Posted by Ooi Teik Bee > 2014-10-16 17:57 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by longkanginvestor > 2014-10-16 18:00 | Report Abuse

Hi Mr OTB Wat do you mean worst case sell at 160?
i thought as long as u dun accept they cant force u to sell?

Posted by hanting999 > 2014-10-16 18:02 | Report Abuse

Mr. Ooi, You have just met a very shrewd master player. OSK has just signed two SSAs to acquire a sizeable amount of shares for RM2.00 (OSKP) and RM1.60 (PJD) on willing buyer - willing seller basis. Now a mandatory offer for the remaining unacquired shares must be executed. What does the relevant law or guideline says about this?
The timing for this exercise is just too perfect. OLH can withstand the downturn for as long as time allows; most of us cannot. What to do now? You tell me.

Posted by laughdieme77 > 2014-10-16 18:15 | Report Abuse

laughdieme

Posted by Ooi Teik Bee > 2014-10-16 19:29 | Report Abuse

I do not encourage anyone to buy further on PJDec, I just inform you to hold on to this stock because there is no risk. You can sell back to OSKH at 1.60.
Final decision is yours. I will not post it again.

Thank you.

Posted by nch218 > 2014-10-16 20:35 | Report Abuse

http://bblifediary.blogspot.com/2014/10/blog-post_16.html

这就是他（OLH)的可恶之处，他要你卖给他，但是出价低，又不给你甜头。

你是PJDEV的股东，现在股价也已经在1.60，你还会傻傻跑去换股吗？而且换了股，又没有份拿凭单和股息。倒不如直接卖掉PJDEV，然后买OSK。对吗？

那到时候，PJDEV和OSKPROP的股价还可能会走得更低。

先要阐明一件事，这里所谓的“强制收购”，只是Bursa的条例。

在这个收购案里，Bursa会强制OSK做出全面收购。

但是OSKPROP并没有强制股东接受，所以你看它和PJDEV并没有在Bursa发出任何有关的通告。

其实收购OSKPROP的73.6%股权，OSK又岂有会不知道这样会触动全面献购的条例。

既然会触动，那就打蛇随棍上，故意把价格定到低低，然后推出给你们看到但又吃不到的免费凭单和特别股息。

除非你我都是白痴，要不然谁会“欢天喜地”拿OSKPROP去换OSK？？（不过不否认股市里真的有这种人存在）

在这种情形下，没多少人接受，到时它就收购不成，一切拉倒。

从这里就可看出大股东很明显没有全购的意愿，只是意思意思做个样子吧了！

很多人没想过，虽然大股东都持有这三家公司的股份，表面上把PJDEV和OSKPROP卖给OSK，好像也吃不到甜头（因为也是以1.60和2.00的价格）。

但是这么以转手，大股东牢牢还是控制OSK的股权，搞不好在OSK的股权还会增加，对他们不会有损失，发而还会获得更大的利益。

这只是左手转右手的把戏，完全没有显现出有一丝的诚意。

Posted by JasonPoh > 2014-10-17 00:04 | Report Abuse

OLH, 跟他握手你都会割伤！