Cheers, guys

more power and steam..................siapa belum show hand????????????? mari mari mari..............buy ticket to when the 4 o'clock show today

volume over 180000000000000000000000000000

LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........GO GO GO

Need more power and steam..................siapa belum show hand????????????? mari mari mari..............buy ticket to when the 4 o'clock show today

Cheers, guys

volume over 150000000000000000000000000000

Cheers, guys

volume 130000000000000000000000000000

LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........GO GO GO

more power and steam..................siapa belum show hand????????????? mari mari mari..............buy ticket to when the 4 o'clock show today

LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........GO GO GO

1.80

LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........GO GO GO

Up 4.3% today................

Need more power and steam..................siapa belum show hand????????????? mari mari mari..............buy ticket to when the 4 o'clock show today

LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........LIMIT UP...........GO GO GO

Up 3.7% today................

Nice break out

after 0.85 only can limit up

Up 3% today................

clap........clap.......clap......nice

Resting so loooong....................leggies numb.............................got super spring power??

Right in the front seat.....................here I am

Din miss.......................just right timing

Huat ar...........

Need more power and steam.........................anyone else can show hand here???

Burp....burp........

The emperor got new clothes!!...................The emperor got new clothes!!...................

Huat ar......

lai......lai......lai...............

The emperor got clothes!!...................The emperor got clothes!!...................

ok.......all in

From public fund-exhausting fanaticism to rampant vigilantism ......From molotov attack on KK marts, vandalism on McD advertisment board and slanderous axing of vern shoes.................

Finding the right balance between academic freedom and societal sensitivities is crucial. Instead of resorting to censorship or marginalization of specific perspectives, open debates should be encouraged. This approach fosters understanding, allows for diverse viewpoints to be heard, and promotes critical thinking among individuals.

Wow....hihi

Hihi

Collecting slowly today.......................... (cheap below 8.20)

We must question the rationale behind investing millions of dollars in promoting tourism when there are ongoing issues such as sabotage, as exemplified by Bruce Gilley's situation in Malaysia. Gilley's experience, where he faced backlash and safety concerns due to his controversial remarks, paints a picture of a country where academic freedom and freedom of speech might be constrained. This raises doubts about Malaysia's image as a safe and welcoming destination for travelers and scholars alike.

Investing in tourism promotion is typically aimed at showcasing a country's attractions, cultural richness, and hospitality. However, when incidents like Gilley's backlash occur, they can tarnish this image and deter potential tourists and academics from visiting or engaging with the country. This is particularly significant in today's interconnected world, where news and information spread rapidly, influencing public perceptions.

Moreover, the incident with Gilley brings to light broader issues regarding political sensitivities, academic discourse, and international relations. It highlights the challenges faced by scholars who engage in controversial topics, especially in countries where certain topics are considered highly sensitive or contentious. It also underscores the importance of ensuring a balance between freedom of expression and maintaining social harmony, which is crucial for fostering a conducive environment for intellectual exchange and promoting a positive image internationally.

Therefore, the question raised about the effectiveness of spending millions on tourism promotion amid ongoing issues reflects concerns about the country's overall reputation, safety, and the conducive nature of its intellectual and academic environment.

We must question the rationale behind investing millions of dollars in promoting tourism when there are ongoing issues such as sabotage, as exemplified by Bruce Gilley's situation in Malaysia. Gilley's experience, where he faced backlash and safety concerns due to his controversial remarks, paints a picture of a country where academic freedom and freedom of speech might be constrained. This raises doubts about Malaysia's image as a safe and welcoming destination for travelers and scholars alike.

Investing in tourism promotion is typically aimed at showcasing a country's attractions, cultural richness, and hospitality. However, when incidents like Gilley's backlash occur, they can tarnish this image and deter potential tourists and academics from visiting or engaging with the country. This is particularly significant in today's interconnected world, where news and information spread rapidly, influencing public perceptions.

Moreover, the incident with Gilley brings to light broader issues regarding political sensitivities, academic discourse, and international relations. It highlights the challenges faced by scholars who engage in controversial topics, especially in countries where certain topics are considered highly sensitive or contentious. It also underscores the importance of ensuring a balance between freedom of expression and maintaining social harmony, which is crucial for fostering a conducive environment for intellectual exchange and promoting a positive image internationally.

Therefore, the question raised about the effectiveness of spending millions on tourism promotion amid ongoing issues reflects concerns about the country's overall reputation, safety, and the conducive nature of its intellectual and academic environment.

Redirecting millions from M40 subsidies to fund the lavish expenditures of hundreds of YBs, VIPs, and VVIPs seems like a skewed priority, sacrificing the welfare of many for the comfort of a few in power

Why bother to spend million to promote tourism when sabotage is ongoing

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 0 seconds ago | Report Abuse

In a dramatic turn of events, Bruce Gilley, a US academic whose controversial remarks at a Universiti Malaya (UM) talk ignited a firestorm, has now spoken out against the Malaysian government and labeled the country as unsafe for travel. Gilley, a renowned professor of political science at Portland State University, cited safety concerns as the primary reason for his departure from Malaysia, attributing these concerns to what he described as an "Islamo-fascist mob whipped up by the government there." His departure comes amidst a backlash stemming from his purported claim that Malaysia was pushing for a "second Holocaust against the Jewish people," a statement that sparked widespread condemnation and raised tensions. Gilley's criticism of the government's handling of the situation adds a new dimension to the already heated debate surrounding freedom of speech and academic discourse in Malaysia. The incident underscores the complex interplay between academic freedom, political sensitivities, and international relations, highlighting the challenges faced by scholars navigating contentious topics in diverse cultural contexts. It also raises questions about the broader implications for intellectual exchange and the perception of Malaysia as a destination for scholarly engagement.

In a dramatic turn of events, Bruce Gilley, a US academic whose controversial remarks at a Universiti Malaya (UM) talk ignited a firestorm, has now spoken out against the Malaysian government and labeled the country as unsafe for travel. Gilley, a renowned professor of political science at Portland State University, cited safety concerns as the primary reason for his departure from Malaysia, attributing these concerns to what he described as an "Islamo-fascist mob whipped up by the government there."

His departure comes amidst a backlash stemming from his purported claim that Malaysia was pushing for a "second Holocaust against the Jewish people," a statement that sparked widespread condemnation and raised tensions. Gilley's criticism of the government's handling of the situation adds a new dimension to the already heated debate surrounding freedom of speech and academic discourse in Malaysia.

The incident underscores the complex interplay between academic freedom, political sensitivities, and international relations, highlighting the challenges faced by scholars navigating contentious topics in diverse cultural contexts. It also raises questions about the broader implications for intellectual exchange and the perception of Malaysia as a destination for scholarly engagement.

No collect now, no huat later

huat ar.....................lai...lai...lai............

huat arrr....lai..lai...lai..........

Can't time the market 100%....just pump in a your bet now and see how profitable later

Redirecting millions from subsidies meant for the M40 (middle-income) group to fund the extravagant expenses of hundreds of YBs (Members of Parliament), VIPs (Very Important Persons), and VVIPs (Very Very Important Persons) raises concerns about skewed priorities and the potential sacrifice of the welfare of many for the comfort of a few in power.

This action reflects a prioritization of the elite's needs over the broader populace, especially those in the M40 group who may rely on subsidies for essential services or support. It can be seen as a form of elitism and favoritism, where resources that could benefit a larger segment of society are diverted to cater to the luxury or convenience of a select few in influential positions.

Such a move can lead to resentment and further exacerbate inequalities within society. It may also erode trust in the government's ability to fairly distribute resources and prioritize the well-being of its citizens. Critics might argue that this allocation of funds reflects a disconnect between the ruling class and the everyday struggles faced by the middle-income and lower-income segments of society.

In the long term, this skewed allocation of resources could have negative repercussions on social cohesion, economic stability, and the overall welfare of the population, highlighting the importance of transparent and equitable decision-making in governance.

Yummy.....

Huat ar...lai lai lai

Huat day today- no reserve- all in, guys. hentam je