Be the first to like this.
3 comment(s). Last comment by EngineeringProfit 1 month ago
Posted by Bursino > 1 month ago | Report Abuse
Never wrestle with akmal, both gets dirty and akmal likes it.
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse
Did he made the accusation recklessly or with the intent to mislead the public - the defamation case strengthens. Even if he did not intend harm, negligence in verifying the facts before making public accusations would still be a valid basis for a defamation claim.
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 month ago | Report Abuse
Did he accuse or fitnah her of making a statement such as against the certification that she never made - this would be a clear case of falsity. The essence of defamation lies in false claims, and fabricating her opinion or "tokok tambah" (exaggerating or adding false elements) means that the statement is not based on truth, but rather on a deliberate distortion of her actual words.
No result.
1
2
3
Good Articles to Share
4
Koon Yew Yin's Blog
Why all plantation companies will continue to report more profit - Koon Yew Yin
5
AmInvest Research Reports
6
7
save malaysia!
8
#
Stock
Score
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock Name
Last
Change
Volume
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
Stock
Time
Signal
Duration
CS Tan
4.9 / 5.0
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse
Politicians are often the subject of public debate, but this does not absolve individuals from making false claims about them. While freedom of speech is protected, it does not extend to the right to defame someone, even in the context of political discourse. Public figures, while subject to greater scrutiny, are still entitled to protection against fabricated statements.