Good Articles to Share

MY ER Kim Hin Industry Berhad – Feb 2017 - Jackson Yuen

Tan KW
Publish date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017, 09:18 AM
Tan KW
0 433,362
Good.

 

Stock Code 5371.KL
Investment Rating BUY
Current  Price RM 1.91
Target Price RM 2.37
Estimated Return +23.9%
Market Cap RM 268m (as of 24/02/17)

Company Profile:
Kim Hin Industry Berhad is an investment holding company engages in the production of Ceramic Tiles, Glazed Decorative Floor, Monoporosa Wall Tiles and Heavy Duty Homogenenous Tiles. Operating in Malaysia, China, Australia and Vietnam.

Investment Considerations:

1) Favourable growth prospects underpinned by Australia’s potential growth
Shifting its revenue base toward Australian market has reduced the reliance on slower domestic growth. Malaysia’s top line grew by 10.3% in 2015 and slow to 5.3% in 2016, reflecting a challenging trading environment. With the acquisition of Australian building products distributors in Sept 2016, the management is confident on doubling the export to Australia in the next few years. Australia’s revenue has increased 67.6% in FY16 (unaudited), and we are projecting FY17 revenue growth to be 15.7% driven by Australian and Vietnam operations.

2) Rising cost is a major pressure point in near-term
Kim Hin has three factories in Malaysia (2), and China (1), the increase in production and operating costs were recently seen in Malaysia on the back of oil price recovery after OPEC-led oil production cut. Feb 17, the Petrol price was raised by c. 10% which many industries will find it hard to digest and finding ways to pass the costs to consumers, resulting in a rise in inflationary pressure. Management has said that fuel expenditure makes up 35% of plant’s operational cost. We raised our estimation (FY17) for production costs and operating expenses by 2.2% and 6.7% respectively.

3) Increased borrowings and comfortable leverage
Although not necessary given its net cash position of RM28m and cash flow positive, the leverage has no immediate credit risk. Current Debt / EBITDA at 0.7x and Interest Coverage at 36x. High liquidity as evidenced by acid test ratio of 1.8x (FY15: 2.5x).

4) Making allowances for potential acquisitions
We are under the impression that management may engage in acquisitive growth strategy. The management plans to open a third production line in Peninsular Malaysia to make up for the shortfall in Kuching’s gradual production scale down. Production capacity is set to grow in short to medium terms.

4) Revising our valuation assumptions
Our previous assumptions did not consider the growth potential after the acquisition of Australian distribution centres. We have revised the target price to RM 2.37 from RM 2.06, implying an upside potential of 23.9%. Upgrade the rating from NEUTRAL to BUY. The risks to our BUY recommendation are discussed later.

Financial Summary FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16
Price to Earnings 80.02x 137.85x 6.39x 8.96x 7.88x
Price to Net Tangible Assets 0.43x 0.39x 0.35x 0.63x 0.50x
Price to FCF n/a n/a 10.08x 10.77x n/a
EV / EBITDA 11.28x 8.04x 3.79x 5.51x 5.05x
Net Profit Margin (in %) 0.99 0.49 8.24 9.72 8.08
Free Cash Flow RM’m -6.5 -25.7 16.4 29.7 -14.1

Please click here for full investment research report.

Investment Research Disclaimer:
The opinions and views presented in this website and equity research reports are based on facts (which Yield Mountain believes to be reliable and correct) and subjective judgements. It is only for information purpose and does not consider the unique circumstances of the readers. It is not intended as an offer to buy or sell the securities discussed. All the information is based upon publicly available information. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the opinions and views are accurate, we are not auditors and do not independently verified every source used. Past performance is not necessarily an indicative of future performance and the contributors at Yield Mountain will not accept for any losses arising from information contained in this report. The contributors may form forward-looking views (projections and estimations) of the companies which may not necessarily be true. Market conditions and unforeseeable events may lead to materially different outcomes. Yield Mountain strongly recommends the readers to seek independent advice from their brokers to understand the investment risks arising from taking investment actions based on the Yield Mountain’s equity research.

http://www.yieldmountain.com/2017/02/25/my-er-kim-hin-industry-berhad-feb-2017/

Related Stocks
Market Buzz
Discussions
1 person likes this. Showing 3 of 3 comments

soojinhou

30% growth in Australian segment? That's way too optimistic. Building approval has been contracting. There's a increasing glut of apartments in Melbourne and Brisbane. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-09/australia-construction-index-building-approvals/8169654

2017-02-26 12:02

Jackson Yuen

Greetings,

The justification for projecting 30% growth is considering the acquisition of Outset Pty (19/9/16). The Q4 report has pointed out that the actual acquired date is 1/9/16 (page 23). Although they did not disclose their % ownership in the company (not that I can see in the Quarterly report), we believe the stake is high enough (50%+) to classified it as a subsidiary based on the accounting treatments (consolidating the revenue, as associates only recognise the net income). We then look at the performance post-acquisition (just four months), the Q4 Australian revenue was RM103m (Q3: RM 58m, a growth of 77% against previous quarter). Then again, for simplicity, how much % is due to the existing operations we do not know, but the Q4 report did explain the contribution was due to Outset. So if Kim Hin merely consolidating 4 months already 70%+, the whole year (FY17 we are projecting 30%) is likely to be much higher. You point out a good thing, building approval is contracting, but the growth we are projecting is what we called acquisitive (rather than organic). Hope it explains my thought process.

Kind regards

2017-02-26 17:59

soojinhou

Thank you for the explanation. It does seem like KimHin didn't overpay for Outset. But I can't get over them overpaying for Johnson Tiles. That's a very expensive acquisition for a brand (non-tangible) and as you can see it contributes close to nothing to their bottom line.

2017-02-26 18:22

Post a Comment