Now they call for a gathering with de agenda below:
a) Current income stream b) Future planning c) Updates on defamation suit by the director, Spark Liang d) Issues concerning the title/designation of Spark Liang
Because they can denied whatever promises to investors after the gathering since it is not an official meeting. According to my experience, this is the strategy that offen been used by those cunning directors in order to avoid any complaints against them from NOT carrying out their execution of commitment in the near future. Better beware of that!
If what mentioned in the open letter is true than I suggest investors to attend the gathering even though it is unofficial meeting. Ask director the above question & request the board to issue a public statement for clarification on all the suspicious raised recently.
Dangel, I wouldn't optimistic to your request. As what we can see now is your directors are refusing to release a public statement against this open letter. It is very clear that the directors of Finspark are not attending to investors' concerns. Good luck to u!
Question no.3 is interesting: Spark Liang Production! I believe there is a conflict of interest between de director & de company! Investors/shareholders should directly go to MACC!
To me, if I'm the investor, I will ask director Spark why he personally still can enjoy the commission given by eToro? Don't u see any conflict of interest between u & the company? Investors seems being cheated by the directors
I think not much investors aware of this, my friend oso showed me that Spark asked him to trade in eToro platform with Spark's personal referral code. Y not asking him to use Finspark's referral code?
Perhaps this is the reason of not carry out the special audit on finspark's a/c as there might be a lot of suspicious transactions in their audited a/c.
Meanwhile, I also doubt of my shareholder identity as I failed to search my name in APC TWO PLT, which is the Limited Liability Partnership in Finspark's project. 为何身为Finspark的投资者股东,名字却不出现在APC TWO PLT里?
Dangel r u sure? It's impossible & u should file a complaint to SSM regarding this! I'll ask my friends who r also involve in crowd funding industry & c what's their comments on this.
I just heard a news from a friend who is venture capitalist that Finspark is in big trouble now as there are too many speculations & comments regarding the CEO in the social media. According to him, Venture Capital Co. wouldn't invest into those company with a lot of internal complaints & bad public image no matter how good is their financial report.
My friend also mentioned that according to his reliable sources, the complaints against Finspark made by their investors are currently being reviewed by SC so good luck to u guys!
SC should look at it seriously and enforce the regulation accordingly against finspark & ataplus in order to provide a more confident and sturdy platform for future crowd funding investors.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by volvojoy > 2019-07-24 23:17 | Report Abuse
由于FinSpark公司一再强调会以股东权益为第一标准,并以维护股东权益为首要指标。因此,请董事们回答我以下的问题: 1)为何董事们至今仍然不向全体股东清楚交代有关大股东兼董事陈星有先生(Alvin Tan)和张开亮先生(Spark Liang)联合向辞去CFO职务的黄济远先生(Stanley Ng)公开道歉并撤回言论及帖文? 2)请问董事们为何在回复股东的电邮里声明公司正在"考虑"而不是履行在特别股东大会上向股东们承诺委任第三方独立审计机构向FinSpark公司进行的特别审计(Special Audit)及董事向股东们回购股票(Share Buy Back)? 3)请问Spark Liang Production(002864448-T)与FinSpark公司是什么关系? 有关FinSpark公司的理财教育视频又是由以上那家公司制作? 4)为什么董事张开亮以FinSpark公司名号及官方电邮向其在eToro交易平台的私人帐号投资者发出有关平台所送出的福利? 5)为何董事张开亮在进行众筹时以虚假的个人资料误导股东作出错误的投资判断? 最后,请董事们在48个小时内针对以上的问题给于全体股东清楚的交代,谢谢。 David Yap FinSpark公司股东 Partner of APC TWO PLT