Post a Comment
Market Buzz
Featured Posts
Latest Videos
Apps
Top Articles
1
2
3
4
5
6
M+ Online Research Articles
7
8
#
Stock
Score
Daily Stocks
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
MQ Trading Signals
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Featured Advertisers / Partners
Ride The Bull Short The Bear
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2024-07-08 09:14 | Report Abuse
PH has forsaken its base supporters- the moderate Msian first people of all creeds and skin colours The Democratic Action Party (DAP) has been criticized by some as having deteriorated into what they refer to as "MCA 2.0." This comparison implies that DAP has become similar to the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), a party that has historically been part of the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition and seen as ineffective in advocating for the rights of the Chinese community in Malaysia. Critics argue that DAP, once seen as a staunch opposition party, has shifted its stance and failed to deliver on its promises, especially to the Chinese and Indian communities. Here are some points commonly raised: 1. **Policy Compromises**: DAP's participation in coalition governments, such as Pakatan Harapan (PH), has led to compromises that some supporters feel betray the party’s original ideals. For example, issues like the recognition of the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) and other educational reforms have seen little progress. 2. **Economic and Social Issues**: Critics argue that DAP has not effectively addressed economic inequalities and social issues affecting the Chinese and Indian communities, such as business opportunities, vernacular school funding, and equitable government resource distribution. 3. **Leadership and Representation**: Some feel that DAP's leadership has become too elitist and disconnected from grassroots concerns. They argue that the party’s representatives are more focused on maintaining power within coalitions than advocating for their constituents. 4. **Public Perception and Trust**: Over time, public trust in DAP has eroded among some segments of the Chinese and Indian communities. This perception is driven by a belief that DAP, much like MCA, has become too comfortable within the political establishment and is no longer a true voice of opposition or reform. 5. **Political Strategy**: The strategic decisions made by DAP, including alliances and policy stances, have sometimes alienated their core supporters. The shift towards broader, multi-ethnic policies within coalition politics has led to a perception that DAP is not prioritizing the specific needs of the Chinese and Indian communities. Despite these criticisms, DAP still retains significant support among many Malaysians who view the party as a critical component of the opposition landscape. The future direction of DAP and its ability to address these criticisms will be crucial for its standing in upcoming general elections.