Posted by Hustle > 2012-10-03 19:58 | Report Abuse

Not pretty sure anybody here have a feeling that as a small shareholder their benefit always control by the company director even the company make lots of revenue but as a small shareholder they don't really get a equal dividend pay out.Just because,director hold 55% and SSH hold 50%,just 5% different and you cannot control a fair distribution. Mostly,director will have high pay monthly,but SHH just keep on sponsoring for their pay check.Even in crisis,you have to bare their risk too and they just keep on waiting for end of the month or year to get their multiple contractual bonus or free share that will reduce our in hand share value.Since what we hold is only IPO,what they hold is a real company share. If a union been form for every stock counter with their SSH as a members,the power to negotiate will be difference.Some of the unfair advantages can be solve and more transparent. For some cases,sometimes some director will hold less than 55% but he still manage to control the company revenue distribution that's because the single share holder is not been united and still have to be the money slave for the director. No one here as a shareholder need an unfair advantages,may be BURSA have to consider this grey zone to prevent big fish kill small fish situation.If union SHH holding percentages more than director,may be some talented CEO can be hired to execute the business better and be fair to all shareholder.