albertyek

June 1st 2024 minyak naik hahahaha

2024-05-21 16:39

EngineeringProfit

**[Title: Prime Minister's Address on Wesak Day]**

**Prime Minister:**
Ladies and Gentlemen, esteemed citizens of our beloved nation,

Today, we come together to celebrate Wesak Day, a momentous occasion that holds deep significance for our Buddhist community and resonates with values that unite us all as a nation.

Wesak Day commemorates the birth, enlightenment, and passing of Lord Buddha. It is a day of reflection, gratitude, and compassion. These virtues are at the heart of Buddhism and serve as guiding principles for harmony and peace in our diverse society.

As we gather to honor this sacred day, let us be reminded of the timeless teachings of Lord Buddha. His message of kindness, non-violence, and the pursuit of wisdom is not confined to any one faith but is universal in its relevance. In our multicultural and pluralistic society, these teachings encourage us to embrace our differences and to celebrate the rich tapestry of cultures, beliefs, and traditions that make up our nation.

Today is also a time for us to reflect on our shared values and aspirations. The principles of compassion and understanding can guide us in our interactions with one another, fostering a spirit of unity and mutual respect. In our daily lives, let us strive to practice these virtues, ensuring that our nation remains a beacon of tolerance and inclusivity.

On this Wesak Day, I urge all citizens to take a moment to engage in acts of kindness, to extend a helping hand to those in need, and to contribute to the well-being of our community. Whether through volunteer work, charitable donations, or simply offering a smile to a neighbor, each act of kindness strengthens the fabric of our society.

As we light the lanterns and offer prayers, let us also remember those who are less fortunate and those who face hardships. In the spirit of Wesak, let us reach out to them with compassion and support, embodying the true essence of this sacred day.

In conclusion, I wish our Buddhist community a blessed Wesak Day. May the teachings of Lord Buddha continue to inspire us all towards a path of righteousness, peace, and harmony. Together, let us build a nation where every individual, regardless of their faith or background, can live with dignity, respect, and a sense of belonging.

Thank you, and may peace and joy be with you all.

---

**[End of Address]**

2024-05-21 17:52

DickyMe

"Turkish inflation hit 70% last month" Erdoganomics.
Malaysia's inflation to hit double digit soon!

2024-05-22 00:04

chinaman

Buddhism is not a Religion, It's a philosophy that teaches us how to live in Harmony, The way of life and the Embodiment of peacefulness. Human suffering stems from human greed. all is karma, self-inflicted. keep printing money to spend cause today's super inflation. now, all must pay the price

2024-05-22 13:15

OnTime

the prime minister's humility and graciousness is acknowledged. Peace and prosperity to all!

2024-05-22 13:36

EngineeringProfit

It is. Buddhism is unequivocally a religion:

1. **Foundational Beliefs and Practices**: Buddhism centers on the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, whose insights form the basis of a spiritual path. It involves beliefs in the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, which guide adherents in understanding suffering and achieving enlightenment (Nirvana). These teachings provide a framework for understanding life, much like doctrines in other religions.

2. **Rituals and Worship**: Buddhism encompasses a wide range of rituals and ceremonies. These include meditation practices, chanting of sutras, and various devotional activities such as offerings and prayers at temples. These rituals are akin to religious practices found in other faiths, aimed at fostering spiritual development and reverence.

3. **Community and Monastic Life**: Buddhism has a strong community aspect, with lay followers and monastic communities (Sangha) living according to Buddhist precepts. Monasteries and temples serve as centers for religious life, education, and community activities. The Sangha plays a crucial role in preserving and disseminating the Buddha's teachings, similar to religious clergy in other traditions.

4. **Sacred Texts and Scriptures**: Buddhism has a rich body of sacred texts, including the Tripitaka (Pali Canon), Mahayana Sutras, and various commentaries. These texts are studied, recited, and revered by Buddhists worldwide, fulfilling a role similar to holy books in other religions.

5. **Moral and Ethical Guidelines**: Buddhism provides a comprehensive moral and ethical code, encapsulated in the Five Precepts for laypeople and the Vinaya rules for monastics. These guidelines influence adherents' behavior, emphasizing compassion, non-violence, and mindfulness, akin to the moral teachings of other religions.

6. **Ultimate Concern and Transcendence**: Like other religions, Buddhism addresses ultimate concerns about the nature of existence, suffering, and the possibility of transcendence. It offers a path to enlightenment and liberation from the cycle of birth and rebirth (samsara), providing answers to profound existential questions.

7. **Diverse Traditions and Sects**: Buddhism has evolved into various traditions, including Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana, each with its own interpretations, practices, and rituals. This diversity within Buddhism reflects the complexity and depth typical of major world religions.

While many like to argue that Buddhism can be viewed as a philosophy or way of life, its comprehensive belief system, rituals, community structure, sacred texts, moral guidelines, and focus on transcendence firmly establish it as a religion. And many minds have been brainwashed, and their lives changed fanatically because of it

2024-05-22 13:37

EngineeringProfit

But I regard it and its peers as protosciences—early attempts at providing explanations about the world and a deeper understanding of life, aiming to offer guidance on how to escape sufferings

2024-05-22 13:41

EngineeringProfit

Most religions are nothing more than proto- and pseudo-sciences can be approached by examining the similarities in their attempts to explain the world and the methods they use, while highlighting the differences in rigor and empirical validation.

1. **Historical Context and Proto-Science**:
- Historically, religions emerged in times when scientific understanding was limited. They provided explanations for natural phenomena such as weather, disease, and cosmic events. These early attempts to make sense of the world can be seen as proto-scientific because they sought to offer answers and predict outcomes in the natural world.
- Like early science, religions formulated theories about the origins of life, the universe, and the purpose of human existence. However, these theories were based on myth, tradition, and authority rather than empirical evidence and experimentation.

2. **Claims and Explanations**:
- Religions offer explanations for natural and supernatural phenomena, often attributing events to the actions of deities or spiritual forces. This is akin to how pseudosciences propose explanations without sufficient empirical support.
- For example, many religions have creation myths that claim the universe was created by a god or gods, which can be compared to scientific theories of the universe's origin. However, unlike scientific theories, religious explanations do not undergo rigorous testing and are not subject to falsification.

3. **Methods of Validation**:
- Proto-sciences and pseudo-sciences often rely on anecdotal evidence, subjective experiences, and non-reproducible observations. Religions similarly depend on personal faith, revelation, and sacred texts, which are not subject to empirical validation or peer review.
- Unlike the scientific method, which demands repeatable experiments and peer-reviewed results, religious beliefs are often accepted on the basis of faith and doctrinal authority, without the need for empirical evidence.

4. **Resistance to Falsification**:
- One key feature of science is its ability to be falsified; scientific theories must be testable and disprovable. Religions, on the other hand, often construct their beliefs in ways that are immune to falsification. For instance, miracles are claimed to be supernatural events that defy natural laws, making them inherently untestable by scientific methods.
- This characteristic aligns more closely with pseudosciences, which often create unfalsifiable hypotheses, shielding their claims from scientific scrutiny.

5. **Evolution of Understanding**:
- As scientific understanding has progressed, many religious explanations have been replaced by scientific ones. For example, diseases once thought to be caused by demonic possession are now understood to be the result of pathogens. This evolution suggests that religions provided early, less accurate models of understanding that science has since refined and replaced.
- Proto-sciences similarly evolve into more sophisticated sciences as methods improve and knowledge accumulates, but pseudo-sciences often cling to outdated or disproven theories.

In conclusion, while religions historically served a proto-scientific role by attempting to explain the world, they lack the empirical foundation, methodological rigor, and openness to falsification that characterize true sciences. This places them closer to pseudo-sciences, which present claims and explanations without the necessary empirical support and critical scrutiny required in scientific disciplines.

2024-05-22 13:44

EngineeringProfit

What children fail to learn in pseudo education:

Many religious narratives include creation stories that attempt to explain the origins of the universe and life. These stories were formed in an era when scientific understanding was limited, and human knowledge of natural phenomena was in its infancy. They provided early frameworks for people to comprehend the mysteries of existence and the world around them, long before modern scientific concepts such as the last common ancestor and the protocell origin were developed.

Dreamtime stories from Indigenous Australian cultures explain the creation of the world and the origins of their people. These narratives often involve ancestral beings who shaped the landscape, flora, and fauna through their actions and journeys. These stories were vital in conveying cultural knowledge and the origins of life.

### Contrast with Modern Scientific Understanding

These religious creation stories were formed long before humanity developed an understanding of the last common ancestor and the protocell origin, which are key concepts in modern biology and the study of life's origins.

1. **Last Common Ancestor:**
Modern evolutionary biology posits that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor, known as the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), which lived approximately 3.5 to 4 billion years ago. This concept is supported by genetic evidence and the study of evolutionary processes, providing a scientific framework for the diversification of life.

2. **Protocell Origin:**
The origin of life is thought to involve the formation of protocells, simple cell-like structures that preceded true living cells. Research in abiogenesis explores how organic molecules could self-assemble into these protocells under early Earth conditions. This scientific inquiry into the origin of life relies on experimental evidence and hypotheses that can be tested and refined.

### The Role of Creation Stories

Religious creation stories played a crucial role in early human societies by providing explanations for the unknown and offering a sense of order and meaning. They helped ancient peoples make sense of their existence and their environment, filling the gaps in knowledge with narratives that were accessible and culturally significant.

However, these stories were limited by the lack of empirical evidence and scientific methodology. They relied on myth, symbolism, and supernatural elements, which, while meaningful within their cultural contexts, do not align with the empirical and testable nature of scientific explanations.

### Conclusion

Religious creation stories represent humanity's early attempts to explain the origins of the universe and life, formed long before the advent of modern science. They served important cultural and explanatory functions in ancient societies but lack the empirical rigor and evidence-based approach of scientific explanations. By comparing these narratives to modern scientific understanding, we can appreciate the historical context of religious explanations while recognizing the advancements made through scientific inquiry.

2024-05-22 13:49

EngineeringProfit

And that term is obsolete. In the hypermodern context, "Protopseudoscience" is the better term as it highlights the historical and developmental context of religious beliefs, differentiating them from modern pseudoscience, which often knowingly mimics scientific language without adhering to scientific standards.
It acknowledges that while religion once served a similar explanatory function to science, it does not meet the criteria of scientific inquiry.

Renaming provides a nuanced understanding of its historical role in human attempts to explain the natural world before the advent of formal scientific methods. This term captures both the primitive explanatory ambitions of early religious thought and its divergence from the empirical rigor that characterizes modern science.

2024-05-22 14:17

EngineeringProfit

What children fail to learn in pseudo education: The differences between science and protopseudoscience classes; and the expected learning outcomes from each side.

Most importantly, science unites, protopseudoscience divides the people among themselves and the other living things irremediably

2024-05-22 14:20

Sslee

Religion is man creation to explain the unexplained on what happening surrouding him. Birth, aging, sickness and death.

It is also man seeking answer to his inner self question what is the purpose of life?

2024-05-22 14:37

chinaman

yes. many things science methodology not able to explain why.

2024-05-22 14:45

EngineeringProfit

Yes, children got option to get the "why" answers if they attend the protopseudoscience classes. But there must be an honest disclaimer made clear to them that the answers are just empirical- far from absolute or evidence-based. Else how they are going to learn the basics of moral value called honesty

2024-05-22 14:52

EngineeringProfit

And disclaimer no.2: They must be made to understand the risk - while science unites, protopseudoscience can permanently divide the people among themselves and the other living things irremediably.

2024-05-22 16:22

EngineeringProfit

The argument for funding science classes with public funds while requiring individuals to pay out-of-pocket for protopseudoscience classes hinges on several key points:

1. **Public Benefit and Common Good**: Science education provides clear and demonstrable benefits to society. A well-educated populace in scientific principles can contribute to technological advancements, medical breakthroughs, and a better understanding of the natural world. This collective benefit justifies the use of public funds.

2. **Evidence-Based Learning**: Science is grounded in empirical evidence and the scientific method. Public funds should support education that is based on verifiable, reproducible research. This ensures that students receive accurate and reliable information, which is essential for informed decision-making in both personal and professional contexts.

3. **Economic Investment**: Investing in science education has long-term economic benefits. Countries with strong scientific education systems tend to have more innovative economies, higher productivity, and better job prospects for their citizens. This return on investment supports the argument for using public funds for science education.

4. **Risk of Misinformation**: Protopseudoscience, which often includes unfounded or disproven theories, can lead to the spread of misinformation. Publicly funding such classes would not only waste resources but also risk legitimizing false information. This could have detrimental effects on public health, safety, and policy.

5. **Personal Choice and Responsibility**: Individuals who choose to explore protopseudoscience should bear the cost themselves. This personal financial commitment discourages the casual dissemination of unverified or false information and places the responsibility on the individual to critically assess the value of the education they are pursuing.

6. **Educational Standards**: Publicly funded education must meet rigorous standards to ensure that students are receiving a quality education. Science classes are subject to such standards, ensuring that the curriculum is up-to-date and based on the latest research. Protopseudoscience classes often do not meet these standards, which justifies why they should not be publicly funded.

In summary, funding science classes with public funds ensures the promotion of reliable, evidence-based knowledge that benefits society as a whole. Conversely, requiring individuals to pay for protopseudoscience classes out of their own pockets prevents the misuse of public funds and helps mitigate the spread of misinformation.

2024-05-22 16:27