sink or swim ..

malayantiger16888 | Joined since 2013-07-13

Investing Experience Beginner
Risk Profile Moderate

Followers

0

Following

0

Blog Posts

0

Threads

64

Blogs

Threads

Portfolio

Follower

Following

Summary
Total comments
64
Past 30 days
0
Past 7 days
0
Today
0

User Comments
Stock
Stock

2018-11-22 13:22 | Report Abuse

proud of Carlsberg staff

Stock

2018-10-17 10:48 | Report Abuse

time will change everything

News & Blogs

2018-08-23 16:38 | Report Abuse

Singapore did not get independence from Malaysia.

Stock

2018-03-30 09:55 | Report Abuse

better than sapura ..

Stock

2018-03-30 09:55 | Report Abuse

this is chinese company ?

Stock

2018-03-22 13:42 | Report Abuse

any news on the JAKS injunction court case ?

Stock

2018-03-20 10:17 | Report Abuse

The JAKS-Star dispute started on Feb 19 when JAKS announced that it had instructed its lawyers to file an injunction with the court to block two financial institutions from releasing the bank guarantees to Star. In response, Star said it called on bank guarantees amounting to RM50 million after JIC failed to complete and deliver Tower A in accordance with the deadline. The High Court has fixed the hearing of the applications for the injunction on March 20.

Stock

2018-03-20 10:16 | Report Abuse

today court will decide on injunction ?

Stock

2018-03-16 17:02 | Report Abuse

how influential is a substantial share holder ?

Stock

2018-03-16 11:02 | Report Abuse

dont think the legal dispute is risky. i would like to know how will JAKS be defeated in the court case and what JAKS had done wrong ?

so far i read/understand that:-
-STAR made some revision
-JAKS may need time to and resources to complete it
-JAKS wants to claim the additional cost to the revisions
- the building is 90+% completed,
-maybe the time taken to complete is prolonged due to revisions, STAR wants to claim 50million performance guarentee.
- JAKS thinks its not fair
-STAR initiate legal action.

in my opinion(maybe wrong), if some revision needs to be made, the time is needed to do it. The time should be agreed but have to cater for unforeseen situation, Unless proven is contractor under performance. As for the cost whether can claim, depends on the contract.

So far, i dont know which detail in the contract JAKS did not meet.
Anyone can share ?

General

2018-03-12 10:46 | Report Abuse

In m2u online stock, what is the meaning of B-Q , S-Q and L-V ? What is tell us about ?

Stock

2018-03-12 10:22 | Report Abuse

Lawsuit and demand from STAR looks unreasonable reading from KYY's statement. For sure there is a clause that is broken to enable STAR to initiate lawsuit. As it is not cheap and fast to fight this battle, STAR is heading towards disaster. Moreover, the trust and partnership to build the building is gone. I mean its almost complete and buyer throw shit at the vendor. Are they so cheap to mean that you build the building for me, cater to all my changes, now i throw you a lawsuit so that i can eat your 50 million ? This business is crazy.

Stock

2018-03-10 07:43 | Report Abuse

why it was penalized by IRB for 45M tax ?does it mean that they try to evade tax but fail ?