No result.
1
2
4
save malaysia!
Visa-free travel to China extended for Malaysians to 30 days
5
6
7
BFM Podcast
8
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by kk123 > 2017-05-22 21:39 | Report Abuse
KUALA LUMPUR: M K Land Holdings Bhd has become the latest public-listed group to announce the receipt of a surprise tax bill from the Inland Revenue Board (IRB). In a filing with Bursa Malaysia on Monday, the company said wholly owned subsidiary Saujana Triangle Sdn Bhd (STSB) -- the developer of its flagship Damansara Perdana project in Petaling Jaya -- had been served with notices for an additional income tax of RM55.7mil and a 45% penalty of RM25.07mil. The tax bill of RM80.77mil is in relation to years of assessment 2009-2011 and 2013. M K Land said the IRB decided to impose the additional income tax and penalty for three reasons. One, it considered the gains from the disposal of land held under Investment Properties in year of assessment 2009 as revenue in nature, instead of capital in nature. The IRB has also disregarded the five-year time barred period to raise the said assessments in respect of the land disposal. Finally, the IRB has disallowed certain development costs on the basis that these were only provisions and the amounts had yet to be paid. Thus it does not treat them to be incurred for the purpose of Section 33 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1967 (as expenses that qualify for tax deduction). M K Land said STSB disagreed with the assessments raised by the IRB and would therefore appeal. Based on the advice from both its tax consultants and lawyers, STSB felt the land sales of the Investment Properties were capital transactions that were liable to real property gain tax in year 2009 (tax-exempt year). In addition, STSB is of the view that the notices of assessment raised are statute barred and erroneous in law. Further, according to STSB, the accrual of development costs has been allowed according to accounting standards and IRB’s public ruling on property development. M K Land said it would make further announcement if there was any material update. Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/05/22/m-k-land-gets-surprise-tax-bill-with-fine-totalling-rm80pt77mil/#c7MjGqV8A57REZZK.99