Be the first to like this.
3 comment(s). Last comment by john doe 2019-10-10 10:03
Posted by teoct > 2019-10-10 09:34 | Report Abuse
This is most interesting, your thinking that poor local do not use public transport as it is below their dignity or whatever.
I am not poor (by definition) nor rich, but every-time I am in KL, I tried my best to use either the LRT / MRT or even the monorail. And if not possible, e-hailing.
In fact everywhere I go in the world - I try to use public transport to see places and use the money saved for food or entertainment. Stretch the money - see.
Maybe the poor in Malaysia (assuming you speak for them) should consider public transport to get away from the debt-trap of owning a car.
Have a nice day.
Posted by john doe > 2019-10-10 10:03 | Report Abuse
Subsidized public transport is the best. It covers a much larger population B40 and M40. M40 is the most pitiful category here. They contributed the most but get the least. When more people use public transport, there will be less jam at road and less petrol fuel to be wasted in jam. Logistic economy including goods delivery will be improved too.
So, why waste money subsidize petrol??
No result.
1
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
3
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
4
Stock Market Enthusiast
PBBANK: Technical Outlook Suggest Target of RM5 (Uptrend but Overbought) - KingKKK
5
6
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
7
8
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
speakup
26,460 posts
Posted by speakup > 2019-10-10 09:25 | Report Abuse
halo, poor locals dont want public transport subsidy lah cos they higher class than those foreign workers that take public transport