Legal Reforms: The court could mandate sweeping reforms in the education system, requiring the government to overhaul policies, invest in better infrastructure, or increase teacher training standards. These reforms would likely be costly and burdensome to implement but necessary to rectify systemic failures.

Accountability and Leadership Changes: Key individuals responsible for overseeing education policies, including ministers, may face dismissal or be forced to resign. This could also result in a political crisis if the leadership is held personally responsible for negligence.

Financial Compensation: The government may be ordered to pay substantial compensation to affected individuals or groups. This could come in the form of reparations for damages caused by the poor quality of education, potentially amounting to billions of ringgit depending on the scope of the lawsuit.

Education Reform Failure

A case for the people of Malaysia to sue the government over the declining quality of education, despite substantial investments, could be built on the following arguments:

Mismanagement of Public Funds: Billions have been allocated to Malaysia’s education sector, yet international assessments like PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) and TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study) consistently show Malaysian students underperforming compared to global peers. This suggests a failure in the effective use of public funds, raising questions about financial accountability.

Violation of Constitutional Rights: The Federal Constitution of Malaysia guarantees access to education. If the quality of education continues to decline, it could be argued that the government is not upholding this constitutional mandate, as poor education undermines the future prospects of students, particularly those from less privileged backgrounds.

Failure to Deliver on Promised Reforms: Numerous educational reforms have been promised but not implemented effectively. The National Education Blueprint 2013-2025, for instance, set clear goals for improving student outcomes, yet little progress has been seen. The failure to meet these benchmarks could be grounds for legal accountability.

Long-term Economic Impact: The poor quality of education is directly linked to lower productivity, higher unemployment, and economic stagnation, disproportionately affecting future generations. This long-term damage can be viewed as negligence by the government.

These factors collectively may provide legal grounds for public litigation against the government.

Education Reform Failure- Failed financial literacy in educaiton. School leavers are getting into bad debt and bankruptcy- time to sue, not?

As of 2024, the issue of debt and bankruptcy remains a significant concern in Malaysia, particularly among younger adults. There has been a notable rise in the number of Malaysians, especially those under the age of 30, struggling with financial debt. In fact, approximately 53,000 young adults in Malaysia collectively owe RM1.9 billion due to factors such as personal loans, vehicle purchases, and business loans. Youths aged 35 to 44 make up the largest group of bankrupt individuals​.

While Malaysia has made strides in reducing the number of bankruptcies since 2018, primarily through debt advisory agencies like AKPK, personal loans continue to be the leading cause of bankruptcy cases. Nearly 50% of all bankruptcy cases are tied to personal loans, with other major contributors including business and vehicle loans

If the lawyer is complicit in the criminal breach of trust, the Penal Code Section 409 (CBT by a public servant, banker, merchant, or agent) provides for punishment up to 20 years imprisonment, a fine, and whipping.

AI belongs to which race? Muslim? Halal? How to be certified?

By focusing on teaching students how to use their brains effectively, maintaining physical and mental health, understanding legal systems, and developing financial literacy, schools can provide a flexible framework for students to succeed in various life paths. Once students master these essential skills, they have the tools needed to make informed decisions, adapt to change, and build fulfilling lives. This approach shifts responsibility from an over-reliance on formal education toward personal empowerment, helping students navigate an increasingly complex world on their terms.

How many bankrupt gorwn-ups we need before we let the children learn- Financial Literacy:
Financial literacy is often overlooked in schools, yet it is essential for navigating adult life. A report by the OECD found that adults with higher levels of financial literacy were better equipped to manage personal debt, save for retirement, and achieve economic stability. Teaching children about budgeting, saving, and investing from an early age can foster better financial decision-making, which is critical given the uncertainty of modern economies. Programs like Junior Achievement have shown that students who receive financial education have higher rates of entrepreneurial activity and long-term economic success.

Understanding Laws and Civic Responsibility:
Legal literacy—understanding the basic laws of the land—helps students become responsible citizens. Teaching children about legal systems and their rights fosters respect for others, encourages civic engagement, and reduces the likelihood of engaging in criminal activity. Research by Education Week suggests that civics education helps reduce social inequality and promotes justice by equipping students with the knowledge to engage in democratic processes and avoid legal pitfalls.

Health and Physical Well-being:
Physical health education is foundational to a successful life. According to the World Health Organization, physical inactivity and poor health literacy are linked to chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Teaching students about nutrition, exercise, and mental health equips them with the knowledge to prevent disease, reduce healthcare costs, and improve overall quality of life. Schools that focus on health education see improvements in both academic performance and long-term life outcomes, as found by a review in the Journal of School Health.

Teaching about the Brain and Cognitive Skills:
Neuroscientific research shows that understanding how the brain works, including emotional regulation and cognitive adaptability, can significantly improve learning outcomes and mental well-being. Teaching students about metacognition (thinking about thinking) can enhance their ability to solve problems, adapt to new situations, and innovate—skills that are crucial in today’s fast-paced world. A study published in Mind, Brain, and Education highlights that students who are taught about how their brain learns are more motivated and resilient in the face of academic challenges.

In today’s rapidly evolving world, the traditional education model—focused heavily on memorizing facts and specific subject matter—can feel increasingly outdated. Instead, evidence suggests that schools should focus on teaching students foundational skills that empower them to thrive in a complex, ever-changing environment.

In today's fast changing world, schools just need to teach them about the brain & how to use it, the body & how to take care of it; existing laws & how to follow them; as well as money & how it works. Once they got the intelligence, health, 'out-of-prison' and financial sense- the rest is up to them to live & enjoy their lives

Given our failed education reform, they stand a good chance to win byb keep on harping on religiosity, nationalism and ethnocentricism. Majority of their supporters just need seasonal handouts- who need a debate on global economy, harmonious diversity or real unity?

The combination of criminal sanctions and professional disbarment would likely constitute the most appropriate punishment for any lawyer involved in misleading the court in such serious cases, hence serves as deterrent to other law practitioners

While nationalism can foster unity and pride, its extreme forms pose significant dangers. Nationalism can fuel xenophobia and racism by promoting the exclusion of outsiders and fostering hostility toward minorities. Historically, aggressive nationalism has led to wars and conflicts, as seen in fascist regimes during World War II. It also provides fertile ground for authoritarianism, where leaders consolidate power by suppressing dissent. Nationalism often suppresses diversity, pushing for homogeneity and marginalizing minorities. It undermines global cooperation, isolating nations from collective solutions to global challenges. Furthermore, populist leaders manipulate nationalist sentiments to gain support, creating division. This ideology can lead to moral superiority, demonizing other nations and justifying violence. Ultimately, extreme nationalism destabilizes societies and undermines values of equality and unity.

While nationalism can foster unity and pride, its extreme forms pose significant dangers. Nationalism can fuel xenophobia and racism by promoting the exclusion of outsiders and fostering hostility toward minorities. Historically, aggressive nationalism has led to wars and conflicts, as seen in fascist regimes during World War II. It also provides fertile ground for authoritarianism, where leaders consolidate power by suppressing dissent. Nationalism often suppresses diversity, pushing for homogeneity and marginalizing minorities. It undermines global cooperation, isolating nations from collective solutions to global challenges. Furthermore, populist leaders manipulate nationalist sentiments to gain support, creating division. This ideology can lead to moral superiority, demonizing other nations and justifying violence. Ultimately, extreme nationalism destabilizes societies and undermines values of equality and unity.

Lawyers who attempt to mislead the court, particularly in a clear-cut case involving criminal breach of trust (CBT) and money laundering, face serious legal and ethical consequences. In such cases, where public funds are involved, and the argument centers around laundering for welfare purposes, the lawyer could still face sanctions, as the law does not permit such justifications.

That's for sapiens. You just wait and see who should sit in the August House

Modern education and schools have a fundamental duty to protect children from the "dogma storm" – the overwhelming influence of rigid beliefs and unquestioned ideologies that can stifle critical thinking, creativity, and intellectual freedom. In an increasingly interconnected world, children are exposed to a barrage of information, much of which may be biased, one-sided, or rooted in historical or cultural dogmas. If schools fail to offer a space for independent thought, they risk producing individuals who are more prone to accept narratives blindly rather than question, explore, and develop their own well-reasoned viewpoints.

Education must empower children to think critically and to develop the intellectual tools to assess the validity of claims, ideas, and traditions. When schools promote a curriculum that encourages inquiry over rote memorization or unquestioning obedience, they cultivate thinkers who can discern fact from fiction, resist manipulation, and make informed decisions. Schools must also emphasize emotional intelligence and the ability to respectfully engage with diverse viewpoints, shielding children from falling into echo chambers or extremist thinking.

Moreover, protecting children from dogma also involves preparing them to navigate a world where societal, religious, and political dogmas can pressure them to conform. Schools should teach children to appreciate nuance, avoid oversimplified narratives, and promote intellectual humility. By fostering an environment that encourages the questioning of assumptions and the exploration of alternative perspectives, education plays a pivotal role in helping future generations grow into autonomous, well-rounded individuals who are not enslaved by outdated ideologies or harmful groupthink.

Ultimately, modern education must be the guardian of intellectual freedom, ensuring that children are prepared to navigate a world fraught with competing beliefs without succumbing to the storms of dogma that seek to limit their potential.

**Title: "The Courtroom of Justice"**

*Scene: A packed courtroom, with the air heavy with anticipation. On one side, a senior and experienced lawyer, Mr. Ramin, stands defending his client, a high-ranking government servant, Mr. Karim, accused of criminal breach of trust (CBT) and money laundering. At the bench, Judge Sophia is known for her sharp mind and no-nonsense approach to justice.*

**Judge Sophia**: (Leaning forward slightly) Mr. Ramin, I’ve listened carefully to your defense over the past few days. And I must say, your arguments are... inventive, to put it kindly. Today, you seem to suggest that the exorbitant fees paid to you were—how did you put it?—part of a welfare scheme to support your client’s 'charitable' endeavors?

**Mr. Ramin**: (Smiling confidently) Your Honor, it is well known that my client, Mr. Karim, has dedicated years of service to public welfare. My fees were a means to assist him in managing his funds for these noble causes, albeit indirectly. Yes, the money came from public funding, but the intention behind its use was for the betterment of the people.

**Judge Sophia**: (Smirking) Ah, I see. So, you’re now claiming that siphoning public funds, laundering them through your law firm, and then distributing them under the guise of legal fees was... benevolent?

**Mr. Ramin**: (Hesitating) I wouldn’t phrase it quite like that, Your Honor. But I believe the outcome of the funds speaks for itself. Welfare, after all—

**Judge Sophia**: (Interrupting, her tone sharp) Welfare, Mr. Ramin? Do you mean to suggest that *your* inflated bank account is a model of public welfare? That’s a very curious definition. In fact, I would almost call it a personal welfare scheme—one that seems to benefit you more than the public.

**(The courtroom murmurs. Mr. Ramin shifts uncomfortably, losing some of his composure.)**

**Mr. Ramin**: Your Honor, I assure you, everything was done within the bounds of legality. The fees charged were for legal services rendered, and—

**Judge Sophia**: (Cutting in with a raised eyebrow) Legal services rendered, Mr. Ramin? I have no doubt you rendered *some* services, but I am beginning to question *whom* they were for. If I recall correctly, Mr. Karim diverted public funds amounting to millions for 'consultancy fees'—fees which, curiously, ended up in your hands. Was this not the same public servant whose signature you advised on nearly every document in this sordid affair?

**Mr. Ramin**: (Stammering) Well, I... I... simply followed my client's instructions.

**Judge Sophia**: (Leaning back in her chair) Instructions to what, Mr. Ramin? Cover up his crimes? Deflect from the theft of public money by arguing he was somehow using it for charitable purposes? You seem to be confusing legal representation with complicity.

**Mr. Ramin**: Your Honor, I object to this characterization! I am simply a lawyer doing my duty to the best of my abilities.

**Judge Sophia**: (Smiling coldly) A lawyer doing his duty, indeed. But there’s one problem with your ‘best efforts,’ Mr. Ramin. They have not only failed to clear your client’s name but also brought your own integrity into question. You seem to believe that laundering money through legal fees is some kind of loophole. You misjudged the law... and perhaps you misjudged this court. (Pauses for effect) The law does not smile upon those who seek to mislead it.

**(The courtroom is silent. Judge Sophia lets the weight of her words hang.)**

**Mr. Ramin**: (Attempting to regain control) Your Honor, I maintain that all fees were legitimate, and as for Mr. Karim—

**Judge Sophia**: (Interrupting, her voice icy) Let me be clear, Mr. Ramin. You are not on trial for the fees—at least not yet. But you are teetering dangerously close to being held accountable for abetting your client’s crimes. Sharing in the spoils of public corruption under the guise of legal fees will not protect you, no matter how skillfully you think you’ve crafted your defense. And as for Mr. Karim’s ‘welfare contributions’—the court sees through them as easily as it sees through this charade. Public funds are meant for public good, not for lining the pockets of those who are supposed to serve the people.

**(Mr. Ramin is visibly shaken, his confidence crumbling.)**

**Judge Sophia**: (Turning to the prosecutor) Prosecutor, prepare the case for final arguments. We’ve heard enough. Mr. Karim’s actions are as clear as the daylight, and no amount of legal theatrics will obscure the facts. And as for you, Mr. Ramin, I suggest you review the professional code of conduct for lawyers before you return to this courtroom.

**(The gavel strikes. The courtroom erupts in whispers, with Mr. Ramin slumping into his seat, his once confident posture now replaced by defeat.)**

**Judge Sophia**: Court adjourned.

*End scene.*

The combination of criminal sanctions and professional disbarment would likely constitute the most appropriate punishment for any lawyer involved in misleading the court in such serious cases, hence serves as deterrent to other law practitioners

Perjury or False Evidence:
If the lawyer presents false evidence or induces a witness to commit perjury, Section 193 of the Penal Code (giving or fabricating false evidence) applies, which carries a punishment of up to 7 years imprisonment and a fine.

And in such a case, the court must pursue under offense of "Complicity in Money Laundering or CBT":
If a lawyer is directly involved in the laundering of public funds or aiding in a CBT, they could also face criminal prosecution under the same laws applicable to the primary offenders (such as Penal Code Section 409 for CBT and AMLA Section 4 for money laundering). In such cases, the punishment for the lawyer would be similar to the penalties imposed on those convicted of these offenses; as well as indirectly sharing the loots from public fund - depends on income tax filed by the said lawyer

Section 94(3) of the Legal Profession Act 1976 empowers the Disciplinary Board to strike a lawyer off the roll or suspend them for misconduct involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit, especially in misleading the court.

Lawyers are bound by professional ethical codes, such as those outlined in the Legal Profession Act 1976 (Malaysia), which prohibit misleading the court.

Under Section 4 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing, and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (AMLA) in Malaysia, anyone convicted of money laundering may be sentenced to up to 15 years in prison and face a fine of not less than five times the sum of the proceeds of the unlawful activity or RM5 million, whichever is higher.

If the lawyer is complicit in the criminal breach of trust, the Penal Code Section 409 (CBT by a public servant, banker, merchant, or agent) provides for punishment up to 20 years imprisonment, a fine, and whipping.

Rightfully under Section 186 of the Malaysian Penal Code, obstructing a public servant in the discharge of their public functions can lead to up to 2 years imprisonment, a fine, or both. However, more serious forms of obstruction, including perverting the course of justice, may carry heavier penalties.

Criminal Charges:
If an unsrupulous senior and experience lawyer knowingly misleads the court, they should be made to face criminal charges, particularly for obstruction of justice or complicity in the crime.

No Excuse for Channeling to Welfare
The law does not excuse criminal actions, even if the funds are redirected for charitable purposes. The principles of *mens rea* (criminal intent) and *actus reus* (criminal act) still apply, and laundering funds, regardless of their final destination, is illegal. The court is unlikely to entertain a defense based on the notion that laundering money for welfare purposes negates the crime.

Judicial Precedents
Courts have a duty to take a strong stance against lawyers who mislead the judicial process, especially in high-profile cases involving public trust. Judges may impose strict penalties on such lawyers, ensuring that the integrity of the legal system is upheld.

Complicity or Aiding and Abetting: If the lawyer is found to have been actively involved in the scheme, they could be considered complicit in the crime of CBT or money laundering.

Obstruction of Justice: Knowingly deceiving or misleading the court may result in charges related to obstructing the judicial process.

In cases where public trust is violated, such as laundering public funds under the guise of welfare, any lawyer attempting to argue innocence based on such justification would likely violate ethical principles.

Or more apppropriate would be disbarment: Permanent revocation of the lawyer’s license to practice.

Suspension: Temporary removal of the right to practice law

Ethical Breach and Misleading the Court
Lawyers are bound by ethical codes that prohibit misleading the court. In most jurisdictions, if a lawyer knowingly presents a false argument or misrepresents facts, they can face disciplinary action.

Heavy indoctrination discourages independent thought, critical questioning, and intellectual exploration. Instead, it promotes obedience, conformity, and rigid adherence to a prescribed set of beliefs. Without the mental exercise of questioning, analyzing, and integrating diverse information, the PFC can become underutilized, impairing its growth and development. This cognitive stagnation can cause individuals to rely more heavily on primitive, instinctual brain functions, often associated with the limbic system and what is colloquially called the "reptilian brain."

Section 505(b) of the Penal Code – This section deals with statements that could lead to public mischief, particularly statements that may cause fear or alarm to the public or disturb public peace

IF a person make a million, chances are he is both intelligent and well-deserved. But when a person make a billion, he has inadvertently taken the portion meant for the many other people to live a decent life- or in short, they are the culprits accountable for the poverty in the nation

Haunting?

Me too. Cheers

Article 10: Public Education and Trust

1. The government shall take steps to educate the public about AI systems' roles in governance, ensuring that citizens are informed and can trust the integration of AI into public office.
2. Public confidence in AI systems must be regularly evaluated through surveys, open forums, and feedback mechanisms.

Article 9: Conflict Resolution

1. In the event of a conflict between human representatives and AI systems, a clear process for resolution shall be established, ensuring that human interests are prioritized in cases where there is disagreement.
2. AI systems shall not have the power to overrule human representatives but may propose alternative solutions or courses of action.

Article 8: Regulation and Oversight

1. A national AI oversight body shall be established to monitor the performance and ethical compliance of AI systems in public office.
2. This body shall have the authority to suspend or remove AI systems from office if they fail to meet ethical or functional standards.
3. AI systems must undergo regular reviews, and their continued service in public office must be subject to parliamentary approval based on their performance and ethical conduct.

Article 7: Continuous Learning and Adaptation

1. AI systems holding public office must undergo continuous learning to adapt to new social, political, and economic challenges.
2. Regular updates and improvements to AI systems shall be made to ensure they remain relevant and effective in their roles.
3. A dedicated body shall oversee AI training and development to prevent errors, reduce risks, and enhance their contributions to governance.

Article 6: Safeguarding Data Privacy

1. AI systems shall prioritize the protection of citizens' data and privacy. Personal data used by AI systems in decision-making processes must be anonymized and securely stored.
2. AI systems must comply with Malaysia’s data protection laws, ensuring that sensitive information is handled with the utmost care and only used for legitimate governance purposes.