arguing over less than 4 sen EPS?

that makes Top Glove worth RM0.20 per share

also Hong Kong
ANGLO-ASIA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Company Registration No.0501219Company NameANGLO-ASIA INVESTMENTS LIMITEDCompany TypePrivate Company Limited By SharesDate of Incorporation22 December 1994 (Thursday)StatusDissolvedRemarksDissolved by Striking OffWinding Up Mode-Date of Dissolution15 May 2009 (Friday)Register of ChargesUnavailable

another one from Hong Kong

ANGLO ASIA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Company Registration No.0229088Company NameANGLO ASIA INVESTMENTS LIMITEDPreviously Known AsGREAT HILL INVESTMENT LIMITED 偉山投資有限公司Company TypePrivate Company Limited By SharesDate of Incorporation4 October 1988 (Tuesday)StatusLiveRemarks-Register of ChargesUnavailableImportant Note-

Public Info available on the Internet searches.
I believe he is a nominee Director


ANGLO-ASIA INVESTMENT LIMITED

Company number 05438883
Registered office address
67 Jack Russell Close, Stroud, England, GL5 4EH
Company status
Active
Company type
Private limited Company
Incorporated on
28 April 2005

CHAN, To Man Dawen
Correspondence address
49a, Victoria Road, Coleford, Gloucestershire, GL16 8DS
Role ACTIVE
Director
Date of birth
January 1955
Appointed on
11 January 2009
Nationality
British
Country of residence
England
Occupation
Director


Mr To Man Dawen Chan ACTIVE
Correspondence address
67 Jack Russell Close, Stroud, England, GL5 4EH
Notified on
25 September 2016
Date of birth
January 1955
Nationality
British
Country of residence
England
Nature of control
Has significant influence or control

The Directors bought it up high high for EPF to sell high high. 😉

The facts clearly state that buyers of airline tickets are Customers due to paying 6% Service Tax.
Creditors do not pay Service Taxes. Creditors receive Service Taxes on behalf of Kastam.

Once the money changes hands, airlines show you the backside hole
and now claims that the paid money is actually an "interest free loan to the airlines", therefore those who paid are now Creditors. 🤣

Foreign investors have dumped more than $25 billion worth of Chinese shares this year, the Financial Times said.
That means 77% of the money they previously invested in China's stock market is now gone.
Meanwhile, other regional markets have gained, further diminishing China's competitiveness.

RMB420 Billion is too big?

Do you know that Pavilion Bukit Jalil is considered a very small shopping complex in China?

Do you know something the size of Suria KLCC is considered pasar malam standard in China?

You still dun understand?
Depositors pay 10 as a Trust investment.
This 10 is used as initial S&P deposit to buy Real estate aka condo worth 100
balance 90 is borrowed...

so when condo fails,
100 is completely lost
and 90 is owing to banks.
and 10 is unable to pay back to Trust investors

its RMB420 Billion/10===> Gearing 10 X

Most of these Trust companies booked hundreds to thousands of blocks of condominiums thinking 50% to 100% profits on flipping over.
These blocks now being 80% to 100% completed are worth zero now due to
1) could be hundreds of years before the balance could be completed.
2) 100% completed ones are inside ghost towns nobody wants to buy. Valuation = RMB0.00

Buy!!
Depending on Indonesian economic growth Maybank may double to above RM20.00 in less than 10 years time.

no worries
cut kukujiao
change name to sslee Abdullah @ sslee Palmberg

Dun be silly.
Once you had given your money to someone else you have no legal right to ask this question.



Lester Teow

when will the dividend policy implement?

17 hours ago

otherwise sslee will write email to BURSA his warrants bought cannot convert 🤣

aha

sslee beat me to it

just remember always warrant trading stops 2 weeks before expiration

Mr Huang

MikeCheatYouCrazy another one never graduate from SRJK Jalan Lao Sai (2)

if maturity mid dec
trading usually stops 2 weeks before, meaning end Nov this month.

BURSA dun want complaints from public about buy warrants unable to convert to shares coz immediately becomes useless toilet paper.
Cosec needs 2 weeks to convert warrants to shares.

Let me amend for my Portfolio.... 🤣
////statement that if the losses portion of the portfolio is excluded, the performance would have been better.////

You know thats not true. I suspect he actually reads stealth running dogs tail wags.

FastMoney666

That was what the FM did, assuming in 2014 the FM was unable to read the tea leaves well

This people deserve to be cheated.

Which fool buys stocks from Whatsapp?
Thats like buying a genuine Rolex for RM1 million from a Transvestite at Lorong Haji Taib back lanes with a 10 years Taib Guarantee.

This people deserve to be cheated.

Which fool buys stocks from Whatsapp?
Thats like buying a genuine Rolex for RM1 million from a Transvestite at Lorong Haji Taib back lanes with a 10 years Taib Guarantee.

This people deserve to be cheated.

Which fool buys stocks from Whatsapp?
Thats like buying a genuine Rolex for RM1 million from a Transvestite at Lorong Haji Taib back lanes with a 10 years Taib Guarantee.

the 2 weeks time difference is meant for the cosec to issue the share after you buy it on 27/11, if you want to convert.

example
if buy 13/12 and expired 13/12 it cannot be converted to shares.
Very unfair to buyer.

if you are not aware of any running dog then it could be a Stealth Running Dog.

if AGM = peaceful means dy/dx -> approaches Zero

since they is an "önly" issue, it means dy/dx = 1

a non-zero solution of dy/dx means => AGM disrupted

QED

Running dog is a pejorative term for an unprincipled person who helps or flatters those who are more powerful and often evil. It is a literal translation of the Chinese pejorative 走狗 (pinyin: zǒugǒu), meaning a yes-man or lackey, and is derived from the tendency of dogs to follow after humans in hopes of receiving food scraps. Historian Yuan-tsung Chen notes that "In the West, a dog is a man's best friend; but in China, dogs are abject creatures. In Chinese, no idiomatic expression [is] more demeaning than the term 'running dogs.'"[1]

The term "imperialist running dog" (帝国主义走狗; dìguó zhǔyì de zǒugǒu) was used by Mao Zedong to refer to allies of counterrevolutionary imperialist forces.[2] Historian Chang-tai Hung suggests the term was used to invoke negative mental imagery; "The image of ... a running dog parallels that of the United States as a wolf. Both bestial representations provide convenient and familiar symbols that political artists can target, but they also validate the use of violence since the annihilation of beasts is justified. ... [The representations of enemies as beasts such as running dogs or rats] call to mind repulsive creatures that inflict damage on the nation."[3]

In 1950, an article in The China Weekly Review gave the definition "A running-dog is a lackey, one who aids and accompanies in the hope of being treated kindly and perhaps being allowed to share in the spoils."[4]

In 1953, a Saturday Evening Post article offered a definition for tso kou ("running dog") and kou t'ui tee ("dog's hips"), saying "A 'running dog' was a person who follows obediently after the person whose dog he is, a fellow traveler; a 'dog's hips' was simply an enthusiastic running dog, who exercises his hips while running errands for his master."[5]

Historian James Reeve Pusey captures some of the power of the idiom when telling of Lu Xun's reaction to seeing people in power mistreat others with the idiom "the weak are the meat of the strong".[6] Lu's anger spilt over to the point of having a reaction even against those calling for resistance without vengeance "For the loudest of such people, he thought, were running dogs of the people-eaters, fed at least on scraps of human flesh."[6]

The phrase running dog has been in use since the Qing Dynasty, and was often used in the 20th century by communists to refer to client states of the United States and other capitalist powers. Its first recorded use in English was in Edgar Snow's 1937 reportage Red Star Over China:

/////////City of London Investment Management, Pop Investment Ltd and their local running dogs to disrupt the said AGM.//////////

1) there are dogs?
2) these dogs are running?
3) are these dogs fed?

Post removed.Why?

I want my RM100.00 also ......... can last 1 day

the future is known...............will be delisted and liquidated by auction to highest bidder.

return to shareholders = RM0.0000000000000 per share

the best way.

My main concern now is ..........

"I want my petrol subsidy."

My main concern now is ..........

"I want my petrol subsidy."

more likely Speakup is a descendant of Hitler and Stalin

all lies
BlackRock pays out 46% of earnings as dividend.

The Edge
MARC revises Tan Chong Motor’s rating outlook to 'negative' on declining market share
Story by Sulhi Khalid

No surprise.
screw the Customer long enough and you end up exactly like today........

3iii was screaming buy and buy and good stock as Dlady kept on going down and down 😂

in the growth rate valuation model by Professor Damodaran et al
NTA [eg INSAS] or NAV [eg iCap] is 100% ignored, not included inside Valuation Model.

value of Nexus is determined solely by growth rate
and no other metrics are included in the formula

You can scream and shout about NTA and NAV but the growth formula does not include said parameters.

same like Nestle Malaysia which growth rate had died off
and share price had been diving down recently

Yeah
Its just Amazon valuation at work
one of those 500 methods of valuation by Professor Damodaran
iCap Growth Rate had committed suicide
=> iCap is over valued.

since 100% cannot breakup.
Conclusion => Its a SELL

Nestle is crashing due to results
Hwa tai just follow

Biscuits and other optional expenses dun do well when people cannot afford menu rahmah RM5.00 meal

during "recession" only companies like LV will do well.
Rakyat now have recession.
Govt claims its economy boom time.

sslee
you are still confused.
You NEVER share your wife or your management fee with others .....

Sslee

Repost from Insas forum.
To be fair Dato' Sri Thong and BOD is building and accumulate wealth into Insas. They need to relearn beside accumulate wealth into Insas also need to share the Insas wealth with Insas shareholders.

Berjaya is even worse.
I always rank companies by their F&B outlets if they have any.

for Berjaya Wendy,
you go order, gives order at cashier counter....
the cashier screams at you... Apa?
you repeat order, cashier screams louder Apa? Apa?
you repeat order, cashier screams like Airbus even louder Apa? Apa? Apa?

suddenly you realise whole restaurant is empty.
I just left the KLCC Wendy outlet and never went back.
Took 1 year for Wendy KLCC to shut down.
Shortly thereafter, entire Wendy ops in Malaysia shutdown.
A entire city of customers for Wendy in KLCC but unfortunately, staff refused to take any orders.

At least in Dome, staff pretended to take your orders which never came but wanted money for missing food. 🤣

free thing no good.
Laura Ashley went into Administration
and sold off almost free 🤣 to US based bankruptcy specialist firm.

////////////
Investors basically got free Laura Ashley with the price they paid.
///////////

sslee
few years ago before covid I made a huge critical mistake.

At Ikano, I saw Dome quite empty 30%,
next door Starbucks fully packed long queue
also next door Ikea coffee fully packed long queue.

so I went inside Dome.
Shortly thereafter I came out of Dome
and cursed Dome management and INSAS and thongjai for 7 generations.

since I have no wish to curse thongjai for 7 generations,
I had never ever went inside any Dome cafe since that day.

=> General public is very smart. Thats why Dome cafe was empty.

In fact after this lesson, I always get scolded by my other half if I insisted on entering any empty F&B outlet.
Logic is, it cannot be good, dun waste time.

sslee
this type of companies like INSAS are very problematic.

Most Dome outlets only 30% full when next door more expensive Coffee Bean / Starbucks is fully packed with long queue.
People prefer to queue and wait and pay more expensive rather than go inside cheaper Dome.
Looks like general public had blacklisted most Dome outlets.
There must be a clear and present reason why there is a disparity in business attraction.

sslee
this type of companies like INSAS are very problematic.

Most Dome outlets only 30% full when next door more expensive Coffee Bean / Starbucks is fully packed with long queue.
People prefer to queue and wait and pay more expensive rather than go inside cheaper Dome.
Looks like general public had blacklisted most Dome outlets.
There must be a clear and present reason why there is a disparity in business attraction.

When you see a lot of posts removed it means company already bungkus liao. There will be no PN17 plan submission to BURSA thats why posts removed.

Communism?
Thats what Chou En Lai got from Paris. Came back and brainwashed everybody.

5,000 years of China History dun have Communism.

agree 100%

once qqq3 is jailed, i3Investor will be very peaceful

Mr sslee
you reply to mike tikus is very dangerous.
You are very lucky mike tikus night time job is to bend down at Jalan Alor massage parlour.
If mike tikus night time job is as a terrorist with Ham_ass or Has_Ball_ah then you very unlucky will get a missile sent to your handphone.
Hiding inside ambulance will not help.

0 seconds ago