Furthermore, if he made this accusation recklessly or with the intent to mislead the public, the defamation case strengthens. Even if he did not intend harm, negligence in verifying the facts before making public accusations would still be a valid basis for a defamation claim.

Being accused and fitnah of saying something she did not, this could constitute defamation under the law, particularly if the accusation damages her reputation, causes public outrage, or lowers her standing in the eyes of others.

In a case of defamation, the core issue revolves around making false statements that harm the reputation of another person.

In 2014, a laboratory test showed that two of a dairy milk products contained porcine DNA ........

What had he contributed to msia???? Anything positive? Got one or two? No?

Tempoyak, which is made from fermented durian, generally undergoes lactic acid fermentation, where naturally occurring lactic acid bacteria break down the sugars in durian. This process usually results in a tangy taste but can also produce small amounts of alcohol as a byproduct, similar to other fermented foods like kimchi or sauerkraut.

The alcohol content in tempoyak is formed through its fermentation process, as lactic acid bacteria tend to dominate over yeast, which is primarily responsible for alcohol production. Based on similar fermented products, the alcohol content would up to 1% alcohol by volume (ABV).

Today, there are advanced scientific methods available to detect even trace amounts of alcohol in foods. If tests confirm the presence of alcohol in these traditional foods, then declaring them haram would prevent any potential conflict with Islamic principles.

Today, there are advanced scientific methods available to detect even trace amounts of alcohol in foods. If tests confirm the presence of alcohol in these traditional foods, then declaring them haram would prevent any potential conflict with Islamic principles.

While traditional Malay foods like tapai, tempoyak, budu, and cencalok are culturally significant, their alcohol content, even in trace amounts, presents a challenge for halal compliance. Given the strict Islamic prohibition of alcohol and the modern, standardized approach to halal certification, it would be consistent to declare these foods haram if they contain any alcohol.

After all, great minds and people discuss great ideas, small minded, hearted and pen*le ppl attack the former ones

Mandatory halal certification introduces additional administrative and financial burdens, especially for small businesses. These include costs associated with compliance, auditing, and documentation, which can strain resources and reduce competitiveness, particularly for businesses that do not primarily cater to Muslim consumers. By enforcing certification, the government may inadvertently limit the flexibility and autonomy that businesses need to operate efficiently in a diverse market.

In contrast, a voluntary halal certification system would allow businesses to respond to market demand organically. Those that see value in obtaining halal certification—due to consumer preferences or market positioning—can do so without being forced. This market-driven approach encourages healthy competition and innovation, while avoiding the imposition of unnecessary costs on businesses that may not benefit from certification.

Forcing compliance could also create operational inefficiencies, leading to higher prices for consumers and reducing the overall agility of businesses in adapting to changing market conditions. Thus, voluntary certification strikes a balance, supporting both the needs of relevant consumers and the sustainability of diverse business operations.

And know why Kodak and Nokia became irrelevant - yup, dinosaur-like stagnation and morbidly unchanging. The rigid and overly cautious nature of JAKIM’s halal certification process may stifle innovation, particularly in industries that rely on fast-paced product development, such as food technology or pharmaceuticals. Entrepreneurs and investors may be deterred from developing innovative halal products or services due to fears of being bogged down in regulatory red tape. Malaysia risks missing out on becoming a leader in innovative halal markets, which are increasingly important in the global economy.

This stagnation in innovation can reduce the economy’s ability to diversify and grow, further shrinking the pie for all players. For example, Thailand’s emphasis on halal tourism, technology, and food production is becoming increasingly attractive to investors who seek lower barriers to entry.

We must strive to put a full stop to such a dark system from the very begining. The strict criteria for halal certification affect not only food preparation but also the sourcing of raw materials. Businesses are required to use ingredients from halal-certified suppliers, limiting their options and increasing procurement costs. The scarcity of halal-certified suppliers in certain areas can further drive up the price of halal meals, as suppliers may charge a premium due to limited competition.

Do proper math. Tons of hidden cost and under the table money required - from the source to product prep. Procurement from limited source, etc. Think twice

Superior leader Nyonya discuss idea, but inferior akmalkin skywalker attacks person

Extremely rude and unbecoming of him to name calling her nyonya Tua. Can she sue him for a million dollar for this?


EngineeringProfit

18,828 posts

Posted by EngineeringProfit > 1 day ago | Report Abuse

In Malaysia, defamation is covered under the Defamation Act 1957. Defamation occurs when a statement made by one person causes harm to another's reputation in the eyes of a reasonable person.
To prove defamation, Teresa Kok would need to demonstrate that:
The statement was published (made public, whether verbally or in writing).
The statement referred to her.
The statement caused damage to her reputation.
The statement was not true or could not be justified as a fair comment.

Also no rotavirus, microplastic, hormone disruptors., trans-fat, saturated fats.................................................

Yet.........still - such behavior ought to be condemned, and concerted efforts are needed to instill respect and proper social conduct through civic education and a reinforcement of moral values in any public discourse.

Posted by DickyMe > 1 hour ago | Report Abuse

It is his freedom of expression just like your freedom to feel hurt by mere words.

Islamic principles emphasize the preservation of health, and numerous fatwas (Islamic legal rulings) by scholars and religious authorities, including Malaysia's National Fatwa Council, have declared smoking as haram due to the severe health risks associated with tobacco. Certifying establishments that tolerate tobacco usage would go against this core principle.

Halal standards in food preparation extend beyond just the ingredients used; the environment where food is prepared and served must be clean and safe. Tobacco smoke in eateries creates an unhygienic environment, impacting both the air quality and the cleanliness of the area, which contradicts the Islamic requirements for purity.

By allowing smoking, an establishment could be seen as promoting something harmful, which Islam prohibits. Certifying such businesses as halal may confuse consumers about the nature of halal certification, as halal encompasses both food quality and adherence to broader Islamic ethical standards.

Many small to medium eateries will not be qualified for halal ceritfication because of rokok. If JAKIM were to maintain consistency in upholding Islamic values, eateries allowing tobacco consumption should not qualify for halal certification, as doing so would contradict the core Islamic values that the certification is meant to uphold.

If JAKIM were to maintain consistency in upholding Islamic values, eateries allowing tobacco consumption should not qualify for halal certification, as doing so would contradict the core Islamic values that the certification is meant to uphold.

Tunggang agama ke?

Name-calling, especially directed at a senior like "nyonya tua" (old woman), is a blatant display of disrespect, lack of civility, and poor upbringing. In a society that prides itself on manners, courtesy, and the values of respecting elders, such behavior is not only rude but harmful to the fabric of social harmony. Disrespecting an elder by reducing them to derogatory terms belittles their life experience, wisdom, and dignity.

In Asian cultures, particularly in Malaysia, respecting elders is integral to civics and communal values. This norm is reflected in cultural teachings, religious principles, and social etiquette, which emphasize gratitude, reverence, and polite engagement across generational lines. A youth's choice to indulge in name-calling reflects a disturbing erosion of these moral values, signaling a failure in parental guidance, education, and societal moral standards.

Furthermore, addressing someone with age-related insults not only highlights immaturity but also fosters a toxic environment where ageism and disrespect for the elderly could flourish. A civilized society cannot thrive if the younger generation disregards the basic tenets of human decency and empathy. Name-calling does not just hurt the individual; it degrades the collective morality of the community.

Such behavior must be condemned, and concerted efforts are needed to instill respect and proper social conduct through civic education and a reinforcement of moral values in schools, homes, and public discourse.

When a youth name-calling a senior "nyonya tua"...........................

Which shops are halal compliant?

Question (True or false): The National Fatwa Council in Malaysia issued a fatwa (religious ruling) in 1995, declaring smoking as haram due to the health risks associated with it, such as cancer and other diseases. This ruling applies to all forms of smoking, including traditional cigarettes and newer alternatives like vaping or e-cigarettes.

Which restaurants are compliant to the certification?

The scope of halal certification has expanded to include products like cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and even services such as logistics and finance. Unfortunately, the costs businesses incur for obtaining and maintaining halal certification are often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. This can disproportionately impact Muslim consumers who are religiously obligated to purchase halal products.

Some businesses report delays or unnecessary complications in the certification or renewal process, which can lead to lost revenue or supply chain disruptions.

And beyond the initial certification, businesses face continuous costs for maintaining halal compliance. This includes training staff, sourcing halal ingredients, and adhering to strict food handling procedures, which can require additional investment.

Yes, the economic burden on businesses is real. Businesses must pay to obtain halal certification, often involving fees for audits, inspections, and renewals.

Reports have emerged of eateries displaying counterfeit halal certificates, misleading customers into believing that the food meets halal standards when it does not.

An too many pitfalls, biases and injustice. Inconsistent Monitoring: One of the main shortcomings is the inconsistency in the inspection process by authorities responsible for halal certification. Some eateries may obtain the certification but fail to maintain halal practices over time. Inspections are often not frequent enough to catch these lapses.

And immature societies often rely on patronage systems where loyalty to a specific group, tribe, or family supersedes qualifications. Leaders are chosen based on their ability to reward supporters with jobs, contracts, or resources rather than their capacity to govern effectively. This leads to a cycle of corruption, cronyism, and incompetence. In societies where critical thinking is underdeveloped, citizens may base their political decisions on superficial factors such as charisma, ethnicity, or religion rather than evaluating leaders on competence, policy, or integrity. This encourages the rise of leaders who focus on populism or emotional appeals rather than substantive governance. In immature societies, there may be little demand for transparency or accountability from leaders. Voters may tolerate or ignore mismanagement, corruption, or abuse of power because they lack political awareness or fear repercussions. This enables leaders to act irresponsibly, knowing they will not face significant consequences. In societies where patriarchal, hierarchical, or authoritarian norms dominate, leaders may emerge who perpetuate these same oppressive structures. Such leaders are not challenged to innovate or improve the system because the society itself does not demand equity or progress.

When society does not prioritize education, critical thinking, merit, and accountability, it begets leaders who reflect these shortcomings, perpetuating a cycle of immature governance. Societies that are highly polarized along ethnic, religious, or ideological lines often see the rise of leaders who exploit these divisions for political gain. Such leaders focus on consolidating power by appealing to narrow, sectarian interests rather than working toward the common good. This results in a fragmented society and weak governance. In a society that prioritizes immediate gratification over long-term planning, citizens may support leaders who promise quick fixes, even if these promises are unrealistic. Leaders who thrive in such environments focus on short-term gains, using rhetoric to exploit emotions instead of addressing the root causes of societal challenges.

Not based on come-back ppl telling- but from tradition, authority and revelation

For a mature person, particularly a Member of Parliament (MP), the primary responsibility is to represent the interests and concerns of all communities within their constituency, regardless of religious or cultural background. In this case, the MP is fulfilling her duty by asking the government to review a proposal that may impact various communities, a reasonable request in the pursuit of fairness and inclusivity. Her statement makes it clear that the review does not challenge the validity of halal certification, question Jakim’s role, or show any disrespect toward Islam. Instead, it is about ensuring that policies are inclusive and well-considered. However, an immature person may lack the ability to critically engage with such a statement. Instead of understanding the context and intent, they might feel offended, interpreting the remark as a personal or religious attack. Immaturity often manifests in emotional responses that overlook the substance of the message, causing individuals to react defensively rather than considering the broader implications or reasoning behind the statement. Thus, while the mature perspective seeks to ensure the well-being of all communities, the immature perspective may misconstrue the message as a provocation.

Cash is king culture still here to live- alive and kicking?

An obstacle to technological advancement.

And restricting of civil liberties,

It is far from being a force for good, promoting dogmatism, intolerance, bigotry and suffering, thus potentially poisons "everything" (many other business models)

It fosters immorality, including bigotry, discrimination, and abuse.

Allegations of corruption within JAKIM’s halal certification process have surfaced over the years. Claims of favoritism, bribery, and opaque processes have been made, which, if true, could lead to an unfair playing field for businesses, especially small ones. These under-the-table dealings could increase operational costs for businesses seeking certification and drive up the cost of food for consumers.

We must strive to put a full stop to such a dark system from the very begining. The strict criteria for halal certification affect not only food preparation but also the sourcing of raw materials. Businesses are required to use ingredients from halal-certified suppliers, limiting their options and increasing procurement costs. The scarcity of halal-certified suppliers in certain areas can further drive up the price of halal meals, as suppliers may charge a premium due to limited competition.

The rigid and overly cautious nature of JAKIM’s halal certification process may stifle innovation, particularly in industries that rely on fast-paced product development, such as food technology or pharmaceuticals. Entrepreneurs and investors may be deterred from developing innovative halal products or services due to fears of being bogged down in regulatory red tape. Malaysia risks missing out on becoming a leader in innovative halal markets, which are increasingly important in the global economy.

This stagnation in innovation can reduce the economy’s ability to diversify and grow, further shrinking the pie for all players. For example, Thailand’s emphasis on halal tourism, technology, and food production is becoming increasingly attractive to investors who seek lower barriers to entry.

Malaysia’s halal certification standards, though stringent, may not always align with international standards. This inconsistency can create complications for businesses that seek to export halal products globally, as they may need to obtain multiple certifications, each with different requirements. This increases operational complexity and costs, disincentivizing companies from operating in Malaysia, and causing them to look for alternative countries where international halal standards are more harmonized. The lack of alignment with global halal markets puts Malaysia at a competitive disadvantage.

At the expense of non-halal sectors? Malaysia’s heavy focus on promoting itself as a global halal hub, while beneficial in some ways, may divert attention and resources away from other sectors that have the potential for growth. For instance, non-halal industries, such as certain areas of technology, education, and tourism, may not receive the same level of support or investment, even though they could drive economic diversification and expansion. Neighboring countries with more balanced economic strategies can capitalize on these missed opportunities, leaving Malaysia behind.

At the expense of non-halal sectors? Malaysia’s heavy focus on promoting itself as a global halal hub, while beneficial in some ways, may divert attention and resources away from other sectors that have the potential for growth. For instance, non-halal industries, such as certain areas of technology, education, and tourism, may not receive the same level of support or investment, even though they could drive economic diversification and expansion. Neighboring countries with more balanced economic strategies can capitalize on these missed opportunities, leaving Malaysia behind.