save malaysia!

Rafizi: Update data on Padu to avoid being left out of first round aid eligibility determination

savemalaysia
Publish date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024, 08:55 PM

PUTRAJAYA, March 18 — Individuals who are eligible for government assistance but do not update their data in the Central Database Hub (Padu) by the end of this month are at risk of being left out from the first round of aid eligibility determination after the targeted subsidy programme is implemented.

Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli said those individuals would have to wait for the next round when Padu reopens for updates at a regular frequency level that will be determined by the government later.

He said updating Padu by March 31 is important so that existing data can be worked on and algorithm development can be done to determine eligibility parameters including disposable income, family’s basic living expenses and discretionary income.

“We have to follow the accurate timeline for the implementation of the targetted subsidy programme and that timeline requires the data to be ready by March 31, 2024.

“The updating process will not be permanently closed, but I’m sure if we keep it open and they still hesitate (to register and update their data), it won’t do any good,” he told a press conference here today.

Rafizi said the next step would be developing the API (Application Programming Interface) so that those over 300 government databases are connected and updated automatically in Padu.

“That’s what we mean by creating a central government database that is updated close to real-time,” he said.

Meanwhile, Rafizi also refuted a news portal’s report that the public were disappointed when most of the registration service counters they went to, were closed.

Explaining the issue, the minister said the Padu and Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) team had been on the ground since the first week of January and had opened counters in localities which were deemed more effective.

“Since January, we have received many requests from residents’ associations, elected representatives, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) for the Padu and DOSM teams to open counters in their areas.

“In Selangor, for example, DOSM counters are open seven days a week from morning to night. It is not true to say that the counters are closed, as if the officers are not working, that is not true,” he said. — Bernama

 

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2024/03/18/rafizi-update-data-on-padu-to-avoid-being-left-out-of-first-round-aid-eligibility-determination/124152

Discussions
Be the first to like this. Showing 3 of 3 comments

Income

5milion plus sign up

1 month ago

EngineeringProfit

perMAiDANI is a big let down so far........................what's more with padu.....................many needy are left behind

1 month ago

EngineeringProfit

plagued with too many wolves in sheep's clothing

Identifying A wolf in sheep's clothing:

Recognizing troublemakers, especially self-serving political leaders who exploit religious issues for personal gain, requires a keen understanding of their behaviors and their impact on society. Here are some ways to identify such individuals in a harmoniously pluralistic society:

Manipulative Use of Religious Rhetoric: These leaders often use religious language and symbols strategically to appeal to certain groups while disregarding the broader impact on societal harmony. They may exaggerate or distort religious teachings to serve their political agendas.

Divisive Tactics: They thrive on creating divisions within society based on religious identities. They may propagate fear, hatred, and suspicion towards other religious groups to consolidate their own power base.

Lack of Genuine Concern for Welfare: While they may claim to champion religious causes, their actions often prioritize personal gain over the well-being of the society as a whole. They may neglect pressing social and economic issues in favor of symbolic gestures or inflammatory rhetoric.

Exploitation of Religious Institutions: They may exploit religious institutions or leaders for political gain, using them as tools to mobilize support or justify their actions, without genuine respect for religious principles or values.

History of Opportunism: Examining their track record reveals a pattern of opportunism, where they exploit religious sentiments during times of political advantage while neglecting these issues when they are not politically beneficial.

Resistance to Dialogue and Compromise: Instead of promoting dialogue and understanding among different religious communities, they often fuel conflicts and resist efforts towards peaceful resolution, as this may not serve their personal interests.

Focus on Personal Branding: They tend to focus more on building their own personal brand and image as religious champions rather than working towards genuine societal progress and harmony.

Disregard for Rule of Law: They may show a disregard for the rule of law and democratic principles, using religious rhetoric to justify authoritarian actions or undermine democratic institutions.

In a harmoniously pluralistic society, it's crucial for citizens to remain vigilant, critically evaluate political discourse, and hold leaders accountable for their actions that undermine societal welfare, economic prosperity, and national peace. Promoting transparency, fostering interfaith dialogue, and supporting ethical leadership are essential steps in countering the negative impact of such irresponsible political leaders.

1 month ago

Post a Comment