Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-04-18 12:26 | Report Abuse

Dr T had bridged the Code of Conduct adopted by Malaysia Medical Council on 9th December 1986 under:

Part II - Forms of Infamous Conduct

1. Neglect or disregard of professional responsibilities

1.1. Responsibility for Standards of Medical Care to Patients

a. conscientious assessment of the history, symptoms and signs of a patient's condition;

b. sufficiently thorough professional attention, examination and where necessary, diagnostic investigation;

c. competent and considerate professional management;

d. appropriate and prompt action upon evidence suggesting the existence of condition requiring urgent medical intervention; and

e. readiness, where the circumstances so warrant, to consult appropriate professional colleagues.

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-04-18 12:28 | Report Abuse

Section 2.14 Abuse of Privileges Conferred by Law: Certificates, Notifications, Reports, etc.

Registered practitioners are in certain cases bound by law to give, or may from time to time be called upon or requested to give particulars, notifications, reports and other documents of a kindred character, signed by them in their professional capacity, for subsequent use either in the Courts or for administrative purposes.

Practitioners are expected by the Council to exercise the most scrupulous care in issuing such documents, especially in relation to any statement that a patient has been examined on a particular date. Any registered practitioner who shall be proved to the satisfaction of the Council to have signed or given under his name and authority any such certificate, notification, report or document of a kindred character, which is untrue, misleading or improper, will be liable to disciplinary punishment.

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-04-18 15:59 | Report Abuse

Hospital Errors is the 3rd largest killer after Heart Disease and Cancer; without fair investigation from Malaysia Medical Council, it is impossible to curb unscrupulous Doctors from taking Patient’s life for granted, in the Hospitals.

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-04-24 21:50 | Report Abuse

As President of Malaysia Medical Council, have Tan Sri Noor ever go through their investigation proceeding recordings to know how it were conducted.

It was a one sided investigation, whereby the Complainant was being queried and cross-examined by both MMC and Dr T's Lawyer. The complainant's Lawyer was not allowed to ask any question even though Dr T's statements and the Medical Document he submitted were full of discrepancies among them.

In what circumstances would PIC II Chairman dismissed the Case; when Dr T had found to have violated code of conduct adopted by MMC on 9 Dec 1986 under:

Part II - Forms of Infamous Conduct
Section 2.14 Abuse of Privileges Conferred by Law: Certificates, Notifications, Reports, etc

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-04-24 22:34 | Report Abuse

Since MMC dismissed the Case it meant they think it was alright for Dr T to joke about Patient's stomachache, due to food materials congested in the Bowel, as Traffic jam; and caused her to take some high fiber foods, after vomiting clear the traffic, which was the main cause of her Bowel became totally obstructed.

MMC also think that it was alright for Dr T not to examine and monitor Patient's condition proven by his unawareness of:

* Patient Partial Bowel Obstruction became totally obstructed; so he did not reinsert NG suction after it was being pulled out for 3rd vomiting.

* Patient's mild dehydration due to Bowel dilatation deterioration even though BUSE taken shown catalysts in lowest and below normal level.

* Patient's Emergency Bowel Obstruction condition; so he postponed operation.

* Patient's Bowel Ischemic and Peritonitis in Septic Shock at night; even though she had rapid heart beat of 100 bpm; yet he did not go to Hospital to conduct immediate operation.

* Patient's low blood pressure, so he did not stop high blood medication the next morning.

* Patient's Sepsis with DIVC at Noon, so he postponed again the Operation when her daughter went to his clinic to confirm operation.

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-04-25 17:18 | Report Abuse

Instead of making the Patient vomit out the foods she just took when 'nil by mouth' was upmost important for Bowel Obstruction; was it right for Dr T to tell her to 'bite the bullet' like his mother who was having appendix operation; when X-rays shown Partial Bowel Obstruction that did not require operation?

Was it not wrong for Dr T to ask Patient to ask her daughter to discharge her when none of the Relatives were around, and left the Hospital without examine her on Sunday?

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-05-01 14:26 | Report Abuse

Was Dr T not wrong for failed to inform the Relatives when he found out in the Afternoon from the Cardiologist, who examined the Patient in the morning, that she was already Sepsis with DIVC and no cure already?

Was it not wrong for him to ask for consent of blood infusion through phone in the Evening after finding out that her blood system was bleeding due to Severe Sepsis of DIVC and her Bowel was dead; when he should have told the Relatives she was no cure already?

Was it not wrong to take Patient's thumb print involuntarily, when she was in semi conscious condition not respond to pain?

Was it not wrong to lie about Patient's inoperable condition to request for consent of operation?

Was it not wrong for Dr T to wait until midnight to ask for sudden immediate operation without giving time for the Relatives to see the Patient?

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-05-09 18:29 | Report Abuse

Nobody should die of Bowel Obstruction; Dr T also said the Patient had 90% chances of recovery with Conservative Management of Drips and Sucks.

Dr V said it was upmost important for Bowel obstruction to keep 'nil by mouth'. If there was proper advice from Dr T, the Patient would not have taken some high fiber biscuits; and if he had made her vomit out the foods she just took when she seen him again; her Bowel would not have been obstructed.

If Dr T had examined the Patient and had inserted NG suction, he would have known that her Bowel was obstructed on the 2nd day. NG suction not only can reduce distention and dilatation of Bowel, the amount of fluids collected also indicates Bowel Obstruction.

Bowel obstruction was an emergency; if Dr T had allowed Patient to take CT scan or he had read the radiologist's report, he would not have misinterpreted the X-ray Bowel Obstruction, as not obstructed.

He postponed the operation and misled the Relatives that it could not be done with laparoscopy surgery that has minimum risks; and allowed her Bowel to continue distend and dilate until Ischemic and Peritonitis at night, without even insert NG suction or stop Buscopan, when obstructed Bowel could not move anymore.

Despite of indication of rapid heart beat of 100 bpm, and complained of serious pain with bulging abdomen, Dr T did not go to Hospital to see the Patient; and denied her of her last chance of survival. Her bulging abdomen subsided and she passed out a lot of urine indicated that her Bowel could be perforated.

Posted by WhatSayYou > 2021-05-15 16:54 | Report Abuse

How Malaysia Medical Council could say it was not wrong for Dr T:

1. To joke about Patient's stomachache as traffic jam, caused her to take some foods after vomiting thinking traffic jam cleared?

2. To fail to insert NG suction due to unawareness of her Bowel obstruction dilatation?

3. To fail to know she was dehydrated due to Bowel obstruction dilatation?

4. To threaten discharge when non of the family members were around?

5. To postpone emergency operation and allowed her Bowel to deteriorate until Ischemic and Peritonitis without treatment?

6. To failed to go to Hospital when she was in critical condition of septic shock and required immediate operation?

7. To fail to stop high blood medications when she was sepsis with low blood pressure?

8. To fail to know Patient in condition of sepsis and seriously low blood pressure at Noon, and postponed operation again, upon confirmation by her daughter?

9. To fail to inform the Relatives when he found out in the Afternoon from the Cardiologist that she was already Sepsis with DIVC and no cure already?

10. To ask for consent of blood infusion through phone in the Evening when she was no cure already with blood system bleeding and bowel dead.

11. To take her thumb print involuntarily, when she was in semi conscious condition not respond to pain?

12. To ask for consent of operation when she was not operable due to Severe sepsis of DIVC and Bowel dead?