Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Being accused and fitnah of saying something she did not, this could constitute defamation under the law, particularly if the accusation damages her reputation, causes public outrage, or lowers her standing in the eyes of others.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Furthermore, if he made this accusation recklessly or with the intent to mislead the public, the defamation case strengthens. Even if he did not intend harm, negligence in verifying the facts before making public accusations would still be a valid basis for a defamation claim.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Politicians are often the subject of public debate, but this does not absolve individuals from making false claims about them. While freedom of speech is protected, it does not extend to the right to defame someone, even in the context of political discourse. Public figures, while subject to greater scrutiny, are still entitled to protection against fabricated statements.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Defamation laws exist to protect individuals from fitnah and false statements that damage their reputation. If his accusation causes her to be viewed in a negative light—either personally or professionally—she has the right to seek redress. Such an accusation could damage her political career, trust with her constituents, and public image.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Being accused or fitnah of making a statement she never made, this would be a clear case of falsity. The essence of defamation lies in false claims, and fabricating her opinion or "tokok tambah" (exaggerating or adding false elements) means that the statement is not based on truth, but rather on a deliberate distortion of her actual words.