The siths and palpatine are wrong. It's the exclusionary nature of fundamentalism that is simultaneously uniting some people while dividing others. Since such dogmatic teachings are open to interpretation, it undeniably divides those who have differing opinions on the same belief. Serious unconcilable conflict occurs between the in- and out-groups formed through different religions. Even worse, the fact that it is such a sensitive topic only makes it ripe for the picking by external forces who further these divisions for their own greenwave agenda. Therefore, as much as religion unites, its nature often results in much more deep-rooted divisions, hence dividing more than it unites.
The people, investors and traders don't want to be fooled. When I put my money in Serbadinamk, I meant to invest for good. But got fooled by the white collar crime committed by the unscrupulous management that got away scot-free. Responsible body SC failed to do the right thing. Every institution, minister and responsible body fail the people. No justice. How?
So, it's no brainer that spending more on religion will only divide the people more, while compromising funding for say sports. On the other hand, more funding for sport will produce better results as well as unity among the rakyat
The evils are divisive factors. Curses of Zahillyyah era has prevailed due to mass ignorant of the spirit of the last universal common ancestor. Ten hypermodern commandments for peace are:
1. Children shouldn't be labelled e.g. as a Jews or Palacetinian kid.
2. All adults are responsible for the well-being of any children
Schools are already like concentration camps. Rantings in school assembly is daily event. "JANGAN, HARUS, MESTI, PASTI, PATUH, IKUT ARAHAN..la la la lalalala.." Paranoid discipline method kills creativity and urge of students attending school.
School subjects are crap. Teaching quality is like roadside snake oil salesman. No effort to improve subjects and and teaching quality but always suggest "CONTROLLING" methods. Useless politicians and Teachers.
Quote: "Schools are already like concentration camps...."
What's more - mushrooming of takfit schools drying up the country coffer (which is already too dry to drive IR5.0 tech transformation, give free medicine, empowering SME entrepreneurship, etc etc
The children must learn that we have more similarities (deep inside) than differences (superficial and cultural):
Prophet Ethan Siegel: the typical human body has 4 × 1027 hydrogen atoms and 2 × 1027 oxygen atoms in it! If each of us accumulates atoms randomly, that still means that each of us, on average, have hundreds of billions of atoms that were, a year ago, inside each and every other person on Earth. Hundreds of billions of atoms are in your body not only from me and everyone else on Earth, but also from dinosaurs that lived millions of years ago.
its funny how english is not a Pass requirement for our national school... time to bring up the standards... why allow those in the east coast to get away and be off without the language... Hence, what nonsense !! haha !! boleeeee
Solution would begin only when the next gen are provided with proper education that makes them see any other human as their distant evolutionary cousin.
People will continue to be divided by falsehood doctrination, prophetic fiction and bigotry dogma
Promoting education that fosters empathy and understanding among the next generation is a crucial step toward preventing war and reducing divisions based on false beliefs and dogma. Encouraging critical thinking and tolerance can help bridge gaps between people and reduce the impact of divisive ideologies.
The typical human body has 4 × 1027 hydrogen atoms and 2 × 1027 oxygen atoms in it! If each of us accumulates atoms randomly, that still means that each of us, on average, have hundreds of billions of atoms that were, a year ago, inside each and every other person on Earth. Hundreds of billions of atoms are in your body not only from me and everyone else on Earth, but also from dinosaurs that lived millions of years ago.
Ensure multiracial school kids are being supplied with age-appropriate textbooks and reading materials that would not further cause disunity among them. Unity is an uphill task - why sabotage!??
In a school where young minds bloom and grow, Fundamentalism's shadow, an unsettling blow. It divides the children into groups so stark, Believers and nonbelievers, a division in the park.
In the core of their faith, they firmly stand, An ingroup formed by beliefs so grand. But in this division, the outgroup takes its place, Isolation and ostracism, a sad and bitter taste.
Polarization brews, prejudice takes hold, Innocent hearts, once warm, now turning cold. In the classroom, intolerance rears its head, Cooperation and understanding, too often left for dead.
Let's strive for unity, in diversity we'll find, A world where all beliefs peacefully bind. For in the hearts of children, there's hope to be seen, A future where acceptance reigns, in every shade and sheen.
It's about time for school children to be nurtured to embrace the universal values of humanity and equality, shedding the cloak of hypocrisy and dismantling discriminatory apartheid systems. Let's unite in the pursuit of a more just and inclusive world.
A deep understanding of fundamentalism can potentially divide people eternally for several reasons:
1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.
2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.
3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.
4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.
5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts.
6. **Fear of Change:** Fundamentalism often resists change and modernization. Deeply understanding the fear of change can perpetuate divisions as fundamentalists resist evolving societal norms and values.
7. **Echo Chambers:** Fundamentalist communities can serve as echo chambers, reinforcing their beliefs and shielding members from alternative viewpoints. This reinforces division and hinders open dialogue.
8. **Religious or Ideological Superiority:** Fundamentalism can breed a sense of religious or ideological superiority, making it difficult to engage in respectful discussions with those perceived as inferior or misled.
While deep understanding can be valuable for promoting empathy and dialogue, it can also, paradoxically, solidify divisions when it leads to a more entrenched commitment to fundamentalist ideologies. Breaking down these divisions often requires patience, open-mindedness, and efforts to foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems.
Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is literally dividing them eternally for several reasons:
1. **Rigid Belief Systems:** Fundamentalist ideologies often promote strict, unyielding belief systems. When individuals deeply understand and adhere to these ideologies, it becomes difficult for them to accept alternative viewpoints or engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different beliefs.
Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is literally dividing them eternally for several reasons:
2. **Ingroup-Outgroup Dynamics:** Fundamentalist groups tend to create strong ingroup-outgroup dynamics, where members feel a deep sense of identity and belonging within their group. This can lead to a perpetual "us vs. them" mentality, making reconciliation or compromise with outsiders seem nearly impossible.
Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is a surefire way of dividing them unconcilably for several reasons:
3. **Lack of Critical Thinking:** Fundamentalism often discourages critical thinking and encourages unquestioning faith in doctrine. When individuals lack the ability to critically examine their beliefs, it can be challenging to bridge gaps with those who employ reason and evidence to support their views.
Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is a surefire way of dividing them unconcilably for several reasons:
4. **Cultural Isolation:** A deep understanding of fundamentalism can lead to cultural isolation. Fundamentalist communities may limit interaction with those who don't share their beliefs, leading to further division and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.
Indoctrinating children with fundamentalism is a surefire way of dividing them unconcilably for several reasons:
5. **Historical Grievances:** Many fundamentalist movements are rooted in historical grievances or perceived injustices. Deep understanding of these grievances can fuel long-standing conflicts and resistance to reconciliation efforts. What a nonsensical solidarity week!????
It divides people into factions, it creates chaos and bloodbath. Millions of lives have been sacrificed in the name of religion over the millenniums. Religion has a gory history.
Shame on this historian who knows so little compare to Yuval Noah Harari. The paradox of fundamentalism lies in its dual capacity to foster unity among certain adherents while simultaneously fracturing broader communities. Rooted in rigid doctrines, fundamentalist beliefs often invite diverse interpretations, inadvertently creating rifts among individuals who hold contrasting views on the same faith-based principles.
This divergence culminates in profound conflicts, pitting in-groups against out-groups delineated by varying religious affiliations. These conflicts, marked by their irreconcilability, further exacerbate societal divisions, perpetuating a cycle of discord and fragmentation.
Compounding this issue is the inherent sensitivity surrounding matters of faith. Exploiting this vulnerability are external actors driven by their own agendas, capitalizing on religious divisions to further their narrow interests. These opportunistic forces manipulate religious tensions to sow chaos and advance their agendas, amplifying the rifts within communities.
Thus, while religion possesses the potential to foster cohesion and solidarity among its adherents, its exclusionary nature often breeds deeper divisions within society. Despite its unifying potential, religion's propensity for fragmentation underscores the intricate interplay between faith, interpretation, and external influences in shaping societal dynamics.
And unlike many learning institutions, vernacular schools do not condone fundamentalism.
every each individual's mindset Must change from personal good/interest to country good/interest again, some particular group will twist country good/interest to suit their own agenda think if through experience sharing from those successful individuals that have correct world view/horizon to periodically go back to school and society may help instill right value into young's mind
Advocating for the removal of the word and concept of "haram" in a multiracial society is essential for fostering inclusivity and reducing divisions based on religious beliefs. Instead, embracing the politically correct terminology of "legal vs. illegal" offers a more neutral and universally understandable framework, which promotes harmony and understanding among diverse communities.
1. **Promotion of Inclusivity**: Using terms like "halal vs. haram" inherently prioritizes one religious group's beliefs over others. This exclusivity can alienate members of different faiths or non-religious individuals within a multicultural society. By employing the terms "legal vs. illegal," the focus shifts from religious doctrine to universally applicable laws and regulations, fostering a sense of inclusion for all citizens regardless of their beliefs.
2. **Avoidance of Religious Bias**: The term "haram" carries strong religious connotations associated primarily with Islamic teachings. Its widespread use in public discourse may inadvertently perpetuate religious bias or favoritism, marginalizing individuals who do not adhere to Islamic beliefs. In contrast, using neutral terminology like "legal vs. illegal" ensures fairness and impartiality in addressing societal norms and regulations, free from religious bias.
3. **Clarity and Understanding**: While "halal vs. haram" may hold significance within the Islamic faith, its meaning may not be universally understood or accepted outside of Muslim communities. On the other hand, "legal vs. illegal" provides a clear and easily comprehensible framework for all members of society to understand and abide by laws and regulations governing various aspects of life, including food consumption.
4. **Facilitation of Integration**: Multiracial societies thrive on mutual respect, understanding, and integration among diverse cultural and religious groups. By adopting inclusive terminology such as "legal vs. illegal," we promote a shared sense of citizenship and belonging, facilitating greater social cohesion and harmony among all members of society.
5. **Recognition of Individual Choices**: Using terms like "food for Muslims or non-Muslims only" can inadvertently reinforce stereotypes and divisions based on religious identity. Embracing inclusive language acknowledges and respects individuals' personal choices and dietary preferences without imposing religious labels or restrictions.
In conclusion, advocating for the replacement of "haram" with "legal vs. illegal" in public discourse and embracing inclusive terminology regarding food consumption is crucial for promoting unity, inclusivity, and understanding in a multiracial society. By prioritizing neutrality, clarity, and respect for individual choices, we can build a more cohesive and harmonious community where all citizens feel valued and accepted.
Teachings of Exclusivity: Certain interpretations may convey the idea that one's religion is the only true faith, potentially leading to feelings of superiority or exclusivity among children of that faith, which could hinder their ability to embrace diversity and coexist peacefully with others.
Teachings of Intolerance Towards Others: Some unhealthy verses may contain language that encourages intolerance or hostility towards individuals of other faiths or beliefs, instilling divisive attitudes in children and undermining efforts to promote understanding and respect for diversity.
Teachings of Discrimination: Certain teachings may imply or explicitly state that adherents of a particular religion are superior to those of other faiths, potentially fostering discriminatory attitudes among children and perpetuating social divisions based on religious identity.
It's essential to approach these teachings with caution and provide children with a balanced and nuanced understanding of their religious heritage, emphasizing values of peace, tolerance, and respect for others. Encouraging critical thinking, open dialogue, and exposure to diverse perspectives can help children develop empathy, understanding, and appreciation for the richness of cultural and religious diversity in a pluralistic society. Additionally, promoting education about human rights, equality, and the importance of coexistence can empower children to become advocates for social harmony and unity.
fundamentalism is detrimental to both the mental health cultivation and brain development of children and the unity, prosperity, and harmony of a country. Here's why:
Stifling Critical Thinking: Fundamentalism often promotes rigid adherence to dogma and discourages questioning or critical thinking. This stifles the intellectual curiosity and cognitive development of children, hindering their ability to analyze complex issues, form independent opinions, and engage in creative problem-solving. A healthy mental environment for children should encourage exploration, curiosity, and critical thinking skills, which are essential for their overall development.
Promoting Fear and Anxiety: Fundamentalist teachings often instill fear and anxiety in children by emphasizing punishment, judgment, and the concept of eternal damnation. This can have profound negative effects on their mental health, leading to feelings of guilt, shame, and inadequacy. Children raised in such environments may struggle with anxiety disorders, depression, and low self-esteem, hindering their overall well-being and hindering their ability to thrive.
Fostering Division and Intolerance: Fundamentalism tends to promote an "us vs. them" mentality, dividing communities along religious, ideological, or cultural lines. This fosters intolerance, bigotry, and prejudice, undermining social cohesion and unity within a country. Instead of celebrating diversity and embracing pluralism, fundamentalist ideologies promote exclusivity and hostility towards those who hold differing beliefs, exacerbating societal divisions and hindering efforts towards peace and harmony.
Undermining Social Progress: Fundamentalism often opposes progressive social values and human rights, such as gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and freedom of expression. By promoting regressive attitudes and discriminatory practices, fundamentalist ideologies impede the country's progress towards a more inclusive, equitable, and just society. This can lead to social unrest, political instability, and economic stagnation, hindering the country's overall prosperity and development.
Fueling Conflict and Violence: In extreme cases, fundamentalism can fuel extremism, terrorism, and violent conflict, posing a serious threat to national security and stability. Children raised in environments where violence is glorified or justified in the name of religion are at risk of being radicalized and recruited into extremist groups. This not only endangers their own lives but also undermines the safety and well-being of society as a whole.
In conclusion, fundamentalism poses significant risks to both the mental health cultivation and brain development of children and the unity, prosperity, and harmony of a country. By promoting closed-mindedness, fear, division, and intolerance, fundamentalist ideologies undermine the foundations of a healthy, inclusive society. Instead, fostering an environment that values critical thinking, tolerance, diversity, and social progress is essential for nurturing the well-being of children and building a more united, prosperous, and harmonious nation.
When individuals are irremediably brainwashed and intoxicated by their indoctrination, it means that their beliefs and perspectives have been deeply ingrained in them to the point where they cannot easily be changed or altered. This indoctrination often comes from being exposed to a particular ideology, belief system, or set of doctrines over an extended period, usually in a way that discourages critical thinking or questioning.
As a result, individuals who are heavily indoctrinated tend to view the world through polarized lenses, especially when it comes to outgroups—those who do not share their beliefs or ideologies. They see members of outgroups as fundamentally different and often as adversaries or enemies. This polarization leads to an "us versus them" mentality, where individuals are more likely to demonize, stereotype, or dehumanize those who are not part of their ingroup.
Furthermore, because of their indoctrination, they may be resistant to considering alternative perspectives or engaging in open-minded dialogue with members of outgroups. Instead, they may interpret any information or evidence that contradicts their beliefs as further proof of the righteousness of their indoctrination, leading to a reinforcement of their polarized views.
In summary, individuals who are irremediably brainwashed and intoxicated by their indoctrination tend to view outgroups through polarized lenses, which can result in hostility, prejudice, and an unwillingness to engage with differing viewpoints
Solution: Replacing religiosity indoctrination with a new age ideology centered around interconnectedness and shared atoms could foster greater unity among school children. Here are the reasons why:
Scientific Foundation: The new age ideology of interconnectedness is grounded in scientific principles, particularly in the fields of biology and chemistry. By teaching children about the shared atoms that make up their bodies and how these atoms cycle through the Earth's biosphere, educators provide them with a tangible and evidence-based understanding of their connection to all living beings.
Inclusive Nature: Unlike religiosity indoctrination, which may exclude individuals who do not adhere to specific religious beliefs, the concept of interconnectedness transcends cultural and religious boundaries. It promotes inclusivity by emphasizing the commonality of all human beings and their connection to the natural world, regardless of their background or beliefs.
Promotion of Empathy and Compassion: Understanding that every person shares atoms with others, including historical figures and people from diverse backgrounds, can cultivate empathy and compassion among school children. It encourages them to recognize the inherent worth and interconnectedness of all individuals, fostering a sense of solidarity and unity.
Environmental Awareness: By highlighting the cycling of atoms through the Earth's biosphere, educators can also instill a sense of environmental stewardship in students. They can emphasize the importance of caring for the planet and its resources, as well as the interconnectedness between human actions and the health of the Earth's ecosystems.
Scientific Curiosity: Introducing children to the concept of shared atoms and interconnectedness can spark scientific curiosity and inquiry. It encourages them to ask questions about the natural world and seek a deeper understanding of their place within it, fostering critical thinking skills and a lifelong appreciation for science.
Respect for Diversity: Embracing the idea of interconnectedness encourages respect for diversity and individual differences. It teaches children that despite their unique identities and experiences, they are all part of the same interconnected web of life, promoting acceptance and celebration of diversity.
In conclusion, replacing religiosity indoctrination with a new age ideology centered around interconnectedness has the potential to foster greater unity among school children. By grounding this ideology in scientific principles, promoting inclusivity, empathy, and environmental awareness, and sparking scientific curiosity, educators can empower children to embrace their interconnectedness with all living beings and cultivate a sense of unity and compassion in their communities.
Divisive factor no.1: Poor Scientific Foundation The new age ideology of interconnectedness is grounded in scientific principles, particularly in the fields of biology and chemistry. By teaching children about the shared atoms that make up their bodies and how these atoms cycle through the Earth's biosphere, educators provide them with a tangible and evidence-based understanding of their connection to all living beings.
Hell is arguably a harmful concept that has been used throughout history to control, manipulate, and intimidate individuals. Its perpetuation serves to hinder personal growth, foster divisiveness, and undermine moral and ethical principles. As such, it should be critically examined and challenged in the interest of promoting human well-being and fostering a more compassionate and inclusive society.
THis halfbaked academic Teo Kok Seong has defended his charge that Chinese schools propagate racism?????
EngineeringProfit
16,446 posts
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 4 days ago | Report Abuse
Shame on this historian who knows so little compare to Yuval Noah Harari. The paradox of fundamentalism lies in its dual capacity to foster unity among certain adherents while simultaneously fracturing broader communities. Rooted in rigid doctrines, fundamentalist beliefs often invite diverse interpretations, inadvertently creating rifts among individuals who hold contrasting views on the same faith-based principles.
Divisive factor no.1: Poor Scientific Foundation The new age ideology of interconnectedness is grounded in scientific principles, particularly in the fields of biology and chemistry. By teaching children about the shared atoms that make up their bodies and how these atoms cycle through the Earth's biosphere, educators provide them with a tangible and evidence-based understanding of their connection to all living beings.
Divisive factor no.2: Failure of educators to tap into inclusive nature of humanity Unlike religiosity indoctrination, which may exclude individuals who do not adhere to specific religious beliefs, the concept of interconnectedness transcends cultural and religious boundaries. It promotes inclusivity by emphasizing the commonality of all human beings and their connection to the natural world, regardless of their background or beliefs.
Vernacular school educators possess a unique advantage in breaking down divisive factors due to their inherent connection to local communities and cultures. These educators are deeply rooted in the fabric of their society, allowing them to understand the nuances of diverse belief systems with patience and open-mindedness.
1. **Cultural Understanding**: Vernacular school educators are often from the same cultural background as their students, giving them a profound understanding of the societal norms, values, and traditions that shape their students' perspectives. This familiarity enables them to approach discussions about divisive topics with sensitivity and empathy.
2. **Community Engagement**: Educators in vernacular schools are actively involved in their communities, which fosters a strong sense of trust and rapport with students and their families. This close connection enables them to navigate discussions about sensitive topics with care, fostering understanding and empathy among students from different belief systems.
3. **Language Proficiency**: Vernacular school educators are typically proficient in the globally relevant language, which is often the relevant medium of communication for their students. This linguistic fluency allows for effective communication and ensures that discussions about divisive issues are conducted in a manner that is clear and culturally sensitive.
4. **Cultural Sensitivity**: Vernacular school educators are attuned to the cultural sensitivities of their students and are adept at creating inclusive learning environments where diverse perspectives are valued and respected. This sensitivity helps in addressing divisive factors with patience and understanding, rather than exacerbating tensions.
5. **Role Models in Diversity**: By embracing and celebrating the diversity within their own communities, vernacular school educators serve as powerful role models for their students. They demonstrate that it is possible to bridge differences and foster unity through respectful dialogue and mutual understanding.
In conclusion, vernacular school educators possess the necessary qualities of patience, open-mindedness, and cultural sensitivity to effectively break down divisive factors and foster understanding and empathy across different belief systems. Their deep connection to local communities, coupled with their linguistic proficiency and cultural awareness, uniquely positions them as superior agents of positive change in society.
For decades, Malay politicians survive on raising issue about vernacular schools. They cite these school does not promote integration. These young prick politicians were kids in early 80s when the old fox came into power. The amount of abuse non Malay students faced during that time in sekolaah kebangsaan seems to be erased from history. In the effort of getting rid of non Malay teachers, Malay headmaster and dubiously qualified teachers were flooded to replace them. These teachers would target non Malay students and put pressure on them. They would say "Go to Chinese or Tamil schools if you don't like it!" Non Malay student's achievements are underwritten to please Malays. So many agitations hence vernacular schools boomed. Now they are putting on blame on non Malays. Simply jealous and childish.
Spot on. Jealousy and childishness are in their blood.
Posted by DickyMe > 36 minutes ago | Report Abuse
For decades, Malay politicians survive on raising issue about vernacular schools. They cite these school does not promote integration. These young prick politicians were kids in early 80s when the old fox came into power. The amount of abuse non Malay students faced during that time in sekolaah kebangsaan seems to be erased from history. In the effort of getting rid of non Malay teachers, Malay headmaster and dubiously qualified teachers were flooded to replace them. These teachers would target non Malay students and put pressure on them. They would say "Go to Chinese or Tamil schools if you don't like it!" Non Malay student's achievements are underwritten to please Malays. So many agitations hence vernacular schools boomed. Now they are putting on blame on non Malays. Simply jealous and childish.
So true. It's a cycle of blame-shifting and selective memory. Malay politicians conveniently forget the abuses non-Malay students endured in national schools, where they were often marginalized and pressured to conform. The rise of vernacular schools was a response to this systemic discrimination, yet now these politicians use them as a scapegoat for integration issues. It's a classic case of historical amnesia and political opportunism at the expense of genuine progress and inclusivity.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
New IPO: The onshore and offshore support services provider for the O&G industry, Steel Hawk Bhd aims to list on the Ace Market!
MQ Trader 2938 views | 2 d ago
0:17
New IPO: The largest mini-market player and a leading groceries retailer in Malaysia, 99 Speed Mart Retail Holdings Bhd aims to list on the Main Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2023-08-31 07:35 | Report Abuse
The siths and palpatine are wrong. It's the exclusionary nature of fundamentalism that is simultaneously uniting some people while dividing others. Since such dogmatic teachings are open to interpretation, it undeniably divides those who have differing opinions on the same belief. Serious unconcilable conflict occurs between the in- and out-groups formed through different religions. Even worse, the fact that it is such a sensitive topic only makes it ripe for the picking by external forces who further these divisions for their own greenwave agenda. Therefore, as much as religion unites, its nature often results in much more deep-rooted divisions, hence dividing more than it unites.