Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Vigilante culture is be highly detrimental to the rule of law in countries that uphold high moral standards. The reasons are:

1. **Undermining Legal Processes:** Vigilante actions bypass legal procedures and due process, undermining the fundamental principles of justice and fairness. This can lead to arbitrary judgments, lack of accountability, and the erosion of trust in the legal system.

2. **Risk of Misidentification:** Vigilantes may act based on incomplete information or personal biases, leading to wrongful accusations and harm to innocent individuals. This not only violates the rights of the accused but also damages the reputation of the legal system in ensuring accurate justice.

3. **Escalation of Violence:** Vigilante actions often escalate conflicts and violence instead of resolving them peacefully through legal channels. This can result in a cycle of retaliation, further destabilizing the social fabric and compromising public safety.

4. **Diminished Deterrence:** When vigilantes take the law into their own hands, it weakens the deterrent effect of official law enforcement. Criminals may perceive a lack of consistent consequences, emboldening them to commit more offenses.

5. **Unaccountable Authority:** Vigilante groups or individuals operate outside the framework of accountability and oversight that governs official law enforcement agencies. This unchecked power can lead to abuses and excesses that go unchecked.

6. **Legal Precedent and Norms:** Allowing vigilante culture to thrive sets dangerous precedents and normalizes extrajudicial actions. It sends a message that individuals or groups can act as judge, jury, and executioner, undermining the rule of law's foundational principles.

7. **Social Division:** Vigilantism can deepen social divisions by pitting groups against each other based on perceived grievances or biases. This fractures community cohesion and makes it harder to address underlying issues through constructive dialogue and legal reforms.

In conclusion, while vigilantes may believe they are upholding their personal living values, their actions ultimately erode the rule of law, weaken societal trust, and contribute to a less just and orderly society. It is crucial to uphold legal processes, accountability, and the principles of justice to maintain a stable and fair legal system.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Order 66 is a pivotal event in the Sockswar. It was a command programmed into Akmalkin Skywalker and his clone troopers by Chancellor Paspustine, secretly the Sith Lord Darth Sidious. The order, when executed, directed the clones to turn against their Jedi commanding officers, whom they had been serving alongside throughout the Clone Wars. This order led to the near-total annihilation of the Jedi Order, marking a significant turning point in galactic history as Paspustine consolidated power to win the next GE.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

It's disheartening to witness political leaders, who are meant to safeguard harmony, acting irrationally and fueling tensions to such an extent that it ignites extremist behaviors. We must unite to rise and strongly condemn these irresponsible actions that sow seeds of hatred, disregarding the far-reaching repercussions on our society as a whole

Posted by Sslee > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

In i3 some dumbass appointed themselve as vigilators, policing i3forum and label people with different opiniins to his as conman, insult and red flag other people post to silence them.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Yes, Sslee. S*ampah ppl everywhere- cyber & real life.

The worst performance of any government is indeed its failure to act swiftly and decisively against vigilantes. Vigilante actions undermine the rule of law, erode trust in official institutions, and can lead to a breakdown of social order. Governments have a responsibility to protect their citizens from harm and ensure that justice is administered through legal channels, not through vigilante justice, which often results in arbitrary and unjust outcomes. Failing to address vigilante activities promptly and effectively only perpetuates a cycle of violence and lawlessness, ultimately harming the very fabric of society.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Any mature and civilised society must stay united against vigilantes and their instigators:

Vigilante actions often escalate conflicts and violence instead of resolving them peacefully through legal channels. This can result in a cycle of retaliation, further destabilizing the social fabric and compromising public safety.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse

Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear.
2. Encourage or participate in violent or retaliatory actions outside of legal channels.
3. Demonize certain communities or individuals, leading to a sense of injustice or persecution.
4. Exploit existing tensions or grievances for personal or political gain.
5. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice at any cost" mentality.
6. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante actions.
7. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 3 weeks ago | Report Abuse

On curbing vigilantism: Arrest today, not tomorrow

In cases of terrorism, all parties involved play a significant role in the perpetration of violence and must be held accountable for their actions:

1. The person with deemed divine knowledge who preaches is guilty because they have the power to influence individuals' beliefs and actions. If their teachings promote or condone violence, they contribute to creating an environment conducive to terrorism.

2. The person with caliber and position who incites is equally culpable as they have authority and influence over a larger audience. Their words can sway public opinion and motivate others to commit acts of terror.

3. The person with little grey matter who commits the arson act is directly responsible for the violent act itself. However, their actions are often influenced by the rhetoric and ideologies spread by those in positions of power and authority.

4. Responsible enforcers who fault to act prophylactically by stopping the perpetual instigators

Therefore, in the context of terrorism, each party plays a role in the chain of events leading to violence, and all must face consequences for their contributions to promoting or inciting such acts.