Tune is its shareholder who is not willing to wait to do what's necessary to grow its insurance business. If you keep demanding your new CEO to turn a profit in the first year, and not invest in the longer term, you can't grow sustainably in the mid term.
Divestment is probably going to be good news for Tune, as current shareholder is the problem with its unrealistic expectations on its CEO. It needs both proven Management, Board and proven Shareholder to make Tune successful.
@donny, it's the same pattern with past CEOs, Rohit isn't the first. The problem is CEO do what shareholders want them to do. They are creative people to extract short term results as what shareholder wanted, but insurance business doesn't work like that when constantly extracting short term results. Insurance is predicated on a large enough size insurance pool, small pools like 400 million GWP have huge hurdles long term.
@warchest, @bbc, it's not about individual who can handle/cannot handle. CEOs and senior management by nature are resilient people. Typically Rohit and other CEO quit in the past likely due to "differences in views" masquerading as "personal reasons" / "better opportunities". It is unlikely that all these CEOs are wrong and the shareholder is right after so many CEOs. More likely, the shareholder demand is wrong / not suited for this line of business.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
Report Abuse
Please Sign In to report this post as abuse.
Market Buzz
No result.
Featured Posts
MQ Chat
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
ooihk899
2,005 posts
Posted by ooihk899 > 1 month ago | Report Abuse
It's only one time write off. If revenue n profit(b4 write down) is up,
then can add lo, next Q will recover.