Posted by Income > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Play up so many

Posted by speakup > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Pmx now come out, scold Teresa Kok. Apalah!

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Extremely rude and unbecoming of him to name calling her nyonya Tua. Can she sue him for a million dollar for this?

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

In Malaysia, defamation is covered under the Defamation Act 1957. Defamation occurs when a statement made by one person causes harm to another's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person.
To prove defamation, Teresa Kok would need to demonstrate that:
The statement was published (made public, whether verbally or in writing).
The statement referred to her.
The statement caused damage to her reputation.
The statement was not true or could not be justified as a fair comment.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

The courts would consider whether the statement damaged her reputation

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

If Teresa Kok wins the case, she could be awarded damages. However, the amount would depend on the severity of the impact on her reputation and the level of public exposure of the statement.

Posted by izoklse > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Teresa Kok just playing with Fire. As an MP she knew that she cannot simply interfere into islamic matters which could cause backlash among Muslim. I don't understand why this DAP MP cannot grow up and become alert of sensitive issue. It is very clear, Islamic agenda and matters let islam manage. Don't interfere. This is why many Malays hate DAP MP. There is a good DAP leaders but due to this small population of MP like Teresa Kok, we Malay will continue hate DAP because after so many months become government, they are still unable to learn about this basic thing.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

The recurring pattern of voters electing governments that restrict freedoms and increase costs of living can be attributed to a complex interplay of psychological conditioning, manipulation, economic dependence, and cultural factors. Breaking free from this cycle requires political education, awareness of manipulation tactics

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Governments often manipulate voters through fear-mongering, framing opposition parties or alternative systems as chaotic, dangerous, or morally bankrupt. This kind of fear-based politics can lead people to vote against their own interests simply because they are convinced that any change will be worse than their current situation. The use of divisive rhetoric—pitting one group against another—can further polarize society, making people cling to their political tribes rather than question the policies being implemented.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

In many cases, voters may be influenced by short-term incentives offered by political parties, such as subsidies, cash handouts, or job guarantees, which temporarily alleviate financial stress. While these measures may not address the underlying issues of economic disparity or escalating costs of living, they create a sense of immediate relief that can translate into electoral support. This "vote buying" practice, whether direct or indirect, is common in many backward-pedalling countries.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

The existence of "little Napoleons" or middlemen or unnecessary agencies who extract fees and impose additional burdens on everyday life is often tolerated because such systems become deeply embedded in the structure of governance. Voters may feel powerless to challenge the bureaucratic systems that siphon off wealth through corruption or inefficiency because these systems are portrayed as part of the natural order of governance. The layers of bureaucracy act as gatekeepers to services, creating a dependency cycle where people must comply with these systems to survive, even if they recognize the exploitation.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Owing to low standard of education, many common voters lack access to comprehensive political education or may be overwhelmed by misinformation, making it difficult to critically assess political platforms. When a government controls media narratives or educational curriculums, it can shape public perception in ways that obscure the true impact of its policies. The public may not fully understand how their freedoms are being constricted or how the economy is being manipulated through layers of fees and charges because they are not given the tools or information to make informed choices.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

History has shown that many voters develop a kind of political "Stockholm Syndrome," where they develop an irrational loyalty to their oppressors, believing that the government's actions, no matter how constrictive, are ultimately for their own good. This deep emotional attachment can be hard to break, as it involves not just political beliefs but also personal identity. People who have aligned themselves with a political party for decades may find it psychologically difficult to admit that the party has betrayed their interests.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

In many societies, there's a powerful pressure to conform to the majority opinion, especially in rural or close-knit kampung communities where dissent is seen as betrayal. The "herd mentality" leads individuals to vote as a collective, even if it means voting against their own personal freedoms and economic well-being. The fear of social ostracism can be a stronger motivator than the desire for individual liberation or prosperity.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

For a mature person, particularly a Member of Parliament (MP), the primary responsibility is to represent the interests and concerns of all communities within their constituency, regardless of religious or cultural background. In this case, the MP is fulfilling her duty by asking the government to review a proposal that may impact various communities, a reasonable request in the pursuit of fairness and inclusivity. Her statement makes it clear that the review does not challenge the validity of halal certification, question Jakim’s role, or show any disrespect toward Islam. Instead, it is about ensuring that policies are inclusive and well-considered.

However, an immature person may lack the ability to critically engage with such a statement. Instead of understanding the context and intent, they might feel offended, interpreting the remark as a personal or religious attack. Immaturity often manifests in emotional responses that overlook the substance of the message, causing individuals to react defensively rather than considering the broader implications or reasoning behind the statement. Thus, while the mature perspective seeks to ensure the well-being of all communities, the immature perspective may misconstrue the message as a provocation.

Posted by DividendGuy67 > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Restaurants and food companies quality and prices are all Malaysian's concern, regardless of race or religion.
Good that Halal certification now only takes 23 days but how much does it cost the restaurants and food companies? If it's not free, then, it should be up to restaurants and food companies. Otherwise, it becomes mandatory tax and this will end up causing everything to become more expensive for all Malaysians.

If its mandatory tax, then, pay it to IRD rather than specific companies that benefits only a few.

Posted by Income > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Pl ease don't ask all to . mandatory，fair?

Posted by Sslee > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Let it be so that Jakim can earned it own upkeep (yearly billion in annual Halal certification fees) rather than dependant on government billion allocation (tax payers money) in annual budget.

And also must insist oversea business that sell products to Malaysia mandatory to have Halal certificate from Jakim.

Posted by Sslee > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

If western consumers can insist must have Kosher certification then the least Malaysia can contribute is to insist who ever want to sell their products (non pig and alcohol) to Malaysia must have Jakim Halal certification.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

JAKIM’s halal certification process, while important for maintaining religious standards, has the potential to shrink the economic pie for all stakeholders in Malaysia. Its bureaucratic complexity, high costs, and monopolistic tendencies can stifle local businesses, drive away investors, and weaken Malaysia’s competitiveness compared to neighboring countries, which are becoming more attractive destinations for investment. The cumulative impact can be seen as a form of economic self-sabotage, limiting growth and prosperity for the nation.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

At the expense of non-halal sectors? Malaysia’s heavy focus on promoting itself as a global halal hub, while beneficial in some ways, may divert attention and resources away from other sectors that have the potential for growth. For instance, non-halal industries, such as certain areas of technology, education, and tourism, may not receive the same level of support or investment, even though they could drive economic diversification and expansion. Neighboring countries with more balanced economic strategies can capitalize on these missed opportunities, leaving Malaysia behind.

Posted by Sslee > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

By the way tax payers money is haram because government also collected tax from alcohol and gambling.

So why denial Jakim from earning his own halal incomes?

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

We must strive to put a full stop to such a dark system from the very begining. The strict criteria for halal certification affect not only food preparation but also the sourcing of raw materials. Businesses are required to use ingredients from halal-certified suppliers, limiting their options and increasing procurement costs. The scarcity of halal-certified suppliers in certain areas can further drive up the price of halal meals, as suppliers may charge a premium due to limited competition.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Allegations of corruption within JAKIM’s halal certification process have surfaced over the years. Claims of favoritism, bribery, and opaque processes have been made, which, if true, could lead to an unfair playing field for businesses, especially small ones. These under-the-table dealings could increase operational costs for businesses seeking certification and drive up the cost of food for consumers.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

It fosters immorality, including bigotry, discrimination, and abuse.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

It is far from being a force for good, promoting dogmatism, intolerance, bigotry and suffering, thus potentially poisons "everything" (many other business models)

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

And restricting of civil liberties,

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

An obstacle to technological advancement.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

An too many pitfalls, biases and injustice. Inconsistent Monitoring: One of the main shortcomings is the inconsistency in the inspection process by authorities responsible for halal certification. Some eateries may obtain the certification but fail to maintain halal practices over time. Inspections are often not frequent enough to catch these lapses.

Posted by DickyMe > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

This HALA certification is another way of milking businesses. Another TAX system disguised as religious mandate.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Reports have emerged of eateries displaying counterfeit halal certificates, misleading customers into believing that the food meets halal standards when it does not.

Posted by DickyMe > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

This HALA certification is another way of milking businesses. Another TAX system disguised as religious mandate.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Yes, the economic burden on businesses is real. Businesses must pay to obtain halal certification, often involving fees for audits, inspections, and renewals.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

And beyond the initial certification, businesses face continuous costs for maintaining halal compliance. This includes training staff, sourcing halal ingredients, and adhering to strict food handling procedures, which can require additional investment.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Some businesses report delays or unnecessary complications in the certification or renewal process, which can lead to lost revenue or supply chain disruptions.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

The scope of halal certification has expanded to include products like cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and even services such as logistics and finance. Unfortunately, the costs businesses incur for obtaining and maintaining halal certification are often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. This can disproportionately impact Muslim consumers who are religiously obligated to purchase halal products.

Posted by DickyMe > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Motive is to capture every economic activities.
Religion is just an excuse.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Tunggang agama ke?

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Many small to medium eateries will not be qualified for halal ceritfication because of rokok. If JAKIM were to maintain consistency in upholding Islamic values, eateries allowing tobacco consumption should not qualify for halal certification, as doing so would contradict the core Islamic values that the certification is meant to uphold.

Posted by ykloh > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

JAKIM should tell Muslims that No Pork No Lard No Alcohol eateries are not halal certified, instead of asking these eateries to to be halal certified.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Also no rotavirus, microplastic, hormone disruptors., trans-fat, saturated fats.................................................

Posted by icecool > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

you are the idi0t that voted for pmx, why are you complaining now ?

Posted by chopstick > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

good evening

Posted by speakup > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

takpa takpa, GE16 we duduk rumah je. no vote PH, no vote PN. dua dua sama je

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Extremely rude and unbecoming of him to name calling her nyonya Tua. Can she sue him for a million dollar for this?


EngineeringProfit

18,828 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 day ago | Report Abuse

In Malaysia, defamation is covered under the Defamation Act 1957. Defamation occurs when a statement made by one person causes harm to another's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person.
To prove defamation, Teresa Kok would need to demonstrate that:
The statement was published (made public, whether verbally or in writing).
The statement referred to her.
The statement caused damage to her reputation.
The statement was not true or could not be justified as a fair comment.