Future Tech

Andrew Tanenbaum honored for pioneering MINIX, the OS hiding in a lot of computers

Tan KW
Publish date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024, 10:39 PM
Tan KW
0 449,842
Future Tech

Andy Tanenbaum, creator of MINIX, has been recognized for his code, seminal textbooks, and wider educational influence over much of the modern FOSS world.

Dr Andrew S Tanenbaum - often known as "ast" for short - has been honored in the ACM Technical Awards 2023 with the Association for Computing Machinery's Software System prize. The award is for his creation of the MINIX operating system. It's not as famous as the offspring it directly inspired - the Linux kernel. As well as that, though, MINIX 3 is a true FOSS microkernel OS, and as it's the software that powers the system management controller embedded in most modern Intel processors, it's exceptionally widely used.

Dr Tanenbaum is emeritus professor of computer science at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, but while his wife is Dutch, he's American. Indeed, US readers may be familiar with a very different aspect of his work. Twenty years ago, he created Electoral-Vote.com, which aggregates US polling results and presents commentary and analysis on US governmental elections. He retired a decade ago, but remains active in several fields.

He's also well known to many OS developers for his series of textbooks on OS design. Included in his seminal book Operating Systems Design and Implementation [PDF] were some 12,000 lines of the source code of a Miniature Unix OS (MINIX), which he created as a working example to study. Because you could get it on floppy cheaply and its source code was available, many early internet hackers worked on the original MINIX, porting it from x86-16 [sic - this was an 8086 OS] to 68000 and SPARC, and adding features. The snag is that because it was copyrighted to Prentice Hall, users couldn't distribute modified versions of MINIX. All they could share were their sets of changes, which each user had to apply themselves and then compile the result to use it.

These restrictions are one of the motivations that caused the young Linus Torvalds to start writing his own replacement kernel, and later, to license it under the GPL so that everyone could share it freely and work on it cooperatively. Dr Tanenbaum was not impressed by this fledgling kernel's monolithic design, already dated in 1991, and he started a flamewar debate entitled "Linux is Obsolete" in the comp.os.minix Usenet group. For some Linux old-timers, that may be what he is most famous - or notorious - for.

(We have to note that in 2000, the older versions of MINIX were re-released under the BSD licence. Now, all versions are truly free software.)

Dr Tanenbaum did follow through on his statement, though. MINIX version 3, launched in 2005, is a true microkernel Unix-like OS, while still small and simple enough to study in its entirety. Tanenbaum has both written and
spoken about the need for simpler, more reliable OSes.

Although you may never have seen MINIX yourself, there's a very high probability that you've used computers running it. Whatever OS you prefer, even if you're devoted to Windows or macOS, your computer may be running MINIX 3 right now because Intel used it as the operating system of its chips' integrated Management Engine. Most Intel-based computers have MINIX 3 inside.

MINIX 3 is distributed under the BSD license, which permits commercial use. This means Intel is under no obligation to share its changes to the source code with the world, and it hasn't. It didn't even tell Professor Tanenbaum himself, as he noted in an open letter to the company:

Sadly, since ast retired, work on MINIX 3 slowed, and there have been no changes to its source code since 2018, which is a great shame. It's a lot more amenable to study than the gigantic Linux kernel.

The FOSS world has learned a huge amount from Andy Tanenbaum, from his teaching and the materials he created, from the code he wrote… and also, about the importance of software licenses. If MINIX 1 and 2 had originally been free software, its users could have redistributed modified versions, and Linux might never have happened.

If ast had chosen a different license for MINIX 3, perhaps Intel would have had more incentive to share its work on it. For all Intel's open source projects, professed open source culture, and its many billions in revenue, it has done nothing to help the MINIX 3 project.

Arguably, Tanenbaum's arguments for cleaner, simpler, more modular software architecture have been rebutted by the wild success of Linux, despite its "obsolete" design. But on that front, we suspect the world may yet come to learn that he knew his stuff there as well. ®

 

https://www.theregister.com//2024/06/25/tanenbaum_minix_award/

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 0 of 0 comments

Post a Comment