Outperform
Last Price
1.66
Avg Target Price
2.29
Upside/Downside
+0.63 (37.95%)

good for bursa some fun play to create excitement😜

37.5sen should be no problem based on the direct deal price for 86m shares

1,000,000 shares @36.5sen bought at 1 transaction; great play up is expected fun

Likely friendly party bought 86mil shares via direct deal ; another 86m shares from open market to make ~10% stake in bjfood; introducing now biz or goreng syer😜

new party bought ~5% at 37.5sen pasti ada plan bagi bjfood😜

Janji speculate till RM1++ ka?

How high can it rise if the party involved in the 86m shares at 36.5sen buys another 86m shares from the open market?😜😎😎😎

Cooking something nice kot? Direct deal @37.5sen for 86m shares pulls😛

An investment vehicle linked to Berjaya Group founder Tan Sri Vincent Tan has divested 4.85% equity interest in Berjaya Food Bhd (KL:BJFOOD) just a week after emerging as a substantial shareholder in the local Starbucks operator with an 8.09% stake purchase.
Detik Ria Sdn Bhd sold the 4.85% stake, comprising 86 million shares, via a direct business transaction on Thursday, according to a bourse filing on Friday. This reduced its stake in Berjaya Food to 3.24%.
Bloomberg data revealed that the 86 million shares were sold at 37.5 sen each, for a total sum of RM32.25 million. The price represents a 2.6% discount to the stock's closing price of 38.5 sen on Thursday.
Berjaya Food’s main shareholder is Berjaya Corp Bhd (KL:BJCORP), with a direct stake of 5.7% and an indirect stake of 57.53% via Berjaya Group Bhd

Share buyback dah approved... Interesting😍 GENERAL MEETINGS: Outcome of Meeting

BERJAYA FOOD BERHAD

Type of Meeting General
Indicator Outcome of Meeting
Date of Meeting 11 Dec 2024
Time 10:00 AM

Venue(s) Broadcast Venue: Manhattan V, Level 14,
Berjaya Times Square Hotel Kuala Lumpur,
No. 1, Jalan Imbi,
55100 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia

Outcome of Meeting
The Board of Directors of Berjaya Food Berhad ("The Company") is pleased to announce that ALL the resolutions tabled at the Company Fifteenth Annual General Meeting held on 11 December 2024 were duly passed by poll.



The results of the poll is set out below.



The Board of Directors is also pleased to announce that the poll result has been duly verified by the Independent Scrutineer namely, Commercial Quest Sdn Bhd.


Voting Results


1. Resolution 1

Description To approve the payment of Directors' fees amounting to RM240,000.00 to the Non-Executive Directors of the Company for the financial year ended 30 June 2024.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,231 99
No. of Shares 1,183,099,209 142,511
% of Voted Shares 99.9880 0.0120
Result Accepted

2. Resolution 2

Description To approve the payment of Directors Benefits (excluding Directors' fees) to the Non-Executive Directors of the Company up to an amount of RM600,000.00 for the period from 12 December 2024 until the next Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2025.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,223 106
No. of Shares 1,182,968,475 267,445
% of Voted Shares 99.9774 0.0226
Result Accepted

3. Resolution 3

Description To re-elect Duli Yang Amat Mulia Tunku Shazuddin Ariff Ibni Al Aminul Karim Sultan Sallehuddin, Tunku Mahkota Kedah who retire pursuant to Clause 117 of the Company's Constitution.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,266 72
No. of Shares 1,170,812,375 13,248,973
% of Voted Shares 98.8811 1.1189
Result Accepted

4. Resolution 4

Description To re-elect Chryseis Tan Sheik Ling who retire pursuant to Clause 117 of the Company's Constitution.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,264 74
No. of Shares 1,184,414,806 232,443
% of Voted Shares 99.9804 0.0196
Result Accepted

5. Resolution 5

Description To re-appoint Messrs Ernst & Young PLT as Auditors of the Company and to authorise the Directors to fix their remuneration.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,276 61
No. of Shares 1,184,603,985 43,164
% of Voted Shares 99.9964 0.0036
Result Accepted

6. Resolution 6

Description To approve the authority to issue and allot shares pursuant to Sections 75 and 76 of the Companies Act 2016.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,245 96
No. of Shares 1,171,392,024 13,255,327
% of Voted Shares 98.8811 1.1189
Result Accepted

7. Resolution 7

Description To approve the proposed renewal of and new Shareholder's Mandate for Recurrent Related Party Transactions of a Revenue or Trading Nature.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,226 75
No. of Shares 122,235,336 139,831
% of Voted Shares 99.8857 0.1143
Result Accepted

8. Resolution 8

Description To approve the proposed renewal of authority for the Company to purchase its own shares.
Shareholder’s Action For Voting
Voted For Against
No. of Shareholders 1,268 71
No. of Shares 1,171,565,009 13,081,840
% of Voted Shares 98.8957 1.1043
Result Accepted

Starbucks has managed to outcompete many other cafes in Malaysia due to several strategic factors:

1. Strong Branding and Global Reputation
• Perception of Quality: As a globally recognized brand, Starbucks is perceived as offering high-quality products and experiences.
• Aspirational Appeal: The Starbucks brand is associated with modern, premium lifestyles, making it appealing to urban Malaysians and younger demographics.

2. Extensive Store Network and Accessibility
• Prime Locations: Starbucks secures locations in popular malls, high-traffic areas, and major urban centers, ensuring high visibility and accessibility.
• Drive-Thru Outlets: These have become especially popular in suburban areas, catering to convenience-focused customers.

3. Wide Product Range and Customization
• Variety: Starbucks offers a diverse menu of coffee, non-coffee beverages, snacks, and desserts that cater to a wide range of preferences.
• Customization: Customers can personalize their drinks, providing a tailored experience that many smaller cafes cannot match.

4. Superior Customer Experience
• Comfortable Ambiance: Stores are designed to provide cozy spaces for work, socializing, or relaxation, which attract customers to stay longer.
• Free Wi-Fi and Amenities: These features make Starbucks a preferred choice for remote workers and students.

5. Loyalty Program
• Starbucks Rewards: The app-based loyalty program incentivizes repeat visits through discounts, freebies, and exclusive offers.
• Mobile Ordering: This streamlines the customer experience, making it convenient to place and pick up orders.

6. Aggressive Marketing Strategies
• Social Media Presence: Starbucks actively engages customers through digital marketing campaigns, promotions, and limited-time offerings.
• Seasonal Specials: Unique offerings like the Pumpkin Spice Latte or festive beverages create excitement and draw in crowds.

7. Adaptation to Local Preferences
• Localized Menu: Starbucks in Malaysia incorporates items like Pandan Gula Melaka cakes and local-inspired beverages, which resonate with Malaysian tastes.
• Halal Certification: This ensures compliance with the dietary preferences of Malaysia’s Muslim majority, broadening its appeal.

8. Economies of Scale and Operational Efficiency
• Cost Management: As a global chain, Starbucks benefits from economies of scale in sourcing, allowing it to offer premium products at competitive prices.
• Consistent Quality: Standardized processes ensure that customers receive consistent quality across outlets.

9. Competitor Weaknesses
• Many local cafes lack the resources or brand recognition to compete on the same scale.
• Independent cafes often struggle to offer the same level of product variety, customer experience, or marketing presence.

Summary

Starbucks’ success in Malaysia stems from a combination of global best practices, strategic localization, and an unwavering focus on customer experience. These elements collectively enable it to dominate the café industry, even in the face of growing competition.

Analyzing the monthly price history of Berjaya Food's stock (BJFood) from December 2022 to December 2024 reveals significant volatility, with periods of rapid gains followed by sharp declines. Below is a positive forecast focusing on BJFood's potential rebound and growth:

Key Observations:
Recent Recovery Signs (Oct–Dec 2024): After a sharp drop in November 2024, BJFood rebounded in December with a modest gain of 1.41%. The increase in volume (16.82M) suggests renewed interest, potentially driven by improved market sentiment or strategic actions.

Growth Trends in 2023-2024:

Despite fluctuations, BJFood demonstrated strong upward movements, e.g., a +12.38% rise in March 2024 and +15.25% in April 2024.
The April 2023 price peak at RM0.916 and significant volumes in May and July 2023 indicate strong investor confidence during key periods.
Market Potential:

The Food & Beverage (F&B) sector is resilient and could benefit from increasing consumer spending post-pandemic and festive season demand.
Strategic initiatives or partnerships by BJFood, such as menu diversification or cost management, could enhance margins.
Historical Support Levels:

The RM0.350–RM0.400 range has historically served as a support zone, with potential for bounce-back in future sessions.
Positive Forecast for 2025:
Catalysts for Growth:

If BJFood sustains strategic initiatives, such as store expansion or digital marketing, a gradual recovery to RM0.400–RM0.450 by Q1 2025 is plausible.
The stock could revisit RM0.500 levels by mid-2025, driven by increasing consumer confidence and improved financial performance.
Projected Price Range:

Short-term (Q1 2025): RM0.400–RM0.450
Mid-term (Mid-2025): RM0.450–RM0.500
Long-term (End-2025): RM0.550–RM0.600, contingent on external economic stability and internal strategic success.
Risks to Monitor:
While optimism is justified, risks such as rising input costs, currency fluctuations, or slower-than-expected consumer demand could hinder growth. Tracking BJFood's quarterly reports and market conditions is essential for validation.

:)

Berjaya Food Stock Price History
Time Frame
Monthly
Download
12/11/2022 - 12/11/2024
Dec 01, 2024 0.360 0.355 0.385 0.350 16.82M +1.41%
Nov 01, 2024 0.355 0.440 0.530 0.335 122.63M -19.32%
Oct 01, 2024 0.440 0.385 0.450 0.385 37.05M +12.82%
Sep 01, 2024 0.390 0.410 0.440 0.335 72.95M -3.70%
Aug 01, 2024 0.405 0.540 0.550 0.400 27.39M -25.00%
Jul 01, 2024 0.540 0.540 0.580 0.535 14.79M 0.00%
Jun 01, 2024 0.540 0.580 0.605 0.530 22.60M -6.90%
May 01, 2024 0.580 0.670 0.685 0.565 47.08M -14.71%
Apr 01, 2024 0.680 0.590 0.700 0.585 138.36M +15.25%
Mar 01, 2024 0.590 0.525 0.605 0.520 49.15M +12.38%
Feb 01, 2024 0.525 0.545 0.585 0.520 91.59M -2.78%
Jan 01, 2024 0.540 0.600 0.635 0.540 109.38M -10.00%
Dec 01, 2023 0.600 0.629 0.670 0.574 77.25M -3.81%
Nov 01, 2023 0.624 0.673 0.713 0.624 121.00M -7.35%
Oct 01, 2023 0.673 0.748 0.757 0.649 78.46M -9.33%
Sep 01, 2023 0.743 0.668 0.767 0.653 70.11M +10.29%
Aug 01, 2023 0.673 0.668 0.698 0.624 55.67M 0.00%
Jul 01, 2023 0.673 0.609 0.718 0.589 167.21M +11.48%
Jun 01, 2023 0.604 0.609 0.634 0.550 131.37M -0.81%
May 01, 2023 0.609 0.876 0.911 0.584 319.20M -30.51%
Apr 01, 2023 0.876 0.916 0.941 0.832 103.58M -3.80%
Mar 01, 2023 0.911 0.970 1.030 0.891 97.82M -8.00%
Feb 01, 2023 0.990 1.059 1.158 0.960 62.18M -7.41%
Jan 01, 2023 1.069 1.030 1.089 0.950 50.45M +3.85%

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Duli Yang Amat Mulia Tunku
Shazuddin Ariff Ibni Al Aminul
Karim Sultan Sallehuddin, Tunku
Mahkota Kedah
Chairman/Independent
Non-Executive Director
Dato' Sydney Lawrance Quays
Director and Group Chief Executive
Officer
Chryseis Tan Sheik Ling
Dato' (Dr) Mustapha Bin Abd Hamid
Tan Thiam Chai
Non-Independent Non-Executive
Directors
Datin Chee Yoke Kuan
Wan Nor Aida Binti Wan Azmi
Independent Non-Executive
Directors
AUDIT AND RISK
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
Datin Chee Yoke Kuan
Chairman
Wan Nor Aida Binti Wan Azmi
Tan Thiam Chai
NOMINATION COMMITTEE
Datin Chee Yoke Kuan
Chairman
Wan Nor Aida Binti Wan Azmi
Tan Thiam Chai
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
Wan Nor Aida Binti Wan Azmi
Chairman
Datin Chee Yoke Kuan
Tan Thiam Chai
SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE
Datin Chee Yoke Kuan
Chairman
Dato' Sydney Lawrance Quays
Dato' (Dr) Mustapha Bin Abd Hamid
Tan Thiam Chai
COMPANY SECRETARIES
Tham Lai Heng Michelle
(SSM Practising Certificate No.
202008001622)
(MAICSA No. 7013702)
Wong Siew Guek
(SSM Practising Certificate No.
202008001490)
(MAICSA No. 7042922)
Wong Poo Tyng
(SSM Practising Certificate No.
202008001580)
(MAICSA No. 7056052)
SHARE REGISTRAR
Berjaya Registration Services Sdn Bhd
[Registration No. 199401008064
(293743-X)]
09-27, Level 9
Berjaya Times Square
No. 1, Jalan Imbi
55100 Kuala Lumpur
Tel : 03-2145 0533
Fax : 03-2145 9702
Email : shareg@berjayareg.com.my
AUDITORS
Ernst & Young PLT
202006000003
(LLP0022760-LCA) & AF 0039
Chartered Accountants
Level 23A, Menara Milenium
Jalan Damanlela
Pusat Bandar Damansara
50490 Kuala Lumpur
Tel : 03-7495 8000
Fax : 03-2095 5332
REGISTERED OFFICE
Lot 13-01A, Level 13 (East Wing)
Berjaya Times Square
No. 1, Jalan Imbi
55100 Kuala Lumpur
Tel : 03-2149 1999
Fax : 03-2143 1685
Email : cosec@berjaya.com.my
PRINCIPAL BANKERS
AmBank (M) Berhad
Malayan Banking Berhad
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
Main Market of Bursa Malaysia
Securities Berhad

www.berjayafood.com/berjaya-food-international-expands-into-the-nordic-market-through-operating-rights-for-starbucks-coffee-company-retail-stores/

https://berjayafood.com/berjaya-food-international-expands-into-the-nordic-market-through-operating-rights-for-starbucks-coffee-company-retail-stores/

Berikut adalah sebab-sebab mengapa ahli keluarga diraja mungkin bekerja atau memiliki saham dalam BJFood (Berjaya Food Berhad):

Perkongsian Perniagaan Strategik: Ahli keluarga diraja sering terlibat dalam perniagaan atau pelaburan strategik untuk mendapatkan prestij dan akses kepada rangkaian perniagaan yang luas. Contoh: D Johor (pegang 1.28% saham), mungkin merujuk kepada entiti yang dikaitkan dengan keluarga diraja Johor.

Pemeliharaan Kekayaan dan Diversifikasi: Ahli keluarga diraja mempunyai kekayaan yang besar dan sering melabur dalam pelbagai sektor untuk memelihara kekayaan dan diversifikasi portfolio mereka. Contoh: Detik Ria Sdn Bhd (pegang 3.16% saham), mungkin dikaitkan dengan tokoh diraja.

Tanggungjawab Sosial dan Kemanusiaan: Keluarga diraja mungkin terlibat dalam perniagaan untuk memajukan ekonomi dan mencipta peluang pekerjaan di negara ini. Pelaburan atau pekerjaan dalam syarikat seperti BJFood selari dengan imej mereka sebagai penyumbang kepada masyarakat.

Membina Legasi dan Pengaruh: Keluarga diraja sering melabur dalam perniagaan untuk meninggalkan legasi jangka panjang dan pengaruh dalam ekonomi negara. Melibatkan diri dalam perniagaan seperti BJFood membolehkan mereka memberi kesan positif pada ekonomi.

Hubungan Keluarga dan Rangkaian Sosial: Keputusan perniagaan sering dipengaruhi oleh hubungan sosial dan rangkaian. Keluarga diraja mempunyai akses kepada hubungan perniagaan tinggi dan mudah untuk terlibat dalam pelaburan atau perkongsian dengan syarikat seperti BJFood.

Pengaruh Budaya atau Kawasan: Keluarga diraja mungkin mempunyai minat budaya atau kawasan tempatan dalam pelaburan mereka. Ahli keluarga diraja Johor, misalnya, mungkin melabur dalam BJFood kerana syarikat ini beroperasi di Malaysia, khususnya di Johor.

Hubungan Peribadi dengan Pengurusan: Sesetengah ahli keluarga diraja mungkin mempunyai hubungan peribadi dengan pasukan pengurusan atau pemilik syarikat. Ini boleh menyebabkan mereka dilantik dalam peranan penasihat atau memiliki saham melalui hubungan peribadi.

Kesimpulannya, pelaburan keluarga diraja dalam BJFood boleh dijelaskan melalui faktor seperti pelaburan strategik, pemeliharaan kekayaan, tanggungjawab sosial, membina legasi, dan hubungan peribadi.

Here’s a summary of the likely reasons behind the surge in **BJFood’s** share price:

- **Strong Financial Performance**: Positive earnings reports, revenue growth, and increased profit margins can boost investor confidence.
- **Brand and Market Expansion**: Growth of BJFood’s brands (e.g., Kenny Rogers Roasters, Starbucks) or expansion into new markets.
- **Strategic Partnerships/Acquisitions**: Announcements of new partnerships, joint ventures, or acquisitions can lead to higher stock prices.
- **Favorable Industry Trends**: Positive trends in the food and beverage industry or increased consumer demand for dining services.
- **Takeover/Merger Speculation**: Speculation about a potential buyout or merger, leading to price appreciation.
- **Higher Dividend Prospects**: Expectations of higher dividend payouts or stable, reliable income for investors.
- **Positive Market Sentiment**: Strong broader market conditions or favorable investor sentiment towards the stock.
- **Effective Leadership**: Changes in management or successful strategic initiatives that signal future growth.
- **Reduced Share Supply (Low Free Float)**: Limited share availability due to low free float, which can drive price increases with higher demand.
- **Government Support**: Policies or regulations benefiting the food and beverage sector may positively affect BJFood.
- **Investor Speculation**: Traders or investors betting on BJFood’s potential, leading to short-term price increases.
- **Improved Consumer Sentiment**: Recovery in consumer spending or a shift in preferences towards BJFood’s offerings.

These factors, individually or combined, could contribute to a surge in BJFood’s stock price.

Ownership Breakdown
State or Government 2.74%48,480,000 shares
Individual Insiders 3.03%53,730,485 sharesPrivate Companies 9.4%166,469,300 sharesInstitutions 11.1%196,026,163 sharesGeneral Public 18.2%322,422,181 sharesPublic Companies 55.6%984,682,995 shares

The **low free float** of BJFood's shares (less than 20%) is primarily due to several factors that often shape the ownership structure of companies like **Berjaya Food Berhad**:

### 1. **Majority Ownership by a Single Shareholder (Berjaya Corporation Berhad)**
The largest shareholder, **Berjaya Corporation Berhad**, holds a dominant 52.8% of BJFood. This concentration of ownership means that a significant portion of the company’s shares is not available for public trading, as it is held by one or a few large entities. A low free float typically indicates a high level of control by major shareholders, which is common in family-controlled or closely-held companies.

### 2. **Strategic Control**
Many large institutional and corporate investors, such as Berjaya Corporation, prefer to maintain control of the company. This often results in fewer shares being available for public trading. The majority shareholder may have a long-term strategic vision for BJFood, where they prefer to keep the shareholding structure relatively stable and avoid diluting control by releasing more shares into the market.

### 3. **Ownership by Government and Social Funds**
A significant portion of BJFood's shares is also held by **government-related funds** like **Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial** and the **Human Resources Development Fund**. These funds often invest in companies for long-term purposes, such as ensuring pension funds and social security are financially secure. These long-term investors do not typically sell shares frequently, further reducing the free float.

### 4. **Stable Institutional Investment**
Institutional investors, including **Norges Bank Investment Management**, **Citigroup**, and others, hold sizeable stakes in the company. These investors tend to buy shares with a long-term perspective, rather than trading frequently. Their holdings are less likely to be sold or traded on the open market, contributing to the low free float.

### 5. **Lack of Share Issuances**
Companies may issue additional shares (through public offerings or secondary listings) to increase the free float, but this often depends on the company’s strategy and capital requirements. BJFood has not had significant secondary offerings, keeping the number of shares available for trading low.

### 6. **Low Retail Investor Participation**
Retail investors may not hold a significant portion of the shares, as many of the stakes are concentrated in large institutional or corporate hands. The retail investor participation in BJFood could be limited by factors such as the company's focus on institutional investors or the perceived value of the shares.

### 7. **Ownership Structure**
The ownership structure of BJFood seems heavily concentrated among a few large entities, with the top 25 shareholders owning over 81% of the company. This high concentration naturally limits the number of shares available for trading in the open market. As a result, the free float remains quite low, making the company less accessible for smaller, individual investors.

### 8. **Company Strategy: Maintaining Control**
The ownership concentration also suggests that BJFood's management and its major shareholders may be prioritizing maintaining control over the company. A low free float helps prevent hostile takeovers, provides more influence over strategic decisions, and reduces the impact of market volatility.

### Conclusion:
The low free float of BJFood's shares (less than 20%) is primarily due to the concentrated ownership by **Berjaya Corporation** and other large institutional investors, as well as the company's strategic intent to maintain control. This structure is typical for companies that are family-controlled or heavily influenced by major institutional investors, where long-term stability and governance are prioritized over a larger, more liquid share base available for trading.

Top companies and institutional investors have likely held onto their investments in **BJFood (Berjaya Food Berhad)** for the long term for several reasons:

### 1. **Stability and Resilience of the Food & Beverage Industry**
The food and beverage sector is generally less volatile compared to other industries like technology or energy. Regardless of economic cycles, people need food, which provides a consistent demand for BJFood's products. The company is also likely involved in both popular and established brands (e.g., **Kenny Rogers Roasters**, **Starbucks Malaysia**), which offer predictable, stable revenue streams.

### 2. **Strong Corporate Governance and Backing**
With **Berjaya Corporation Berhad** being the largest shareholder (52.8%), the company has strong corporate backing. Berjaya Corporation is a diversified conglomerate with a long history of managing its investments well, which can give investors confidence in the long-term potential of BJFood. This corporate stability may be a key factor in the decision of major institutional investors to retain their shares.

### 3. **Brand Value and Market Position**
BJFood operates well-known brands like **Kenny Rogers Roasters** and **Starbucks** (under franchise in Malaysia). These brands have strong customer loyalty, which translates to reliable and predictable revenue. Brands with established consumer recognition often show resilience and long-term value, making them attractive to long-term investors.

### 4. **Growth Prospects**
BJFood has the potential to grow both domestically and internationally, particularly with a strong franchise model like Starbucks. Additionally, the company may look for new expansion opportunities, product diversification, or innovations within the food service industry. Institutional investors tend to retain holdings in companies they believe will continue to grow in the long run.

### 5. **Strategic Partnerships and Synergies**
Shareholders such as **7-Eleven Malaysia Holdings Berhad** and **Sports Toto Berhad** might see strategic synergies between BJFood and their other business operations, which could enhance long-term returns. For instance, joint marketing, distribution agreements, or cross-promotion of brands could provide mutual benefits, encouraging long-term hold on the stock.

### 6. **Dividend Income**
Many institutional investors, including government funds like **Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial (SOCSO)** and the **Human Resources Development Fund**, are focused on stable income streams for their beneficiaries. BJFood may provide attractive dividend payouts, which make it a good long-term holding for investors looking for income-generating assets.

### 7. **Favorable Long-Term Outlook**
BJFood’s consistent performance and positioning in the market suggest a solid future, especially as the company adapts to consumer trends, such as increasing demand for healthier food options, delivery services, and greater digital engagement. Investors with a long-term perspective often prefer companies that can adapt to changing market conditions and continue to grow over time.

### 8. **Reduced Risk from Institutional Investors**
Large institutional investors are often less inclined to engage in short-term speculation. Their primary goal is to invest in companies with a solid track record, stable management, and predictable returns. BJFood fits this profile, and many of these investors may be happy to hold their shares long term while enjoying consistent returns.

### 9. **Strategic Long-Term Value**
Holding investments in a company like BJFood may also provide long-term strategic value to its shareholders. Companies such as **Citigroup Inc.** and **Dimensional Fund Advisors LP** may not be focused on short-term price fluctuations but rather on the long-term potential of the company, including its ability to maintain a dominant position in the food and beverage sector.

### Conclusion:
In essence, BJFood’s stability, strong market position, brand recognition, growth prospects, and dividend potential make it an attractive investment for long-term holders. Investors likely believe that the company will continue to perform steadily, generate consistent revenue, and adapt to changing market conditions, thus ensuring long-term value for their portfolios.

The high level of investment in **BJFood (Berjaya Food Berhad)** by top companies and institutions, as reflected by the significant ownership of the top 25 shareholders (81.8% of the company), can be attributed to several factors:

1. **Strong Corporate Backing**: The largest shareholder, **Berjaya Corporation Berhad**, which holds 52.8% of the company, is itself a major diversified corporation. This indicates that BJFood is likely a strategic asset for Berjaya, and its continued support might signal long-term growth potential, stability, and influence in the food and beverage sector.

2. **Growth Potential and Market Stability**: BJFood operates in the food and beverage sector, a typically resilient industry with steady demand. Investors, particularly institutions such as **Norges Bank Investment Management** and **Public Mutual Bhd.**, may see BJFood as a stable, income-generating asset with consistent growth prospects.

3. **Diversification of Investment Portfolios**: Many institutional investors such as **Citigroup Inc.**, **Dimensional Fund Advisors**, and **Inter-Pacific Asset Management** may have invested in BJFood as part of a diversification strategy to reduce risk while ensuring exposure to stable, well-performing companies in the consumer sector.

4. **Attractive Returns and Brand Strength**: Companies like **7-Eleven Malaysia Holdings Berhad** and **Sports Toto Berhad** have significant shares, suggesting they may benefit from mutual business partnerships or collaboration opportunities. Additionally, BJFood may have a strong brand portfolio (e.g., Kenny Rogers Roasters, Starbucks in Malaysia) that appeals to investors seeking growth and innovation in the food sector.

5. **Government and Social Fund Investments**: The presence of government-related funds like **Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial** (Social Security Organization) and the **Human Resources Development Fund** indicates that BJFood is viewed as a reliable, long-term investment that aligns with social responsibility goals, particularly in terms of supporting stable employment and providing steady returns for pension and welfare funds.

6. **Long-term Investment Strategy**: Many of these institutional investors have a long-term investment outlook, which suits BJFood’s profile as a company with established brands, a strong market presence, and significant potential for steady, incremental growth.

In summary, the significant investment in BJFood reflects its strong market positioning, solid growth prospects, and appeal as a stable, income-generating asset in the food and beverage sector. This can attract a wide range of institutional and individual investors aiming to diversify their portfolios and ensure long-term returns.

Mau beli cepat beli... very thin free float ya hehe

Top 25 shareholders own 81.8% of the company
Ownership Name Shares Current Value Change % Portfolio %
52.8%

Berjaya Corporation Berhad
935,293,759 RM 332.0m -7.7% no data
4.9%

Human Resources Development Fund
86,900,400 RM 30.8m 1% no data
4.06%

Inter-Pacific Asset Management Sdn. Bhd.
71,947,000 RM 25.5m 0% 14.12%
3.27%

Norges Bank Investment Management
57,849,900 RM 20.5m 0% no data
3.16%

Detik Ria Sdn Bhd
55,945,400 RM 19.9m 0% no data
2.74%

Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
48,480,000 RM 17.2m 1% no data
1.93%

Sports Toto Berhad
34,239,236 RM 12.2m 0% no data
1.86%

Citigroup Inc.,Banking and Securities Investments
32,893,399 RM 11.7m 0% no data
1.33%

Global Success Network Sdn Bhd
23,623,500 RM 8.4m -15.6% no data
1.31%

Boon Liat Lim
23,230,000 RM 8.2m 1% no data
1.28%

D Johor
22,725,000 RM 8.1m 1% no data
0.86%

7-Eleven Malaysia Holdings Berhad
15,150,000 RM 5.4m 1% no data
0.81%

Public Mutual Bhd.
14,410,000 RM 5.1m -74.6% 0.03%
0.46%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
8,063,829 RM 2.9m 1.24% no data
0.24%

Sydney Quays
4,332,900 RM 1.5m 0% no data
0.16%

KAF Investment Funds Bhd.
2,865,400 RM 1.0m 0% 0.15%
0.16%

Hong Leong Asset Management Bhd.
2,750,000 RM 976.3k 0% 0.03%
0.12%

BOS Wealth Management Malaysia Bhd.
2,175,000 RM 772.2k 0% 0.47%
0.12%

Thiam Tan
2,043,735 RM 725.5k 0% no data
0.065%

AmIslamic Funds Management Sdn Bhd
1,152,107 RM 409.0k 0% 0.6%
0.057%

AmFunds Management Berhad
1,016,740 RM 360.9k 0% 0.55%
0.046%

Mustapha Bin Hamid
813,050 RM 288.6k 0% no data
0.033%

Shazuddin Bin Tunku Sallehuddin
585,800 RM 207.9k 0% no data
0.033%

American Century Investment Management Inc
585,388 RM 207.8k 0% no data
0.014%

MIDF Amanah Asset Management Bhd.
250,000 RM 88.8k 0% 0.28%

VT let go 86m shares of bjfood at 37.5sen to friendly buddy, bringing in new biz or turnaround strategy... phew!!

[BJFOOD] Notice of Person Ceasing of Substantial Shareholders - DETIK RIA SDN BHD on 06-Dec-2024
Stock
[BJFOOD]: BERJAYA FOOD BERHAD
Announcement Date
06-Dec-2024
Director's Particular:
Name
DETIK RIA SDN BHD
Details of Changes:
Currency
-
Date of Change Type Number of Shares
05-Dec-2024 Disposed 86,000,000
Registered Name
Nature of Interest
Nature Interest
Direct Interest
Shares
Ordinary Shares
Reason
Beneficial Interest - Ceased as a Substantial Shareholder following the disposal of shares via direct business transaction

3 Tahap ramalan:

1. > 40sen
2. 40sen - 50sen
3. 50sen & above

Replacing a Starbucks outlet with a Paris Baguette outlet is a good idea in most cases, as the two concepts share similar layouts and operational models, minimizing the modifications needed. Paris Baguette focuses on bakery items, coffee, and light meals, making it a feasible transformation with only moderate changes. Here’s an analysis:

Advantages of Replacing Starbucks with Paris Baguette
1. Similar Business Model:
• Both brands operate as quick-service F&B outlets with a café-like ambiance.
• The existing infrastructure, such as counters, seating, and basic kitchen setups, aligns with Paris Baguette’s needs.
2. Minimal Renovation Needed:
• Starbucks’ design includes open layouts and display counters that are easily adaptable for showcasing Paris Baguette’s bakery items, cakes, and ready-to-eat meals.
3. Prime Locations:
• Starbucks outlets are located in high-traffic areas, which are ideal for Paris Baguette’s target audience of urban professionals, families, and tourists.
4. Customer Base Overlap:
• Both brands cater to customers seeking premium baked goods, coffee, and light meals, ensuring a smooth transition without drastically changing the target demographic.

What Modifications Might Be Needed?
1. Kitchen Upgrades:
• Starbucks outlets typically have a minimal kitchen setup focused on beverage preparation. Paris Baguette may require:
• Additional baking ovens for on-site bread and pastry production.
• Refrigerated display cases for cakes and desserts.
• Larger cold storage for ingredients like dairy and dough.
2. Interior Design and Branding:
• Paris Baguette’s brand identity focuses on a modern, chic, and slightly European aesthetic. Minor changes might include:
• Adding bakery display shelves and cases.
• Rebranding with Paris Baguette’s logo, signage, and color palette.
• Incorporating warm lighting and decorative accents for a premium bakery feel.
3. Seating Layout:
• While Starbucks often has more lounge-like seating, Paris Baguette may need a mix of small café tables and display-focused layouts to enhance customer flow and dining comfort.
4. Operational Adjustments:
• Paris Baguette’s emphasis on self-serve bakery items and ready-to-eat meals may require adding trays, tongs, and checkout stations tailored to this model.
5. Health and Safety Compliance:
• Upgrading the workspace to accommodate fresh baking and food preparation may require additional ventilation or grease traps.

Challenges
1. Baking vs. Heating:
• If the outlet intends to bake fresh goods on-site rather than rely on pre-prepared products, more significant kitchen upgrades may be required.
2. Cost of Rebranding:
• While not extensive, branding and décor changes could still add to the setup costs.
3. Target Market Fit:
• Consider whether the Starbucks location has sufficient foot traffic or demand for Paris Baguette’s premium bakery items and European-style offerings.

Why It Works Well
• Paris Baguette’s Hybrid Model (coffee + bakery + light meals) aligns well with Starbucks’ customer expectations.
• Minimal Disruption: The layout and infrastructure of a Starbucks outlet closely match Paris Baguette’s needs, reducing downtime during the transition.

Conclusion

Replacing a Starbucks outlet with a Paris Baguette is a smart move, especially in urban or high-traffic areas. The conversion process would involve moderate costs for kitchen upgrades and rebranding but offers high potential for success due to the similar target market and operational style.

Replacing a Starbucks outlet with a Kenny Rogers Roasters (KRR) outlet is feasible, but it would require moderate modifications due to differences in the business models and operational needs. Here’s an analysis:

Key Considerations for Transitioning to Kenny Rogers Roasters
1. Menu and Kitchen Requirements:
• Starbucks focuses on beverages, pastries, and light food preparation, which means the kitchen setup is minimal.
• KRR specializes in rotisserie chicken, hot meals, and sides, requiring more extensive kitchen facilities, including:
• Rotisserie ovens.
• Grills or fryers for side dishes.
• Larger food prep and storage areas (e.g., for fresh ingredients and sauces).
2. Ventilation and Safety:
• Starbucks outlets do not typically have heavy-duty exhaust systems needed for cooking operations. A new ventilation system may need to be installed to comply with health and safety regulations.
3. Seating and Layout:
• Starbucks outlets usually have a casual, flexible seating layout.
• KRR outlets often feature a more structured dining setup to accommodate families or groups. This might involve adding booths, larger tables, or a buffet-style serving area if applicable.
4. Branding and Interior Design:
• Starbucks’ minimalist and modern design would need to be rebranded with KRR’s signature warm, homey aesthetic, including:
• New color schemes (e.g., earthy tones and wood accents).
• Menu boards and promotional displays.
5. Utilities and Storage:
• Additional cold storage for raw chicken and fresh ingredients.
• Expanded freezer space for frozen items.
• Adjustments to the plumbing system for increased water usage.
6. Customer Flow:
• Starbucks is designed for quick-service and takeout, while KRR caters more to dine-in customers. Modifications to improve flow and comfort, such as dividing takeout and dine-in areas, may be needed.

Advantages of Using a Starbucks Location for Kenny Rogers
1. Prime Location:
Starbucks outlets are often located in high-traffic areas with strong visibility, which aligns well with KRR’s target audience.
2. Existing Infrastructure:
• Some existing features, such as counters, seating, and restrooms, can be reused or slightly modified, reducing setup costs.
3. Adaptable Space Size:
• Many Starbucks outlets are of adequate size to fit a mid-scale KRR restaurant.

Challenges and Costs
1. Renovation Costs:
• Moderate to significant investment is required for kitchen upgrades, ventilation systems, and rebranding.
2. Regulatory Approvals:
• Health, safety, and fire code compliance for full-scale food preparation could involve obtaining new permits.
3. Operational Shift:
• Training staff for a full-service restaurant versus a quick-service café involves additional time and resources.

Conclusion

It is possible to replace a Starbucks outlet with a Kenny Rogers Roasters outlet, but it will require:
• Kitchen and ventilation upgrades.
• A shift in layout to suit dine-in operations.
• Rebranding to match KRR’s identity.

The transition is cost-effective in high-traffic areas with a customer base suited to both casual dining and takeaway. Proper planning and budgeting are essential for a smooth transformation.

Yes, Starbucks outlets can generally be replaced by other F&B businesses with slight modifications, depending on the type of business and its specific requirements. Here are some factors and considerations:

Advantages of Repurposing Starbucks Outlets
1. Prime Locations:
Starbucks outlets are usually situated in high-traffic, accessible areas, which can benefit other F&B businesses.
2. Existing Infrastructure:
• Kitchen Space: Starbucks outlets typically have basic kitchen setups (e.g., sinks, storage areas, and some appliances), which can be adapted for another F&B concept.
• Seating and Layout: The seating arrangements can often be retained or slightly modified for new themes.
• Utilities: Pre-installed water, electricity, HVAC, and plumbing systems reduce the cost of setting up.
3. Familiar Environment:
Customers are accustomed to the café-like ambiance, which suits many other casual dining or fast-casual concepts.

What Modifications Might Be Needed?
1. Menu-Specific Equipment:
• Starbucks equipment (e.g., coffee machines, blenders) may need to be replaced or supplemented with specialized equipment like ovens, grills, or fryers, depending on the cuisine.
2. Kitchen Layout:
• If the new F&B concept requires extensive cooking, the kitchen may need upgrades or a larger setup.
3. Interior Design:
• The space might need rebranding with new furniture, color schemes, and decor to align with the new business theme.
• For example, a bakery or dessert shop may require more display counters, while a casual dining restaurant might need more spacious seating.
4. Health and Safety Compliance:
• Depending on the type of food prepared, new ventilation, fire safety measures, or grease traps may be required.
5. Customer Flow:
• Modifications might be needed to optimize customer flow for table service, self-service, or takeout.
6. Storage and Inventory:
• Additional cold storage or dry storage may be required for businesses offering a broader menu.

Examples of Businesses That Can Replace Starbucks Outlets
1. Cafés and Bakeries:
• Minimal changes needed to introduce pastries, cakes, or a wider beverage menu.
2. Fast Casual or Quick Service Restaurants:
• Sandwich shops, salad bars, or poke bowl outlets can easily adapt the space.
3. Dessert or Specialty Drink Shops:
• Ice cream parlors, bubble tea shops, or smoothie bars.
4. Ethnic Cuisine:
• Light modifications can make room for ramen shops, taco bars, or small-scale Italian delis.
5. Hybrid Spaces:
• F&B businesses combined with retail, such as wine and cheese shops, or bookstores with cafés.

Challenges to Consider
1. Local Regulations:
• Some modifications might require permits, especially for major kitchen upgrades.
2. Brand Perception:
• Starbucks’ premium and casual brand positioning may not align with all F&B concepts.
3. Cost of Renovation:
• While slight modifications are feasible, extensive rebranding or kitchen upgrades can increase costs.
4. Foot Traffic vs. Customer Type:
• Analyze whether the existing location’s demographics align with the target audience for the new concept.

In conclusion, with thoughtful planning and minor adjustments, Starbucks outlets can be repurposed for various F&B concepts, particularly those requiring a café-style layout or minimal cooking.

Starbucks outlets are often used for various purposes beyond being just a café, thanks to their comfortable environment, free Wi-Fi, and welcoming atmosphere. Here are some common alternative uses:
1. Workplace or Study Space:
Many people use Starbucks as a coworking space or study area due to the availability of seating, power outlets, and internet access.
2. Meeting Place:
It serves as a neutral ground for casual business meetings, interviews, or brainstorming sessions.
3. Event Hosting:
Some Starbucks outlets can host small-scale events, workshops, or book clubs, depending on the store’s policy and layout.
4. Community Gathering Spot:
People often gather there for social meetups, such as hobby groups, networking events, or informal discussions.
5. Temporary Resting Spot:
Travelers or shoppers often use Starbucks to rest, recharge, and refresh during their day.
6. Remote Teaching or Consulting:
Tutors, consultants, or professionals might use the space for one-on-one sessions.
7. Content Creation Hub:
Bloggers, vloggers, and content creators sometimes use Starbucks as a location for shooting casual lifestyle videos or photos.
8. Art and Creativity Zone:
Artists and writers often use Starbucks as a space to sketch, write, or work on creative projects.
9. Local Marketing Platform:
Some Starbucks stores allow local businesses or individuals to leave flyers or business cards for promotions.
10. Cultural Exchange:
Language learners and cultural exchange groups may gather for conversational practice.

If you’re planning a specific activity at a Starbucks, it’s good to check with the store management to ensure they allow it.

Can tie up with this as an alternative

The second biggest café chain from China is likely Manner Coffee.

Founded in Shanghai in 2015, Manner Coffee has grown rapidly, gaining popularity for its high-quality coffee at affordable prices. It focuses on small-format stores, often kiosks, which are efficient and cost-effective. Manner Coffee has attracted a loyal following, particularly among urban professionals, and is known for its minimalist aesthetic and sustainability initiatives, such as offering discounts for customers who bring their own cups.

Manner Coffee continues to expand aggressively in major Chinese cities, competing closely with Luckin Coffee and Starbucks.

Explore others, the world is so big

@VIinvestor
but hextar industries is bringing in Luckin coffee alrdy. https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/735986
1 hour ago

Wait n See

In Malaysia, Berjaya Food, which is a major operator of Starbucks outlets in the region, has reportedly been considering converting some temporarily closed Starbucks stores into locations for foreign brands. This move is part of an effort to maximize the potential of these retail spaces during periods when Starbucks outlets might be temporarily closed.

Such a strategy could help maintain profitability by diversifying offerings and bringing in different brands that might appeal to local customers. However, it remains to be seen which foreign brands might be introduced into these spaces, and the exact impact on Starbucks' overall operations in Malaysia.

This kind of adaptation is not unusual in retail, as brands explore different ways to stay competitive and responsive to changes in customer preferences and market conditions.

It's possible that Luckin Coffee, the Chinese coffee chain, could be one of the foreign brands considered to occupy temporarily closed Starbucks outlets in Malaysia, though there hasn't been an official announcement yet. Luckin Coffee has been expanding rapidly in international markets since its launch in 2017. Known for its tech-savvy approach, like mobile ordering and delivery, Luckin has made a name for itself by offering high-quality coffee at competitive prices.

If Berjaya Food decides to introduce Luckin Coffee in place of Starbucks outlets, it would align with the growing popularity of coffee brands beyond Starbucks, especially in markets like Malaysia, where consumers are increasingly open to trying new brands. Luckin's innovative business model could also resonate with the tech-driven Malaysian market, offering a unique alternative to the traditional coffeehouse experience.

However, this is speculative, and further details would be needed to confirm if Luckin Coffee or another foreign brand will take over these spaces.

dah dapat mandat untuk buat share buyback, lakukan semua hehe

BERJAYA FOOD BERHAD

Subject CIRCULAR/STATEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS IN RELATION TO:- PART A PROPOSED RENEWAL OF AND NEW SHAREHOLDERS' MANDATE FOR RECURRENT RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS OF A REVENUE OR TRADING NATURE PART B PROPOSED RENEWAL OF AUTHORITY FOR THE COMPANY TO PURCHASE ITS OWN SHARES


Please refer attachment below.
Attachments

BFood- Circular or Statement dated 28 October 2024.pdf
471.8 kB

Announcement Info
Company Name BERJAYA FOOD BERHAD
Stock Name BJFOOD
Date Announced 28 Oct 2024
Category Document Submission
Reference Number DCS-22102024-00001

86mil shares sold to friendly party at 37.5sen direct deal pulak...

History
Date Price Change Dir-Volume Day Volume Dir-Value Day Value Avg Price % of Total Share Remarks
05/12/2024 00:00:00 0.3750 -0.0100 86.000m 86.000m 32.250m 32.250m 0.3750 4.4156 -

###[BJFOOD] Notice of Person Ceasing of Substantial Shareholders - DETIK RIA SDN BHD on 06-Dec-2024
Stock
[BJFOOD]: BERJAYA FOOD BERHAD
Announcement Date
06-Dec-2024
Director's Particular:
Name
DETIK RIA SDN BHD
Details of Changes:
Currency
-
Date of Change Type Number of Shares
05-Dec-2024 Disposed 86,000,000
Registered Name
Nature of Interest
Nature Interest
Direct Interest
Shares
Ordinary Shares
Reason
Beneficial Interest - Ceased as a Substantial Shareholder following the disposal of shares via direct business transaction

volatility ada, kecairan pun ada.. all the best ya!

30-days Price
Date Price Open High Low Volume
2024-12-10 0.355 0.355 0.360 0.350 1,202,100
2024-12-09 0.355 0.375 0.385 0.355 6,689,000
2024-12-06 0.375 0.380 0.385 0.370 2,183,000
2024-12-05 0.385 0.385 0.385 0.375 1,048,300
2024-12-04 0.385 0.370 0.385 0.365 1,971,500
2024-12-03 0.370 0.355 0.370 0.355 1,691,100
2024-12-02 0.355 0.355 0.365 0.350 1,423,800
2024-11-29 0.355 0.385 0.390 0.355 6,373,600
2024-11-28 0.390 0.390 0.390 0.380 872,400
2024-11-27 0.390 0.380 0.395 0.375 2,088,200
2024-11-26 0.380 0.375 0.385 0.370 1,884,900
2024-11-25 0.375 0.375 0.385 0.370 1,938,300
2024-11-22 0.380 0.380 0.385 0.370 2,257,500
2024-11-21 0.380 0.360 0.385 0.355 4,261,300
2024-11-20 0.360 0.350 0.360 0.340 7,925,000
2024-11-19 0.350 0.345 0.350 0.335 8,494,200
2024-11-18 0.345 0.365 0.370 0.345 9,276,400
2024-11-15 0.375 0.405 0.405 0.355 10,729,700
2024-11-14 0.410 0.430 0.435 0.410 5,944,200
2024-11-13 0.440 0.490 0.490 0.440 5,068,600
2024-11-12 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.465 6,665,200
2024-11-11 0.500 0.520 0.525 0.495 6,917,000
2024-11-08 0.530 0.510 0.530 0.500 5,875,500
2024-11-07 0.510 0.525 0.525 0.490 9,690,500
2024-11-06 0.525 0.520 0.525 0.515 4,590,600
2024-11-05 0.520 0.505 0.520 0.495 3,462,400
2024-11-04 0.505 0.485 0.505 0.475 12,292,700
2024-11-01 0.485 0.440 0.485 0.430 6,023,200
2024-10-30 0.440 0.415 0.440 0.410 3,464,200
2024-10-29 0.415 0.420 0.420 0.400 3,045,500
2024-10-28 0.420 0.420 0.425 0.405 3,414,200
2024-10-25 0.420 0.435 0.435 0.420 2,010,800
2024-10-24 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.410 2,583,200
2024-10-23 0.435 0.435 0.440 0.430 354,000
2024-10-22 0.435 0.435 0.445 0.430 669,600
2024-10-21 0.440 0.435 0.440 0.435 259,600
2024-10-18 0.440 0.445 0.445 0.430 823,800
2024-10-17 0.440 0.435 0.440 0.430 809,300
2024-10-16 0.435 0.430 0.435 0.425 333,500
2024-10-15 0.435 0.445 0.445 0.415 1,659,500
2024-10-14 0.445 0.450 0.450 0.440 1,442,500
2024-10-11 0.450 0.450 0.450 0.440 756,900
2024-10-10 0.450 0.440 0.450 0.435 1,674,000
2024-10-09 0.440 0.440 0.440 0.430 905,100
2024-10-08 0.440 0.440 0.445 0.430 954,900
2024-10-07 0.440 0.435 0.440 0.430 889,500
2024-10-04 0.440 0.445 0.445 0.420 1,630,700
2024-10-03 0.445 0.445 0.445 0.420 2,375,600
2024-10-02 0.440 0.425 0.450 0.425 2,941,500
2024-10-01 0.425 0.385 0.435 0.385 4,047,700
2024-09-30 0.390 0.385 0.390 0.375 1,676,300
2024-09-27 0.385 0.370 0.385 0.370 3,629,700
2024-09-26 0.370 0.360 0.380 0.360 2,795,200
2024-09-25 0.365 0.360 0.365 0.355 2,525,700
2024-09-24 0.360 0.350 0.360 0.350 1,895,600
2024-09-23 0.355 0.350 0.355 0.335 4,763,700
2024-09-20 0.350 0.360 0.365 0.340 8,238,800
2024-09-19 0.360 0.385 0.385 0.360 8,086,300
2024-09-18 0.390 0.375 0.390 0.340 6,775,000
2024-09-17 0.365 0.380 0.380 0.360 3,340,300
2024-09-13 0.375 0.420 0.420 0.370 7,987,900

Ignorance among certain segments of the population can contribute to situations like attacks or misunderstandings against businesses such as Starbucks or KK Marts for several reasons:

1. Lack of Education or Knowledge
• Some people may not fully understand the actual situation or may not have sufficient information about the business. A lack of education and knowledge on economic, political, or social issues causes them to be easily influenced by rumors, misinformation, or distorted narratives pushed by certain parties.
• Without a deeper understanding, they may accept false information and spread it to others, further escalating the situation.

2. Influence of Social Media
• Social media often serves as a primary source of information for many people, but it can also be a platform for spreading rumors and false information. This happens when individuals or groups manipulate public opinion by disseminating inaccurate stories.
• Without verifying or conducting further research, some people may easily believe and share false information, reinforcing negative perceptions of businesses or entities without basis.

3. Lack of Critical Thinking Skills
• Misunderstandings and attacks on businesses can occur due to a lack of critical thinking skills among some people. Without the ability to analyze, filter, and assess information objectively, they are more likely to believe what they hear without question.
• This situation can lead them to become trapped in false narratives and be easily swayed by rhetoric or unfounded claims made by certain parties, whether political or business-related.

4. Emotional and Sentimental Factors
• Situations like boycotts against Starbucks or KK Marts are often influenced by emotional sentiments, where some people act based on feelings of anger or dissatisfaction over a certain issue. When emotions dominate, rationality and logic are often set aside.
• Political or social issues involving national or cultural identity are often distorted to provoke anger, which then leads to actions against businesses or certain parties without justification.

5. Trust in Authorities or Leaders
• In some cases, people may place a high level of trust in leaders or authorities without questioning or critically assessing the information provided. When leaders or authorities make statements or push for certain actions, some individuals may follow them unquestioningly because they trust that authority.
• This trust can contribute to the spread of misinformation or unjustified actions against businesses or individuals.

Conclusion

Ignorance among some people in understanding issues more deeply, coupled with reliance on inaccurate information, contributes to situations where businesses or certain parties are attacked without solid foundation. Better education, critical thinking skills, and awareness of misinformation are key to addressing this issue and preventing misunderstandings from escalating.

Kejahilan segelintir rakyat boleh menyumbang kepada situasi seperti serangan atau salah faham terhadap perniagaan seperti Starbucks atau KK Marts kerana beberapa sebab:

1. Kurangnya Pendidikan atau Pengetahuan
• Sebahagian rakyat mungkin kurang memahami situasi sebenar atau tidak mempunyai maklumat yang mencukupi mengenai perniagaan tersebut. Kekurangan pendidikan dan pengetahuan mengenai isu-isu ekonomi, politik, atau sosial menyebabkan mereka mudah terpengaruh oleh khabar angin, misinformasi, atau naratif yang diputarbelitkan oleh pihak tertentu.
• Tanpa pemahaman yang mendalam, mereka mungkin menerima maklumat yang salah dan menyebarkannya kepada orang lain, memperburuk lagi keadaan.

2. Pengaruh Media Sosial
• Media sosial sering menjadi sumber utama maklumat bagi kebanyakan rakyat, namun ia juga boleh menjadi medan penyebaran khabar angin dan maklumat palsu. Kejadian ini berlaku apabila individu atau kumpulan tertentu menggunakan media sosial untuk memanipulasi pendapat awam dengan menyebarkan cerita yang tidak tepat.
• Tanpa melakukan verifikasi atau penyelidikan lanjut, segelintir rakyat mungkin mudah mempercayai dan mengongsikan maklumat palsu, yang akhirnya mengukuhkan persepsi negatif terhadap perniagaan atau pihak yang tidak berasas.

3. Ketiadaan Kemahiran Berfikir Kritis
• Kejadian salah faham dan serangan terhadap perniagaan boleh berlaku kerana kurangnya kemahiran berfikir kritis dalam kalangan sesetengah rakyat. Tanpa kemampuan untuk menganalisis, menyaring, dan menilai maklumat dengan objektif, mereka lebih cenderung untuk mempercayai apa yang mereka dengar tanpa soal.
• Keadaan ini boleh menyebabkan mereka terperangkap dalam naratif yang salah dan mudah terpengaruh oleh retorik atau dakwaan yang dibuat oleh pihak tertentu, sama ada berunsur politik atau perniagaan.

4. Faktor Emosi dan Sentimen
• Kejadian seperti boikot terhadap Starbucks atau KK Marts sering kali dipengaruhi oleh sentimen emosi, di mana segelintir rakyat bertindak berdasarkan perasaan marah atau tidak puas hati terhadap sesuatu isu. Ketika emosi menguasai, rasionaliti dan logik sering kali diketepikan.
• Isu politik atau sosial yang melibatkan negara atau identiti budaya sering kali diputarbelitkan untuk menimbulkan rasa marah, yang kemudiannya membawa kepada tindakan yang tidak berasas terhadap syarikat atau pihak tertentu.

5. Kepercayaan Terhadap Pihak Berkuasa atau Pemimpin
• Dalam sesetengah kes, rakyat mungkin meletakkan kepercayaan yang tinggi terhadap pemimpin atau pihak berkuasa tanpa mengkritik atau mempertanyakan maklumat yang diberikan. Apabila pemimpin atau pihak berkuasa mengeluarkan kenyataan atau mendesak tindakan tertentu, sesetengah rakyat mungkin tanpa soal melaksanakannya kerana mereka mempercayai otoriti tersebut.
• Kepercayaan ini boleh menjadi penyebab kepada penyebaran maklumat yang salah atau tindakan yang tidak berasas terhadap perniagaan atau individu tertentu.

Kesimpulan

Kejahilan segelintir rakyat dalam memahami isu dengan lebih mendalam, serta kebergantungan kepada maklumat yang tidak tepat, menyumbang kepada situasi di mana perniagaan atau pihak tertentu diserang tanpa asas yang kukuh. Pendidikan yang lebih baik, kemahiran berfikir kritis, dan kesedaran terhadap misinformasi adalah kunci untuk mengatasi masalah ini dan mencegah salah faham daripada berlarutan.

Kes KK Marts di Malaysia, seperti Starbucks, mungkin melibatkan dinamik yang serupa dari segi pengaruh politik atau sosial, pendapat awam, dan kepentingan ekonomi. Berikut adalah beberapa sebab mengapa KK Marts mungkin menghadapi serangan atau taktik negatif, sama seperti yang berlaku pada Starbucks:

1. Persaingan Ekonomi
• KK Marts, sebagai rangkaian kedai serbaneka tempatan, mungkin menghadapi cabaran politik atau perniagaan daripada pesaing yang lebih besar atau mereka yang merasa terancam dengan pertumbuhannya dan kejayaannya. Sama seperti syarikat multinasional, perniagaan tempatan yang berkembang pesat boleh dianggap sebagai pesaing kepada perniagaan atau kumpulan politik yang mempunyai kepentingan dalam pasaran tempatan.
• Terdapat kemungkinan usaha untuk merosakkan reputasi KK Marts bagi mengurangkan bahagian pasaran atau pengaruhnya, terutamanya jika ia mengganggu hubungan perniagaan sedia ada atau monopoli tempatan.

2. Politik dan Isu Tempatan
• Sama seperti politikasi jenama global seperti Starbucks, perniagaan tempatan seperti KK Marts boleh menjadi sasaran di Malaysia disebabkan oleh faktor politik dan sosial. Isu seperti pemilikan, keputusan pengurusan, atau afiliasi boleh diputarbelitkan untuk selaras dengan atau menentang agenda politik tertentu.
• Sebagai contoh, jika terdapat tanggapan bahawa KK Marts mendapat manfaat daripada dasar yang menguntungkan satu parti atau kumpulan politik, pihak yang lain mungkin cuba menggunakan ini untuk mendiskreditkan atau menyerang jenama tersebut.

3. Misinformasi dan Khabar Angin
• Sama seperti Starbucks, KK Marts boleh menjadi subjek khabar angin atau misinformasi, terutamanya di platform media sosial. Dakwaan palsu mengenai amalan, afiliasi, atau niat syarikat mungkin disebarkan, sama ada dengan niat jahat atau sebagai sebahagian daripada persaingan politik atau perniagaan.
• Ini mungkin termasuk dakwaan yang mengelirukan mengenai hubungan syarikat dengan individu politik, pelabur, atau impaknya terhadap ekonomi tempatan.

4. Perbezaan Budaya dan Ideologi
• Di Malaysia, seperti di banyak negara lain, perniagaan boleh menjadi simbol bagi perjuangan ideologi atau budaya yang lebih besar. Jika KK Marts dilihat bersekutu dengan kumpulan atau ideologi politik tertentu, ia boleh menarik sokongan dan tentangan berdasarkan persepsi tersebut.
• Sebagai contoh, jika KK Marts memperkenalkan amalan, produk, atau perkhidmatan baharu yang dilihat terlalu “barat” atau bertentangan dengan norma budaya tempatan, beberapa kumpulan mungkin menggunakan ini sebagai bahan kritikan.

5. Nasionalisme Tempatan dan Identiti Negara
• Sama seperti bagaimana syarikat multinasional menghadapi kritikan kerana dikawal oleh pihak asing, perniagaan tempatan juga boleh disiasat kerana pemilikan, pembiayaan, atau pengurusan mereka jika dilihat mendapat manfaat daripada pelaburan atau hubungan asing.
• Beberapa kumpulan politik atau sosial mungkin mengeksploitasi sentimen ini untuk mendapatkan sokongan dengan membentangkan perniagaan tempatan sebagai “patriotik” atau “tidak patriotik” berdasarkan hubungan mereka dengan entiti asing atau pengaruh mereka terhadap komuniti tempatan.

Kesimpulan

Sama seperti Starbucks, perniagaan tempatan seperti KK Marts di Malaysia boleh menjadi sasaran serangan politik, sosial, atau ekonomi atas sebab-sebab yang berkaitan dengan persaingan, misinformasi, atau perbezaan ideologi. Dalam kedua-dua kes, serangan ini sering dipacu oleh faktor luar seperti agenda politik, persaingan perniagaan, atau sentimen budaya, dan bukannya fakta atau amalan sebenar perniagaan tersebut.

The case of KK Marts in Malaysia, like Starbucks, could involve similar dynamics in terms of political or social influences, public opinion, and economic interests. Here are some possible reasons why KK Marts may face attacks or negative tactics, similar to what happens with Starbucks:

1. Economic Competition
• KK Marts, as a local chain of convenience stores, may face political or business challenges from larger competitors or those who feel threatened by its growth and success. Just like multinational companies, local businesses that expand rapidly can be seen as rivals to other businesses or political groups with vested interests in the local market.
• There could be attempts to undermine KK Marts to reduce its market share or influence, especially if it disrupts existing business relationships or local monopolies.

2. Politicization and Local Issues
• Similar to the politicization of global brands like Starbucks, local businesses like KK Marts can become targets in Malaysia due to political and social factors. Issues such as ownership, management decisions, or affiliations may be twisted to align with or oppose certain political agendas.
• For example, if there’s a perception that KK Marts is benefiting from policies favorable to one political party or group, other factions may seek to use this to discredit or attack the brand.

3. Misinformation and Rumors
• Just like Starbucks, KK Marts could become the subject of rumors or misinformation, especially on social media platforms. False claims regarding the company’s practices, affiliations, or intentions might be spread, either out of malice or as part of a political or business rivalry.
• This could include misleading claims about the company’s connections with certain political figures, financial backers, or its impact on local economies.

4. Cultural and Ideological Differences
• In Malaysia, as in many other countries, businesses can become symbols of larger ideological or cultural struggles. If KK Marts is perceived to be aligned with a particular group or political ideology, it could attract both support and opposition based on those perceptions.
• For example, if KK Marts introduces new practices, products, or services that are seen as too “westernized” or contrary to local cultural norms, some groups might attempt to use this as a point of criticism.

5. Local Nationalism and National Identity
• Just like how multinational corporations face criticism for being foreign-controlled, local businesses can also be scrutinized for their ownership, funding, or management if they are seen to be benefiting from foreign investments or connections.
• Some political or social groups may exploit these sentiments to gain support by presenting local businesses as either “patriotic” or “unpatriotic” based on their connections to foreign entities or their influence on local communities.

Conclusion

Just like Starbucks, local businesses such as KK Marts in Malaysia can be subject to political, social, or economic attacks for reasons related to competition, misinformation, or ideological differences. In both cases, these attacks are often fueled by external factors such as political agendas, business rivalries, or cultural sentiments, rather than facts or the actual practices of the businesses themselves.

There are several reasons why some politicians might engage in what is considered “dirty tactics” against Starbucks. Here are a few factors that may influence such actions:

1. Economic and Political Influence
• Starbucks, as a large multinational corporation, holds significant economic power. Some politicians may feel threatened by this influence, especially if they perceive large companies as competitors to their own economic or political interests.
• Opposing a company like Starbucks can be a strategy to gain support from certain groups who may have negative views towards multinational corporations.

2. Politicization of Social and Economic Issues
• Starbucks is often involved in social issues such as environmental sustainability, social justice, and ethical sourcing. Some politicians may target the company to highlight certain issues, even if they are based on misunderstandings or misrepresentations of facts.
• For example, issues like boycotting products or allegations of support for certain political movements are sometimes used by individuals seeking to leverage social sentiment for political gain.

3. Misinformation and Manipulation of Public Opinion
• Some politicians may use false or incomplete information to manipulate public perceptions of Starbucks, hoping to benefit from their political agenda. This misinformation can be spread through social media or public speeches.
• Issues related to Israel-Palestine, for instance, are often misinterpreted and used to attack companies perceived to have ties with Israel, even though Starbucks is not involved in politics related to this conflict.

4. Boicot Strategy as a Fear of Progress
• Starbucks is known for its progressive social and economic initiatives, which may be seen as a challenge to the status quo or traditional interests in some communities or countries. Attacking Starbucks can be part of an effort to halt the changes or progress that the company represents.

5. Political and Ideological Polarization
• In some situations, Starbucks also becomes a symbol for certain ideologies, such as liberalism or globalism. For some politicians representing more conservative views, attacking Starbucks can be seen as a way to solidify support from more conservative or nationalist voters.

Conclusion

Politicians engaging in “dirty tactics” against Starbucks can be driven by various factors, including a desire to control the political narrative, oppose large companies with global influence, or exploit public sentiment for political or social reasons. However, these accusations are often not based on accurate facts and are more likely driven by specific political or social agendas.

Terdapat beberapa sebab mengapa segelintir ahli politik mungkin terlibat dalam tindakan yang dianggap “main kotor” terhadap Starbucks. Berikut adalah beberapa faktor yang mungkin mempengaruhi tindak-tanduk tersebut:

1. Sumber Pengaruh Ekonomi dan Politik
• Starbucks, sebagai syarikat multinasional yang besar, memiliki pengaruh ekonomi yang kuat. Sesetengah ahli politik mungkin merasa terancam dengan pengaruh ini, terutama jika mereka melihat syarikat besar sebagai pesaing kepada kepentingan ekonomi atau politik mereka sendiri.
• Tindakan menentang syarikat seperti Starbucks boleh menjadi strategi untuk menarik sokongan daripada golongan tertentu yang mungkin mempunyai pendapat negatif terhadap syarikat multinasional.

2. Isu Politisasi Isu Sosial dan Ekonomi
• Starbucks sering terlibat dalam isu sosial, seperti kelestarian alam sekitar, keadilan sosial, dan sumber etika. Beberapa ahli politik mungkin menggunakan syarikat ini sebagai sasaran untuk menarik perhatian terhadap isu-isu tertentu yang sedang dibangkitkan, walaupun ada yang berasaskan salah faham atau penyelewengan fakta.
• Misalnya, isu seperti boikot produk atau dakwaan tentang sokongan terhadap politik tertentu kadang-kadang digunakan oleh pihak yang ingin memanfaatkan sentimen sosial untuk kepentingan politik.

3. Misinformasi dan Manipulasi Opini Awam
• Sesetengah ahli politik mungkin menggunakan maklumat yang salah atau tidak lengkap untuk memanipulasi pandangan awam terhadap Starbucks, dengan harapan ia akan memberi manfaat kepada agenda politik mereka. Misinformasi ini boleh disebarkan melalui media sosial atau ceramah awam.
• Isu yang berhubung dengan Israel-Palestin, misalnya, seringkali disalah tafsir dan digunakan untuk menyerang syarikat-syarikat yang dianggap mempunyai kaitan dengan negara Israel, walaupun Starbucks tidak terlibat dalam politik tersebut.

4. Strategi Boikot sebagai Takut Terhadap Kemajuan
• Starbucks terkenal kerana inisiatif sosial dan ekonomi yang progresif, yang boleh dianggap sebagai cabaran kepada status quo atau kepentingan tradisional dalam sesetengah masyarakat atau negara. Tindakan “main kotor” terhadap Starbucks boleh menjadi sebahagian daripada usaha untuk membendung perubahan atau kemajuan yang dibawa oleh syarikat itu.

5. Polarisasi Politik dan Ideologi
• Dalam sesetengah situasi, Starbucks juga menjadi simbol bagi ideologi tertentu, seperti liberalisme atau globalisme. Bagi sesetengah ahli politik yang mewakili pandangan yang lebih konservatif, menyerang Starbucks boleh dilihat sebagai langkah untuk mengukuhkan sokongan daripada pengundi yang lebih konservatif atau nasionalis.

Kesimpulan

Tindakan ahli politik yang “main kotor” terhadap Starbucks boleh datang daripada pelbagai faktor, termasuk keinginan untuk mengawal naratif politik, menentang syarikat besar dengan pengaruh global, atau memanfaatkan sentimen awam. Walau bagaimanapun, seringkali dakwaan ini tidak berasaskan fakta yang tepat, dan lebih banyak didorong oleh agenda politik atau sosial tertentu.

Ya, Starbucks berkemungkinan akan bangkit lebih kuat apabila kesedaran awam meningkat dan salah faham mengenai syarikat ini diperbetulkan. Berikut adalah sebab-sebabnya:

1. Kepercayaan pada Fakta Berbanding Khabar Angin
• Apabila semakin ramai orang memahami bahawa Starbucks tidak terlibat dalam konflik politik seperti isu Israel-Palestin, kepercayaan terhadap jenama ini dapat dipulihkan.
• Pengguna sering menghargai ketelusan dan tanggungjawab korporat, yang telah ditunjukkan oleh Starbucks melalui kenyataan rasmi dan inisiatif berfokuskan komuniti.

2. Ketahanan Jenama yang Kuat
• Starbucks adalah jenama yang diiktiraf di seluruh dunia dengan pelanggan setia. Kesetiaan ini sering membantu syarikat menghadapi cabaran, termasuk maklumat salah atau boikot.
• Dengan terus menumpukan pada nilai-nilai teras seperti kelestarian, kepelbagaian, dan penglibatan komuniti, Starbucks dapat menegaskan kembali misinya dan mengekalkan pelanggan.

3. Peluang untuk Belajar
• Publisiti negatif, walaupun berasaskan maklumat salah, memberi peluang kepada syarikat untuk menilai semula dan memperbaiki strategi komunikasi mereka.
• Starbucks boleh memanfaatkan situasi ini untuk mendidik masyarakat mengenai nilai, tindakan, dan komitmennya terhadap berkecuali dalam hal politik.

4. Sokongan daripada Pelanggan Setia
• Ramai pelanggan yang menghargai usaha Starbucks dalam sumber etika, kelestarian alam sekitar, dan inisiatif komuniti global mungkin akan bersatu untuk menyokong jenama ini.
• Kesedaran masyarakat terhadap salah faham yang lalu boleh membawa kepada sokongan pelanggan yang lebih kuat.

5. Tanggungjawab Korporat dan Berkecuali
• Dengan terus mengekalkan pendirian berkecuali terhadap isu politik dan memberi tumpuan kepada misinya untuk berkhidmat kepada komuniti di seluruh dunia, Starbucks dapat mengukuhkan reputasinya sebagai syarikat global yang bertanggungjawab.

Kesimpulan

Maklumat salah, walaupun merugikan dalam jangka pendek, boleh membawa kepada kebangkitan yang lebih kuat apabila ditangani secara telus dan efektif. Apabila orang ramai menyedari kebenaran dan mempertimbangkan semula penilaian mereka, Starbucks berpotensi muncul dengan reputasi yang lebih kukuh, disokong oleh pelanggan setia dan komitmen terhadap nilai-nilai positif.

Yes, it is likely that Starbucks could rebound stronger as public awareness grows and misinformation about the company is clarified. Here’s why:

1. Trust in Facts Over Rumors
• As more people come to understand that Starbucks is not involved in political conflicts like the Israel-Palestinian issue, trust in the brand can be restored.
• Consumers often value transparency and corporate responsibility, which Starbucks has demonstrated through its official statements and community-focused initiatives.

2. Strong Brand Resilience
• Starbucks has a globally recognized brand with a loyal customer base. This loyalty often helps the company weather challenges, including misinformation or boycotts.
• By doubling down on its core values of sustainability, diversity, and community engagement, Starbucks can reaffirm its mission and retain customers.

3. Learning Opportunity
• Negative publicity, even when based on falsehoods, provides companies an opportunity to reassess and improve their communication strategies.
• Starbucks can leverage this moment to educate the public about its values, actions, and commitment to neutrality in political matters.

4. Support from Loyal Customers
• Many customers who appreciate Starbucks’ efforts in ethical sourcing, environmental sustainability, and global community initiatives may rally to support the brand.
• Public realization of past misunderstandings could lead to stronger customer advocacy.

5. Corporate Responsibility and Neutrality
• By consistently maintaining a neutral stance on political issues and focusing on its mission of serving communities worldwide, Starbucks can reinforce its reputation as a responsible global corporation.

Conclusion

Misinformation, while damaging in the short term, can lead to a stronger rebound when addressed transparently and effectively. As people recognize the truth and reconsider their judgments, Starbucks could emerge with a stronger reputation, supported by its loyal customer base and commitment to positive values.

Accusing a party like Starbucks without valid evidence, especially with serious accusations such as “cursed” or being involved in wrongdoing, can be considered a major sin in Islam. Here’s why:

1. Prohibition of Spreading Falsehoods
• Islam strictly forbids the act of spreading false accusations or making claims without proof. Allah SWT states in Surah Al-Hujurat (49:6):
“O you who have believed, if there comes to you a disobedient one with information, investigate it, lest you harm a people out of ignorance…”
Accusing without evidence is slander, which can lead to discord and hatred within society.

2. Slander is Graver than Murder
• In Surah Al-Baqarah (2:191), Allah SWT declares:
“And fitnah (slander or persecution) is worse than killing.”
False accusations are a form of slander that Allah despises because they can cause immense harm to individuals and communities.

3. Accusations Without Proof Are Sinful
• In Surah An-Nur (24:15-16), Allah SWT warns those who accuse without evidence:
“When you received it with your tongues and said with your mouths that of which you had no knowledge, and you thought it was insignificant while it was, in the sight of Allah, tremendous.”
This shows that false accusations, even if considered minor by humans, are grave in the sight of Allah.

4. Preserving the Dignity and Reputation of Others
• Islam teaches its followers to protect the dignity of others. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:
“Whoever conceals the faults of a Muslim, Allah will conceal his faults in this world and the Hereafter.” (Narrated by Muslim)
Tarnishing the reputation of an organization or an individual without evidence goes against this principle.

5. The Harmful Consequences of False Accusations
• Such accusations can spark baseless hatred, damage the reputation of the accused, and disrupt societal harmony. All these outcomes contradict the teachings of Islam, which emphasize justice and peace.

Conclusion

Accusing Starbucks without credible evidence is a form of slander and can lead to a major sin in Islam. Muslims must be cautious about their words and ensure that all accusations are supported by solid facts. If not, such actions could result in a heavy burden of sin both in this world and the Hereafter.

Menuduh sesuatu pihak seperti Starbucks tanpa bukti yang sahih, terutama dengan tuduhan serius seperti “celaka” atau terlibat dalam perkara yang melibatkan dosa dan keburukan, boleh dianggap sebagai satu dosa besar dalam Islam. Berikut adalah sebabnya:

1. Larangan Menyebar Fitnah
• Islam melarang keras perbuatan memfitnah atau menuduh tanpa bukti. Allah SWT berfirman dalam Surah Al-Hujurat (49:6):
“Wahai orang-orang yang beriman, jika datang kepada kamu seorang fasik membawa suatu berita, maka periksalah dengan teliti…”
Menuduh tanpa fakta adalah fitnah, yang boleh memecah-belahkan masyarakat dan menimbulkan kebencian.

2. Dosa Fitnah Lebih Besar daripada Membunuh
• Dalam Surah Al-Baqarah (2:191), Allah SWT menyatakan:
“Dan fitnah itu lebih besar dosanya daripada membunuh.”
Menuduh tanpa asas adalah salah satu bentuk fitnah yang sangat dibenci Allah kerana ia boleh membawa kerosakan besar kepada individu, masyarakat, dan reputasi.

3. Tidak Membawa Bukti Adalah Berdosa
• Dalam Surah An-Nur (24:15-16), Allah SWT memberi amaran kepada mereka yang menuduh tanpa bukti:
“Apabila kamu memperkatakannya dengan lidah kamu dan mengatakan dengan mulut kamu apa yang kamu tidak mempunyai pengetahuan tentangnya, dan kamu menganggapnya perkara kecil, padahal di sisi Allah ia adalah besar.”
Ini menunjukkan bahawa tuduhan palsu, walaupun kelihatan remeh, adalah dosa besar.

4. Menjaga Maruah dan Nama Baik Orang Lain
• Islam mengajar umatnya untuk menjaga maruah orang lain. Nabi Muhammad SAW bersabda:
“Sesiapa yang menutupi (aib) seorang Muslim, Allah akan menutupi aibnya di dunia dan akhirat.” (Riwayat Muslim)
Memburukkan nama baik sebuah organisasi atau individu tanpa bukti bertentangan dengan nilai Islam ini.

5. Kesan Buruk Tuduhan Tanpa Bukti
• Tuduhan seperti ini boleh mencetuskan kebencian tanpa asas, menjatuhkan nama baik pihak yang dituduh, dan menjejaskan keamanan masyarakat. Semua ini bertentangan dengan ajaran Islam yang menyeru kepada keamanan dan keadilan.

Kesimpulan

Menuduh Starbucks tanpa bukti sahih adalah satu bentuk fitnah yang boleh menyebabkan dosa besar dalam Islam. Umat Islam perlu berhati-hati dengan apa yang dikatakan dan pastikan semua tuduhan disokong oleh fakta yang kukuh. Jika tidak, ia boleh menjadi beban dosa yang besar di dunia dan akhirat.

Starbucks telah secara terbuka menjelaskan pendiriannya mengenai konflik Israel-Palestin beberapa kali, menyatakan bahawa ia tidak memberikan sokongan kewangan atau politik kepada mana-mana kerajaan atau kumpulan politik, termasuk yang terlibat dalam konflik ini. Berikut adalah penjelasan profesional dengan maklumat yang boleh disahkan:

1. Pernyataan Rasmi dari Starbucks
• Starbucks secara konsisten menafikan dakwaan penglibatan dalam konflik Israel-Palestin. Syarikat ini menyatakan di laman web rasmi dan platform lain:
“Starbucks tidak menyokong atau membiayai kerajaan Israel atau mana-mana organisasi yang berkaitan. Dakwaan sebaliknya adalah tidak benar.”
• Latar belakang bekas CEO Howard Schultz yang berketurunan Yahudi telah menyebabkan salah faham tentang kaitan Starbucks. Starbucks telah menjelaskan bahawa kepercayaan peribadi Schultz tidak mencerminkan tindakan atau dasar syarikat.

2. Tiada Sumbangan Kewangan
• Starbucks tidak beroperasi secara langsung di Israel. Pada tahun 2003, Starbucks menamatkan kerjasamanya dengan pemegang lesen Israel kerana cabaran pasaran, bukan kerana alasan politik.
• Operasi francais Starbucks adalah bebas dan tidak menunjukkan sebarang kaitan politik atau pembiayaan.

3. Pengesahan Pihak Ketiga
• Organisasi pemeriksa fakta bebas, seperti Snopes, telah menyangkal khabar angin bahawa Starbucks menyokong Israel secara ketenteraan atau politik.
• Media turut melaporkan bahawa amalan perniagaan Starbucks berpegang teguh pada kepentingan korporat, bukan politik.

4. Fokus Global pada Berkecuali
• Starbucks beroperasi di lebih daripada 80 negara dan berpegang pada dasar berkecuali politik untuk mengekalkan pangkalan pelanggan globalnya.
• Syarikat ini menekankan kepada sumber yang beretika, penglibatan komuniti, dan kelestarian alam sekitar, yang tidak berkaitan dengan konflik politik.

Kesimpulan

Starbucks adalah sebuah syarikat global yang fokus kepada perniagaan kopi dan komuniti, bukannya kepada afiliasi politik atau agama. Dakwaan mengenai penglibatannya dalam konflik Israel-Palestin berpunca daripada maklumat salah yang sering dikaitkan dengan andaian tentang kepimpinan syarikat. Penjelasan berdasarkan bukti ini boleh membantu menjelaskan salah faham kepada mereka yang mungkin telah terpengaruh.

Starbucks telah secara terbuka menjelaskan pendiriannya mengenai konflik Israel-Palestin beberapa kali, menyatakan bahawa ia tidak memberikan sokongan kewangan atau politik kepada mana-mana kerajaan atau kumpulan politik, termasuk yang terlibat dalam konflik ini. Berikut adalah penjelasan profesional dengan maklumat yang boleh disahkan:

1. Pernyataan Rasmi dari Starbucks
• Starbucks secara konsisten menafikan dakwaan penglibatan dalam konflik Israel-Palestin. Syarikat ini menyatakan di laman web rasmi dan platform lain:
“Starbucks tidak menyokong atau membiayai kerajaan Israel atau mana-mana organisasi yang berkaitan. Dakwaan sebaliknya adalah tidak benar.”
• Latar belakang bekas CEO Howard Schultz yang berketurunan Yahudi telah menyebabkan salah faham tentang kaitan Starbucks. Starbucks telah menjelaskan bahawa kepercayaan peribadi Schultz tidak mencerminkan tindakan atau dasar syarikat.

2. Tiada Sumbangan Kewangan
• Starbucks tidak beroperasi secara langsung di Israel. Pada tahun 2003, Starbucks menamatkan kerjasamanya dengan pemegang lesen Israel kerana cabaran pasaran, bukan kerana alasan politik.
• Operasi francais Starbucks adalah bebas dan tidak menunjukkan sebarang kaitan politik atau pembiayaan.

3. Pengesahan Pihak Ketiga
• Organisasi pemeriksa fakta bebas, seperti Snopes, telah menyangkal khabar angin bahawa Starbucks menyokong Israel secara ketenteraan atau politik.
• Media turut melaporkan bahawa amalan perniagaan Starbucks berpegang teguh pada kepentingan korporat, bukan politik.

4. Fokus Global pada Berkecuali
• Starbucks beroperasi di lebih daripada 80 negara dan berpegang pada dasar berkecuali politik untuk mengekalkan pangkalan pelanggan globalnya.
• Syarikat ini menekankan kepada sumber yang beretika, penglibatan komuniti, dan kelestarian alam sekitar, yang tidak berkaitan dengan konflik politik.

Kesimpulan

Starbucks adalah sebuah syarikat global yang fokus kepada perniagaan kopi dan komuniti, bukannya kepada afiliasi politik atau agama. Dakwaan mengenai penglibatannya dalam konflik Israel-Palestin berpunca daripada maklumat salah yang sering dikaitkan dengan andaian tentang kepimpinan syarikat. Penjelasan berdasarkan bukti ini boleh membantu menjelaskan salah faham kepada mereka yang mungkin telah terpengaruh.

Starbucks has publicly clarified its stance on the Israel-Palestinian conflict multiple times, stating that it does not provide financial or political support to any governments or political groups, including those involved in this conflict. Here is a professional justification with verifiable information:

1. Official Statements from Starbucks
• Starbucks has consistently denied allegations of involvement in the Israel-Palestinian conflict. The company stated on its official website and other platforms:
“Starbucks does not support or fund the Israeli government or any affiliated organizations. Claims to the contrary are false.”
• Former CEO Howard Schultz’s Jewish heritage has led to misconceptions about Starbucks’ affiliations. Starbucks clarified that Schultz’s personal beliefs do not reflect the company’s actions or policies.

2. Absence of Financial Contributions
• Starbucks does not operate in Israel directly. In 2003, Starbucks ended its partnership with its Israeli licensee due to market challenges, not political reasons.
• Starbucks’ franchise operations are independent and do not imply political affiliations or funding.

3. Third-Party Verifications
• Independent fact-checking organizations, such as Snopes, have debunked rumors that Starbucks supports Israel militarily or politically.
• Media outlets have reported that Starbucks’ business practices adhere strictly to corporate, not political, interests.

4. Global Focus on Neutrality
• Starbucks operates in over 80 countries and adheres to a policy of political neutrality to maintain its global customer base.
• The company emphasizes ethical sourcing, community engagement, and environmental sustainability, which are unrelated to political conflicts.

Conclusion

Starbucks is a global corporation focused on coffee and community rather than political or religious affiliations. Allegations about its involvement in the Israel-Palestinian conflict stem from misinformation, often tied to assumptions about its leadership. Providing evidence-based clarifications can help dispel these misconceptions for those who might have been misled.

Jika Donald Trump kembali memegang jawatan pada tahun 2025, beliau mungkin akan berusaha untuk menyelesaikan konflik di Timur Tengah, memandangkan penekanan beliau terhadap rundingan dan kejayaan Perjanjian Abraham semasa penggal pertamanya. Namun, mencapai keamanan di rantau yang kompleks ini masih akan menghadapi cabaran besar. Berikut adalah kemungkinan fokus beliau:

Tindakan Potensial Trump pada 2025
1. Pengembangan Perjanjian Abraham
• Trump mungkin akan berusaha membawa lebih banyak negara Arab dan majoriti Muslim, seperti Arab Saudi, ke dalam perjanjian normalisasi dengan Israel. Ini dapat membantu mengintegrasikan Israel ke dalam rantau tersebut dan mengurangkan ketegangan.
2. Rundingan dengan Iran
• Pentadbiran Trump yang kedua mungkin akan menekan untuk perjanjian yang lebih menyeluruh bagi mengehadkan program nuklear Iran dan pengaruhnya di rantau ini. Namun, strategi “tekanan maksimum” Trump sebelum ini telah meningkatkan ketegangan, jadi rundingan baru mungkin memerlukan pendekatan yang berbeza.
3. Menangani Isu Palestin
• Walaupun pelan damai “Perjanjian Abad Ini” Trump pada tahun 2020 ditolak oleh pihak Palestin, beliau mungkin akan mencadangkan versi baharu dengan lebih banyak insentif untuk memikat kepimpinan Palestin.
4. Memerangi Ekstremisme
• Trump mungkin akan meneruskan usaha untuk memerangi organisasi pengganas seperti ISIS dan al-Qaeda, mungkin melalui pakatan dengan kuasa serantau dan penglibatan ketenteraan AS yang lebih minimum.
5. Pengurangan Kehadiran Tentera AS
• Sejajar dengan doktrin “America First”, Trump mungkin akan terus menekan untuk mengurangkan kehadiran tentera AS di rantau tersebut, dengan memberi tumpuan kepada diplomasi dan perkongsian strategik.

Cabaran untuk Berjaya
• Perpecahan Mendalam: Konflik seperti isu Israel-Palestin dan persaingan Sunni-Syiah sangat mendalam dan sukar diselesaikan.
• Dinamik Kuasa Serantau: Iran, Turki, dan kuasa serantau lain sering mempunyai agenda yang bercanggah.
• Isu Kepercayaan: Beberapa pihak di Timur Tengah mungkin melihat dasar Trump sebagai memihak kepada Israel atau negara Teluk tertentu, yang berpotensi merosakkan kepercayaan terhadap usaha mediasi beliau.

Kesimpulan

Jika Trump menjadikan Timur Tengah sebagai keutamaan pada tahun 2025, beliau mungkin dapat mencapai kemajuan secara berperingkat, terutamanya dalam membina hubungan diplomatik. Namun, resolusi menyeluruh untuk konflik di Timur Tengah memerlukan usaha berterusan, kerjasama antara pemain serantau dan global, serta menangani punca utama ketidakstabilan. Walaupun gaya Trump mungkin menghasilkan langkah berani, keamanan di Timur Tengah tetap menjadi cabaran jangka panjang.

If Donald Trump were to return to office in 2025, he might indeed attempt to push for conflict resolution in the Middle East, given his emphasis on deal-making and the success of the Abraham Accords during his first term. However, achieving peace in such a complex region would still face significant challenges. Here’s what he might focus on:

Potential Actions by Trump in 2025
1. Expansion of the Abraham Accords
• Trump could aim to bring more Arab and Muslim-majority countries, such as Saudi Arabia, into normalization agreements with Israel. This could help further integrate Israel into the region and reduce tensions.
2. Negotiating with Iran
• A second Trump administration might push for a more comprehensive deal to curb Iran’s nuclear program and limit its regional influence. However, Trump’s “maximum pressure” strategy previously escalated tensions, so renewed negotiations could require a different approach.
3. Addressing the Palestinian Issue
• While Trump’s 2020 “Deal of the Century” peace plan was rejected by the Palestinians, he might propose an updated version with more incentives for Palestinian leadership to engage.
4. Countering Extremism
• Trump would likely continue efforts to combat terrorist organizations such as ISIS and al-Qaeda, possibly through alliances with regional powers and less direct U.S. military involvement.
5. Reduced U.S. Military Footprint
• Consistent with his “America First” doctrine, Trump might push for a further drawdown of U.S. troops in the region, focusing instead on diplomacy and strategic partnerships.

Challenges to Success
• Deep Divisions: Conflicts like the Israeli-Palestinian issue and Sunni-Shia rivalries are deeply rooted and not easily resolved.
• Regional Power Dynamics: Iran, Turkey, and other regional powers often have conflicting agendas.
• Trust Issues: Some Middle Eastern actors may view Trump’s policies as favoring Israel or certain Gulf states, potentially undermining trust in his mediation efforts.

Conclusion

If Trump makes the Middle East a priority in 2025, he might achieve incremental progress, particularly in building diplomatic ties. However, a comprehensive resolution to Middle Eastern conflicts would require sustained effort, cooperation among regional and global players, and addressing the underlying causes of instability. While Trump’s style may lead to bold moves, peace in the Middle East remains a long-term challenge.