Calvin, stop baiting bilises into rsawit trap. The total value of its assets is just about one third of Kretam's or TSH's

This is called bagai tukul dengan pahat. Got report only will they do their work

Can wait to drop more before riding second round

Can wait

He's deep fake progressive, but truly fanatic

They focus on what's islamic. First world focus on what's progressive, economical and scientific reality

It's actually just the right formula because the nons make up the majority of honestly declared M40

Wrong formula. Economy continues to sink as the M40 are squeezed - as economy equals M40's money goes round. And these superrich and superprivilege ones continue to impoverish the nation and weaken ringgit because they keep shifting their wealth to overseas

Posted by eastern_joy > 9 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Do you think we are plugging the correct "leakages" in govt in the correct way? Reducing subsidies, the money saved, goes to where? Give budget of nice cars for MPs, give higher allowances for MPs, give more pensions for MPs? Give higher salaries to MPs?

Again, the best way to live life is still the balancing act- between Robbins' "Forced Awakening the Giant Within & Taking Massive Action " and Daoism's "Letting things go naturally, spontaneously and selflessly"

Posted by 4dview > 14 minutes ago | Report Abuse

In fact, Liezi 列子, the leading Daoist scholar after Laozi but before Zhuangzi, has deep observation into the universe and had pointed out natural phenomena like movement of celestial bodies, earthquake and boundlessness of the universe. From observing the ways of nature, and knowing the insurmountable power of nature, Daoist then tried to formulate a way to life which adapts to nature.

Noble people earn respect through their actions, integrity, and positive contributions to society. Nobility is not just a title or status but a way of conducting oneself with honor, honesty, and compassion towards others. When noble individuals uphold these values consistently, they naturally earn respect from those around them.

On the other hand, rogue people often resort to force, coercion, threat, or blackmail to gain respect or compliance from others. This type of behavior is not based on genuine respect but on fear or manipulation. It does not reflect true character or integrity but rather a willingness to use power or intimidation to get what they want.

In essence, nobility earns respect through virtue and positive actions, while rogue behavior relies on fear and manipulation, which is not sustainable or honorable in the long run.

Just need reliable insiders' tips (no.1), robust data analyses (no.2) , timely execution - both buying and selling (no.3) as well as the balancing act of "time in the market" & "timing the market", etc etc

Posted by 4dview > 22 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Investment needs two aspect, both scientific and philosophical.

What???? Just need reliable insiders' tips (no.1), robust data analyses (no.2) , timely execution - both buying and selling (no.3) as well as the balancing act of "time in the market" & "timing the market", etc etc

Posted by 4dview > 22 minutes ago | Report Abuse

Investment needs two aspect, both scientific and philosophical.

Sadly, DAP is part of this failure (in the history)

Posted by metaverse > 25 minutes ago | Report Abuse

This kind of cold turkey economic strategy will eventually fail as it will "keep the rich at bay to strengthen the poor," which is very similar to our education system, which took away all the exams so that no one will happily fail the primary school exam and come to secondary school; the whole classes failed. M40s or B40s will be in deep disappointment if they think the government will spoon-feed them with the so-called targeted petrol subsidy every month, as the government is heavily in debt and most T20s are cashing out their assets and sending their kids overseas.

Shameless

Posted by DickyMe > 1 hour ago | Report Abuse

PM should be ashamed to announce that 85% of population are depending on handouts.
It also describes the state of economy.

Just forget about the nons. Pmx's actions, inaction and policies bagai kacang lupkan kulit

Plus the 2 sen dividend, remember. Huat ar

To prevent casualties from kk attack?

Akmalkin Skywalker: I Corrupt All Cops? Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender & come clean about bearing their responsibilities:

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear e.g. by exaggerating of human error as intentional provocation

2. Demonize, accuse, slander and call for boikot certain companies, communities or individuals, leading to a sense of condemnation and persecution

3. Exploit existing emotional tensions or religious grievances for personal or political gain.

4. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice by boikotting at any cost" mentality.

5. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante, extremism or terrorism actions.

6. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues

Akmalkin Skywalker: I Corrupt All Cops? Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender & come clean about bearing their responsibilities:

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear e.g. by exaggerating of human error as intentional provocation

2. Demonize, accuse, slander and call for boikot certain companies, communities or individuals, leading to a sense of condemnation and persecution

3. Exploit existing emotional tensions or religious grievances for personal or political gain.

4. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice by boikotting at any cost" mentality.

5. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante, extremism or terrorism actions.

6. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues

Exactly. Doesn't make sense to me too

Sold too early😥

Vernacular
-acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. - promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric
- fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens
- reduces feelings of alienation or marginalization

National
- limits cultural homogeneity
- erases valuable cultural heritage
- stifles individual expression
- creates divisions and resentment among marginalized communities

Different educators, different outcomes:

Vernacular
-prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity

Vs national
-unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability (kaki boikot, vigilante gangterism, molotov makers & throwers, etc etc)

When irresponsible enforcers fail the community as a whole.....

Enforcers who fail to act promptly are equally responsible for negligence and dereliction of duty. The police must proactively address violent tendencies, as evidenced by inflammatory speeches, without waiting for the situation to escalate or a crisis to occur. Delaying action only allows the problem to grow and potentially lead to catastrophic consequences.

Physical violence, such as life-threatening bomb-throwing, often stems from the seeds of verbal violence, which are sown by provocative and inflammatory threats. Leaders of groups seeking to unleash violence, like racial riots, typically incite people beforehand to create the conditions for such actions.

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Unity through integration is superior to unity via assimilation for several reasons.

Firstly, integration acknowledges and respects the diversity of individuals and communities within a nation. It promotes inclusivity by allowing people to maintain their cultural, religious, and linguistic identities while still being part of the larger national fabric. This approach fosters a sense of belonging and acceptance among citizens, reducing feelings of alienation or marginalization that can arise with assimilation.

Secondly, integration encourages mutual understanding and cooperation among different groups. Instead of forcing everyone to conform to a dominant culture, it values the contributions and perspectives of various cultural backgrounds. This diversity of viewpoints can lead to more innovative solutions to societal challenges and promote a richer tapestry of arts, literature, and traditions.

Additionally, integration promotes social harmony and reduces the risk of conflicts that may arise from cultural suppression or forced homogenization. When people feel respected and valued for who they are, they are more likely to participate positively in society and work towards common goals.

Furthermore, integration fosters resilience in the face of external pressures or threats. A nation built on the principles of integration is better equipped to adapt to changing demographics, global trends, and geopolitical shifts without compromising the rights and identities of its diverse population.

In contrast, unity via assimilation can lead to cultural homogeneity, erasing valuable cultural heritage and stifling individual expression. It may also create divisions and resentment among marginalized communities, leading to social unrest and instability.

Therefore, prioritizing unity through integration not only strengthens the social fabric of a nation but also contributes to its long-term sustainability and prosperity.

Mentality of educators: noble verna Vs ignoble natio

Educators' mentality can either embrace universalism, promoting a multiracial, diverse society, or fall into the trap of "katak di bawah tempurung," fostering narrow-mindedness leading to antisemitism, and a monoethnic exclusivity that divides rather than unites.

Mentality of educators: noble verna Vs ignoble natio

Educators' mentality can either embrace universalism, promoting a multiracial, diverse society, or fall into the trap of "katak di bawah tempurung," fostering narrow-mindedness leading to antisemitism, and a monoethnic exclusivity that divides rather than unites.

Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear.
2. Encourage or participate in violent or retaliatory actions outside of legal channels.
3. Demonize certain communities or individuals, leading to a sense of injustice or persecution.
4. Exploit existing tensions or grievances for personal or political gain.
5. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice at any cost" mentality.
6. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante actions.
7. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues

Sensibility, accountability and responsibility

There is an emphasis on cultural sensitivity and respect for diversity. Doctors are encouraged to understand and respect the cultural beliefs, values, and preferences of the people. The oath also underscores the importance of accountability. Doctors are accountable for their actions, decisions, and the consequences of their actions. This includes taking responsibility for errors, instigating vigilante, and striving to improve the well-being of the whole community.

Kuantan, Pahang?

Doctors are tied to this swearing:

Hippocratic Oath?

1.The oath emphasizes the primary goal of benefiting the people and doing what is best for their well-being. Physicians pledge to use their knowledge and skills for the benefit of the needy, prioritizing their health, emotion, prosperity and healing above all else.

2.A critical aspect of the oath is the commitment to do no harm. Physicians vow to avoid causing direct or indirect harm or injury to anyone, whether through actions or omissions. This principle underscores the importance of ethical conduct and responsible healer.

Do you think he got a fake degree?

Why? For violating the Hippocratic Oath?

1.The oath emphasizes the primary goal of benefiting the people and doing what is best for their well-being. Physicians pledge to use their knowledge and skills for the benefit of the needy, prioritizing their health, emotion, prosperity and healing above all else.

2.A critical aspect of the oath is the commitment to do no harm. Physicians vow to avoid causing direct or indirect harm or injury to anyone, whether through actions or omissions. This principle underscores the importance of ethical conduct and responsible healer.

Has he violate these good human principles?

A critical aspect of the oath is the commitment to do no harm. Physicians vow to avoid causing direct or indirect harm or injury to anyone, whether through actions or omissions. This principle underscores the importance of ethical conduct and responsible healer.

Would the fire in Bidor and Taiping considered attempt murd*r? Will the igp shamefully resign?

Posted by icecool > 36 minutes ago | Report Abuse

i have said it many times best to put out the fire asap or else it will burn everything eventually.

Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear.
2. Encourage or participate in violent or retaliatory actions outside of legal channels.
3. Demonize certain communities or individuals, leading to a sense of injustice or persecution.
4. Exploit existing tensions or grievances for personal or political gain.
5. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice at any cost" mentality.
6. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante actions.
7. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues.

Instigators: On having the balls, courage and jantanness to surrender

The identifiers for instigators causing vigilanteism can include individuals or groups who:

1. Spread false or misleading information to incite anger or fear.
2. Encourage or participate in violent or retaliatory actions outside of legal channels.
3. Demonize certain communities or individuals, leading to a sense of injustice or persecution.
4. Exploit existing tensions or grievances for personal or political gain.
5. Disregard the rule of law and promote a "justice at any cost" mentality.
6. Use inflammatory rhetoric or propaganda to mobilize supporters towards vigilante actions.
7. Target specific individuals or groups as scapegoats for broader societal issues.

Responsible enforcers who have a duty to act prophylactically by addressing perpetual instigators should:

1. **Surveillance and Monitoring:** Employ advanced surveillance techniques to track the activities of potential instigators and their networks.

2. **Intelligence Gathering:** Gather intelligence through various sources to understand the motivations, capabilities, and plans of instigators.

3. **Risk Assessment:** Conduct thorough risk assessments to identify potential hotspots or targets for provoking activities.

4. **Early Intervention:** Take proactive measures to intervene early, such as engaging with culpable individuals, counseling, or providing support services.

5. **Targeted Operations:** Conduct targeted operations to disrupt instigators' activities, seize illegal materials, and dismantle their networks.

6. **Community Engagement:** Foster positive relationships with communities to gather intelligence, build trust, and prevent radicalization or recruitment efforts.

7. **Collaboration:** Work closely with other law enforcement agencies, intelligence services, and international partners to share information and coordinate efforts.

8. **Legal Actions:** Take legal actions, such as issuing warnings, imposing restrictions, or making arrests when necessary to prevent the escalation of vigilante activities.

9. **Public Awareness:** Raise public awareness about the risks of criminal activities, encourage reporting of suspicious behavior, and promote community resilience against extremism and violence.

Stop that, UlarSawa. Bursa is to make profits. Don't just talk, talk, talk. Tell us something directly relevant. How much you bought - price? Volume? That's enough

Perpetual instigators often escalate their actions if not stopped early. When enforcers overlook or ignore warning signs and early indications of criminal behavior, they contribute to the escalation of conflicts and incidents, potentially leading to more serious crimes like arson or acts of terrorism.

Public funded law enforcers play a crucial role in maintaining law and order within society. When they fail to act prophylactically by stopping perpetual instigators, they contribute to the perpetuation of criminal behavior and the escalation of situations that can lead to acts of arson, vigilantism, or terrorism.

1. **Failure to Prevent Future Crimes:** Enforcers are entrusted with the responsibility of preventing crimes and ensuring public safety. When they neglect to intervene proactively with known instigators, they allow these individuals to continue their actions, increasing the likelihood of future criminal acts.

2. **Enabling Criminal Behavior:** By not taking action against perpetual instigators, enforcers inadvertently enable and embolden these individuals to persist in their disruptive or violent behaviors. This lack of intervention can create an environment where criminal activities thrive.

3. **Contributing to Escalation:** Perpetual instigators often escalate their actions if not stopped early. When enforcers overlook or ignore warning signs and early indications of criminal behavior, they contribute to the escalation of conflicts and incidents, potentially leading to more serious crimes like arson or acts of terrorism.

4. **Loss of Trust and Accountability:** Communities rely on law enforcement agencies to uphold justice and protect them from harm. When enforcers fail to act against known instigators, they erode public trust in the justice system and create a sense of impunity among criminals. This lack of accountability can further exacerbate societal problems.

5. **Preventative Measures vs. Reactive Responses:** Prophylactic action by enforcers involves taking preventative measures to address potential threats before they escalate into major incidents. This approach is proactive and emphasizes the importance of early intervention to maintain order and prevent harm to individuals and communities.

In conclusion, responsible enforcers have a duty to act prophylactically by addressing perpetual instigators to prevent the escalation of criminal activities, including acts of arson, vigilantism, and terrorism. Failure to do so not only undermines public safety but also contributes to a breakdown of trust in law enforcement and accountability within society.

When teaching school children about the root of terrorism, it's important to approach the topic with sensitivity and accuracy. Here are some key points they could learn and understand:

1. **Definition of Terrorism:** Start with a clear definition of terrorism as the use of violence, intimidation, or coercion for political or ideological purposes.

2. **Historical Context:** Provide historical context about various terrorist groups and movements, highlighting their origins, motivations, and actions.

3. **Factors Contributing to Terrorism:**
- Ideological Factors: Teach about extremist ideologies that promote violence, such as religious extremism or political radicalism.
- Socioeconomic Factors: Discuss how poverty, marginalization, and lack of opportunities can contribute to feelings of resentment and alienation, which may be exploited by terrorist groups.
- Political Factors: Explain how political grievances, including issues like oppression, injustice, or perceived foreign interference, can fuel terrorist activities.

4. **Impact of Terrorism:** Help students understand the devastating impact of terrorism on individuals, communities, and societies, including loss of life, fear, economic disruption, and social division.

5. **Counterterrorism Measures:** Educate students about efforts to combat terrorism, including law enforcement, intelligence gathering, international cooperation, and community resilience programs.

6. **Promote Critical Thinking:** Encourage critical thinking skills by discussing propaganda techniques used by terrorist groups to recruit and radicalize individuals, and how to critically evaluate information from various sources.

7. **Empathy and Understanding:** Emphasize the importance of empathy and understanding towards different cultures and beliefs, while also promoting tolerance, respect for human rights, and peaceful conflict resolution.

By providing a comprehensive and balanced education on terrorism, school children can develop a nuanced understanding of this complex issue and contribute to building a more peaceful and resilient society.

Proto-terror, Proterror Vs Peace Within cultivation

When teaching school children about the root of terrorism, it's important to approach the topic with sensitivity and accuracy. Here are some key points they could learn and understand:

1. **Definition of Terrorism:** Start with a clear definition of terrorism as the use of violence, intimidation, or coercion for political or ideological purposes.

2. **Historical Context:** Provide historical context about various terrorist groups and movements, highlighting their origins, motivations, and actions.

3. **Factors Contributing to Terrorism:**
- Ideological Factors: Teach about extremist ideologies that promote violence, such as religious extremism or political radicalism.
- Socioeconomic Factors: Discuss how poverty, marginalization, and lack of opportunities can contribute to feelings of resentment and alienation, which may be exploited by terrorist groups.
- Political Factors: Explain how political grievances, including issues like oppression, injustice, or perceived foreign interference, can fuel terrorist activities.

4. **Impact of Terrorism:** Help students understand the devastating impact of terrorism on individuals, communities, and societies, including loss of life, fear, economic disruption, and social division.

5. **Counterterrorism Measures:** Educate students about efforts to combat terrorism, including law enforcement, intelligence gathering, international cooperation, and community resilience programs.

6. **Promote Critical Thinking:** Encourage critical thinking skills by discussing propaganda techniques used by terrorist groups to recruit and radicalize individuals, and how to critically evaluate information from various sources.

7. **Empathy and Understanding:** Emphasize the importance of empathy and understanding towards different cultures and beliefs, while also promoting tolerance, respect for human rights, and peaceful conflict resolution.

By providing a comprehensive and balanced education on terrorism, school children can develop a nuanced understanding of this complex issue and contribute to building a more peaceful and resilient society.

On curbing vigilantism: Arrest today, not tomorrow

In cases of terrorism, all parties involved play a significant role in the perpetration of violence and must be held accountable for their actions:

1. The person with deemed divine knowledge who preaches is guilty because they have the power to influence individuals' beliefs and actions. If their teachings promote or condone violence, they contribute to creating an environment conducive to terrorism.

2. The person with caliber and position who incites is equally culpable as they have authority and influence over a larger audience. Their words can sway public opinion and motivate others to commit acts of terror.

3. The person with little grey matter who commits the arson act is directly responsible for the violent act itself. However, their actions are often influenced by the rhetoric and ideologies spread by those in positions of power and authority.

4. Responsible enforcers who fault to act prophylactically by stopping the perpetual instigators

Therefore, in the context of terrorism, each party plays a role in the chain of events leading to violence, and all must face consequences for their contributions to promoting or inciting such acts.

...of International Pride like Singapore

On curbing vigilantism: Arrest today, not tomorrow

In cases of terrorism, all parties involved play a significant role in the perpetration of violence and must be held accountable for their actions:

1. The person with deemed divine knowledge who preaches is guilty because they have the power to influence individuals' beliefs and actions. If their teachings promote or condone violence, they contribute to creating an environment conducive to terrorism.

2. The person with caliber and position who incites is equally culpable as they have authority and influence over a larger audience. Their words can sway public opinion and motivate others to commit acts of terror.

3. The person with little grey matter who commits the arson act is directly responsible for the violent act itself. However, their actions are often influenced by the rhetoric and ideologies spread by those in positions of power and authority.

4. Responsible enforcers who fault to act prophylactically by stopping the perpetual instigators

Therefore, in the context of terrorism, each party plays a role in the chain of events leading to violence, and all must face consequences for their contributions to promoting or inciting such acts.