Good Articles to Share

Fact of Phantom Voter Malaysia

Tan KW
Publish date: Fri, 10 May 2013, 09:54 PM
Tan KW
0 509,780
Good.

 

Dah banyak dan cukup bukti bhw SPR merencanakan pengundi hantu, kata Anwar Ibrahim
ada undi hantu
ada undi pos tambahan
ada undi mat bangla
ada undi mat indon
ada undi mat myanmar
ada undi mat kemboja
ada undi sulu
ada undi filipino
ada undi thai
ada satu alamat 100 orang tinggal
ada yg namanya mengundi dua tempat
ada 18658 pengundi diragui di Pekan
ada yg hidup tiba2 mati
ada yg mati tiba2 hidup
ada beratus ribu nama hilang
ada kawasan mengundi di alih
ada sempadan kawsn mengundi di ubah
ada yg daftar x ada nama
ada yg daftar x ada alamat
ada...
ada...

Anda dipersila tengok video ni dgn lebih jelas faham apa berlaku pd senarai daftar nama SPR (Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia)..
Hantu tu halangan! Hantu tu pengkhianat! Hantu tu hancur maruah negara!
Sila sebarkan secara luas!
Bersyukur kongsi page ini! Bersyukur kongsi maklumat ini!
Hidup Bers

✔h! TQ

 

Election aftermath: 10 things Najib must do - kinibiz

[转帖] 马国揭秘

Kit Siang: Shock of my life when I woke up this morning and told that I am target of attacks...

508 Night of Black. ( 10 minute version ) with Anwar speech

Election aftermath: Is the rally real? - kinibiz

SAH keputusan PRU13 akan di cabar - erapasca

 

Discussions
1 person likes this. Showing 2 of 2 comments

carries

So far no concrete evidence has been produced to support these allegations.

Allegations have been made against :-
MAS, Air Aisia, AirAsiaX, Risda, PDRM, as well as Private Companies/Factories (who were apparently, merely transporting their own foreign workers) etc

Some other so called "phantom voters" detained by members of the public/opposition members have even turned out to be Malaysians.

There have been claims that "evidence" exists and it is in the hands of the Oposition.
Honestly, isn't it about time that the "evidence" is revealed to the public?
And proper legal action be taken against the parties/persons or corporations resposible?

Anyone can allege anything at any time but until and unless it is properly supported by "real evidence", it is only an allegation and certainly not a fact.

I would like to give you an example and ask you to decide if you would consider these people as "phantom voters" or not.

Alot of Malaysians do not update their current addresses on their Identity Cards. This is mostly due i think, to laziness on their part, eventhough i believe it is an offence not to do so.
Anyway, alot of these people were therefore voting at constituencies to which they no longer belong.

If a physical check is made, meaning that, if you go to an address and check if the person stated as living there is in fact living there, you would find that there exists no such person at that address, however, that person has voted in the election. Now, would you say he is a "phantom voter"?

Actually,whether or not you consider him to be a "phantom voter", is irrelevant, the real question is "Who is to blame?"

2013-05-11 11:05

jacko

Here we come Penang!!

UBAH POWER IS HERE TO STAY!!

2013-05-11 19:20

Post a Comment