save malaysia!

Unity government idealistic but unrealistic, constitutional expert Shad Saleem says

savemalaysia
Publish date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020, 11:31 PM

KUALA LUMPUR, March 4 — The non-partisan unity government proposed by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad at the height of Malaysia’s political crisis last week was an idealistic idea but would have been unrealistic, constitutional expert Datuk Shad Saleem Faruqi said.

In a forum livestreamed on National Human Rights Society (Hakam) Youth Facebook page, the academic said Malaysia’s system is built on parties or factions controlling a certain number of MPs in Parliament debating against one another.

“Our system is built on parties or factions having control of certain number of MPs in parliament. So, the idea of a unity government is really not contemplated by our constitution but it is more like presidential system of the USA,” said Shad.

“It’s very idealistic but it’s not really contemplated by our system. In our system there must be the cut and thrust of the debate, the confidence of the majority of the House.”

The forum titled “Checkmate! Death of Democracy in Malaysia” was discussing the recent political upheaval following the resignation of Dr Mahathir and the appointment of Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin in what has been termed as a “backdoor government”.

During the forum, Shad added that his idea of a unity government means that the prime minister behaves as inclusive as possible after forming a government by bringing into his or her Cabinet members representing the various races, religions and regions in the country.

The professor said it does not mean that a prime minister should ignore his rival politicians’ political faction and invite them to join their Cabinet, as this is not “contemplated” in Malaysia’s system.

Last week, Dr Mahathir announced his proposal to lead a non-partisan government if given the opportunity, as a solution to the political impasse.

He said his proposal would see individuals appointed regardless of their partisan affiliations, and would work towards the interests of the nation above partisan politics.

The proposal inevitably drove Pakatan Harapan to back Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as its prime minister candidate instead, causing neither Anwar or Dr Mahathir to command the majority of the Dewan Rakyat.

 

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2020/03/04/unity-government-idealistic-but-unrealistic-constitutional-expert-shad-sale/1843453

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 2 of 2 comments

qqq33333333

traitors, betrayals is politics..........developing country...what to expect? advanced country meh?

2020-03-04 23:59

teoct

After much reflection, all this started with the PH Presidential Council of which Tun M, DS Anwar, Lim KS, Lim GE and others are member. They should all take responsibility for the mess as they and only they agreed just before GE14 as candidates (the treacherous MPs that had leap-frog away) and accepting Bersatu as partner of PH and now they are gone. And most knew what character they are of.

Like in the "so-called" western countries that are "democratic" and of principled people (that we all aspired to be), they - Tun M, DS Anwar, Lim KS, Lim GE should immediately resigned to take responsibility. Anything less is an affront to the voters that have voted for PH. And worse of all, they said they are not responsible and pointing fingers at everyone else except themselves - what a disgraced, a damn lousy example you all are setting, especially those that are writing apology for them.

Now is the time for the so call young progressive members (e.g Nurul, Wan Saiful, etc) of all these political parties to stand up and take over the leading from all these old leaders that are totally bankrupt of any new ideas to lead and of no moral standing whatsoever..

2020-03-05 08:53

Post a Comment