Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-11-01 13:22 | Report Abuse

Great distraction! When the school children are busy to focus on foreign conflicts afar, they couldn't protest against inflation, depreciation of ringgit and misappropriation of public fund at the same time.

Be the first to like this.

19 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 4 days ago

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-11-01 13:49 | Report Abuse

Belum belajar berdikari dan menyara hidup, sudah diajar demonstrasi dan memegang senjata bertempur

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-11-14 19:17 | Report Abuse

In the realm of nation-building, the choice between integration and assimilation plays a pivotal role in shaping a country's identity, survivability, and progress. While assimilation may appear tempting, the benefits of integration surpass it, fostering a rich tapestry of cultures, perspectives, and talents that contribute to the robustness and vitality of a nation.

1. **Cultural Enrichment:**
Integration celebrates diversity by allowing various cultural elements to coexist harmoniously. This multicultural mosaic enhances the cultural richness of a nation, fostering a tapestry of traditions, languages, and customs. Unlike assimilation, which seeks to homogenize, integration acknowledges the value of diverse cultural contributions, creating a vibrant and dynamic national identity.

2. **Social Cohesion:**
Integration encourages social cohesion by emphasizing unity in diversity. Communities that maintain their distinctiveness while engaging with the broader society contribute to a more interconnected and harmonious nation. This approach promotes understanding, tolerance, and collaboration, building a foundation for lasting social harmony.

3. **Economic Advancement:**
A diverse and integrated society can be a driving force for economic progress. Embracing a variety of skills, talents, and perspectives leads to innovation and adaptability. Unlike assimilation, which may stifle unique talents in favor of conformity, integration leverages the strengths of each community, fostering a more resilient and competitive economy.

4. **Political Stability:**
Integrative policies promote political stability by acknowledging and accommodating various voices within a nation. A diverse representation in governance ensures that policies consider the needs and aspirations of different communities. In contrast, assimilation may lead to the marginalization of certain groups, potentially causing unrest and hindering overall political stability.

5. **Global Influence:**
Nations that embrace integration are better positioned for global engagement. A diverse and inclusive society is more likely to engage positively with the international community, fostering diplomatic relations and cultural exchange. Assimilation, on the other hand, may create insular societies less receptive to external influences, limiting a nation's global impact.

In conclusion, integration stands as a superior approach to nation-building, enhancing the survivability and progress of a country. By valuing and celebrating diversity, nations can forge a collective identity that draws strength from its various components. In contrast, assimilation risks suppressing unique cultural expressions and stifling the potential for innovation and growth. In an era where global interconnectedness is paramount, the adaptability and resilience fostered by integration pave the way for a more prosperous and harmonious future.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-11-15 13:59 | Report Abuse

While we are too obsessed with boycotting, humanitarian, crying over spilt milk/melting pot and tepi kain orang lain, Thailand is moving ahead with a $28 billion plan to circumvent the Melaka Strait, as stated by Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin during discussions with investors in San Francisco. The initiative aims to reduce travel time by an average of four days and decrease shipping costs by 15%.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

When musangs are assigned to jaga reban, this is the end results: The staggering losses incurred by Felda in 2022, amounting to RM1 billion, nearly double the losses from the previous year, highlight the consequences of entrusting unworthy individuals with leadership roles. The auditor-general's report sheds light on the mismanagement and poor decision-making that have plagued Felda, ultimately leading to dire financial outcomes.

Firstly, the significant increase in losses reflects a systemic failure within the organization's leadership structure. When individuals lacking the necessary expertise and integrity are placed in positions of power, they may make misguided decisions that jeopardize the financial health and stability of the institution. This lack of competent leadership fosters an environment ripe for mismanagement and financial missteps.

Secondly, the mounting debt owed to external institutions underscores the repercussions of allowing individuals unfit for their roles to oversee crucial financial matters. Incompetent leadership can result in reckless spending, unsustainable borrowing practices, and failure to implement effective debt management strategies. As a result, Felda finds itself burdened with substantial debt obligations, further exacerbating its financial woes and hindering its ability to operate efficiently.

Furthermore, the slight decrease in debt owed from the previous year offers little consolation in the face of continued financial mismanagement. While the reduction may signal attempts to address the issue, it falls short of addressing the root causes of Felda's financial distress. Without fundamental reforms and competent leadership at the helm, the organization remains vulnerable to further losses and indebtedness in the future.

In conclusion, the alarming losses and debt accumulation experienced by Felda in 2022 underscore the dire consequences of entrusting unworthy individuals with leadership responsibilities. To safeguard the financial stability and prosperity of institutions like Felda, it is imperative to appoint qualified and ethical leaders who possess the expertise and integrity necessary to make sound decisions and steer the organization towards success. Failure to do so only perpetuates a cycle of mismanagement, losses, and indebtedness, ultimately compromising the institution's ability to fulfill its mandate and serve its stakeholders effectively.


14,428 posts

Posted by DickyMe > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

They a fed to keep mouth shut via multiples of scholarship and bantuan.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Yup, these ppl only know how to ask what the country can do for them and how much handouts - and never see how tenat they have caused the country. RM5-6 for SGD 1 soon

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

2 years too short for M'sia to prepare as Commonwealth Games host, says ex-sports minister

Be the first to like this.

2 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 50 seconds ago



2,957 posts

Posted by ks55 > 16 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Why still want to host Commonwealth Games? Isn't it to let UK host it? If India can have it better still. Don't waste money unnecessarily..........


16,736 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 50 seconds ago | Report Abuse

These incompetent gaji buta ppl incharge- just want others to believe still cave age now. China build a hospital in 1 day- this millennium...hehe

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Boycotting local businesses can indeed have far-reaching consequences that go beyond mere economic impact.

1. **Economic Impact:** Local businesses are the backbone of any economy. They provide employment opportunities, contribute to tax revenues, and stimulate economic growth through innovation and competition. By boycotting these businesses, there's a direct hit to the economy, leading to job losses, decreased tax revenue, and a slowdown in economic activity.

2. **Country's Image and Goodwill:** Local businesses also play a significant role in shaping a country's image and goodwill. They often represent the entrepreneurial spirit, cultural heritage, and unique offerings of a nation. When people boycott local businesses, it can send a negative message about the country's business environment, potentially tarnishing its reputation and goodwill in the global market.

3. **Currency Strength:** A thriving local economy is closely linked to the strength of the national currency. When local businesses suffer due to boycotts, it creates instability and weakens the currency. This can lead to inflation, reduced purchasing power for citizens, and increased economic uncertainty, affecting everyone in the country, including those not directly involved in the boycott.

4. **Social Fabric:** Local businesses are often deeply connected to the social fabric of communities. They sponsor local events, support charitable causes, and foster a sense of community pride. Boycotting these businesses can erode this social cohesion, leading to divisions and tensions within society.

In essence, boycotting local businesses can be seen as sabotaging not just the economy but also the country's image, goodwill, and overall stability. It's important to promote a balanced approach that encourages responsible consumer choices while also supporting local businesses and the broader national economy

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

That's a different kind of governance. Here governance is just a game of cards for gomen of the thoughtlessly deluded poor with herd mentality, by the cunningluly influential and super rich elites, for the entitled by birth

Posted by Sslee > 8 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Just attend any AGM of listed company and tell me is governance alive or a stillborn?

Did any shareholders or Bursa SC hold the BOD accountable, responsible and answarable?

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Spiraling downward: From kangkung to ubi kayu to taugeh

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

How pmx fails the nation and every msian? A leader's first duty and primary skill should indeed revolve around their ability to effectively resolve conflicts and intervene swiftly in crises. Here's why:

1. **Maintaining Stability:** A leader's foremost responsibility is to ensure stability within their domain, whether it's a community, organization, or nation. Conflict resolution and crisis intervention directly contribute to this stability by addressing issues before they escalate.

2. **Protecting People:** Leaders are entrusted with the safety and well-being of their constituents. Promptly resolving conflicts and intervening in crises protects people from harm, whether physical, emotional, or social.

3. **Preserving Trust and Confidence:** Effective conflict resolution and crisis intervention build trust and confidence in a leader's ability to handle challenging situations. This trust is crucial for maintaining support and cooperation during both calm and turbulent times.

4. **Preventing Escalation:** Unresolved conflicts and unaddressed crises can quickly escalate, leading to more significant problems and potentially catastrophic outcomes. Leaders who excel in conflict resolution and crisis management can nip these issues in the bud.

5. **Fostering Collaboration:** By skillfully resolving conflicts, leaders can foster collaboration and unity among diverse groups. This collaboration is essential for progress, innovation, and sustainable development.

6. **Enhancing Reputation:** Leaders known for their adeptness in handling conflicts and crises gain a positive reputation not only locally but also internationally. This reputation can attract investment, partnerships, and goodwill, benefiting the entire community or nation.

7. **Promoting Growth:** When conflicts are resolved efficiently and crises are managed effectively, it creates an environment conducive to growth and prosperity. People feel secure and motivated to contribute their best efforts towards common goals.

In essence, a leader's ability to resolve conflicts and intervene in crises promptly and skillfully is foundational to their overall effectiveness and the well-being of those they lead.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Anwar's focus should indeed be on addressing domestic issues like the economy, currency value, food shortages, and living costs. Bringing geopolitical issues into schools, even symbolically, can be seen as inappropriate and distracting from essential priorities. His selective approach to defending certain groups based on religion or ethnicity rather than principles of fairness within Malaysia can be concerning and may not reflect effective leadership.


3,238 posts

Posted by chinaman > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

One term gomen?

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

A clever diversion indeed! As schoolchildren find themselves engrossed in far-off international conflicts, their attention is diverted from issues closer to home – issues like inflation, the depreciation of the Ringgit, and the alleged misappropriation of public funds. This strategic distraction manages to shift the focus away from pressing domestic concerns, effectively keeping the spotlight away from these critical economic and financial challenges.

While it's important for students to be aware of global events and issues, it is equally vital that they have the opportunity to learn about and engage with matters that directly affect their daily lives. In doing so, they can develop a deeper understanding of their country's economic challenges and how these issues impact their future.

A vigilant and informed citizenry is crucial for holding those in power accountable and for addressing pressing matters of national importance. The art of distraction, while a common political tactic, should never overshadow the importance of addressing real and immediate concerns that affect the well-being of the citizens.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

The journey from universal subsidies to targeted subsidies, and eventually to no subsidies at all, reflects a troubling trajectory shaped by the government's inability to stem the tide of illegal smuggling facilitated by profit-driven syndicates with ties to untouchable VVIPs and enforcement agencies.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Redirecting millions from subsidies meant for the M40 (middle-income) group to fund the extravagant expenses of hundreds of YBs (Members of Parliament), VIPs (Very Important Persons), and VVIPs (Very Very Important Persons) raises concerns about skewed priorities and the potential sacrifice of the welfare of many for the comfort of a few in power.

This action reflects a prioritization of the elite's needs over the broader populace, especially those in the M40 group who may rely on subsidies for essential services or support. It can be seen as a form of elitism and favoritism, where resources that could benefit a larger segment of society are diverted to cater to the luxury or convenience of a select few in influential positions.

Such a move can lead to resentment and further exacerbate inequalities within society. It may also erode trust in the government's ability to fairly distribute resources and prioritize the well-being of its citizens. Critics might argue that this allocation of funds reflects a disconnect between the ruling class and the everyday struggles faced by the middle-income and lower-income segments of society.

In the long term, this skewed allocation of resources could have negative repercussions on social cohesion, economic stability, and the overall welfare of the population, highlighting the importance of transparent and equitable decision-making in governance.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

When corruptible ppl are put to key positions and further plunder the country coffer, leading to subsidy cut.

When musangs are assigned to jaga reban, this is the end results: The staggering losses incurred by Felda in 2022, amounting to RM1 billion, nearly double the losses from the previous year, highlight the consequences of entrusting unworthy individuals with leadership roles. The auditor-general's report sheds light on the mismanagement and poor decision-making that have plagued Felda, ultimately leading to dire financial outcomes.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 4 days ago | Report Abuse

The argument for funding science classes with public funds while requiring individuals to pay out-of-pocket for protopseudoscience classes hinges on several key points:

1. **Public Benefit and Common Good**: Science education provides clear and demonstrable benefits to society. A well-educated populace in scientific principles can contribute to technological advancements, medical breakthroughs, and a better understanding of the natural world. This collective benefit justifies the use of public funds.

2. **Evidence-Based Learning**: Science is grounded in empirical evidence and the scientific method. Public funds should support education that is based on verifiable, reproducible research. This ensures that students receive accurate and reliable information, which is essential for informed decision-making in both personal and professional contexts.

3. **Economic Investment**: Investing in science education has long-term economic benefits. Countries with strong scientific education systems tend to have more innovative economies, higher productivity, and better job prospects for their citizens. This return on investment supports the argument for using public funds for science education.

4. **Risk of Misinformation**: Protopseudoscience, which often includes unfounded or disproven theories, can lead to the spread of misinformation. Publicly funding such classes would not only waste resources but also risk legitimizing false information. This could have detrimental effects on public health, safety, and policy.

5. **Personal Choice and Responsibility**: Individuals who choose to explore protopseudoscience should bear the cost themselves. This personal financial commitment discourages the casual dissemination of unverified or false information and places the responsibility on the individual to critically assess the value of the education they are pursuing.

6. **Educational Standards**: Publicly funded education must meet rigorous standards to ensure that students are receiving a quality education. Science classes are subject to such standards, ensuring that the curriculum is up-to-date and based on the latest research. Protopseudoscience classes often do not meet these standards, which justifies why they should not be publicly funded.

In summary, funding science classes with public funds ensures the promotion of reliable, evidence-based knowledge that benefits society as a whole. Conversely, requiring individuals to pay for protopseudoscience classes out of their own pockets prevents the misuse of public funds and helps mitigate the spread of misinformation.

Post a Comment
Market Buzz