Everything looks so good but how come it is not moving up?

Given that this is a virtual monopoly, it should only go up unless there are policy changes affecting its growth drivers. I have experienced first hand the management under WTS is not easily accessible, slow to act, indifferent to critical feedback and not as hungry as he could be.

Still uptrend

Volume is over 64 million at 11am ...

so agree ... got volume but no price movement

http://seekingalpha.com/news/3247937-bloomberg-china-orders-steel-aluminum-cuts-fight-pollution China orders steel, aluminum cuts to fight pollution - is this good for PMETAL?

Laying off staff may be the right thing to do to preserve stakeholders' value in the face of uncertain market. Seriously, is there another more sinister reason for this sell off?

Tek Seng may be doing the right thing in downsizing its operation. They could and should have been more transparent.

Tek Seng Holdings (7200.KU) - Malaysia
(2nd) quarter ended Jun 30:
Figures Are In Ringgit (MYR).


2016 2015

Revenue 159,526,000 78,871,000
PreTax Profit 25,779,000 4,541,000
Net Profit 16,232,000 3,694,000
Earnings Per Share 4.89 Sen 1.50 Sen
Dividend 1.00 Sen 0.00 Sen

6 months ended Jun 30:

Revenue 290,805,000 137,828,000
PreTax Profit 52,361,000 7,261,000
Net Profit 31,306,000 5,822,000
Earnings Per Share 10.18 Sen 2.39 Sen
Dividend 1.00 Sen 1.00 Sen

KUALA LUMPUR--Bumi Armada Bhd. (5210.KU), a Malaysian offshore energy facilities and services firm, said Friday its net loss for the second quarter ended June widened to 518.3 million ringgit ($129 million) from MYR291.5 million a year earlier because of higher impairment costs.

Revenue declined 12% to MYR402.87 million in the April-June period from MYR459.08 million the same quarter a year ago mainly due to lower contributions from its floating production storage and offloading business and floating gas solutions unit, according to a local stock exchange filing.

Bumi Armada said the delay in new oil and gas activity in the offshore segment will continue to hurt demand for its assets and services. It added that oil companies have been cutting down on activities ranging from offshore exploration to awarding of new projects

Substantial Shareholders, Golden Oasis Resources Sdn. Bhd and Ang Ang Li-hann bought a considerable number of Vivocom shares on 13 September 2016 - closing price 0.22.

Average TP 1.60 - still got room to go up

TP 1.475 based on 2 consensus.

Looks like 1 single 5,000,000 unit transaction at 10am

stuck also. Up 9%! Why is volume so strong today?

http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/PublicInvest/103258.jsp .... TAANN's timber not doing so good

Sorry 0.06

Bosses who bought at 0.60 stuck also. Need new impetus

Hevea is having a similar turn around - Japanese housing demand plus watch for September rate hike

fasten your seat belts, timber is turning around

Big boys snapped up some 7 million in 45 minutes

Good time to accumulate

Vivocom is starting to move in the right direction

CIMB Research has an “Add” rating on Vivocom, with a target price of 78 sen for the stock – with a re-rating catalyst being strong Q2 results.

Substantial Shareholders Nor Haslinda Binti Abdul Hamid (26%) and Ng Boon Sing (26%) sitting pretty on 0.19 since Dec 2015. http://www.businesstoday.net.my/vivocom-intl-holdings-berhad-a-mid-cap-construction-rising-star-that-continues-to-shine-brightly

Come on Ho Hup. PE<4 coupled with decent compounded annual revenue growth of 95% over 3 years in the Engineering and Construction sector is remarkable and good value.

Weaker ringgit should be good for Evergrn which is a fundamentally solid, undervalued (PE 8.27) company with a great tract record.

Waseong's win at USD18.2m (equivalent to RM73.9m) is not that big, and will be spread over 2 years

Why is our stock market looking so anemic today despite the rate cut?

decline is slowing down ... when will it head north?

Dropped to 1.78 now, where is the stabiliser?

Has this got to do with Perwaja's MoA with China’s Zhiyuan Investment as reported in the Star on 12 February 2015?

In a filing with Bursa Malaysia, Perwaja said that Zhiyuan had agreed to conduct a study of the investment proposal and explore the feasibility of an investment in Perwaja. Both the studies will be conducted and completed within two months from the date of the MoA.

Zhiyuan, a Chinese investment company with one of its core businesses in alloy manufacturing, is looking to expand its business into Malaysia. Perwaja told Bursa that it had entered into the MoA because it was an affected listed issuer under the Practice Note 17 (PN17).

Has Pesona bought 30% of Putra Perdana Expressways Sdn Bhd? Putra Perdana was taken private in 2010 as part of the privatisation of UBG Bhd by Petro Saudi International. Is this a significant hold back?

LC, since this is a bonus issue, not share split then price after 16 April will be determined by market, so what A21 said earlier is correct, no?

Passengers who came in at around 0.85 are getting off the bus.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/25/us-markets-oil-idUSKBN0ML06C20150325

Acid test ratio 0.86