Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Compromising Depth of Knowledge: By cutting the curriculum in half, students may not be able to explore topics in depth. Complex subjects like Science and Mathematics require comprehensive understanding, not superficial learning. The reduced content may force teachers to rush through important topics, preventing students from mastering fundamental concepts that are crucial for higher-level education and application in real-life problem-solving.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Global Standards and Benchmarks: International assessments like the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) measure students' proficiency in these subjects globally. Reducing curriculum content could widen the performance gap between Malaysian students and their peers in countries with more rigorous standards, diminishing Malaysia's standing on the global stage.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Compromising Educational Quality for Short-term Gains Of syok-sendiri KPI & Popularity: While reducing curriculum density may be aimed at easing the burden on students, it risks sacrificing long-term educational quality for short-term relief. Rather than cutting content, efforts should focus on improving the teaching methodology, making learning more engaging and effective without compromising the breadth and depth of subjects.

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 2 months ago | Report Abuse

Impact on Future Competitiveness: Reducing the content of critical subjects like Science and Mathematics could hinder students' ability to compete globally. As Malaysia aspires to become a high-tech, knowledge-based economy, a strong foundation in these subjects is essential. Diluting the curriculum may compromise the development of critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills needed in fields such as engineering, technology, and medicine.